Bone graft substitutes in the radius and upper limb

Bone Graft Substitutes-What Are My Options?

We examine the range of available bone graft substitutes often used in nonunion and malunion surgery of the upper extremity. Synthetic materials such as calcium sulfate, beta-calcium phosphate ceramics, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and 3D printed materials are discussed. We delve into the advantages, disadvantages, and clinical applications for each, considering factors such as biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, mechanical strength, and resorption rates. This review provides upper extremity surgeons with insights into the available array of bone graft substitutes. We hope that the reviews helps in the decision-making process to achieve optimal outcomes when treating nonunion and malunion of the upper extremity.

Bone graft substitutes in the upper extremity

The development of effective bone graft substitutes is one of the most important innovations in musculoskeletal surgery. Bone graft substitutes provide an osteoconductive scaffolding similar to those of autogenous bone. They eliminate donor site morbidity,decrease operative time and complexity and treatment costs, and improve patient satisfaction. Osteoinductive and osteogenic elements may be added to further stimulate and enhance healing and incorporation of the scaffolding substance into the adjacent bone. Bone graft substitutes have proven effective in the spine and larger long bones of the extremities. The continuing development of bone graft substitutes, evaluation of their efficacy relative to autogenous bone grafts and to each other, and their use in the hand and wrist are emerging fields.

Use of bone graft substitutes and bioactive materials in treatment of distal radius fractures

Although autogenous bone graft has been shown to be useful in the treatment of distal radius fractures, the role of bone graft substitutes and the optimal replacement material remains unclear. Several products are commercially available, each with differing osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and structural properties. Indications and choice of graft substitute should be based on the needs of the individual case with regard to need for structural support, gap filling, or bone healing stimulation. Further comparative research will help clarify the indications and most appropriate material for a given fracture and clinical situation.