Lung cancer cytology and small biopsy specimens: diagnosis, predictive biomarker testing, acquisition, triage, and management

Supernatant fluid from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for rapid next-generation sequencing

INTRODUCTION

There is an increasing demand to optimize the workflow and maximize tissue available for next-generation sequencing (NGS) for non-small cell carcinoma. We looked at transbronchial needle endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscopy with transbronchial needle aspiration samples and evaluated the performance of supernatant (SN) fluid processed from a dedicated aspirate collected for NGS testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen samples were collected and processed using a new workflow. Five aspirates were collected in formalin. One additional dedicated pass was collected fresh and centrifuged. The resulting cell pellet was added to formalin for cell block (CB) processing. DNA and RNA were extracted from concentrated SN for targeted testing using the Oncomine Precision Assay (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). NGS results from the corresponding CB samples were used as "controls" for comparison.

RESULTS

Thirty-one mutations were detected in SN (Table 1). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (35%), EGFR (23%), KRAS (13%), CTNNB1 (6%), and ERBB2 (6%). There was 100% concordance between the mutations detected in SN and corresponding CBs with comparable variant allele frequencies. Turnaround time of NGS results was 1 day for SN compared to 4-10 days for CB.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to demonstrate the usefulness of SN for reliable rapid molecular results. We successfully incorporated the workflow for tissue handling and processing among our clinical, cytopathology, and molecular teams. Molecular results were available at the same time as the cytologic diagnosis, allowing for timely reporting of a comprehensive diagnosis. This approach is particularly useful in patients with advanced disease requiring urgent management.

Evaluating the Risk of Malignancies of the Diagnostic Categories Proposed by the World Health Organization System for Reporting Lung Cytopathology: A 2-Year Single Institutional Experience

INTRODUCTION

The WHO System of Reporting Lung Cytopathology proposed a 5-tiered system in 2023. We report the risk of malignancies (ROMs) of bronchial washing/lavage and percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. We also evaluated the change of ROMs when image correlation is required.

METHODS

Lung cytology cases in 2021 and 2022 with histologic follow-up were included. CT reports were reviewed to identify cases with a solid nodule/tumor but benign cytological findings. These were reassigned from the "benign" to "non-diagnostic" category, and the ROMs were re-estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,031 bronchial washing/lavage and 206 FNAs were identified. The ROMs of bronchial washing/lavage were "non-diagnostic" 56.5% (13/23), "benign" 41.9% (320/764), "atypical" 71.7% (71/99), "suspicious for malignancy" 94.7% (72/76), and "malignant" 100% (70/70). The ROMs of FNAs were "non-diagnostic" 66% (33/50), "benign" 58.2% (39/67), "atypical" 70% (28/40), "suspicious for malignancy" 96.2% (25/26), and "malignant" 100% (70/70). When image finding was considered, cases initially assigned as "benign" were re-classified to "non-diagnostic" with decreases in ROMs for the "benign" category.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignancy risks associated with the WHO System of Reporting Lung Cytopathology diagnostic groups were reported. Image correlation for the "benign" category led to a decrease in case number and ROM.

Methoxylated Cinnamic Esters with Antiproliferative and Antimetastatic Effects on Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and malignant melanomas are highly lethal owing to their elevated metastatic potential. Despite improvements in therapeutic approaches, cancer treatments are not completely effective. Thus, new drug candidates are continuously sought. We synthesized mono- and di-methoxylated cinnamic acid esters and investigated their antitumor potential. A cell viability assay was performed to identify promising substances against A549 (non-small-cell lung cancer) and SK-MEL-147 (melanoma) cells. (E)-2,5-dimethoxybenzyl 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)acrylate (4m), a monomethoxylated cinnamic acid derivative, was identified as the lead antitumor compound, and its antitumor potential was deeply investigated. Various approaches were employed to investigate the antiproliferative (clonogenic assay and cell cycle analysis), proapoptotic (annexin V assay), and antimigratory (wound-healing and adhesion assays) activities of 4m on A549 cells. In addition, western blotting was performed to explore its mechanism of action. We demonstrated that 4m inhibits the proliferation of A549 by promoting cyclin B downregulation and cell cycle arrest at G2/M. Antimigratory and proapoptotic activities of 4m on A549 were also observed. The antitumor potential of 4m involved its ability to modulate the mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) signaling pathway once phosphorylated-ERK expression was considerably reduced in response to treatment. Our findings demonstrate that 4m is a promising anticancer drug candidate.

Challenges in diagnosis and biomarker testing for RET-altered lung and thyroid cancer care: an international mixed-method study

BACKGROUND

The introduction of new targeted therapies for RET-altered lung and thyroid cancers (LC/TC) has impacted pathologists' practice by making genomic testing more relevant. Variations in health systems and treatment access result in distinct clinical challenges and barriers. This study aimed to assess practice gaps and challenges experienced by pathologists involved in the diagnosis of RET-altered LC/TC, including biomarker testing, to inform educational solutions.

METHODS

Pathologists in Germany, Japan, the UK, and US participated in this ethics-approved mixed-methods study, which included interviews and surveys (data collected January-March 2020). Qualitative data was thematically analysed, quantitative data was analysed with chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests, and both were triangulated.

RESULTS

A total of 107 pathologists took part in this study. Knowledge gaps were reported regarding genomic testing for LC/TC in Japan (79/60%), the UK (73/66%), and the US (53/30%). Skill gaps were reported when selecting genomic biomarker tests to diagnose TC in Japan (79%), the UK (73%) and US (57%) and when performing specific biomarker tests, especially in Japan (82% for RET) and in the UK (75% for RET). Japanese participants (80%) reported uncertainty about what information to share with the multidisciplinary team to ensure optimal patient-centered care. At the time of data collection, pathologists in Japan faced access barriers to using RET biomarker tests: only 28% agreed that there are relevant RET genomic biomarker tests available in Japan, versus 67% to 90% in other countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified areas where pathologists need additional continuing professional development opportunities to enhance their competencies and better support delivery of care to patients with RET-altered lung or thyroid tumours. Addressing identified gaps and improving competencies of pathologists in this field should be emphasised in continuing medical education curricula and through quality improvement initiatives. Strategies deployed on an institutional and health system level should aim to improve interprofessional communication and genetic biomarker testing expertise.

Molecular/biomarker testing in lung cytology: A practical approach

The increasing comprehension of molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer and the discovery of targetable genomic alterations has dramatically change the pathological approach to lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This unstoppable knowledge has taken pathologists to the leading front on lung cancer management. This is especially relevant in the world of cytopathology where "doing more with less" is a daily challenge. Nowadays with a growing number of predictive biomarkers needed to manage patients with NSCLC, there has been a paradigm shift in care and handling of diagnostic samples. One of the main emphasis and interest relies on the utilization of cytologic samples and small biopsies for not only diagnostic purposes but also for ancillary testing. Moreover, lung cytopathology is in continuous evolutions with implementation of new diagnostic techniques, new tools, and facing new challenges. The goal of this paper will be to provide the reader with the necessary concepts than can be used to exploit the cytological samples in order to use these samples for comprehensive diagnosis and relevant ancillary testing purposes.

Recommendations for optimizing the use of cytology in the diagnosis and management of patients with lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the oncological entities with the greatest evolution in molecular diagnosis due to the large number of diagnostic biomarkers and new treatments approved by international regulatory agencies. An accurate, early diagnosis using the least amount of tissue is the goal for the establishing and developing precision medicine for these patients. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) provides cytological samples of optimal quantity and quality for a complete diagnosis of NSCLC. The usefulness of cytological samples has been demonstrated, not only for massive parallel sequencing but also for the quantification of the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumour mutational burden (TMB). Pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical recommendations are made for the management and appropriate use of cytological samples in order to obtain all the information necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with NSCLC according to current quality parameters.

Optimizing molecular testing of lung cancer needle biopsy specimens: potential solutions from an interdisciplinary qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Molecular testing can detect actionable genomic alterations and tumor cell surface proteins in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, utilization remains suboptimal, representing missed treatment opportunities. This study aimed to identify challenges and potential solutions to obtaining percutaneous lung needle biopsy specimens for successful molecular testing in patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This interdisciplinary qualitative study included ten radiologists and four pathologists from academic and community settings across the United States who routinely perform and analyze percutaneous lung needle biopsies. Participants underwent semi-structured one-on-one interviews (Phase 1). Interview questionnaires were constructed based on a literature review of key lines of inquiry and conducted by professional market researchers using the theoretical domains framework. Primary barriers to molecular testing were identified using thematic analysis. Subsequently, multidisciplinary focus groups were convened to identify potential solutions (Phase 2).

RESULTS

Four themes emerged as barriers to molecular testing and were matched to the clinical workflow: (1) biopsy request, (2) biopsy procedure, (3) specimen analysis, and (4) communication. The nineteen potential solutions included adding a "checkbox" to indicate molecular testing in the biopsy request, leveraging pre-procedural imaging to guide biopsies, conserving tissue through appropriate allocation strategies and next generation sequencing panels instead of sequential single-gene assays, instituting reflex-molecular testing upon NSCLC diagnosis, tracking and communicating biopsy outcomes at multidisciplinary tumor boards, and improving integration of radiologists and pathologists into oncology care teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential solutions exist to increase successful molecular testing of lung needle biopsy specimens in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Molecular testing of cytology specimens: overview of assay selection with focus on lung, salivary gland, and thyroid testing

Ancillary and molecular testing of cytopathology specimens has emerged as a reliable and useful tool to provide diagnostic information and treatment-related biomarker status for the management of cancer patients. The cytology specimens obtained through minimally invasive means have proven suitable testing substrates for a variety of ancillary tests, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, as well as polymerase chain reaction and next generation sequencing molecular techniques. By focusing specifically on the cytology specimen, this review provides an overview of basic testing considerations and assay selection in addition to updates on the ancillary testing of cytologic tumor specimens from the lung, salivary gland, and thyroid.

Optimising tissue acquisition and the molecular testing pathway for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A UK expert consensus statement

Targeted therapy against actionable variants has revolutionised the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately half of NSCLC adenocarcinomas have an actionable variant, making molecular testing a critical component of the diagnostic process to personalise therapeutic options, optimise clinical outcomes and minimise toxicity. Recently, genomic testing in England has undergone major changes with the introduction of Genomic Laboratory Hubs, designed to consolidate and enhance existing laboratory provision and deliver genomic testing as outlined in the National Genomic Test Directory. Similar changes are ongoing in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. However, multiple challenges exist with current tissue acquisition procedures and the molecular testing pathway in the UK, including quantity and quality of available tissue, adequacy rates, test availability among genomic laboratories, turnaround times, multidisciplinary team communication, and limited guidance and standardisation. The COVID-19 pandemic has added an extra layer of complexity. Herein, we summarise best practice recommendations, based on expert opinion, to overcome existing challenges in the UK. The least invasive biopsy technique should be undertaken with the aim of acquiring the greatest quality and quantity of tissue. Use of sedation should be considered to improve patient experience. Rapid on-site evaluation may also be useful to help guide adequate sampling, and liquid biopsy may be beneficial in some instances. Sample processing should be appropriate to facilitate biomarker testing, in particular, next-generation sequencing for comprehensive genomic information. Steps to optimise tissue utilisation and turnaround times, such as planning of tissue usage, limiting immunohistochemistry, tumour enrichment, and reflex testing at diagnosis, should be implemented. Guidelines for tissue acquisition and sample processing may help to improve sample adequacy to perform downstream testing. Communication among genomic laboratories will help to standardise test availability across England and local auditing could identify further areas for optimisation, including ways to improve turnaround times and adequacy rates.

Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing - Part 1: Tissue collection and management

Biomarker testing is crucial for treatment selection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the quantity of available tissue often presents a key constraint for patients with advanced disease, where minimally invasive tissue biopsy typically returns small samples. In Part 1 of this two-part series, we summarise evidence-based recommendations relating to small sample processing for patients with NSCLC. Generally, tissue biopsy techniques that deliver the greatest quantity and quality of tissue with the least risk to the patient should be selected. Rapid on-site evaluation can help to ensure sufficient sample quality and quantity. Sample processing should be managed according to biomarker testing requirements, because tissue fixation methodology influences downstream nucleic acid, protein and morphological analyses. Accordingly, 10% neutral buffered formalin is recommended as an appropriate fixative, and the duration of fixation is recommended not to exceed 24–48 h. Tissue sparing techniques, including the ‘one biopsy per block’ approach and small sample cutting protocols, can help preserve tissue. Cytological material (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] cytology blocks and non-FFPE samples such as smears and touch preparations) can be an excellent source of nucleic acid, providing either primary or supplementary patient material to complete morphological and molecular diagnoses. Considerations on biomarker testing, reporting and quality assessment are discussed in Part 2.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Cell Block Method with Core Tissue Biopsy for Adequate Diagnosis of Lung Malignant

BACKGROUND: An adequate diagnosis of lung malignancy can be detected through examination of pleural fluid and Transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) based on the cell block method and tissue core biopsy. The cell block method is an immunocytochemical examination method that is useful for the adequate diagnosis of lung malignancy. AIM: This study was to compare the effectiveness of the cell block method with tissue core biopsy on pleural fluid cytology and TTNA cytology to establish the diagnosis of lung malignancy. METHODS: This study is a diagnostic test with an analytical cross-sectional approach on 15 respondents suspected of lung cancer at Dr. Moewardi Hospital Surakarta in September 2021. Subjects underwent pleural fluid cytology, TTNA cytology based on the cell block method, and tissue core biopsy examination. Data analysis used the Kappa test and bivariate analysis to calculate the p-value. RESULTS: The results of the combined examination of pleural fluid cytology and TTNA cytology based on the cell block method gave a very good level of conformity to the tissue core biopsy with a Kappa value of 0.857 and a p-value of 0.001. The results of the combined examination of pleural fluid cytology and TTNA cytology with cell block method showed the highest percentage for sensitivity (100%), NPV (100%), and accuracy (93%); while the results of the TTNA cytology examination using the cell block method showed the highest percentage of specificity (100%) and PPV (100%) of the tissue core biopsy method. CONCLUSION: The cell block method is very effective and significant in assessing the results of combined pleural fluid cytology and TTNA cytology against the tissue core biopsy method so that it is useful for the adequate diagnosis of lung malignant

Immunohistochemical markers to diagnose primary squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Background:

Inconsistent diagnostic test accuracies of immunohistological staining for squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) of the lung have been frequently reported. There have been few meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracies of the immunohistochemical markers.

Methods:

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following standard guidelines for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Immunohistochemical markers (p40, p63, CK5/6, and DSC3) were evaluated as index tests for SQC. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was obtained by the DerSimonian–Laird variate model. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate model. The protocol registration ID is UMIN000041664.

Results:

The meta-analysis included 85 of the 1353 first-screened articles. The total number of patients was 17,893, which consisted 6151 SQC cases and 11,742 non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer cases. The DOR was better for p40 (377, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 213–644, I² = 0%) than for CK5/6 (120, 95% CI = 78–184, I² = 2.5%), p63 (70, 95% CI = 55–88, I² = 9.1%), and DSC3 (94, 95% CI = 35–250, I² = 3.7%). Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were followings: p40 sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI = 0.89–0.95), specificity 0.94 (95% CI = 0.93–0.96); p63 sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI = 0.90–0.94), specificity 0.83 (95% CI = 0.80–0.86); CK5/6 sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87–0.93), specificity 0.91 (95% CI = 0.89–0.93); DSC3 sensitivity 0.81 (95% CI = 0.73–0.88), and specificity 0.95 (95% CI = 0.85–0.98).

Conclusion:

P40 had the best DOR to diagnose SQC in non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Despite its lower sensitivity, DSC3 had the best specificity among the four markers and might be useful to rule-in the diagnosis of SQC.

Challenges in Pathology Specimen Processing in the New Era of Precision Medicine

CONTEXT.—

Precision therapies for patients with driver mutations can offer deep and durable responses that correlate with diagnosis, metastasis prognosis, and improvement in survival. Such targeted therapies will continue to increase, pushing us to change our traditional approaches. We needed to search for new tools to effectively integrate technological advancements into our practices because of their capability to improve the efficiency and accuracy of our diagnostic and treatment approaches. Perhaps nothing is as relevant as identifying and implementing new workflows for processing pathologic specimens and for improving communication of critical laboratory information to and from clinicians for appropriate care of patients in an efficient and timely manner.

OBJECTIVES.—

To define the gold standard in delivering the best care for patients, to identify gaps in the process, and to identify potential solutions that would improve our process, including gaps related to knowledge, skills, attitudes, and practices.

DESIGN.—

We assembled a team across disciplines to systematically perform a gap analysis study to clarify the discrepancy between the current reality in pathology specimen processing and the desired optimal situation to deliver the results intended for patient care.

RESULTS.—

A practical collaborative workflow for specimen management seeking the cooperation of the stakeholders in each medical discipline to provide guidelines in specimen collection, delivery, processing, and reporting of results with the ultimate goal of improving patients' outcomes is provided.

CONCLUSIONS.—

New tools are required to effectively integrate data-driven approaches in specimen processing to meet the new demands.

Fusion proteins in lung cancer: addressing diagnostic problems for deciding therapy

Introduction: Gene fusions are frequent chromosomal aberrations in solid tumors. In Lung cancer (LC) several druggable-fusions involving tyrosine kinase receptor genes have been described, including ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK. In non-small cell lung cancer, testing for targetable fusions has become a part of routine clinical practice, greatly impacting therapeutic choice for patients with these aberrations. Although substantial technologies for gene fusion detection have been implemented over time including; cytogenetic, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Retro-transcription Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR), to Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), nCounter system (Nanostring technology), several critical issues remain. To date, only the companion diagnostic tests FISH and IHC for ALK-rearrangements and NGS for ROS1-rearrangments were approved. Other fusion approved tests are currently unavailable.Areas covered: In this review, we explore current diagnostic problems of gene fusion detection relative to the technologies available, in order to clarify future standardization of analyses which determine therapeutic choices.Expert opinion: The establishment of a gold standard, an effective diagnostic algorithm, and a standardized interpretation for the analysis of each druggable-fusions in lung cancer is essential for adequate therapeutic management.

Cytology samples and molecular biomarker testing in lung cancer-advantages and challenges

This review presents an overview on molecular diagnostic in lung cancer using cytologic samples. Every patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should be tested for targetable driver mutations and gene arrangements. If a mutation is found, this may open an option for targeted therapy. As most of the NSCLC patients in advanced stage of disease are no candidates for surgery, these tests have to be performed on small biopsies or cytology samples. The most common and treatable gene alterations should be tested in every patient: EGFR, ALK, ROS1. A growing number of other genetic changes with targetable mutations may become treatable in the near future. To find patients who might profit from inclusion into clinical studies, relevant additional markers may be tested in an appropriate context. Another important approach for treatment is immunotherapy of lung cancer, which is guided by status of PD-L1 expression on tumour cells. The use of cytology samples carries considerable advantages: often, DNA of high quality is extracted thus enabling easy and precise analysis, and samples may be easily obtained. In case of effusions, effusion fluid seldom is not aspirated for immediate patient relief, so no additional dedicated procedure is needed. Some challenges exist: If the tumour cell count is low, mutations with a low allelic frequency may be missed. In cellblocks formalin-induced DNA, damage may obviate any DNA analysis. In very cellular smears, FISH may be impossible due to massive overlapping of nuclei. Autofluorescence may impede FISH analysis. Although there is no real universal test for genomic profiling for lung cancer, the pathology laboratory must be prepared to offer different assays on different specimens in order to address turnaround time and optimise detections of difficult tumour alterations such as gene fusions. The data from the literature demonstrate that cytology show consistent results, and it is a good alternative for lung cancer molecular testing.