Improvements in Antibiotic Appropriateness for Cystitis in Older Nursing Home Residents: A Quality Improvement Study With Randomized Assignment

Facility-level antibiotic prescribing rates and the use of antibiotics among nursing home residents

BACKGROUND

The high frequency of antibiotic use in US nursing homes is a public health concern. Facility-level prescribing patterns may provide a measure for antibiotic stewardship targeting.

METHODS

An analysis of 2018-2019 data from linked files from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare was conducted. Multilevel generalized linear models were used to calculate odds ratios for antibiotic receipt for calendar year 2019 using the 2018 facility prescribing rate.

RESULTS

In 2019, 186,274 (19%) residents were prescribed an antibiotic. The most frequently prescribed class of antibiotics was cephalosporins (26%), and the average duration of antibiotic use was 9 days. Residents who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid had 37% increased odds of antibiotic receipt (all adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35, 1.39). The 2018 facility prescribing rate was associated with 14% increased odds of antibiotic receipt in 2019 in NHs in the medium (11.9%-20.2%) prescribing category (all aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.17) and 36% increased odds of antibiotic receipt in NHs in the high (> 20.3%) prescribing category (all aOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.40) when compared with the lowest (0%-11.8%) prescribing category.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic stewardship strategies should target nursing homes with high antibiotic prescribing rates and high populations of dually eligible patients to improve care in this population.

Assessment of implementation strategies adopted for antimicrobial stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is influenced by multi-level factors (resident, organizational, and external) making their effectiveness sensitive to the implementation context.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the strategies adopted for the implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs, whether they considered organizational characteristics, and their effectiveness.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases until April 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles covering implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were collected on AMS interventions and context characteristics (e.g. type of facility, staffing, and residents). Implementation strategies and outcomes were mapped according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and validated taxonomy for implementation outcomes. Implementation and clinical effectiveness were assessed according to the primary and secondary outcomes results provided in each study.

RESULTS

Among 48 studies included in the analysis, 19 (40%) used implementation strategies corresponding to one to three ERIC domains, including education and training (n = 36/48, 75%), evaluative and iterative strategies (n = 24/48, 50%), and support clinicians (n = 23/48, 48%). Only 8/48 (17%) studies made use of implementation theories, frameworks, or models. Fidelity and sustainability were reported respectively in 21 (70%) and 3 (10%) of 27 studies providing implementation outcomes. Implementation strategy was considered effective in 11/27 (41%) studies, mainly including actions to improve use (n = 6/11, 54%) and education (n = 4/11, 36%). Of the 42 interventions, 18/42 (43%) were deemed clinically effective. Among 21 clinically effective studies, implementation was deemed effective in four and partially effective in five. Two studies were clinically effective despite having non-effective implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of AMS interventions in LTCFs largely differed according to the interventions' content and implementation strategies adopted. Implementation frameworks should be considered to adapt and tailor interventions and strategies to the local context.

Behavioral Strategies in Diagnostic Stewardship

Diagnostic stewardship refers to the responsible and judicious use of diagnostic tests to reduce low value care and improve patient outcomes. This article provides an overview of behavioral strategies, their relevance to diagnostic stewardship and highlights behavioral determinants that drive diagnostic testing behavior, drawing on theoretic frameworks. Additionally, we provide concrete examples of evidence-based behavioral strategies for promoting appropriate diagnostic testing while acknowledging associated challenges. Finally, we highlight the significance of evaluating these strategies and provide an overview of evaluation frameworks and methods.

Implementation of interprofessional quality circles on deprescribing in Swiss nursing homes: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are still frequent among older adults in nursing homes. Deprescribing is an intervention that has been shown to be effective in reducing their use. However, the implementation of deprescribing in clinical practice has not yet been widely evaluated. The Quality Circle Deprescribing Module (QC-DeMo) intervention has been trialled through an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 design. The intervention consists of a quality circle workshop session between healthcare professionals HCPs (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) within a nursing home, in which they define a consensus to deprescribe specific PIMs classes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the QC-DeMo intervention in nursing homes.

METHODS

This observational study focuses on the implementation part of the QC-DeMo trial. Implementation was based on the Framework for Implementation of Pharmacy Services (FISpH). Questionnaires at baseline and follow-up were used to evaluate reach, adoption, implementation effectiveness, fidelity, implementation, maintenance and the implementation strategies. Other data were collected from the QC-DeMo trial and routine data collected as part of the integrated pharmacy service where the QC-Demo trial was embedded. Implementation strategies included training of pharmacists, integration of the intervention into an existing quality circle dynamic and definition of tailored strategies to operationalise the consensus by each nursing home.

RESULTS

The QC-DeMo intervention was successfully implemented in 26 nursing homes in terms of reach, fidelity, adoption, implementation and implementation effectiveness. However, the intervention was found to be implemented with low maintenance as none of the nursing homes repeated the intervention after the trial. Implementation strategies were well received by HCPs: training was adequate according to pharmacists. Pre-existing quality circle dynamic facilitated interprofessional collaboration as involvement and support of each HCP was rated as high. HCPs recognized a specific and important role for each HCP in the deprescribing process. The most relevant tailored strategies to implement the consensus defined by each nursing home were identification of the patients by the pharmacist and a systematic review of medication's patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a Quality Circle on Deprescribing is feasible but its maintenance in practice remains challenging. This study explores multiple implementation outcomes to better inform future implementation efforts of these types of interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03688542 ), registered on 26.09.2018.

Are antimicrobial stewardship interventions effective and safe in long-term care facilities? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are health-care settings with high antimicrobial consumption and hence need to develop effective antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of ASPs on care-related, clinical and ecological outcomes in LTCFs.

METHODS

Data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and SCOPUS. Study eligibility criteria were original research articles (controlled clinical trials or controlled before and after studies) published up to 1 October 2020. Participants were adult residents of LTCFs, residential aged-care facilities, nursing homes, veterans' homes, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities for older people. Interventions included ASPs versus standard care. Outcomes assessed were antimicrobial consumption and appropriateness, infections, hospital admissions and mortality. Available data were pooled in a meta-analysis, and inconsistency between studies was evaluated using the I² statistic. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Of the 3111 papers identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. All of them analysed the impact of interventions on antimicrobial use based on consumption-related variables (n = 8) and/or percentage of inappropriate prescriptions (n = 6). Pooled data showed a mean difference of -0.47 prescriptions per 1000 resident-days in favour of ASPs (95% CI -0.87 to -0.07, I² = 71%). Five studies analysed the clinical effect of ASPs on the number of hospital admissions and/or resident mortality. The meta-analysis showed a mean difference of 0.17 hospital admissions per 1000 resident-days (95% CI -0.07 to 0.41, I² = 17%) and a mean difference of -0.02 deaths per 1000 resident-days (95% CI -0.14 to 0.09, I² = 0%). Only two studies included infections as a study outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

ASPs appear to improve antimicrobial use in this setting without increasing hospital admissions or deaths, indicating that these programmes do not lead to under-treatment of infections. Nonetheless, further higher-quality clinical trials are required to understand the effects of ASPs in LTCFs.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021225127.