1
|
Foley RA, Hurard LL, Cateau D, Koutaissoff D, Bugnon O, Niquille A. Physicians', Nurses' and Pharmacists' Perceptions of Determinants to Deprescribing in Nursing Homes Considering Three Levels of Action: A Qualitative Study. PHARMACY 2020; 8:pharmacy8010017. [PMID: 32046022 PMCID: PMC7151677 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy8010017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications are frequent safety issues among nursing home (NH) residents. Deprescribing can significantly reduce the number of drugs used, medication costs, and mortality. This qualitative study sought to understand and compare the perceptions and practices of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians regarding deprescribing in Swiss NHs, referring to an implementation approach on three levels of action: the individual, the institution, and the healthcare system. Methods: Two focus groups were held with 21 participants: one focus group with 11 pharmacists, another with 10 nurses and six semi-structured interviews with physicians were conducted and focused on their individual experience and practices. They were audiotaped and fully transcribed, and a content analysis was performed using to MAXQDA (Ver 12) software. Results: (1) At an individual level, physicians were concerned by consequences of deprescribing in terms of safety. Nurses were closest to residents and stressed the importance of finding the right time, creating a bond of trust before deprescribing and considering the purpose of the stay in the NH. Pharmacists relied on structured guides for deprescribing, which led their reflection and practice. All professionals saw the complexity of the clinical situations, as well as residents’ and relatives’ fears of interruption of care. (2) At an institutional level, the professionals stressed the lack of time to discuss patients’ health and treatment, while pre-existing interprofessional collaboration, specifically, quality circles, seemed useful tools to create common knowledge. In order to reduce prescriptions, better coordination between physicians, nurses, pharmacists and specialists seemed crucial. (3) At the health system level, funding still needs to be provided to consolidate the process, go beyond organisational constraints and ensure deprescribing serves the patient’s wellbeing above all. Conclusions: At the individual level of implementation, the different healthcare professionals expressed specific concerns about deprescribing, depending on their defined role in NHs. Their perspective about the different levers to promote deprescribing at institutional and healthcare system levels converge towards interprofessional collaboration supported by the healthcare system. Specific funding and incentives are therefore needed to support a sustainable interprofessional team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose-Anna Foley
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.-A.F.)
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lucie Lechevalier Hurard
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Damien Cateau
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.-A.F.)
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daria Koutaissoff
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.-A.F.)
| | - Olivier Bugnon
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.-A.F.)
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne Niquille
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.-A.F.)
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-21-314-48-45
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Estabrooks CA, Straus SE, Flood CM, Keefe J, Armstrong P, Donner GJ, Boscart V, Ducharme F, Silvius JL, Wolfson MC. Restoring trust: COVID-19 and the future of long-term care in Canada. Facets (Ott) 2020. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2020-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The Royal Society of Canada Task Force on COVID-19 was formed in April 2020 to provide evidence-informed perspectives on major societal challenges in response to and recovery from COVID-19. The Task Force established a series of working groups to rapidly develop policy briefings, with the objective of supporting policy makers with evidence to inform their decisions. This paper reports the findings of the COVID-19 Long-Term Care (LTC) working group addressing a preferred future for LTC in Canada, with a specific focus on COVID-19 and the LTC workforce. First, the report addresses the research context and policy environment in Canada’s LTC sector before COVID-19 and then summarizes the existing knowledge base for integrated solutions to challenges that exist in the LTC sector. Second, the report outlines vulnerabilities exposed because of COVID-19, including deficiencies in the LTC sector that contributed to the magnitude of the COVID-19 crisis. This section focuses especially on the characteristics of older adults living in nursing homes, their caregivers, and the physical environment of nursing homes as important contributors to the COVID-19 crisis. Finally, the report articulates principles for action and nine recommendations for action to help solve the workforce crisis in nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sharon E. Straus
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Janice Keefe
- Department of Family Studies and Gerontology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Pat Armstrong
- Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gail J. Donner
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Véronique Boscart
- CIHR/Schlegel Industrial Research Chair for Colleges in Seniors Care, Conestoga College, Kitchener, ON, Canada
| | | | - James L. Silvius
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael C. Wolfson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health and Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|