Proceedings of the American Society of Cytopathology Companion Session at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Meeting Part 1: towards an International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology

Higher sensitivity of pericardial fluid cytology than biopsy in malignant effusions with potential explanation of false-negative cytology: A multi-institutional analysis

OBJECTIVE

Malignant pericardial effusions are associated with a poor prognosis. Pericardial fluid cytology and pericardial biopsy are the primary methods for diagnosis. This study aimed to conduct a multi-institutional analysis to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of cytology and biopsy, and to investigate potential explanations for false-negative results in cytology.

METHODS

A retrospective review of pericardial fluid cytology cases with concurrent biopsy was conducted across four different institutions. Results were compared using standard statistical methods with attention to sensitivity and histologic distribution. False-negative cytology cases were investigated for further exploration.

RESULTS

A total of 309 cases were collected, of which 99 (32.0%) were confirmed malignant through repeat sampling or clinical history. Pericardial fluid cytology and biopsy identified 84 and 64 malignant cases, respectively. Our findings confirmed significantly higher sensitivity of cytology compared to biopsy (84.8% vs 65.7%). The most common sites of origin were lung, breast, and gastrointestinal, with adenocarcinoma being the most prevalent histologic subtype. Histologic review of 12 false-negative cytology cases revealed three key explanations; lymphoma was the most common missed diagnosis (33.3%); fibrinous pericarditis obscures neoplastic cells on the pericardial surface; and pericardial involvement can be seen without extension into the pericardial space.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated diagnostic superiority of pericardial fluid cytology over biopsy in the evaluation of malignant pericardial effusions. We identified several limitations in fluid cytology causing false negatives. In the context of an underlying malignancy with pericardial effusion, pathologists should consider immunohistochemistry studies to aid on the diagnosis.

Application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology on pleural effusion cytology with paired pleural biopsy: A new insight and novel approach on risk of malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The risk of malignancy (ROM) remains an area of interest for further evaluation in reporting systems including in International System for reporting serous fluid cytopathology (TIS), which is a standardized system for reporting effusion cytology. Herein, we report our findings in further investigation of ROM in TIS by studying on paired pleural effusion specimens and corresponding pleural biopsies with emphasis on negative for malignancy, and atypia of undetermined significance categories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The  Johns Hopkins Hospital pathology database was retrospectively searched for patients with a pleural biopsy (PBX) and a paired pleural effusion (PF) cytology specimens over a 4-year period. We employed the TIS categories. The following statistical parameters were evaluated: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and ROM.

RESULTS

A total of 223 patient cases were included. Effusions TIS reclassification and ROM were as follows: 1.8% non-diagnostic (ROM 75%), 75.8% negative for malignancy (ROM 23%), 4.9% atypical cells of undetermined significance (ROM 45%), 2.2% suspicious for malignancy (ROM 80%), and 15.2% malignant (ROM 100%). Overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated and were 79.4%, 45%, 97.7%, 91.2% and 77%, respectively. Among, discordant cases diagnosed negative for malignancy on PF and positive for malignancy on PBX, there were significant number of lymphomas, mesotheliomas, and sarcomas. Lung cancer was the most common carcinoma; however, rare types of carcinomas were noted. Cells blocks and immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies were utilized to confirm either malignant conditions or rule out malignancy in both cell blocks and histology biopsies.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the high specificity and ROM for 'malignant' and 'suspicious for malignancy' categories in the TIS reporting system and highlights the modest negative predictive value for the 'negative for malignancy' category. Although Tissue biopsies are usually considered as 'gold standard', any definitive diagnosis of malignancy of body fluid should be considered positive for malignancy in further clinical decision-making.

Application of the newly published International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology in atypical and suspicious diagnosis: a four-year retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Serous fluids offer crucial diagnostic insights, but inconsistent analysis hampers reporting quality, especially in indeterminate (ID) categories like atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious for malignancy (SFM). The 2020 International System for reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) aims to standardize communication and reduce reporting disparities. This study evaluates TIS's role in AUS and SFM categories within our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 4-year retrospective search of cytopathology reports from December 2015 to December 2019 for AUS and SFM diagnoses in pleural, ascitic, pericardial fluids, and peritoneal washings was performed and results reclassified using TIS definitions. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for existing and reclassified diagnoses.

RESULTS

Over 4 years, we received 2998 serous fluid specimens. AUS constituted 2.3% (70 cases), while SFM constituted 0.5% (16 cases). Excluding repeats, 80 cases were TIS-reviewed. Sixteen cases of ID diagnoses were reclassified. Two cases of AUS were changed to negative for malignancy (NFM) and 12 to SFM. Two SFM cases were upgraded to malignancy. ROM shifted from 63% to 60% for AUS and 100% to 85% for SF (TIS's ROM range: AUS: 66% ± 10%; SFM: 82% ± 4.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This institution's ID diagnosis rate is low. AUS ROM is challenging but aligns with TIS, primarily favoring benign. All SFM diagnoses are highly suspicious but quantitatively inadequate for definitive malignancy, explaining the elevated ROM. AUS rate should gauge quality, not serve as a catch-all category. Algorithmic cytology with cell blocks and ancillary studies aids reclassification. TIS is user-friendly and is a consistent methodology for standardized reporting. Further studies are needed to evaluate ROM and define reproducible diagnostic criteria for each category for better system utilization.

Deciphering Serous Effusions Using the New International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology

Introduction Serous effusion cytopathology is a minimally invasive, cost-effective procedure and plays a crucial role in diagnosing a spectrum of pathological conditions, ranging from benign to malignant. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) offers a standardized framework for reporting serous effusions, aiding in better communication and clinical decision-making. Aims and objectives This study aimed to categorize effusions using the ISRSFC reporting system. In addition, we sought to estimate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category and evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional smear versus cell block techniques. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology over one year. We applied the ISRSFC criteria to serous effusions and categorized them accordingly. The ROM for each category was assessed with histopathology serving as the gold standard. Then, the diagnostic performance including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using conventional smear and cell block techniques. Results The study included 185 serous effusion cases, with ages ranging from two months to 85 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.1:1. Most effusions were pleural fluids constituting about 133 cases (71.9%), followed by peritoneal fluids (47 cases, 25.4%) and pericardial fluids (five cases, 2.7%). Among the fluids, four (2.2%) were diagnosed as non-diagnostic (ND), 152 (82.2%) as negative for malignancy (NFM), four (2.2%) as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), nine (4.8%) as suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 16 (8.6%) as malignant (MAL). The overall ROM was 25% for ND, 8.5% for NFM, 50% for AUS, 77% for SFM, and 100% for MAL. The sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were superior when combining conventional smear with the cell block technique. Conclusions Our findings underscore the use of ISRSFC in categorizing effusion samples, assessing the ROM, and guiding clinical management. Moreover, our study highlights the benefits of employing a combined approach using conventional smears and cell blocks for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in serous effusions.

Optimal Volume Assessment for Serous Fluid Cytology

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the optimal volume of serous fluid needed for accurate diagnosis using The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS), as well as to provide information on the distribution of serous effusion cases in the TIS categories (ND: non-diagnostic, NFM: negative for malignancy, AUS: atypia of undetermined significance, SFM: suspicious for malignancy, MAL: malignant) and relevant epidemiological data.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 2340 serous effusion cases (pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial) from two hospitals between 2018 and 2020 was conducted. TIS categories were assigned to each case, and for 1181 cases, these were correlated with the volume of the analyzed fluid.

RESULTS

Our study found statistically significant differences in volume distributions between certain TIS categories. Statistically lower volumes were observed in NFM compared to MAL, in UNCERTAIN (ND, AUS, SFM) compared to both MAL and NFM, and in NOT MAL (ND, NFM, AUS, SFM) compared to MAL. However, these differences were not substantial enough to hold any clinical relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that while fluid volume may slightly influence the TIS category, it does not impact the diagnostic accuracy of serous effusion cytology. Therefore, the ideal serous effusion specimen volume can be defined solely by practical parameters.

Review of the impact of the International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (TIS) has been proposed by an expert working team composed of the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology, following an international survey. Since its introduction, the TIS has gained worldwide acceptance, and this review aims to assess its global impact. A literature search revealed 25 studies which have presented data on the impact of the TIS. Most of them provide data, including risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category, separately for pleural, peritoneal and pericardial effusions, while a few do not separate them. A few studies focus on specific diagnoses like mesothelioma on specific types of fluids or more specific issues like the optimal fluid volume for cytology or interobserver variability. A synopsis of the data from the literature search is presented in four tables. The ROM assessment is discussed, as well as interobserver variability and the use of ancillary diagnostic immunochemistry. In conclusion, our review of the published data suggests that the TIS is a valid classification scheme that has been widely accepted by pathologists globally, is highly reproducible and makes a valuable contribution to clinical therapeutic management.

Optimal fluid volume for detecting malignancy in serous effusions: a single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Detection of malignant cells in serous fluids is an indicator of advanced stage of malignancy and is critical in clinical management decisions and prompt treatment initiation. The minimum volume which is ideal for detecting malignancy in serous fluid is not well established. In this study, we aim to identify optimal volume that will be ideal for adequate cytopathological diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1597 samples of serous fluids from 1134 patients were included in the study. Samples were diagnosed based on International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC). Clinicopathologic results from different diagnostic groups were compared and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Pleural fluids comprised 890 (55.7%) specimens, followed by 456 (28.6%) peritoneal, 128 (8%) ascites, and 123 (7.7%) pericardial fluid specimens. The majority were negative for malignancy (1138, 71.3%), followed by malignant (376, 23.5%), atypical (59, 3.7%), and suspicious for malignancy (24, 1.5%). Malignancy was identified in sample with volumes from 5 mL to 5000 mL. Rate of detection of malignant cells increased significantly with higher sample volumes. For malignancy detection the optimal volume for overall serous fluid is 70 mL. Pericardial fluid is an exception, with lower mean volume and significantly lower proportion of cases with malignant diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that higher fluid volumes have a higher rate of malignancy detection and a low false-negative rate. We recommend a minimum of 70 mL of serous fluid for optimal cytopathologic examination and malignancy detection. Pericardial fluid is an exception, with lower mean volume and thus lower requirement.

Application of international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (ISRSFC) in effusion samples-a prospective study in an oncology setting

INTRODUCTION

Serous fluid cytology is a cost-effective procedure that can help in the diagnosis, staging, and origin of the malignancy. Recently introduced International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (ISRSFC) standardizes the reporting of serous fluid cytology in the 5 categories: Category 1: Nondiagnostic (ND), Category 2: negative for malignancy (NFM), Category 3: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), Category 4: suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and Category 5: malignant (MAL). Here, we present our experience adopting the ISRSFC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We implemented ISRSFC in December of 2019 at our institute and included a cohort of 555 prospective effusion samples. The pertinent surgical pathology, radiology, and clinical follow-up were also extracted to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance parameters.

RESULTS

The assessment of interobserver reliability indicated substantial concordance (κ = 0.717) between the 2 investigators for serous fluid categorization. A total of 555 effusion samples were classified as follows: ND, 14 (2.5%); NFM, 394 (71%); AUS, 12 (2.2%); SFM, 13 (2.3%); and MAL, 122 (22%). The ROM for the ND, NFM, AUS, SFM, and MAL categories was 57.1%, 9.9%, 66.7%, 66.7%, and 97.2%, respectively, in peritoneal effusions and 57.1%, 7.1%, 66.7%, 100%, 100%, respectively, in pleural effusions. The ROM for NFM and MAL was 0% and 100%, respectively, in pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the proposed ISRSFC can help in achieving uniformity and reproducibility in diagnoses and also help in risk stratification in cytology. ISRSFC was successfully adopted by our cytology laboratory and clinicians, with overall diagnostic performance similar to previous studies.

Categorisation of peritoneal serous effusions using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology-A study on gynaecological samples

BACKGROUND

Cytology of serous effusions is an indispensable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of non-neoplastic as well as neoplastic effusions, aiding in the categorisation, staging, and prognostication of the patient. This study focuses on reclassifying cases of peritoneal fluid cytology following the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS), highlighting various challenges encountered and adding to the body of data regarding the risk of malignancy (ROM), focussing on peritoneal effusions due to gynaecological causes.

METHODS

Peritoneal effusion samples were retrieved from our department's archives and reclassified according to the TIS. The ROM for each category was calculated based on available surgical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 818 peritoneal effusions were studied. Following the definitions and guidelines of the TIS, the cases were reclassified with 125 (15.2%) in the category of non-diagnostic (ND), 595 (72.7%) as negative for malignancy (NFM), 26 (3.2%) as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 12 (1.5%) as suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 60 (7.3%) as malignant (MAL). The respective ROM values for each category were 16.9%, 12.1%, 50%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. By considering the MAL and SFM groups as positive, and the ND, NFM, and AUS groups as negative, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined as 85.2%, 36.7%, 99.1%, 91.7%, and 84.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal cytology categorisation following the proposed TIS offered a practical approach for categorisation of the fluids received. The ROMs reported in our study were mostly concordant with those published according to the TIS.

Risk of malignancy assessment of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: Experience in a community hospital setting and comparison with other studies

BACKGROUND

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) was published recently to provide standard reporting terminology for serous fluid. To date, several ISRSFC reclassification studies have reported a wide range of diagnostic category frequency and the associated risk of malignancy (ROM). Herein, the authors applied the ISRSFC to report pleural and peritoneal effusions retrospectively in a community hospital setting.

METHODS

With Internal Review Board approval, 446 peritoneal effusion specimens and 299 pleural fluid specimens from 576 patients in three community hospitals over a 12-month period were reviewed and reclassified according to the ISRSFC.

RESULTS

After reclassification, in pleural effusions, 18 (5.0%) were nondiagnostic (ND), 273 (76.0%) were negative for malignancy (NFM), 18 (5.0%) were atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 6 (1.7%) were suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 44 (12.3%) were malignant (MAL). In peritoneal effusions, after reclassification, 11 (5.5%) were ND, 168 (77.1%) were NFM, 9 (4.1%) were AUS, 2 (0.9%) were SFM, and 27 (12.4%) were MAL. The calculated ROM was 0.0% for ND, 1.8% for NFM, 37.5% for AUS, 83.3% for SFM, and 100.0% for MAL in peritoneal effusions; and the ROM was 8.3% for ND, 1.2% for NFM, 44.4% for AUS, and 100.0% for both SFM and MAL in pleural effusions. Further analysis demonstrated notable heterogeneity among published ISRSFC reclassification studies, although the overall ROMs did not differ significantly from the ISRSFC-determined ROMs (all p values were > .05 for mean ROM comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested the necessity for each laboratory to perform its own ROM analysis based on its statistics for ISRSFC-tiered classification terminology.

A retrospective analysis of serous effusions based on the newly proposed international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: a report of 3633 cases in an oncological center

Background

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) was recently proposed. We retrospectively applied TIS recommendations for reporting the cytological diagnosis of serous effusions and reported our experience.

Methods

All the serous effusions from January 2018 to September 2021 were retrieved from the database. Recategorization was performed using the TIS classification, the risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each TIS category. In addition, on the basis of the original TIS classification, we further subdivided the TIS category IV (suspicious for malignancy, SFM) into 2 groups (IVa and IVb) according to cytological characteristics (quality and quantity) to explore the necessity of SFM subclassification. The performance evaluation was carried out using different samples (pleural, peritoneal and pericardial effusions) and preparation methods (conventional smears, liquid-based preparations and cell blocks).

Results

A total of 3633 cases were studied: 17 (0.5%) were diagnosed as ‘nondiagnostic’ (I, ND), 1100 (30.3%) as ‘negative for malignancy’ (II, NFM), 101 (2.8%) as ‘atypia of undetermined significance’ (III, AUS), 677 (18.6%) as ‘suspicious for malignancy’ (IV, SFM), and 1738 (47.8%) as ‘malignant’ (V, MAL). The ROMs for the categories were 38.5%, 28.6%, 52.1%, 99.4% and 100%, respectively. The ROM for SFM was significantly higher than that for AUS (P < 0.001), while the difference between the ROMs for IVa and IVb was insignificant. The sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of liquid-based preparations were all superior to those of conventional smears and cell blocks in detecting abnormalities. Using the three preparation methods simultaneously had the highest sensitivity, NPV and diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

Serous effusion cytology has a high specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), and TIS is a user-friendly reporting system. Liquid-based preparations could improve the sensitivity of diagnosis, and it is best to use three different preparation methods simultaneously for serous effusion cytologic examination.

Risk Stratification of Pleural Fluid Cytology Based on the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology in a Tertiary Care Centre

BACKGROUND

The International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology proposed the international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (TISRSFC) in 2019 to form uniform reporting terminologies for fluid cytology. This system defines a spectrum of diagnostic categories to be used in daily clinical practice. Fluid cytology is a widely accepted, cost-effective, minimally invasive earliest diagnostic method for the investigation that aids management decisions. The present study aims to reclassify pleural fluid cytology and calculate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is a retrospective 2 years observational study comprising 690 pleural fluid specimens. Retrospective reviews were performed, and cases were reclassified into five categories as per TISRSFC. Immunohistochemistry was applied whenever needed. Cytological diagnosis was correlated with respective histopathology and/or clinical and/or radiological diagnosis. ROM was calculated for all diagnostic categories.

RESULTS

In the present study of 690 cases, 7.97% were non-diagnostic (ND), 84.1% cases were negative for malignancy (NFM), 0.87% were atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 1.16% were suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 5.94% were malignant (MAL). Cell blocks were prepared in 33 (4.8%) cases and immunohistochemistry was applied in 7 cases. The commonest site for pleural fluid metastasis was the lungs, accounting for 4.64% (32/690) cases. Further, ROM was calculated for all diagnostic categories as follows: (1) ND: 30.9%, (2) NFM: 12.9%, (3) AUS: 100%, (4) SFM: 100%, and (5) MAL: 90.2%.

CONCLUSION

Cytological examination of pleural fluids is an accurate, prompt, and affordable technique. This standardized ISRSFC reporting system will maintain uniformity and reproducibility in reporting, leading to improved clinical decision-making of pleural fluids.

Adequacy in pleural effusion: What is the minimum volume required for detection of malignant cells?

BACKGROUND

Adequacy criteria of pleural fluid volume for optimal reporting are contentious, and very little literature is available to date. This problem has not been addressed in the novel International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 939 pleural fluid samples. Five volume bins were created: 0-9.9 ml, 10-19.9 ml, 20-34.9 ml, 35-69.9 ml, and > 70 ml and included 203, 222, 314, 174, and 26 samples, respectively. Volume bins were compared across various categories using a Chi-square test. A malignancy fraction was used to assess diagnostic accuracy. Descriptive statistics for categorical variables were done with median and interquartile range. A ROC curve was constructed to find if pleural fluid volume can be used to detect malignancy. A cut-off volume was found which can detect malignancy with optimum sensitivity.

RESULTS

The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve showed that 55% of the time, the pleural volume can detect malignancy correctly. From the coordinates of the curve it was found that for a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 40%, a cut-off volume of 13.5 ml of pleural fluid is sufficient to detect malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend 13.5 ml as the minimum volume cut-off for a satisfactory pleural effusion cytology report. Below this volume, the false-negative rates increase, and the specimen may be deemed as limited for a conclusive diagnosis. As the volume rises above this threshold volume, the false negativity rate decreases but does not significantly improve malignant cells' detection.

Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology with Cytohistological Correlation and Risk of Malignancy Assessment

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) classifies serous effusions into five categories: non-diagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of unknown significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM) and malignant (MAL). The main objectives of this classification comprise the establishment of a universal code of communication between cytopathologists and clinicians and histopathologists, as well as between different laboratories worldwide, paving the way for the setting of clinical management guidelines based on the risk of malignancy assessment for each diagnostic category. We retrieved the total number of pleural and peritoneal effusion cases of our department for the three-year time period between 2018 and 2020, yielding a total of 528 and 500 cases, respectively. We then proceeded to reclassify each specimen according to TIS guidelines and calculate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category by searching each patients’ histology records, medical history and clinical follow-up. For pleural effusions, 3 (0.57%) cases were classified as ND, 430 (81.44%) cases as NFM, 15 (2.84%) as AUS, 15 (2.84%) as SFM and 65 (12.31%) as MAL. ROM amounted to 0%, 5.3%, 33.33%, 93.33% and 100% for each category, respectively. As far as peritoneal effusions are concerned, 6 (1.2%) were categorized as ND with ROM estimated at 16.66%, 347 (69.4%) as NFM (ROM = 9%), 13 (2.6%) as AUS (ROM = 38.46%), 12 (2.4%) as SFM (ROM = 83.33%) and 122 (24.4%) as MAL (ROM = 100%). Our results underline the utility of the current classification, both as a means of communication between doctors of different specialties and as general guidelines for the further clinical management of patients.

Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology in routine reporting of pleural effusion and assessment of the risk of malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) was proposed by the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We have applied this system for reporting of pleural effusion cytology and report our experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the pleural effusions from January 2019 to June 2020 were retrieved from the database. All these cases were reviewed and recategorized according to the proposed system of 5 categories: non-diagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). The risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 939 cases were studied. The age of patients ranged from 2 to 88 years, and the volume of fluid ranged from 1 to 600 ml. There were 41 ND (4.37%), 697 NFM (74.23%), 44 AUS (4.69%), 27 SFM (2.88%), and 130 MAL (13.84%) cases. The ROM for the categories were found to be 87.5%, 51.61%, 88.23%, 87.5%, and 100% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ISRSFC is a user-friendly system for use in reporting of pleural fluid. The criteria for defining the various categories need to be further elaborative and stricter for this system to be more effective. More studies are required for the estimation of the ROM for each category.

Cytohistological Correlation in Pleural Effusions Based on the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (TIS) was recently developed. Given its novelty, most studies looking into the risk of malignancy (ROM) of serous effusion diagnostic categories were published before the development of TIS. We searched the database of our department for pleural effusions diagnosed in the last five years, excluding those without a corresponding pleural biopsy. Cases were reviewed and reclassified according to the TIS. A cytohistological correlation was performed. In total, 350 pleural effusion specimens with one or more corresponding pleural biopsies were included. After reclassification, 5 (1.43%) were nondiagnostic (ND), 253 (72.29%) were negative for malignancy (NFM), 7 (2.00%) had atypia of unknown significance (AUS), 14 (4.00%) were suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 71 (20.57%) were malignant (MAL). Calculated ROM was 40% for ND, 20.16% for NFM, 42.86% for AUS, 78.57% for SFM, and 100% for MAL. Effusion cytology sensitivity and specificity were 60.29% and 98.56%, respectively. This is the first publication looking into the cytohistological correlation of a retrospective cohort of pleural effusions based on the TIS. We add to the body of data regarding the ROM for TIS categories, highlighting areas of potential future research.

The value of cytology in distinguishing malignant mesothelioma: An institutional experience of 210 cases reclassified according to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC)

OBJECTIVE

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is usually diagnosed by histological examination of tissue samples; however, effusion cytology offers an opportunity to identify a strong possibility for mesothelioma diagnosis at an early stage. We conducted a retrospective analysis of cytological specimens from a large series of histologically proven MM diagnosed over 19 years. The cases were reviewed and reclassified according to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC).

METHODS

A total of 450 cases were identified. Cytological analysis was present in 210 patients (164 pleural and 46 peritoneal effusions). All cases were reviewed and reclassified according to the proposed ISRSFC scheme. A comparison among the cytomorphological features was made throughout the different diagnostic categories.

RESULTS

The 210 cases were histologically diagnosed as follows: 192 (91.4%) cases had an epithelioid type and 18 (8.6%) had a sarcomatoid subtype of MM. The cytological cases were reclassified as follows: 2 (0.9%) as non-diagnostic (ND), 81 (38.6%) as negative for malignancy (NFM), 4 (1.9%) as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 11 (5.2%) as suspicious for malignancy (SFM), 112 (53.4%) as malignant (MAL). Sarcomatoid cells in the MAL category were characterised cytomorphologically by more pronounced discohesion. In comparison with the epithelioid subtype, the tumour cells appeared solitary with moderate or marked nuclear pleomorphism, and irregular chromatin.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to recognise the cytological characteristics of this aggressive entity to suggest an early and precise possible diagnosis. Morphological features, coupled with clinico-radiological data may help the clinicians in adequately managing the patients.

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: How to Incorporate Molecular Data in Cytopathology Reports

Serous effusion cytology is widely employed in the initial evaluation of the etiology of effusions with a high diagnostic sensitivity. To standardize practices, The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (TIS) was developed following best international practices, the most up-to-date literature, and expert consensus. In the context of this system, ancillary techniques play an important role. Besides defining basic principles in laboratory specimen handling, adequacy criteria, and a standardized reporting terminology with five diagnostic categories, TIS provides an actionable framework for using immunohistochemical and molecular testing in effusion samples, namely, in atypical, suspicious of malignant samples. For diagnostic purposes, these tests may be employed to distinguish between a primary and secondary neoplasm, to confirm a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma vs. reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, and to correctly classify and determine the primary location of a metastasis. Theranostic molecular tests may also be used for these samples to evaluate potential therapeutic targets. Pathologists play a central role in guiding this process by determining adequacy and selecting appropriate ancillary tests. The activity in this area of research should increase in the near future as new therapeutic targets are discovered and new drugs enter the clinical practice.

Serous fluid cytopathology: Past, present, and future

Serous fluids/effusions are common cytology samples that reflect a wide range of diseases and lend themselves to a multitude of investigations that include microscopy, chemical analysis, cell count, cultures, and analysis for biomarkers and immunomarkers. In recent years, effusions have also served as a liquid biopsy that can be interrogated by molecular tests for thoranostic and prognostic markers and selection of targeted therapy. The recently published International Reporting System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology (IRSSF) provides a standardized reporting terminology with well- defined diagnostic criteria. This editorial provides a global review of the progress in the work-up of effusions and a summary of the IRSSF book and its most significant contributions. The editorial also includes a summary of the diagnostic categories including their definition and the significant relevant information.

Root cause analysis of indeterminate diagnoses in serous fluids cytopathology

INTRODUCTION

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology proposed five diagnostic categories: Nondiagnostic (ND), Negative for Malignancy (NFM), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS), Suspicious for Malignancy (SFM) and Malignant (MAL) (Primary or Metastatic). The indeterminate (AUS/SFM) categories are challenging for management. The goal of this study is to reveal the root causes contributing to indeterminate diagnoses (ID).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched our archives between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2019, and performed a root cause analysis (RCA) using the "5 whys" method to determine the contributing factors of ID.

RESULTS

Nine hundred eleven specimens were evaluated and diagnosed: ND (9, 1%), NFM (667, 73.2%), AUS (51, 5.6%), SFM (27, 3%) and MAL (157, 17.2%). More than one factor contributed to 38/78 ID. Low volume (<50 cc), and low cellularity were identified in 31 and 51 cases, respectively. Three cases were simply deferred to concurrent biopsy. Eleven cases were called atypical, favor reactive mesothelium despite confirmatory IHC. Atypical lymphoid population was reported in seven cases. Cellblocks (CB) were low in cellularity despite volume >1000 mL in 13 cases. Two mesotheliomas were underdiagnosed as suspicious.

CONCLUSIONS

Low cellularity and low volume were the most common contributing factors, highlighting the importance of adequate sample collection. Adequate volume specimens with low cellularity may benefit from a close inspection and a second CB. Some IDs can be switched to NFM or MAL with careful consideration of clinical, radiologic findings and ancillary testing, and concurrent surgical pathology correlation when available.

The value of a tiered cytology diagnostic reporting system in assessing the risk of malignancy in indeterminate serous effusions

BACKGROUND

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology was recently proposed as a tiered structure to provide consistent reporting terminology for serous effusions. Because of the variation in reporting practices for indeterminate serous effusions, namely, the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious for malignancy (SFM) groups, the authors retrospectively reviewed cases in these 2 categories at their institution and determined the associated risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

Pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions that were reported as AUS or SFM over a 1-year period were reviewed, and their associated ROMs were calculated based on confirmation of malignancy by previous and/or subsequent fluid and/or tissue biopsy specimens from the same general location.

RESULTS

In total, 145 AUS and 98 SFM serous effusion cases were identified. The AUS category was used when the cells in question lacked the requisite quantitative (cell number) and/or qualitative (morphologic) features for a definitive diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) or flow cytometry (FCM) was available in 15% of cases (n = 22) with inconclusive results. The ROM based on 69 cases with available follow-up results was 39%. In contrast, the SFM category demonstrated cells that were morphologically suspicious for malignancy but sparse, precluding IHC or FCM (n = 63; 64%) or yielding inconclusive results (n = 35; 36%). The ROM in the SFM category, based on follow-up results of 61 cases, was 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

The ROM for SFM was significantly higher than that for AUS (P < .01), supporting separate diagnostic categories for these 2 groups.

Suspicious for Malignancy Diagnoses on Pleural Effusion Cytology

OBJECTIVES

A definitive diagnosis of malignancy may not be possible in pleural effusions. We report our experience with the diagnosis of suspicious for malignancy (SFM) in pleural effusion.

METHODS

A search for pleural effusions diagnosed as SFM (2008-2018) was performed. Patient records and pathology reports were reviewed. Specimens were subdivided into groups depending on volume (<75, 75-400, >400 mL). Diagnoses of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) served as controls.

RESULTS

We identified 90 patients, with a mean age of 60.6 years. Diagnoses included suspicious for involvement by carcinoma/adenocarcinoma in 64.4%, leukemia/lymphoma in 15.6%, melanoma in 2.2%, sarcoma in 3.3%, germ cell tumor in 1.1%, and not otherwise specified in 13.3%. Immunostains were performed in 47.8% and considered inconclusive in 24%. Average sample volume was 419 mL. There was a statistically significant difference between the SFM vs MPE groups for volumes greater than 75 mL (P = .001, χ 2 test), with SFM having increased proportion of volumes  greater than 400 mL, compared with the MPE group. There was no statistically significant difference in mean overall survival when the groups were compared (P = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

Samples with low cellularity, scant cell blocks, and inconclusive immunostains may contribute to a suspicious category diagnosis in pleural effusions.

The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology-diagnostic categories and clinical management

INTRODUCTION

Effusions can develop inside serous cavities in several pathologic states, both neoplastic and non-neoplastic. They are easy to drain and can provide useful diagnostic information. However, the reported diagnostic efficacy of these specimens has not been uniform across different laboratories. To standardize practices, the international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (TIS) was developed in accordance with the best international practices, the most up-to-date reported data, and expert consensus.

RESULTS

TIS has set the basic principles for laboratory handling of serous effusion specimens, defined the adequacy criteria, and set a standardized reporting terminology with well-defined criteria for each diagnostic category. These include nondiagnostic, negative for malignancy, atypia of undetermined significance, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. Each can provide useful inherent information for appropriate clinical management and follow-up, with a defined expected diagnostic category incidence and risk of malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

TIS applies to serous fluids collected from the pleura, peritoneal, and pericardial cavities. Using TIS, indeterminate categories are presented as either preliminary or as options of last resource. TIS has emphasized the role of ancillary tests in arriving at the correct interpretation within each category. It also has emphasized the importance of a malignant diagnosis as a definitive diagnosis, comparable to histologic examinations. Because of the well-documented outcomes in the adoption of uniform cytology terminology for other organ systems, we recommend the use of the upcoming TIS and believe its use will be paramount to improving the diagnostic yield in this area of cytology.