1
|
Amblàs-Novellas J, Santaeugènia SJ, Vela E, Clèries M, Contel JC. What lies beneath: a retrospective, population-based cohort study investigating clinical and resource-use characteristics of institutionalized older people in Catalonia. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:187. [PMID: 32487082 PMCID: PMC7265641 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01587-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Planning population care in a specific health care setting requires deep knowledge of the clinical characteristics of the target care recipients, which tend to be country specific. Our area virtually lacks any descriptive, far-reaching publications about institutionalized older people (IOP). We aimed to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics of institutionalized older people (IOP) ≥65 years old and compare them with those of the rest of the population of the same age. Methods Retrospective analysis (total cohort approach) of clinical and resource-use characteristics of IOP and non-IOP older than 65 years in Catalonia (North-East Spain). Variables analysed included age and sex, diagnoses, morbidity burden—using Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA, Grupos de Morbilidad Ajustada)—, mortality, use of resources, and medications taken. All data were obtained from the administrative database of the local healthcare system. Results This study included 93,038, 78,458, 68,545 and 67,456 IOP from 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2017, respectively. In this interval, an increase in median age (83 vs. 87 years), in women (68.64% vs. 72.11%) and in annual mortality (11.74% vs. 20.46%) was observed. Compared with non-IOP (p < 0.001 in all comparisons), IOP showed a higher annual mortality (20.46% vs. 3.13%), a larger number of chronic diseases (specially dementia: 46.47% vs. 4.58%), higher multimorbidity (15.2% vs. 4.2% with GMA of maximum complexity), and annual admissions to acute care (47.6% vs. 27.7%) and skilled nursing facilities (27.8% vs. 7.4%), mean length of hospital stay (10.0 vs. 7.2 days) and mean of medications taken (11.7 vs. 8.0). Conclusions There is a growing gap between the clinical and demographic characteristics of age-matched IOP and non-IOP, which overlaps with a higher mortality rate of IOP. The profile of resources utilization of IOP compared with non-IOP strongly suggests a deficiency of preventive actions and stresses the need to rethink the care model for IOP from a social and health care perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Amblàs-Novellas
- Geriatric and Palliative Care Department, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu and Hospital Universitari de Vic, Barcelona, Spain.,Chair and Department of Palliative Care, University of Vic, Barcelona, Spain.,Central Catalonia Chronicity Research Group (C3RG), Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Universitat de Vic - University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), 08500, Vic, Spain.,Chronic Care Program, Ministry of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya, Travessera de les Corts, 131-159 08028, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sebastià J Santaeugènia
- Central Catalonia Chronicity Research Group (C3RG), Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Universitat de Vic - University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), 08500, Vic, Spain. .,Chronic Care Program, Ministry of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya, Travessera de les Corts, 131-159 08028, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Emili Vela
- Unitat d'Informació i Coneixement, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Montse Clèries
- Unitat d'Informació i Coneixement, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Joan C Contel
- Central Catalonia Chronicity Research Group (C3RG), Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Universitat de Vic - University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), 08500, Vic, Spain.,Chronic Care Program, Ministry of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya, Travessera de les Corts, 131-159 08028, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gordon AL, Goodman C, Davies SL, Dening T, Gage H, Meyer J, Schneider J, Bell B, Jordan J, Martin FC, Iliffe S, Bowman C, Gladman JRF, Victor C, Mayrhofer A, Handley M, Zubair M. Optimal healthcare delivery to care homes in the UK: a realist evaluation of what supports effective working to improve healthcare outcomes. Age Ageing 2018; 47:595-603. [PMID: 29315370 PMCID: PMC6014229 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afx195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION care home residents have high healthcare needs not fully met by prevailing healthcare models. This study explored how healthcare configuration influences resource use. METHODS a realist evaluation using qualitative and quantitative data from case studies of three UK health and social care economies selected for differing patterns of healthcare delivery to care homes. Four homes per area (12 in total) were recruited. A total of 239 residents were followed for 12 months to record resource-use. Overall, 181 participants completed 116 interviews and 13 focus groups including residents, relatives, care home staff, community nurses, allied health professionals and General Practitioners. RESULTS context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified explaining what supported effective working between healthcare services and care home staff: (i) investment in care home-specific work that legitimises and values work with care homes; (ii) relational working which over time builds trust between practitioners; (iii) care which 'wraps around' care homes; and (iv) access to specialist care for older people with dementia. Resource use was similar between sites despite differing approaches to healthcare. There was greater utilisation of GP resource where this was specifically commissioned but no difference in costs between sites. CONCLUSION activities generating opportunities and an interest in healthcare and care home staff working together are integral to optimal healthcare provision in care homes. Outcomes are likely to be better where: focus and activities legitimise ongoing contact between healthcare staff and care homes at an institutional level; link with a wider system of healthcare; and provide access to dementia-specific expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
- Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Sue L Davies
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heather Gage
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Justine Schneider
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brian Bell
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jake Jordan
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College, London, UK
| | - Clive Bowman
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - John R F Gladman
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christina Victor
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Mayrhofer
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Melanie Handley
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Maria Zubair
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Recognition of the complexity facing residential care homes: a practitioner inquiry. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018; 19:584-590. [PMID: 29444736 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423618000105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
AimTo explore the experiences and challenges for residential care home staff when managing the healthcare needs of their residents, in particular those living with dementia. BACKGROUND: Increasing number of older people, with complex health and social care needs are living in residential care homes. Yet there is limited appreciation of why staff sometimes struggle to manage residents' healthcare needs, or understanding of their working relationship with district nurses (DNs), whose responsibility it is to provide nursing support. METHODS: This PhD study, in a metropolitan area in the United Kingdom, was conducted by an experienced DN and involved three phases. This paper focuses on the first two phases. Phase 1 data included: semi-structured interviews (n=8), reflective field notes based on non-participant observation, documentary analysis of policies, procedures and assessment tools and other contextual data from one care home (case study site). The practitioner researcher reflected on the findings from the case study, in relation to her own knowledge and experience as a DN, focusing in particular on findings that were familiar, or which surprised. In Phase 2 she fed these findings back to other care homes (n=11) to check whether the findings from the single case study were unique or resonated with others. She gathered their feedback through semi-structured interviews with senior care staff (n=14). Data were analysed using thematic data analysis.FindingsFindings highlight the complexity facing residential care homes: high levels of healthcare needs amongst residents, the demands of caring for residents living with dementia, variations in the knowledge and skill set of care staff, inequity in the level of healthcare support, the challenges of building a good relationship with DNs, and funding pressures facing care homes.ImplicationsAny, or all of these factors can prevent care home staff from managing the healthcare needs of their residents.
Collapse
|
4
|
Iliffe S, Wright P, Law R, Rogerson A, Cole L, Manthorpe J, Khan M. Enabling Research in Care Homes. Age Ageing 2017; 46:1017. [PMID: 28985266 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afx131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Iliffe
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| | - Pandora Wright
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| | - Ruth Law
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| | - Andrew Rogerson
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| | - Laura Cole
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| | - Mashur Khan
- Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Royal Society of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Goodman C, Davies SL, Gordon AL, Dening T, Gage H, Meyer J, Schneider J, Bell B, Jordan J, Martin F, Iliffe S, Bowman C, Gladman JRF, Victor C, Mayrhofer A, Handley M, Zubair M. Optimal NHS service delivery to care homes: a realist evaluation of the features and mechanisms that support effective working for the continuing care of older people in residential settings. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCare homes are the institutional providers of long-term care for older people. The OPTIMAL study argued that it is probable that there are key activities within different models of health-care provision that are important for residents’ health care.ObjectivesTo understand ‘what works, for whom, why and in what circumstances?’. Study questions focused on how different mechanisms within the various models of service delivery act as the ‘active ingredients’ associated with positive health-related outcomes for care home residents.MethodsUsing realist methods we focused on five outcomes: (1) medication use and review; (2) use of out-of-hours services; (3) hospital admissions, including emergency department attendances and length of hospital stay; (4) resource use; and (5) user satisfaction. Phase 1: interviewed stakeholders and reviewed the evidence to develop an explanatory theory of what supported good health-care provision for further testing in phase 2. Phase 2 developed a minimum data set of resident characteristics and tracked their care for 12 months. We also interviewed residents, family and staff receiving and providing health care to residents. The 12 study care homes were located on the south coast, the Midlands and the east of England. Health-care provision to care homes was distinctive in each site.FindingsPhase 1 found that health-care provision to care homes is reactive and inequitable. The realist review argued that incentives or sanctions, agreed protocols, clinical expertise and structured approaches to assessment and care planning could support improved health-related outcomes; however, to achieve change NHS professionals and care home staff needed to work together from the outset to identify, co-design and implement agreed approaches to health care. Phase 2 tested this further and found that, although there were few differences between the sites in residents’ use of resources, the differences in service integration between the NHS and care homes did reflect how these institutions approached activities that supported relational working. Key to this was how much time NHS staff and care home staff had had to learn how to work together and if the work was seen as legitimate, requiring ongoing investment by commissioners and engagement from practitioners. Residents appreciated the general practitioner (GP) input and, when supported by other care home-specific NHS services, GPs reported that it was sustainable and valued work. Access to dementia expertise, ongoing training and support was essential to ensure that both NHS and care home staff were equipped to provide appropriate care.LimitationsFindings were constrained by the numbers of residents recruited and retained in phase 2 for the 12 months of data collection.ConclusionsNHS services work well with care homes when payments and role specification endorse the importance of this work at an institutional level as well as with individual residents. GP involvement is important but needs additional support from other services to be sustainable. A focus on strategies that promote co-design-based approaches between the NHS and care homes has the potential to improve residents’ access to and experience of health care.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Sue L Davies
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Adam L Gordon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heather Gage
- School of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Justine Schneider
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brian Bell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jake Jordan
- School of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health (PCPH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Clive Bowman
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - John RF Gladman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christina Victor
- Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Mayrhofer
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Melanie Handley
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Maria Zubair
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maidment I, Booth A, Mullan J, McKeown J, Bailey S, Wong G. Developing a framework for a novel multi-disciplinary, multi-agency intervention(s), to improve medication management in community-dwelling older people on complex medication regimens (MEMORABLE)--a realist synthesis. Syst Rev 2017; 6:125. [PMID: 28673335 PMCID: PMC5496371 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0528-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication-related adverse events have been estimated to be responsible for 5700 deaths and cost the UK £750 million annually. This burden falls disproportionately on older people. Outcomes from interventions to optimise medication management are caused by multiple context-sensitive mechanisms. The MEdication Management in Older people: REalist Approaches BAsed on Literature and Evaluation (MEMORABLE) project uses realist synthesis to understand how, why, for whom and in what context interventions, to improve medication management in older people on complex medication regimes residing in the community, work. METHOD This realist synthesis uses secondary data and primary data from interviews to develop the programme theory. A realist logic of analysis will synthesise data both within and across the two data sources to inform the design of a complex intervention(s) to help improve medication management in older people. 1. Literature review The review (using realist synthesis) contains five stages to develop an initial programme theory to understand why processes are more or less successful and under which situations: focussing of the research question; developing the initial programme theory; developing the search strategy; selection and appraisal based on relevance and rigour; and data analysis/synthesis to develop and refine the programme theory and context, intervention and mechanism configurations. 2. Realist interviews Realist interviews will explore and refine our understanding of the programme theory developed from the realist synthesis. Up to 30 older people and their informal carers (15 older people with multi-morbidity, 10 informal carers and 5 older people with dementia), and 20 care staff will be interviewed. 3. Developing framework for the intervention(s) Data from the realist synthesis and interviews will be used to refine the programme theory for the intervention(s) to identify: the mechanisms that need to be 'triggered', and the contexts related to these mechanisms. Intervention strategies that change the contexts so the mechanisms are triggered to produce desired outcomes will be developed. Feedback on these strategies will be obtained. DISCUSSION This realist synthesis aims to develop a framework (underpinned by our programme theory) for a novel multi-disciplinary, multi-agency intervention(s), to improve medication management in community-dwelling older people on complex medication regimens. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42016043506.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Maidment
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Judy Mullan
- University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522 Australia
| | - Jane McKeown
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield, S10 2LA UK
| | - Sylvia Bailey
- Kingshayes Road, Aldridge, Walsall, West Midlands WS9 8RU UK
| | - Geoffrey Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Relationships, expertise, incentives, and governance: supporting care home residents' access to health care. An interview study from England. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16:427-32. [PMID: 25687930 PMCID: PMC4415475 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2014] [Revised: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore what commissioners of care, regulators, providers, and care home residents in England identify as the key mechanisms or components of different service delivery models that support the provision of National Health Service (NHS) provision to independent care homes. METHODS Qualitative, semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of people with direct experience of commissioning, providing, and regulating health care provision in care homes and care home residents. Data from interviews were augmented by a secondary analysis of previous interviews with care home residents on their personal experience of and priorities for access to health care. Analysis was framed by the assumptions of realist evaluation and drew on the constant comparative method to identify key themes about what is required to achieve quality health care provision to care homes and resident health. RESULTS Participants identified 3 overlapping approaches to the provision of NHS that they believed supported access to health care for older people in care homes: (1) Investment in relational working that fostered continuity and shared learning between visiting NHS staff and care home staff, (2) the provision of age-appropriate clinical services, and (3) governance arrangements that used contractual and financial incentives to specify a minimum service that care homes should receive. CONCLUSION The 3 approaches, and how they were typified as working, provide a rich picture of the stakeholder perspectives and the underlying assumptions about how service delivery models should work with care homes. The findings inform how evidence on effective working in care homes will be interrogated to identify how different approaches, or specifically key elements of those approaches, achieve different health-related outcomes in different situations for residents and associated health and social care organizations.
Collapse
|