Do We Need Another Dementia Pain Scale?

Development and Testing of the Pain Assessment Tool in Cognitively Impaired Elders (PATCIE): Nonverbal Pain Behaviors in African American and Caucasian Nursing Home Residents with Dementia

BACKGROUND

People with dementia experience a decline in language skills required to self-report pain; researchers thus recommend the use of nonverbal behaviors to assess pain. Although multiple instruments exist for assessing nonverbal pain behaviors, psychometric data are lacking for African American nursing home residents with dementia.

AIMS AND DESIGN

The purpose of this methodological study was to describe the development and testing of the Pain Assessment Tool in Cognitively Impaired Elders (PATCIE) in African American and Caucasian nursing home residents with dementia.

SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS

The convenience sample included 56 African American and 69 Caucasian residents with dementia in multiple nursing homes from three states. The research staff completed the pain assessments when the nursing home staff transferred the residents.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Initially, 15 nonverbal pain behaviors were evaluated. Based on the alpha scores and additional literature review, the 15 nonverbal pain behaviors were expanded to 28 behaviors. The PATCIE had a Cronbach's alpha of .73 during movement. Construct validity for the pain behaviors was demonstrated because higher scores were noted during movement, and scores before movement were significantly higher than those obtained after movement. For movement over time, there was a significant difference in the PATCIE score, regardless of ethnicity or time (p < .0001). There were no significant differences found between ethnic groups, either overall or in change over time between movements or between the categories of cognitive function. African Americans were more likely to display frowning, and Caucasians to display irritability. The PATCIE demonstrates preliminary reliability and validity in assessing pain in African American and Caucasian nursing home residents with dementia.

Palliative care and quality of life for people with dementia: medical and psychosocial interventions

BACKGROUND

Despite mounting evidence that principles of palliative care are appropriate in care for individuals with dementia they are often not applied. As a result, patients with dementia are often exposed to burdensome interventions that have little or no benefit and are not provided with psychosocial treatments.

METHODS

Recommendations for applying palliative care principles in caring for people with dementia are provided, based on the WHO definition of palliative care, our clinical experience and some key literature reports.

RESULTS

People with a diagnosis of an irreversible dementia such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their families are rarely informed that this is a terminal disease and palliative care principles are not discussed with them. They are applicable early in the course of illness when the person can still make end-of-life decisions. Palliative care can be used in conjunction with other therapies and services, such as hospice care that provide relief from pain and other distressing symptoms. The care should include keeping people with dementia involved in meaningful activities which decrease or eliminate behavioral symptoms of dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

Educating families and professionals about palliative care is important as many professionals and non-professionals believe that this approach intends to hasten death, instead of affirming life and regarding dying as a normal process. Living, not just existing, with a dementing illness involves encouraging the person to continue to be involved in meaningful activities. Medical interventions should be compatible with goals of care and balance benefits and burdens for each intervention taking into consideration severity of dementia.

Acceptability of an Advance Directive That Limits Food and Liquids in Advanced Dementia

Some individuals fear living with advanced dementia and may even commit suicide if they receive dementia diagnosis. Living with advanced dementia could be prevented if a person who cannot feed himself or herself would not be fed by others. The purpose of the study was to find out how acceptable would be an advance directive that includes discontinuation of feeding at certain stage of dementia for relatives of persons who died with dementia. All participants of 2 focus groups would be willing to indicate at least 1 condition in which they would not want to be fed. Some of them would be willing to make a proxy decision to stop feeding in the absence of advance directives.

The basis for improving and reforming long-term care. Part 4: identifying meaningful improvement approaches (segment 2)

While many aspects of nursing home care have improved over time, numerous issues persist. Presently, a potpourri of approaches and a push to "fix" the problem have overshadowed efforts to correctly define the problems and identify their diverse causes. This fourth and final article in the series (divided between last month's issue and this one) recommends strategies to make sense of improvement and reform efforts. This month's concluding segment covers additional proposed approaches. Despite the challenges of the current environment, all of the proposed strategies could potentially be applied with little or no delay. Despite having brought vast increases in knowledge, the research effort may be losing its traction as a formidable force for meaningful change. It is necessary to rethink the questions being asked and the scope of answers being sought. A shift to overcoming implementation challenges is needed. In addition, it is essential to address issues of jurisdiction (the apparent "ownership" of assessment and decision making over patient problems or body parts) and reductionism (the excessive management of these issues and problems without proper context) that result in fragmented and problematic care. Issues of knowledge and skill also need to be addressed, with greater emphasis on key generic and technical competencies of staff and practitioners, in addition to factual knowledge. There is a need to rethink the approach to measuring performance and trying to improve quality of care and services. There are significant limits to trying to use quality measures to improve outcomes and performance. Ultimately, vast improvement is needed in applying care principles and practices, independent of regulatory sources. Reimbursement needs to be revamped so that it helps promote care that is consistent with human biology and other key concepts. Finally, improving long-term care will require a coordinated societal effort. All social institutions and health care settings need to address their own shortcomings and contribute constructively in order to improve and reform nursing homes and health care generally. It is not helpful to scapegoat nursing homes for what are far more universal problems of care, practice, and performance.