1
|
Tateo V, Cigliola A, Mercinelli C, Agarwal N, Grivas P, Kamat AM, Gibb EA, Moschini M, Brausi M, Dyrskjøt L, Loriot Y, Gupta S, Colecchia M, Spiess PE, Ross JS, Necchi A. Optimizing the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Assays in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma: Recommendations by the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat Panel. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102091. [PMID: 38735133 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The application of precision medicine in clinical practice implies a thorough evaluation of actionable genomic alterations to streamline therapeutic decision making. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor via next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a great opportunity but also several challenges. During the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat, we aimed to provide expert recommendations for the optimal use of NGS in urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A modified Delphi method was utilized, involving a panel of 12 experts in UC from European and United States centers, including oncologists, urologists, pathologists, and translational scientists. An initial survey, conducted before the meeting, delivered 15 statements to the panel. A consensus was defined when ≥70% agreement was reached for each statement. Statements not meeting the consensus threshold were discussed during the meeting. RESULTS Nine of the 15 statements covering patient selection, cancer characteristics, and type of NGS assay, achieved a consensus during the survey. The remaining six statements addressing the optimal timing of NGS use, the ideal source of tumor biospecimen for NGS testing, and the subsequent need to evaluate the germline nature of certain genomic findings were discussed during the meeting, leading to unanimous agreement at the end of the conference. CONCLUSION This consensus-building effort addressed multiple unanswered questions regarding the use of NGS in UC. The opinion of experts was in favor of broader use of NGS. In a setting where recommendations/guidelines may be limited, these insights may aid clinicians to provide informed counselling and raise the bar of precision and personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Tateo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Antonio Cigliola
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Mercinelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute (NCI-CCC), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Brausi
- Department of Urology, Cure Hesperia Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Greenland NY, Khorsandi N, Peng Y, Balassanian R, Tabatabai ZL, Tiffany Shing TW, Vohra P. Utility and performance of cell blocks in urine cytology: Experience at three teaching hospitals. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131:614-625. [PMID: 37291084 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of cell block (CB) preparation is underused in urine cytology (UC) and varies among hospitals. In addition to confirming a diagnosis, CBs can be useful in cases of metastatic disease, diagnoses requiring immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and for ancillary studies. The role of this study is to examine the performance of CBs for UC at three affiliated teaching hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of UC cases with a CB was conducted at a county hospital, Veterans Affairs hospital, and tertiary university-based hospital. For each specimen, patient demographics, specimen type, volume, original diagnosis, and IHC stains were recorded. Each case was reviewed for diagnosis based on ThinPrep alone, diagnosis based on ThinPrep and CB, utility of CB for diagnosis, and CB cellularity. RESULTS A total of 250 UC specimens with CB from 186 patients was identified. Bladder washes were the most common (72.1%). IHC stains were performed on 17.2% of cases. On blinded review, CB preparation was deemed useful in 61.2% of cases, with the highest rate for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) cases (87.0%). The diagnosis based on ThinPrep review changed with incorporation of CB in 13.2% of cases, with the highest rate for SHGUC cases (43.5%). CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that use of CB in UC confirms the final diagnosis in more than one-half of cases and changes the diagnosis in a subset of cases. Use of CB was most helpful in the SHGUC category. Further evaluation of the types of cases in which CB are prepared is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Y Greenland
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nikka Khorsandi
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Yue Peng
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ronald Balassanian
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Z Laura Tabatabai
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Tze Wai Tiffany Shing
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Poonam Vohra
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diagnostische und prädiktive Marker in der Harntraktzytologie. DER PATHOLOGE 2022; 43:99-104. [PMID: 35133495 PMCID: PMC8888376 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01053-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In der Routinediagnostik spielt die Mehrfach-Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierung (FISH) nach wie vor die führende Rolle in der Abklärung unklarer Atypien in der Harntraktzytologie. Die Paris-Klassifikation (The Paris System, TPS) bildet eine wichtige Grundlage zur gezielten Indikationsstellung der FISH und untermauert die Bedeutung der morphologischen Korrelation für eine integrative Diagnosestellung. Die Next-Generation-Sequencing-Technologie, welche durch gleichzeitigen Nachweis multipler genetischer Alterationen eine hohe Sensitivität erzielt, wird in naher Zukunft auch in der Harntraktzytologie Anwendung finden.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pisapia P, Pepe F, Sgariglia R, Nacchio M, Russo G, Conticelli F, Girolami I, Eccher A, Bellevicine C, Vigliar E, Malapelle U, Troncone G. Next generation sequencing in cytology. Cytopathology 2021; 32:588-595. [PMID: 33792981 PMCID: PMC8451925 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The application of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology to cytological samples has significantly modified molecular cytopathology practice. Cytological samples represent a valid source of high-quality DNA for NGS analysis, especially for predicting patients' response to targeted treatments and for refining the risk of malignancy in indeterminate cytological diagnoses. However, several pre-analytical factors may influence the reliability of NGS clinical analysis. Here, we briefly review the challenges of NGS in cytology practice, focusing on those pre-analytical factors that may negatively affect NGS success rates and routine diagnostic applications. Finally, we address the future directions of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Pepe
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Sgariglia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariantonia Nacchio
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Floriana Conticelli
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Girolami
- Division of Pathology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Albino Eccher
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bellevicine
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Elena Vigliar
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|