Lack of Early Defibrillation Capability and Automated External Defibrillators in Nursing Homes

Prehospital advanced cardiac life support by EMT with a smartphone-based direct medical control for nursing home cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival to discharge between nursing home (NH) cardiac arrest patients receiving smartphone-based advanced cardiac life support (SALS) and basic life support (BLS).

METHODS

The SALS registry includes data on cardiac arrest from 7 urban and suburban areas in Korea between July 2015 and December 2016. We include adult patients (>18) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of medical causes and EMS attended and dispatched in. SALS is an advanced field resuscitation including drug administration by paramedics with video communication-based direct medical direction. Prehospital resuscitation method was key exposure (SALS, BLS). The primary outcome was survival to discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 616 consecutive out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation cases in NHs were recorded, and 199 (32.3%) underwent SALS. Among the NH arrest patients, the survival discharge rate was a little higher in the SALS group than the BLS group (4.0% vs 1.7%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.078). Survival discharge with good neurologic outcome rates was 0.5% in the SALS group and 1.0% in the BLS group (P = 0.119). On the other hand, in the non-NH group, all outcome measures significantly improved when SALS was performed compared to BLS alone (survival discharge rate: 10.0% vs 7.3%, P = 0.001; good neurologic outcome: 6.8% vs 3.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of providing prehospital ACLS with direct medical intervention through remote video calls to paramedics, the survival to discharge rate and that with good neurologic outcome (CPC 1, 2) of non-NH patients significantly improved, however those of NH patients were not significantly increased.

[Identification of common locations of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in a German metropolis]

BACKGROUND

Most patients who suffer a sudden cardiac arrest initially have a shockable rhythm. Fast defibrillation and correctly performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are key factors for patient survival. These can be carried out by bystanders if an automated external defibrillator (AED) is available even in the absence of emergency services.

AIM

The place and time of CPRs in a German city were investigated and the strategic placement of emergency medical services and AEDs necessary were evaluated.

METHODS

All prehospital resuscitation attempts by Bochum's emergency services in 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The city was divided into a grid, according to the city map to describe the location of every resuscitation. The distribution of cases was correlated to the city grid and time of day.

RESULTS

There were 299 cardiac arrests (mean age 74.2 ± 12.47 years; 59% of patients were male). Most resuscitations happened in a home environment between 8 am and 8 pm. There was a higher proportion of resuscitation attempts in grid squares with a high population density. Of the resuscitations in public places 16 of 47 (34%) happened in city district centers. In 72% of all cases, only a nonshockable rhythm could be documented as primary arrhythmia on the arrival of the emergency services. Of the 299 attempted resuscitations, a return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 41%.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge about increased frequency of resuscitations in city centers provides insight for strategic placement of emergency devices and services in those areas. This can possibly minimize the time until first response and enables early defibrillation with AED in a first-responder program. In addition, bystanders should obtain clear instructions for resuscitation by the dispatcher of the emergency services.