Do SSRIs play a role in decreasing bone mineral density?

Fluoxetine induces direct inhibitory effects on mesenchymal stem cell‑derived osteoprogenitor cells independent of serotonin concentration

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the most commonly prescribed antidepressants worldwide, which have been reported to exert potential detrimental effects on bone mineral density and increase the risk of developing fractures. The present study aimed to investigate the pathways underlying the negative effects of fluoxetine on bone using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from rat adipose tissue as a source of osteoprogenitor cells. MSCs were harvested from adipose tissue using a collagenase enzyme digestion method and were allowed to differentiate into osteoprogenitor cells. Various concentrations of fluoxetine were added to the cells, which were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry to detect apoptotic markers Annexin V and caspase-3, in order to assess the levels of apoptosis. The levels of endogenous serotonin released in the extracellular matrix were measured using a serotonin ELISA kit. The underlying molecular pathways associated with the effects of fluoxetine on bone were investigated with reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The results of the present study revealed a significant dose-dependent increase in apoptosis in response to increasing doses of fluoxetine, which was independent of serotonin levels in the culture supernatant. These findings indicated that fluoxetine exerted a direct inhibitory effect on bone cells via an apoptosis-dependent pathway. Furthermore, the expression levels of serotonergic genes, including serotonin 1B receptor, serotonin 2A receptor (HTR2A), serotonin 2B receptor and serotonin transporter, were down regulated; of these genes, HTR2A exhibited the highest expression levels. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are required to verify this association and to determine the molecular pathways involved in fluoxetine-induced bone loss. Fluoxetine-induced apoptosis of osteoprogenitor cells may be the mechanism underlying the increased incidence of bone loss observed in patients treated with fluoxetine.

Effects of Depression and Serotonergic Antidepressants on Bone: Mechanisms and Implications for the Treatment of Depression

Osteoporosis is a chronic skeletal disease marked by microarchitectural deterioration of the bone matrix and depletion of bone mineral density (BMD), with a consequent increased risk for fragility fractures. It has been frequently associated with depression, which is also a chronic and debilitating disorder with high prevalence. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), first-line agents in the pharmacological treatment of mood and anxiety disorders, have also been shown to negatively affect bone metabolism. SSRIs are the most prescribed antidepressants worldwide and a large number of persons at risk of developing osteoporosis, including older patients, will receive these antidepressants. Therefore, a proper musculoskeletal evaluation of individuals who are being targeted for or using SSRIs is a priority. The aim of this article is to review the evidence regarding the effects of depression and serotonergic antidepressants on bone and its implications for clinical care.

Effects of antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers on risk for physical diseases in people with schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder

People with severe mental illness have a considerably shorter lifespan than the general population. This excess mortality is mainly due to physical illness. Next to mental illness-related factors, unhealthy lifestyle, and disparities in health care access and utilization, psychotropic medications can contribute to the risk of physical morbidity and mortality. We systematically reviewed the effects of antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers on physical health outcomes in people with schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder. Updating and expanding our prior systematic review published in this journal, we searched MEDLINE (November 2009 - November 2014), combining the MeSH terms of major physical disease categories (and/or relevant diseases within these categories) with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, and the three major psychotropic classes which received regulatory approval for these disorders, i.e., antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers. We gave precedence to results from (systematic) reviews and meta-analyses wherever possible. Antipsychotics, and to a more restricted degree antidepressants and mood stabilizers, are associated with an increased risk for several physical diseases, including obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, hyponatremia; cardiovascular, respiratory tract, gastrointestinal, haematological, musculoskeletal and renal diseases, as well as movement and seizure disorders. Higher dosages, polypharmacy, and treatment of vulnerable (e.g., old or young) individuals are associated with greater absolute (elderly) and relative (youth) risk for most of these physical diseases. To what degree medication-specific and patient-specific risk factors interact, and how adverse outcomes can be minimized, allowing patients to derive maximum benefits from these medications, requires adequate clinical attention and further research.

Endocrinology of bone/brain crosstalk

Bone metabolism is regulated by the action of two skeletal cells: osteoblasts and osteoclasts. This process is controlled by many genetic, hormonal and lifestyle factors, but today more and more studies have allowed us to identify a neuronal regulation system termed 'bone-brain crosstalk', which highlights a direct relationship between bone tissue and the nervous system. The first documentation of an anatomic relationship between nerves and bone was made via a wood cut by Charles Estienne in Paris in 1545. His diagram demonstrated nerves entering and leaving the bones of a skeleton. Later, several studies were conducted on bone innervation and, as of today, many observations on the regulation of bone remodeling by neurons and neuropeptides that reside in the CNS have created a new research field, that is, neuroskeletal research.

Evaluation of the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on bone mineral density: an observational cross-sectional study

Sixty patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and treated with either paroxetine, sertraline, or citalopram for at least 12 months were enrolled in this study, and the bone mineral density (BMD) of the patients was compared with that of 40 healthy volunteers. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy in generalized anxiety disorder was found to be related with decreased BMD values.

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of SSRI therapy on BMD in postmenopausal women diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and to identify the effects of the duration of disease and treatment on risk factors for osteoporosis.

METHODS

Sixty patients diagnosed with GAD and treated with paroxetine, sertraline, or citalopram from the SSRI group for at least 12 months were enrolled. Social demographic features, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS) results, and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) scores of all the patients were assessed. The BMD of the patients was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the femoral and lumbar regions. The patients were divided into three groups which are the paroxetine, sertraline, and citalopram groups. The BMD of the patients was compared with that of 40 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

The L2-L4, total lumbar vertebrae, femoral intertrochanteric, total femoral Z-scores, and femoral Ward's region T-scores of the treatment group were lower than the median T- and Z-scores of the control group (p < 0.05). Of the treatment groups, the femoral neck, trochanteric and intertrochanteric T- and Z-scores, total femoral T- and Z-scores, and femoral Ward's T- and Z-scores of the sertraline group were significantly lower than the BMD values measured at the identical regions in the paroxetine and citalopram groups (p < 0.05).There was a significant negative correlation between the duration of treatment and the BMD values.

CONCLUSION

SSRI therapy in GAD was found to be related with decreased BMD values. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted to determine whether SSRI use is a risk factor for osteoporosis; such studies should investigate these factors by performing BMD assessments before treatment.

New insights into the physiology of bone regulation: the role of neurohormones

Bone metabolism is regulated by interaction between two skeletal cells - osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Function of these cells is controlled by a number of humoral factors, including neurohormones, which ensure equilibrium between bone resorption and bone formation. Influence of neurohormones on bone metabolism is often bimodal and depends on the tissue, in which the hormone is expressed. While hypothalamic beta-1 and beta-2-adrenergic systems stimulate bone formation, beta-2 receptors in bone tissue activate osteoclatogenesis and increases bone resorption. Chronic stimulation of peripheral beta-2 receptors is known to quicken bone loss and alter the mechanical quality of the skeleton. This is supported by the observation of a low incidence of hip fractures in patients treated with betablockers. A bimodal osteo-tropic effect has also been observed with serotonin. While serotonin synthetized in brain has osteo-anabolic effects, serotonin released from the duodenum inhibits osteoblast activity and decreases bone formation. On the other hand, both cannabinoid systems (CB1 receptors in the brain and CB2 in bone tissue) are unambiguously osteo-protective, especially with regard to the aging skeleton. Positive (protective) effects on bone have also been shown by some hypophyseal hormones, such as thyrotropin (which inhibits bone resorption) and adrenocorticotropic hormone and oxytocin, both of which stimulate bone formation. Low oxytocin levels have been shown to potentiate bone loss induced by hypoestrinism in postmenopausal women, as well as in girls with mental anorexia. In addition to reviewing neurohormones with anabolic effects, this article also reviews neurohormones with unambiguously catabolic effects on the skeleton, such as neuropeptide Y and neuromedin U. An important aim of research in this field is the synthesis of new molecules that can stimulate osteo-anabolic or inhibiting osteo-catabolic processes.

Metabolic and toxicological considerations for obsessive-compulsive disorder drug therapy

INTRODUCTION

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects the daily life of the patients. Chronic nature of this disease and the need for long-term high-dose drug therapy for its maintenance increase the risk of metabolic and toxicological complications.

AREAS COVERED

In this concise article, the metabolic and toxicological aspects of major medication categories prescribed in OCD, such as serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressant (clomipramine), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and atypical antipsychotics indicated in OCD (both Food and Drug Administration-approved and off-label) are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The most critical point in pharmacotherapy of OCD is the need for the high-dose and long-term use of drugs. In OCD, generally the higher doses of applicable drugs than those used in depression are required, often exceeding the recommended maximum dose. Moreover, such high doses should be given for at least 10 - 12 weeks to ensure the adequate treatment duration for the clinical effects to emerge. This long-term high-dose maintenance therapy increases the risk of drug toxicity and adverse effects. Physicians should take extra care in periodical assessment of signs and symptoms of metabolic and toxicological complications in patients. Subjective symptoms reported by patients should be carefully assessed and not attributed to obsessive nature of the patients.