Lessons learned from clinical trial queries on small biopsy collections: importance of rapid on-site evaluation

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of image-guided FNA specimens improves subsequent core biopsy adequacy in clinical trial patients: The impact of preanalytical factors and its correlation with survival

BACKGROUND

Sufficient tumor collection has become of utmost importance in therapeutic experimental protocols. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) ensures adequate sampling for quantification of biomarkers, molecular analyses, and other ancillary studies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of ROSE in trial-associated fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and to analyze predictors of adequacy and cumulative survival from in-house FNA cases used in clinical trials.

METHODS

Clinical trial FNA biopsies performed at a large academic institution were analyzed over 10 months using a comprehensive chart review of the electronic medical records. SPSS version 28 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-five FNAs were collected for 57 clinical trials. In total, 225 individual patients had an average of 1.4 FNA procedures each as a result of a multidepartmental collaborative effort. ROSE was performed for all patients, and adequacy was evaluated by cytotechnologists. Seventy-eight percent of samples were considered adequate, 14% were considered less than optimal, and 8% were considered inadequate, with the latter two categories designated together as less than adequate. The imaging modalities were mainly ultrasound-guided (n = 267; 82%) and computed tomography-guided (n = 58; 18%). There was a statistically significant association between adequate sampling and ultrasound-guided biopsies (83%) compared with computed tomography-guided biopsies (59%; p < .01). The effect of body mass index (BMI) on mortality was also a significant finding. The authors observed a survival benefit in patients who had elevated BMIs (range, 25.0-34.9 kg/m2 ) compared with those who were underweight (BMI, <18.5 kg/m2 ) or class III obese (BMI, >35.0 kg/m2 ; p < .01). Therefore, the best predictors of adequacy and mortality were imaging modality and BMI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided modalities are recommended for obtaining adequate FNA sampling for clinical trials. In addition, patients with cancer who had slightly elevated BMIs (25.0-34.0 kg/m2 ) had increased overall survival in this cohort.

Molecular/biomarker testing in lung cytology: A practical approach

The increasing comprehension of molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer and the discovery of targetable genomic alterations has dramatically change the pathological approach to lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This unstoppable knowledge has taken pathologists to the leading front on lung cancer management. This is especially relevant in the world of cytopathology where "doing more with less" is a daily challenge. Nowadays with a growing number of predictive biomarkers needed to manage patients with NSCLC, there has been a paradigm shift in care and handling of diagnostic samples. One of the main emphasis and interest relies on the utilization of cytologic samples and small biopsies for not only diagnostic purposes but also for ancillary testing. Moreover, lung cytopathology is in continuous evolutions with implementation of new diagnostic techniques, new tools, and facing new challenges. The goal of this paper will be to provide the reader with the necessary concepts than can be used to exploit the cytological samples in order to use these samples for comprehensive diagnosis and relevant ancillary testing purposes.

Accuracy of definitive rapid onsite evaluation cytopathology diagnoses: Assessment of potentially critical diagnoses as a quality assurance measure

INTRODUCTION

Intraprocedural rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of cytology specimens enhances cytopathology practice. More recently, ROSE diagnoses, like frozen section (FS) diagnoses, have guided immediate clinical decisions. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of definitive ROSE diagnoses in our quality assurance system over a 52-month period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytopathology cases with ROSE from January 2017 to April 2021were retrieved from our laboratory information system. After excluding cases that were deferred or nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory, each definitive ROSE diagnosis (ie, negative for malignant cells or positive for malignant cells) was categorized as having agreement or disagreement with the final diagnosis. For comparison, concordance of FS diagnoses from the same time period were tabulated and compared to those of ROSE diagnoses by using χ² testing with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 1649 ROSE diagnoses, there were 15 disagreements (0.9%) with 1 final moderate interpretive disagreement (0.06%). By comparison, of the 17,469 FS diagnoses, there were 141 disagreements (0.8%) with 49 final moderate or major interpretive disagreements (0.3%). The remaining disagreements were minor. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of final moderate and major interpretive disagreements.

CONCLUSIONS

The final interpretive disagreement rates for definitive ROSE and FS diagnoses were similar in this study. Given the expanding role of ROSE and its use for immediate clinical decisions in some cases, monitoring the accuracy of definitive diagnoses may serve as an initial quality assurance measure.