Prospective evaluation of impact of using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: an institutional experience

Evolving approaches in paediatric thyroid cytopathology: A review

The guidelines for the workup of thyroid nodules have been established in adult populations and secondarily applied to paediatric populations. In particular, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is commonly applied to both adult and paediatric thyroid nodules. However, as paediatric nodules have distinct molecular drivers and behavioural trajectories, there is renewed interest in diagnostic and management strategies that are paediatric specific. Here, we review key differences between paediatric and adult thyroid cancer and recent literature evaluating the use of TBSRTC in paediatric populations.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: Initial versus repeat fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND

There is limited data comparing the performance of Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) in thyroid nodules carrying an initial versus a repeat diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). This study reported an institutional experience in this regard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive thyroid nodules that had an initial or a repeat AUS diagnosis and had a subsequent GSC diagnostic result (benign or suspicious) from 2017 to 2021. All nodules were followed by surgical intervention or by clinical and/or ultrasound monitoring. GSC's benign call rate (BCR), rate of histology-proven malignancy associated with a suspicious GSC result, and diagnostic parameters of GSC were calculated and compared between the two cohorts (initial versus repeat AUS). Statistical significance was defined with a p-value of <.05 for all analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 202 cases fulfilled inclusion criteria, including 67 and 135 thyroid nodules with an initial and a repeat AUS diagnosis, respectively. BCR was 67% and 66% in initial and repeat AUS cohorts, respectively. Rate of histology-proven malignancy associated with a suspicious GSC result were 22% and 24% in initial and repeat AUS cohorts, respectively. Compared with the repeat AUS cohort, the initial AUS cohort showed slightly lower sensitivity (83% vs. 100%), specificity (70% vs. 73%), PPV (23% vs. 24%), NPV (98% vs. 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (72% vs. 75%). Nevertheless, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

GSC demonstrated comparable performance in thyroid nodules with a repeat AUS diagnosis versus nodules with an initial AUS diagnosis.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome are associated with patterns of atypia in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Data on Afirma's genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) performance in atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) subcategories is limited. This study investigated GSC performance in AUS nodules with architectural atypia (AUS-A), cytological atypia (AUS-C), architectural and cytological atypia (AUS-AC), and predominantly Hürthle cells (AUS-HC).

METHODS

This study retrieved consecutive thyroid nodules having a recurrent cytologic diagnosis of AUS with qualifiers and a concurrent GSC diagnostic result. All nodules were followed by either surgical intervention or clinical and/or ultrasound monitoring (≥6 months). GSC benign call rate (BCR), rate of histology-proven malignancy, and diagnostic parameters of GSC were calculated for individual AUS subcategories. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 135 AUS nodules fulfilled inclusion criteria, including 79 AUS-A, 9 AUS-C, 29 AUS-AC, and 18 AUS-HC. BCR was 72.2%, 66.7%, 44.8%, and 77.8% in AUS-A, AUS-C, AUS-AC, and AUS-HC, respectively. AUS-A showed a greater BCR than AUS-AC (p &lt; .05). All GSC-benign nodules were considered benign on clinical or surgical follow-up. Among GSC-suspicious nodules, histology-proven malignancies represented 4.5% of AUS-A, 0% of AUS-C, 56.3% of AUS-AC, and 25.0% of AUS-HC cases. AUS-AC demonstrated a higher malignant rate compared with AUS-A (p &lt; .05). GSC offers 100% NPV and a wide range (5%-56%) of PPV across all AUS subcategories. AUS-AC demonstrated a greater PPV compared with AUS-A (p &lt; .05).

CONCLUSION

BCR of GSC and malignant rates associated with suspicious GSC may differ in various AUS subcategories. GSC-suspicious nodules with both architectural and cytologic atypia are more likely to be malignant. These findings may improve clinical triage and/or management of patients with AUS thyroid nodules.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is an adjunct to thyroid fine needle aspiration shown to improve pre-operative risk assessment and reduce unnecessary surgery of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) is a newer version aiming to improve specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of Afirma testing. There are limited studies comparing GSC vs GEC. This study was undertaken to compare these classifiers in terms of diagnostic performance and effect on clinical management of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of patients with thyroid nodules that had a recurrent cytologic diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and were tested by either GEC or GSC. Patient demographics, nodule size, and clinical follow-up were recorded. Benign call rate (BCR) of Afirma testing, rate of subsequent surgery (RSS), rate of histology-confirmed malignancy (RHM), as well as diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predicative value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated and compared between GSC and GEC cohorts.

RESULTS

Among 264 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules, 127 and 137 were tested with GEC and GSC, respectively. Compared to GEC, GSC demonstrated increased BCR (77.3% vs 52%), decreased RSS (31.4% vs 51.2%), greater RHM (29% vs 9.8%) associated with a suspicious Afirma result, as well as improved specificity (82.8% vs 54.5%), PPV (29% vs 9.8%), and diagnostic accuracy (83.9% vs 56.7%), while maintaining high sensitivity and NPV.

CONCLUSION

Afirma GSC substantially improved BCR, RSS, RHM, and diagnostic performance, enhancing appropriate triage and thereby helped avoid unnecessary surgery in AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules.

False positive cases in thyroid cytopathology - the experience of a single laboratory and a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is fundamental in the pre-operative assessment of thyroid nodules. However, the shining success of thyroid FNA is occasionally eclipsed by false positive (FP) cytological diagnoses. We describe our experience regarding FP cytological diagnoses and present a literature review concerning FP rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2031 consecutive cytology reports. FP was defined as a case with "suspicious for malignancy" or "malignant" cytology, whose surgical follow-up failed to confirm the initial diagnosis of malignancy. We used the PubMed database for the literature review using specific search terms ("thyroid", "cytology", "false positive").

RESULTS

Out of 2031 FNA reports, 93 cases with "suspicious for malignancy" or "malignant" cytology underwent surgical excision. Histopathology did not confirm malignancy in 10 cases (0.6% FP rate). Nodules with FP cytology were significantly larger (P = 0.0024) than those with with TP (true positive) cytology. A review of 25 publications shows comparable results to ours with some slight differences. The majority of studies achieve a FP rate below 3%. Most FP cytological diagnoses turn out to be non-neoplastic lesions (nodular hyperplasia, adenomatous nodule, lymphocytic thyroiditis), which combined account for 80.5% of all histological diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Thyroid nodules with FP cytology were larger than nodules with TP cytology. Most studies manage to adhere to the recommended FP rates, or values close to them, with some outliers. Nevertheless, the mean FP rate values are very close to the value recommended by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). The FP rate value depends on how one defines true negative cases, which can be either histologically proven benign cases, via a benign clinical course, or by assuming that cytologically benign cases remain as such.

Indian experience of AUS/FLUS diagnosis: is it different from rest of Asia and the West?-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is the most heterogeneous subcategory of the Bethesda system for thyroid cytopathology with laid down permissible limits of frequency and risk of malignancy (ROM). Due to differences in thyroid clinical practice worldwide, variations have been found in frequency, resection rates (RR) and ROM. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis of AUS/FLUS across different regions was conducted and comparison of data from India was done with the rest of Asia and the West.

Methods

We searched PubMed and Google search engines from January 2009-Dec 2019 using terms "AUS Thyroid" and "FLUS Thyroid". Meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian-Laird method and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects model. Independent samples t-test was used to compare frequency, RR, and ROM of AUS/FLUS between India, rest of Asia and the West.

Results

Out of 15,000 studies on internet, 60 (18 Indian, 12 Asian and 30 Western) were included. Total aspirates were 201,657; 14,279 Indian, 62,448 Asian, 124,930 Western. Pooled estimates were: frequency 7.3% (6.3-8.3%), RR 41.9% (37.4-46.6%), ROM 33.3% (26.8-39.9%). Pooled prevalence of rate did not vary significantly across the three regions. Pooled prevalence of RR was highest in India (52.9%) and lowest in rest of Asia (26.5%); of ROM was highest in Asia (45.9%), lowest in the West (26.3%) (P<0.01). Statistical analysis demonstrated publication bias, limited to Indian and Western studies. Papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most common surgical diagnosis (87.9%; 1,082/1,231).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed differences in thyroid clinical practice followed in India, rest of Asia and the West. Although pooled prevalence of rate of AUS/FLUS was similar across the three, pooled RR and ROM varied. AUS/FLUS nodules were more frequently resected in Indian and Western studies than in rest of Asia. ROM was higher than recommended values in all three areas, being intermediate for India.

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N) vs. architectural atypia (AUS-A), and, finally, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) vs. follicular neoplasms (FNs) in resected AUS/FLUS cases in Asian and non-Asian regions. Where possible, these metrics were compared with the Singapore experience from a tertiary referral institution. While the incidence of AUS/FLUS was similar in both regions, we found geographical differences in the RRs and ROMs, which may reflect a higher collective threshold for surgery in Asian countries. However, both cohorts showed higher ROMs in the AUS-N subcategory as compared to the AUS-A subcategory, supporting the subclassification of the AUS/FLUS based on the presence of nuclear atypia. We also observed a higher incidence of AUS-N coupled with a higher incidence of PTC in resected AUS/FLUS nodules in Asian cohorts, while AUS-A and follicular-patterned neoplasms featured more prominently in the non-Asian cohorts. These incidences may account for the starkly different molecular approaches that we noted-in Asian (chiefly Korean and Chinese) centers, BRAF mutational analysis was favored, while gene panels and gene expression classifiers were more frequently applied in non-Asian centers (chiefly in the United States of America). Overall, the data from Singapore appears more closely aligned to non-Asian trends, despite its geographical location in Southeast Asia and its predominantly Asian population. We conclude that there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of the AUS/FLUS categories between and within regions, which is only partially explained by regional variations, and may also reflect different regional diagnostic and management practices. This highlights the importance of understanding the local context in the interpretation of indeterminate Bethesda categories, rather than adopting a "one-size fits all" approach.

Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center

Context.—

The Management Guidelines for Children with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer from The American Thyroid Association recommends fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as an essential tool for evaluation and management of pediatric thyroid nodules, and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) as a guideline to categorize FNA cytologic findings. A few publications have focused on TBSRTC categorization in children.

Objective.—

To evaluate our institutional experience of using TBSRTC in the pediatric population.

Design.—

We conducted a retrospective data search for thyroid FNA specimens from patients younger than 21 years who were assessed by using TBSRTC categorization between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2017. Cytologic and histologic diagnoses, rate of surgical follow-up, rate of histology-proven malignancy, and cytologic-histologic concordance were assessed in comparison with our previously published adult experience.

Results.—

Among a total of 201 specimens, benign category accounted for 103 (51.2%), followed by 35 (17.4%) malignant, 30 (14.9%) atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), 14 (7.0%) nondiagnostic, 10 (5.0%) follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN), and 9 (4.5%) suspicious for malignancy (SFM) categories. Surgeries were subsequently performed in 100 of the 201 cases (49.8%). All surgically removed nodules categorized as malignant and SFM by FNA showed malignancy, while malignancy was evident in various proportions of specimens classified as AUS/FLUS (5 of 16; 31.3%), FN/SFN (1 of 9; 11.1%), and nondiagnostic (1 of 7; 14.2%). No malignancy was identified in the benign category. Cytologic-histologic concordance achieved 100% in malignant, SFM, and FN/SFN categories, and exceeded beyond 85% and 50% for benign and AUS/FLUS categories, respectively.

Conclusions.—

TBSRTC is effective for appropriate categorization of pediatric thyroid nodules. Risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules is higher for the pediatric than adult population. Understanding the difference in TBSRTC categorization between children and adults may aid in achieving more appropriate evaluation and management of pediatric thyroid nodules.