Partial Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Radiocarpal Osteoarthritis

Patient reported and functional outcome measures after surgical salvage procedures for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis is an irreversible and often progressive condition. Many surgical treatments, used in (daily) practice, aim to relieve symptoms like pain and restore function. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the patient reported and functional outcomes of the most common surgical interventions in patients with posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis. This overview can help clinicians select the best treatment and manage patient's expectations.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane for articles published between 1990 and November 2022 according to the PRISMA guidelines. The study protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017080427). Studies that describe patient reported outcomes (pain and Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) -score) and functional outcomes (range of motion (ROM) and grip strength) after surgical intervention with a minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. The identified surgical procedures included denervation, proximal row carpectomy, interpositional- and total arthroplasty, and midcarpal-, radiocarpal- and total arthrodesis. The pre-and postoperative outcomes were pooled and presented per salvage procedure.

RESULTS

Data from 50 studies was included. Pain score improved after all surgeries except denervation. Flexion/extension decreased after radiocarpal arthrodesis, did not show significant changes after proximal row carpectomy, and improved for all other surgeries. DASH score improved after arthroplasty, proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis. Grip strength improved after interposition arthroplasty and partial arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from this review did not support the indication for denervation in this particular patient population. In patients with SLAC/SNAC II, proximal row carpectomy might be favourable to a midcarpal arthrodesis solely based on better FE ROM of the radiocarpal joint after proximal row carpectomy. In terms of radiocarpal mobility, total wrist arthroplasty might be preferred to radiocarpal arthrodesis in patients with osteoarthritis after a distal radius fracture. More uniform measurements of outcomes would improve the understanding of the effect of surgical treatments of the posttraumatic osteoarthritic wrist.

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis and arthritis of the wrist

Although the simultaneous occurrence of arthritis of the wrist and the base of the thumb is rare, it is nonetheless imperative to carry out a preoperative clinical and radiological assessment of the wrist when managing trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The presence of pre-arthritic lesions or established wrist arthritis, even if treated, must be taken into consideration when treating osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. The coexistence of these lesions determines the entire surgical strategy. Failure to take them into account during the surgical treatment often results in a compromised postoperative course and it often adversely impacts the outcome of secondary surgeries.

Radioscapholunate fusion for posttraumatic osteoarthritis with consecutive excision of the distal scaphoid and the triquetrum: A comparative study

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes after radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion for posttraumatic osteoarthritis. This was a retrospective, dual-center study of all patients who underwent RSL fusion between 1995 and 2015 for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. Patients were assessed at the final review to determine clinical (pain, wrist range of motion and strength), self-reported (QuickDASH, PRWE and MWS scores) and radiological (degenerative osteoarthritis in the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) or midcarpal joint and radiocarpal fusion) outcomes. We analyzed three groups: RSL fusion alone, RSL fusion with distal scaphoid excision (DSE) and RSL fusion with DSE and triquetrum excision (TE). Eighty-five patients were included; 10 were lost to follow-up and 11 required conversion to total wrist fusion before the final review. Finally, 64 patients had both clinical and radiographic evaluations. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years (range 1-21.4). RSL fusion alone was performed in 29 patients, RSL fusion with DSE in 23 and RSL fusion with DSE and TE in 12. At the final follow-up, the three groups did not differ in their pain or wrist motion. Overall, 47 (73%) patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure. DSE significantly decreased STT osteoarthritis and radiocarpal non-union. The total wrist osteoarthritis rate after RSL fusion was 55%. RSL fusion is an effective procedure to preserve some motion in wrists with posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. DSE prevents STT osteoarthritis by removing bony impingement and increases the fusion rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series, Therapeutic studies.

Clinical and radiological outcomes following radioscapholunate fusion

INTRODUCTION

Radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion is typically performed following wrist trauma. It addresses the pain caused by radiocarpal osteoarthritis but reduces the wrist's mobility. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all wrists operated for RSL fusion in our surgery unit over a 12-year period. The clinical analysis consisted of joint amplitudes, grip strength, pain (VAS) and functional scores (PRWE, QuickDash, Mayo Wrist Score). The radiological analysis focused on bone fusion and the presence of midcarpal osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

This surgery procedure was performed on 48 wrists. Of these, 34 patients were available for review, including 6 who had subsequently undergone total wrist fusion after the RSL procedure. The average follow-up was 53 months. Flexion/extension and radioulnar deviation were 56° and 30°, respectively. Grip strength in the operated wrist was 71% of the contralateral wrist. The mean pain level was 3 out of 10. The PRWE, QuickDash and Mayo Wrist Score were 35.7, 44.5 and 57.2, respectively. Seventy-nine percent of patients were satisfied with the outcome. The fusion rate was 71%, the midcarpal osteoarthritis rate was 64% and the STT osteoarthritis rate was 46%.

DISCUSSION

Reduced wrist range of motion in patients who have undergone RSL fusion helps to preserve satisfactory function in the majority of patients; however, the functional outcome scores point to some hindrance in day-to-day activities. Nonunion occurred in nearly one-quarter of patients and appears to be preventable by excision of the distal pole of the scaphoid (DPS). Midcarpal osteoarthritis develops in most wrists over the long-term and appears to be inevitable.

CONCLUSION

RSL fusion is a palliative procedure that preserves some of the wrist's mobility. However, it is a difficult procedure that has a significant nonunion rate. Excision of the DPS may contribute to lowering the nonunion rate.

Osteoarthritis of the wrist

Osteoarthritis of the wrist is one of the most common conditions encountered by hand surgeons. It may result from a nonunited or malunited fracture of the scaphoid or distal radius; disruption of the intercarpal, radiocarpal, radioulnar, or ulnocarpal ligaments; avascular necrosis of the carpus; or a developmental abnormality. Whatever the cause, subsequent abnormal joint loading produces a spectrum of symptoms, from mild swelling to considerable pain and limitations of motion as the involved joints degenerate. A meticulous clinical and radiographic evaluation is required so that the pain-generating articulation(s) can be identified and eliminated. This article reviews common causes of wrist osteoarthritis and their surgical treatment alternatives.