Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a study of 14 cytopathology cases

Cytopathologic features of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma including touch imprints for rapid on-site evaluation

Objectives

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a vascular tumor of intermediate malignant potential, which presents as infiltrative lesions involving multiple organs. We reviewed our institutional experience with the cytologic diagnosis of this neoplasm including the performance of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).

Material and Methods

From our institutional database, we identified 29 cytology specimens, obtained between 2012 and 2020, from 21 patients with biopsy confirmation of EHE. ROSE and final diagnosis were compared. All cytology slides were reviewed, and selected cytologic features were recorded.

Results

The cohort included 29 specimens comprising 17 (59%) from liver, 6 (21%) from lung, 2 (7%) from lymph node, and 4 (14%) from other sites. At ROSE, 8/27 (30%) were reported inadequate, yet on review, all cases contained scattered cells typical of EHE in the touch imprint air-dried slides including two cases reported with a final diagnosis of non-diagnostic. All cases contained epithelioid and plasmacytoid cells with ovoid nuclei, fine chromatin, delicate (or biphasic) cytoplasm, and scattered cells with delicate, elongated cytoplasmic tails. The majority 26/29 (90%) of cases had multi-nucleated and multi-lobated nuclei. Intracytoplasmic lumens/blister cells were in 17/29 (59%), and a subset had erythrocytes therein (4/29, 14%). Metachromatic fibromyxoid or fibrotic stroma fragments were commonly seen (23/29, 79%). Mitoses and necrosis were absent in all cases. Of 11 tested cases, WWTR1::CAMTA1 and YAP1::TFE3 fusions were detected in nine and two cases, respectively.

Conclusion

EHE has distinctive cytologic features which are often under-recognized during ROSE.

Cytologic features and immunohistochemical findings of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) in effusion: A case series

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare malignant vascular tumor characterized by WWTR1-CAMTA1, t (1:3) (p36;q25) translocation in 90% of cases. Without prior EHE history, it can mimic other malignant effusions. Recently, CAMTA1 was published as an excellent immunohistochemical surrogate marker for molecular testing for WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion in surgical specimens.

METHODS

A 6-year retrospective search using our computer system was performed for cases diagnosed as EHE on effusion cytology and surgical specimens. The clinical presentation, cytologic findings and immunohistochemical stain results, including CAMTA1 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four pleural and one peritoneal effusions were identified. The median age was 52 years with a female to male ratio of 3:2. Most patients presented with pulmonary symptoms. The cytologic features were non-specific easily mimicking other malignancies; especially in the absence of known prior malignancy. This was exemplified by one of our cases which was initially misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma. Intracytoplasmic erythrocytes were present only on the cell blocks but not on cytology. The cytology cell blocks from patients with prior EHE confirmed on surgical biopsies stained positive for vascular markers (CD31, ERG) and CAMTA1.

CONCLUSION

The features of EHE in effusion are non-specific and a diagnostic pitfall in cytology. In the absence of prior EHE diagnosis, inclusion of this entity in the differential diagnoses and application of immunohistochemical stain panels will be prudent in avoiding a misdiagnosis. However, in cases with prior EHE diagnosis, CAMTA1 could serve as diagnostic marker; especially on limited cytology material. Additional studies will be helpful in supporting our results.

Mediastinal sarcomas: experience using fine needle aspiration cytopathology

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a sparsely used diagnostic method in the evaluation of mediastinal sarcomas in most medical centers worldwide with most literature citations regarding this category of malignancies consisting of small series and individual case reports. Most of these published studies highlight vascular sarcomas such as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and angiosarcoma, various subtypes of liposarcoma including well-differentiated liposarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and pleomorphic liposarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and sarcomas of uncertain differentiation, primary synovial sarcoma and the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors. This paucity of cytopathology reports regarding mediastinal sarcomas is in marked contrast to the almost daily application of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided FNA biopsy for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes and mediastinal masses for primary and metastatic carcinomas which, of course, are considerably more common that any type of sarcoma in this location. EBUS, endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) needle biopsy, and percutaneous image-guided biopsy using either core needle, fine-needle, or both can serve a potentially useful role for diagnostic sampling of mediastinal sarcomas, be they primary or metastatic. This review catalogues much of the published data regarding FNA cytopathology and its application to mediastinal sarcomas. An attempt is made to primarily highlight case series rather than individual case reports; however, due to the paucity of these, case reports are cited and discussed where appropriate.

Cytopathology of classic type epithelioid sarcoma: a series of 20 cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

As a rare soft tissue malignancy, epithelioid sarcoma (EpS) is infrequently subjected to cytopathologic analysis. With the exception of a few series, the cytology literature regarding EpS is largely limited to single case reports. Our purpose was to evaluate our experience with EpS, and review the literature regarding its cytopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was made of our cytopathology and surgical pathology databases for cases diagnosed as EpS. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy smears and imprint smears were performed and examined using standard technique. Effusion samples were processed using liquid-based slides.

RESULTS

Twenty cases of EpS were retrieved from 10 patients (M:F 1:1; mean age = 36 years). One patient had 5, 1 patient had 3, and 3 patients had 2 separate specimens. All patients had prior or subsequent tissue confirmation of EpS; all were of the classic/distal type. Seven were new patient cases, 7 were locally recurrent, and 6 were metastases. Sites included lower extremity (8 cases), upper extremity (4), trunk (4), serous effusion (2), scalp (1), and mediastinum (1). Specific cytologic diagnosis were EpS (13 cases), sarcoma not otherwise specified (5), and malignant neoplasm (2). All cases where cell-block SMARCB-1 staining was used were specifically recognized as EpS. Cytomorphology was composed primarily of epithelioid/plasmacytoid cells having eccentrically positioned nuclei, moderate cytoplasm, and variable nuclear pleomorphism.

CONCLUSION

The cytopathology of EpS is somewhat variable, morphologically non-specific, and mimics that of other neoplasms with epithelioid features. Ancillary immunostaining is necessary for a specific diagnosis in newly encountered patients.

Surgical considerations in a paediatric case of a large skull-base epithelioid haemangioendothelioma

Intracranial epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare intermediate grade vascular tumour with heterogeneous clinical and histopathological behaviour. We present the surgical considerations of an exceptionally large skull-based EHE in an 11-year old female who presented to our institution with headaches and a protuberance over the left parietal area. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a left sided 10.5 × 6.6 × 11.1 cm extra-axial tumour arising from the parieto-temporaloccipital region which was continuous with the calvarium. An initial biopsy confirmed EHE. Staged treatment involved preoperative angiography and embolization. The patient underwent an extensive tumour excision and acrylic cranioplasty. Residual tumour persists in the petrous temporal bone. No neurological deficit was sustained. Postoperatively, we proceeded to tumour surveillance rather than adjuvant therapies, and follow-up imaging up to 36 months postoperatively has shown no tumour progression. We illustrate our surgical management of this large EHE and review the literature of this rare pathological entity with variable tumour behaviour and potential role for adjuvant therapy.