Strong performance on the Progressive Evaluation of Competency fellowship final examination predicts American Board of Pathology Certification

Graduate Medical Education in Pathology: A Scoping Review

CONTEXT.—

Pathologists have produced a substantial body of literature on graduate medical education (GME). However, this body of literature is diverse and has not yet been characterized.

OBJECTIVE.—

To chart the concepts, research methods, and publication patterns of studies on GME in pathology.

DATA SOURCES.—

This was a systematic scoping review covering all literature produced since 1980 in the PubMed and Embase databases.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Research on GME in pathology is evenly dispersed across educational topics. This body of literature would benefit from research based on theory, stronger study designs, and studies that can provide evidence to support decisions on educational policies.

Comparison of quantitative internal and external measures of performance for trainees in cytopathology fellowships

INTRODUCTION

Cytopathology fellowships need measures to assess performance of fellows. We sought to compare several internal quantitative assessment metrics in our fellowship with external metrics, such as performance on the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) Progressive Evaluation of Competency (PEC) examination and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE).

METHODS

Quantitative parameters generated from our laboratory information system (LIS) on cytopathology fellows were evaluated over 6 years, including case volume and diagnostic discrepancies, in addition to ASC PEC and USMLE scores. For discrepancy reports, interpretations made by the fellow were compared with that of the cytopathologist, and classified as none (concordant), minor (<2-levels) or major (≥2-levels).

RESULTS

We evaluated internal and external metrics on 13 fellows over 6 years. The program average diagnostic concordance rate was 89.9%, with an average major discrepancy rate of 1.5%, and an average monthly case volume of 260 cases. More fellows with above-average ASC PEC performance showed above-average concordant diagnoses and lower case volume, while below-average PEC scores were seen more often with higher major discrepancy rates. More fellows with above-average USMLE scores had higher case volumes, while low USMLE scores showed a trend towards higher major discrepancy rates.

CONCLUSION

Our fellowship program has used a variety of internal and external measures of performance for cytopathology fellows. Although the findings show no statistically significant finding correlating performance, these quantitative parameters generated from our LIS were helpful to identify areas of improvement, facilitate comparison to peers, and provide case volume documentation.

Correlating Transfusion Medicine In-Service Examination Scores With Outcomes of the American Board of Pathology Transfusion Medicine Subspecialty Certifying Examination

OBJECTIVES

The Transfusion Medicine In-Service Examination (TMISE) is offered twice a year to transfusion medicine (TM) fellows. We examined the relationship between TMISE scores and outcomes of the American Board of Pathology (ABP) TM subspecialty certifying examination (TM boards).

METHODS

TM fellowship programs were contacted to provide anonymous data about TM fellows, their scores on TMISE, and outcome of TM boards.

RESULTS

Of 48 TM fellowship programs contacted, 24 (50%) responded with data for 170 fellows. Average TMISE score of fellows who passed their first TM boards attempt was 71.3, while the average TMISE score of fellows who failed their first TM boards attempt was 64.3 (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

TMISE scores correlated with passing TM boards on the first attempt. Fellows who took the TM boards the same year that they graduated from TM fellowship had a significantly higher first-time pass rate than fellows who delayed taking TM boards.

Cytology cases of the week: an educational tool that improves trainee exposure to cytology

INTRODUCTION

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residents to examine 1500 cytology specimens by the end of residency. Cytology cases of the week (COWs) were instituted in 2010-2011 in an effort to increase trainee exposure to cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images of 2 to 5 cases with basic clinical information are sent to residents weekly. Residents have 1 week to respond by e-mail; after which, correct answers are e-mailed. Cytology resident in-service examination (RISE) scores were used to assess the effectiveness of COWs. Additionally, a feedback survey was distributed to trainees to determine the perception of COWs as a teaching tool.

RESULTS

An unpaired two-sided t test showed residents who participated in COWs scored 15.4% higher on the RISE than residents who participated minimally or not at all over the 5-year period (P < 0.05). In 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, when COWs were minimally and not at all offered, we saw a significant decrease in average cytology RISE scores compared with prior years when COWs were offered (P < 0.05). There was no correlation between percentage of correctly submitted answers for COWs and RISE scores. The vast majority (83%) of trainees reported participating in COWs for self-study, and the majority (86%) felt participation in COWs increased their cytology knowledge. Major reasons for not participating included technical challenges and time limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

COWs are an effective educational tool that increase resident fund of knowledge in cytology. Residents who participate in COWs perform higher on the RISE, regardless of percentage of correctly submitted answers.

Does Taking the Fellowship In-Service Hematopathology Examination and Performance Relate to Success on the American Board of Pathology Hematology Examination?

OBJECTIVES

The biannual Fellow In-Service Hematopathology Examination (FISHE) assesses knowledge in five content areas. We examined the relationship between taking the FISHE and performance on it with outcomes on the first attempted American Board of Pathology Hematology subspecialty certifying examination (ABP-HE).

METHODS

The pass rate between the ABP-HE candidates who took the spring FISHE and those who did not were compared. The likelihood of fellows passing the ABP-HE based on their percentiles on the FISHE was also assessed.

RESULTS

ABP-HE candidates who took the spring FISHE had a higher pass rate (96.4%) than those who did not (76.1%, P < .001). Spring FISHE performance, including total percentile and percentiles in four of five FISHE content areas, was only a weak predictor of passing the ABP-HE.

CONCLUSIONS

Candidates who take the spring FISHE do better on the ABP-HE than those who do not. Most fellows passed the first attempted ABP-HE regardless of FISHE performance. Whether this is due to fellows making use of the FISHE as a self-evaluation tool to help identify and then correct their knowledge deficiencies remains to be determined.