Treat to target in axial spondyloarthritis: From its concept to its implementation

[Current treatment for spondyloarthritis: focus on netakimab. A review]

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of rheumatic diseases that includes ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and a number of other diseases. SpA lead to a significant social problem, since it is a common pathology that debuts mainly at a young age, significantly impairing the ability to work and the ability to social contacts of the most active part of the population. For all the main types of chronic progressive SpA, biological agents (biologics) are of great importance in patients with persistent activity despite standard treatment, especially in the case of predominantly axial involvement, since in this case it is actually the only option for effective treatment, in addition to the constant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Over the past decade, interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitors have taken the first place in therapy of SpA, because, according to modern ideas about pathogenesis, IL-17A may be a key target for therapeutic intervention in SpA. In terms of ensuring availability for Russian patients with SpA, it is of particular importance to the introduction of the original medication from the group of IL-17A inhibitors Netakimab (NTK). This review presents data from randomized clinical trials of NTK phases I, II and III in AS and PsA also post-registration observational studies of phase IV, including analysis of subpopulations of patients of special interest, in particular, patients with psoriatic spondylitis. NTK demonstrated high effectiveness in the treatment of SpA both in randomized clinical trials and in clinical practice. The drug is characterized by a rapid onset of clinical action and persistent maintenance of the achieved improvement, a complex effect on various manifestations of the disease, is able to have a structure-modifying effect and slow down the progression of both the erosive process and osteoproliferation. The safety profile of NTK is generally typical for the entire group of IL-17 inhibitors. The drug has low immunogenicity, which allows us to count on the possibility of many years of effective use. Resolutions of expert councils on the use of NTK in AS and PsA support the inclusion of this drug in clinical guidelines.

Effectiveness of bDMARDs in ankylosing spondylitis patients by biologic use: experience from the CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry

OBJECTIVE

To describe bDMARD initiators by biologic experience among ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and change in disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in real-world US patients.

METHODS

We included patients ≥18 years with AS based on physician diagnosis enrolled between 3/2013 and 11/2019 in the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA)/Spondyloarthritis Registry (NCT02530268). Patients concurrently diagnosed with PSA were excluded. Baseline (bDMARD initiation) demographics, comorbidities, disease characteristics, treatment, and PROs were collected. Response rates and changes in disease activity and PROs between baseline and 6- and 12- month follow-up visits were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 489 AS patients in the PsA/SpA Registry, 254 AS (52.0%) patients initiated a bDMARD at enrollment or during follow-up (total initiations: AS = 313). Of the 313 AS initiations, 179 (57.2%) had a 6-month follow-up, 122 (39.0%) had a 12-month follow-up, and 94 (30.0%) had a 6- and 12-month follow-up visit. For those AS initiators with a 6-month follow-up, the mean age was 49.1 years, 44.4% were female, and 70.4%, 47.5%, 96.1%, and 46.9% had never used cDMARDs, TNFis, non-TNFis, and bDMARDs, respectively. Of these 179 AS initiators, 20.1% and 14.0% achieved ASAS20/40, respectively. Further, only 34% achieved low disease activity (ASDAS <2.1). When stratified by biologic-naivete and biologic-experience, the ASAS 20/40 achievement rates were 26.2% and 14.7%, and 21.4% and 7.4%, respectively, for this cohort.

CONCLUSION

Although AS patients initiate bDMARDs, many do not achieve optimal treatment responses. Future research is needed to investigate the aspects associated with inadequate improvement and treatment response to bDMARDs.

A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI'PsA)

OBJECTIVES

Clinical inertia, or therapeutic inertia (TI), is the medical behaviour of not initiating or intensifying treatment when recommended by clinical recommendations. To our knowledge, our survey is the first to assess TI around psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Eight hundred and twenty-five French rheumatologists were contacted via email between January and March 2021 and invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of seven clinical vignettes: five cases ('oligoarthritis', 'enthesitis', 'polyarthritis', 'neoplastic history', 'cardiovascular risk') requiring treatment OPTImization, and two 'control' cases (distal interphalangeal arthritis, atypical axial involvement) not requiring any change of treatment-according to the most recent PsA recommendations. Rheumatologists were also questioned about their routine practice, continuing medical education and perception of PsA.

RESULTS

One hundred and one rheumatologists completed this OPTI'PsA survey. Almost half the respondents (47%) demonstrated TI on at least one of the five vignettes that warranted treatment optimization. The complex profiles inducing the most TI were 'oligoarthritis' and 'enthesitis' with 20% and 19% of respondents not modifying treatment, respectively. Conversely, clinical profiles for which there was the least uncertainty ('polyarthritis in relapse', 'neoplastic history' and 'cardiovascular risk') generated less TI with 11%, 8% and 6% of respondents, respectively, choosing not to change the current treatment.

CONCLUSION

The rate of TI we observed for PsA is similar to published data for other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, gout or multiple sclerosis. Our study is the first to show marked clinical inertia in PsA, and further research is warranted to ascertain the reasons behind this inertia.

Treat-to-target in dermatology: A scoping review and International Eczema Council survey on the approach in atopic dermatitis

Treat-to-target (T2T) is a pragmatic therapeutic strategy being gradually introduced into dermatology after adoption in several other clinical areas. Atopic dermatitis (AD), one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases, may also benefit from this structured and practical therapeutic approach. We aimed to evaluate existing data regarding the T2T approach in dermatology, with a specific focus on AD, as well as the views of International Eczema Council (IEC) members on the potential application of a T2T approach to AD management. To do so, we systematically searched for peer-reviewed publications on the T2T approach for any skin disease in the PubMed and Scopus databases up to February 2022 and conducted a survey among IEC members regarding various components to potentially include in a T2T approach in AD. We identified 21 relevant T2T-related reports in dermatology, of which 14 were related to psoriasis, five to AD, one for juvenile dermatomyositis and one for urticaria. In the IEC member survey, respondents proposed treatable traits (with itch, disease severity and sleep problems getting the highest scores), relevant comorbidities (with asthma being selected most commonly, followed by anxiety and depression in adults), recommended specialists that should define the approach in AD (dermatologists, allergists and primary care physicians were most commonly selected in adults), and applicable assessment tools (both physician- and patient-reported), in both adult and paediatric patients, for potential future utilization of the T2T approach in AD. In conclusion, while the T2T approach may become a useful tool to simplify therapeutic goals and AD management, its foundation in AD is only starting to build. A multidisciplinary approach, including a wide range of stakeholders, including patients, is needed to further define the essential components needed to utilize T2T in AD.

Targeting DORIS Remission and LLDAS in SLE: A Review

Remission is the established therapeutic goal for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is currently defined by the widely adopted Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) criteria. Attainment of remission is rare in the clinical setting, thus an alternative, pragmatic treatment target of low disease activity, as defined by the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), provides a less stringent and more attainable treatment goal for a wider proportion of patients compared with DORIS remission. Randomized controlled trials and real-world analyses have confirmed the positive clinical benefits of achieving either DORIS remission or LLDAS. The treat-to-target (T2T) approach utilizes practical clinical targets to proactively tailor individual treatment regimens. Studies in other chronic inflammatory diseases using the T2T approach demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes and quality-of-life measures compared with established standard of care. However, such trials have not yet been performed in patients with SLE. Here we review the evolution of DORIS remission and LLDAS definitions and the evidence supporting the positive clinical outcomes following DORIS remission or LLDAS attainment, before discussing considerations for implementation of these outcome measures as potential T2T objectives. Adoption of DORIS remission and LLDAS treatment goals may result in favorable patient outcomes compared with established standard of care for patients with SLE.

Advances in pharmacotherapies for axial spondyloarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) refers to an inflammatory rheumatic disease that mainly affects the axial skeleton and leads to progressive radiographic changes of the sacroiliac joints and spine. axSpA is currently subdivided into the radiographic (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic (nr-axSpA) form. Both forms are associated with musculoskeletal pain, restriction of spinal mobility, specific extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, and overall, altered quality of life. The therapeutic management of axSpA is currently well standardized.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed available literature (by using PubMed search) on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options that may be used in axSpA, including r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, as well as the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), biological agents including TNFalpha (TNFi) and IL-17 (IL-17i) inhibitors. New treatment options such as Janus kinase inhibitors are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

NSAIDs remain the mainstay of initial therapy, and subsequently, biological agents (TNFi and IL-17i) may be envisaged. Four TNFi are licensed for the treatment of both r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, while IL-17i are approved in each indication. The choice between a TNFi and an IL-17i is mainly guided by the presence of extra-articular manifestations. JAKi were more recently introduced for the treatment of r-axSpA, but their use is restricted to specific patients with a safe cardiovascular profile.

Can Bone Erosion in Axial Spondyloarthropathy be Detected by Ultrashort Echo Time Imaging? A Comparison With Computed Tomography in the Sacroiliac Joint

BACKGROUND

Structural lesion evaluation in axial spondyloarthropathy (SpA) can improve accuracy of diagnosis. However, structural lesions (bone erosions) are difficult to be assessed using conventional MRI compared to computed tomography (CT).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrashort echo time (UTE) for detecting bone erosion in axial SpA compared to T1WI and three-dimensional double-echo steady-state (3D DESS) imaging using CT as the reference standard.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Fourteen patients (eight females, 57.1%) and 14 healthy controls (seven females, 50.0%) who underwent sacroiliac (SI) joint MRI and CT.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3 T; TSE T1WI, 3D DESS, 2D UTE.

ASSESSMENT

The bilateral SI joints were assessed for bone erosion. Three observers scored bone erosion for all three sequences of MRI. CT was used as the gold standard. Diagnostic confidence in axial SpA was measured based on a four-point confidence score.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Correlation of erosion scores between CT and MRI were evaluated using Spearman's correlation test. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive-negative predictive values were calculated. Confidence scores were compared using the Wilcoxon sum rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Compared with erosion scores of CT, the correlation coefficients for each MRI sequence showed significant low-to-high positive correlations (0.39-0.72). UTE imaging showed the highest correlation coefficients for all observers (0.70, 0.72, and 0.67, respectively). The specificity of UTE imaging was equal or higher than those of T1WI and 3D DESS for all observers (0.86 vs. 0.71 vs. 0.57; 0.93 vs. 0.71 vs. 0.57; 0.79 vs. 0.79 vs. 0.43). All observers had the highest confidence in interpreting UTE imaging for detecting bone erosion among the three sequences (3.5, 3.4, and 3.3 for UTE; 3.1, 3.0, and 2.6 for T1WI; and 3.2, 2.7, and 2.4 for DESS).

DATA CONCLUSION

UTE imaging can detect bone erosions in patients with axial SpA and show higher specificity than conventional T1WI and 3D DESS.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Expert recommendations on early diagnosis and referral of axial spondyloarthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that primarily involves the axial skeleton (sacroiliac joints and spine), causing stiffness, severe pain and fatigue. In some patients, definitive structural damage of sacroiliac joints is visible on imaging and is known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Some patients do not have a clear radiographic damage of the sacroiliac joints, and this subtype is known as non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Early diagnosis is important for reducing the risk of irreversible structural damage and disability. Management of axial spondyloarthritis is challenging in Saudi Arabia because of inadequate disease knowledge and the unavailability of local guidelines. Therefore, this expert consensus is intended to provide recommendations, including the referral pathway, the definition of remission and the treat-to-target approach, to all healthcare professionals for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. A Delphi technique of consensus was developed by involving an expert panel of 10 rheumatologists, 1 dermatologist and 1 general physician. The experts offered consensus-based recommendations based on a review of available scientific evidence and clinical experience for the referral, screening and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

Implementation of the Treat-to-Target Concept in Evaluation of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

BACKGROUND

The treat-to-target approach was recently adopted for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) management.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the implementation of the "treat-to-target" (T2T) concept in daily management of PsA by use of composite scores of disease activity versus clinical judgement alone.

METHODS

A total of 117 PsA patients from a longitudinal PsA cohort were enrolled consecutively in the study during each patient's first clinic visit during 2016-2017. Clinic notes from the treating rheumatologist were reviewed by an independent rheumatologist, noting clinical impression of disease activity, treatment changes based on clinical judgement, and rationale. Treatment changes were then compared to the use of formal disease activity parameters in Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) composite measures. All associations were assessed using the chi-square test or the Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

The 117 PsA patient cohort consisted of 65.5% women, mean age 58.4 ± 13.6 years. Clinical judgement of treating rheumatologist concorded with MDA and DAPSA in 76 (65.5%) and 74 (64.9%) patients, respectively. Agreement between clinical judgement and composite measure criteria did not correlate with patient age, sex, alcohol/tobacco use, or treatment regimens chosen. Disagreement between physician assessment and MDA occurred in 40 (34.5%) cases: in 30 cases, the MDA status was overestimated due to disregard of patient reported outcomes (PRO), while underestimation of MDA status occurred in 25% of cases with treatment changes made in patients with a single active joint or enthesis. Underestimation of disease activity using DAPSA occurred in 22 cases and could be attributed to disregarding tender joint count, patient pain visual analogue scale and C-reactive protein level.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, agreement between clinical impression and formal composite measure utilization for implementation of T2T strategy occurred in 65% of patients. Discordance resulted from physicians' overlooking PRO and emphasizing objective findings when using clinical judgement alone.

Disease activity outcome measures are only available in half of the electronic medical files of patients with axial spondyloarthritis followed in an outpatient clinic: the results of an audit of a tertiary-care rheumatology department

Current recommendations for management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) include regular collection of validated disease activity outcomes. This study aimed at evaluating the proportion of patients for whom validated outcome measures were available on their electronic medical reports (EMR), and the factors associated with the presence of such information on the EMR. We performed a cross-sectional monocentric observational study, including patients with an axSpA diagnosis who attended an outpatient visit between February, 2018 and February, 2019. Patients (demographics, disease characteristics, treatment) and physician characteristics (age, gender) and the disease activity outcome measures (BASDAI, CRP and ASDAS, and the items allowing to calculate them) were retrieved from the EMR. The proportion of patients in which disease activity outcome measures were available in the EMR was calculated, and the association between the presence of such outcomes and patients and physician's characteristics was evaluated. 320 EMR of axSpA patients seen in the outpatient clinic were examined. Among them, 131 (41%) and 123 (38.4%) had a BASDAI + CRP and an ASDAS reported, respectively, but at least one was available in 178 (55.6%) of the EMR. The most frequently reported disease activity items were duration of morning stiffness (n = 230, 72%) and CRP (n = 224, 70%). Only previous participation on a systematic holistic review was independently associated with a reported disease activity outcome. Thus, implementation of recommendations with regard to regularly collecting disease activity outcome measures is not optimal. The participation in educational programs including self-assessment educational programs might be a key to improve such implementation.

IL-17 is expressed on beta and alpha cells of donors with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

IL-17 is an important effector cytokine driving immune-mediated destruction in autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis. Blockade of the IL-17 pathway after the initiation of insulitis was effective in delaying or preventing the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in rodent models. Expression of IL-17 transcripts in islets from a donor with recent-onset T1D has been reported, however, studies regarding IL-17 protein expression are lacking. We aimed to study whether IL-17 is being expressed in the islets of diabetic donors.

METHODS

We stained human pancreatic tissues from non-diabetic (n = 5), auto-antibody positive (aab+) (n = 5), T1D (n = 6) and T2D (n = 5) donors for IL-17, Insulin, and Glucagon, and for CD45 in selected cases. High resolution images were acquired with Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope LSM780 and analyzed with Zen blue 2.3 software. Cases stained for CD45 were also acquired with widefield slide scanner and analyzed with QuPath software.

RESULTS

We observed a clear cytoplasmic staining for IL-17 in insulin-containing islets of donors with T1D and T2D, accounting for an average of 7.8 ± 8.4% and 14.9 ± 16.8% of total islet area, respectively. Both beta and alpha cells were sources of IL-17, but CD45⁺ cells were not a major source of IL-17 in those donors. Expression of IL-17 was reduced in islets of non-diabetic donors, aab+ donors and in insulin-deficient islets of donors with T1D.

CONCLUSION

Our finding that IL-17 is expressed in islets of donors with T1D or T2D is quite intriguing and warrants further mechanistic studies in human islets to understand the role of IL-17 in the context of metabolic and immune stress in beta cells.

Factors associated with remission at 5-year follow-up in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis: results from the DESIR cohort

Objective

The factors contributing to long-term remission in axial SpA (axSpA) are unclear. We aimed to characterize individuals with axSpA at the 5-year follow-up to identify baseline factors associated with remission.

Methods

We included all patients from the DESIR cohort (with recent-onset axSpA) with an available Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score–CRP (ASDAS-CRP) at 5-year follow-up. Patients in remission (ASDAS-CRP < 1.3) were compared with those with active disease by demographic, clinical, biological and imaging characteristics. A logistic model stratified on TNF inhibitor (TNFi) exposure was used.

Results

Overall, 111/449 patients (25%) were in remission after 5 years. Among those never exposed to TNFi, 31% (77/247) were in remission compared with 17% (34/202) of those exposed to TNFi. Patients in remission after 5 years were more likely to be male, HLA-B27+, have a lower BMI, and a higher education level. Baseline factors associated with 5-year remission in patients never exposed to TNFi included lower BASDAI [adjusted odds ratio (OR_a) 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8, 0.9) and history of peripheral arthritis (OR_a 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2, 5.3). In those exposed to TNFi, remission was associated with higher education level (OR_a 2.9, 95% CI: 1.6, 5.1), lower enthesitis index (OR_a 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7, 0.9), lower BASDAI (OR_a 0.9, 95% CI: 0.9, 0.9) and lower BMI (OR_a 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7, 0.9).

Conclusion

This study highlights the difficulty in achieving 5-year remission in those with recent-onset axSpA, especially for the more active cases, despite the use of TNFi. Socio-economic factors and BMI are implicated in the outcome at 5 years.

Diagnostic delay is common for patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit

Objectives

Updated guidelines for patients with axial SpA (axSpA) have sought to reduce diagnostic delay by raising awareness among clinicians. We used the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) to describe baseline characteristics and time to diagnosis for newly referred patients with axSpA in England and Wales.

Methods

Analyses were performed on sociodemographic and clinical metrics, including time to referral and assessment, for axSpA patients (n = 784) recruited to the NEIAA between May 2018 and March 2020. Comparators were patients recruited to the NEIAA with RA (n = 9270) or mechanical back pain (MBP; n = 370) in the same period.

Results

Symptom duration prior to initial rheumatology assessment was longer in axSpA than RA patients (P < 0.001) and non-significantly longer in axSpA than MBP patients (P = 0.062): 79.7% of axSpA patients had symptom durations of >6 months, compared with 33.7% of RA patients and 76.0% of MBP patients. Following referral, the median time to initial rheumatology assessment was longer for axSpA than RA patients (36 vs 24 days; P < 0.001) and similar to MBP patients (39 days; P = 0.30). Of the subset of patients deemed eligible for early inflammatory arthritis pathway follow-up, fewer axSpA than RA patients had disease education provided (77.5% vs 97.8%) and RA patients reported a better understanding of their condition and treatment.

Conclusion

Diagnostic delay in axSpA remains a major challenge despite improved disease understanding and updated referral guidelines. Disease education is provided to fewer axSpA than RA patients, highlighting the need for specialist clinics and support programmes for axSpA patients.

Objective and noninvasive biochemical markers in rheumatoid arthritis: where are we and where are we going?

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects approximately 1% of the adult population. RA is multi-factorial, and as such our understanding of the molecular pathways involved in the disease is currently limited. An increasing number of studies have suggested that several molecular phenotypes (i.e. endotypes) of RA exist, and that different endotypes respond differently to various treatments. Biochemical markers may be an attractive means for achieving precision medicine, as they are objective and easily obtainable.

AREAS COVERED

We searched recent publications on biochemical markers in RA as either diagnostic or prognostic markers, or as markers of disease activity. Here, we provide a narrative overview of different classes of markers, such as autoantibodies, citrulline products, markers of tissue turnover and cytokines, that have been tested in clinical cohorts or trials including RA patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Although many biochemical markers have been identified and tested, few are currently being used in clinical practice. As more treatment options are becoming available, the need for precision medicine tools that can aid physicians and patients in choosing the right treatment is growing.

IL-23/IL-17 Axis in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

In inflammatory rheumatic disorders, the immune system attacks and damages the connective tissues and invariably internal organs. During the past decade, remarkable advances having been made towards our understanding on the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in rheumatic diseases. The discovery of IL-23/IL-17 axis and the delineation of its important role in the inflammation led to the introduction of many needed new therapeutic tools. We will present an overview of the rationale for targeting therapeutically the IL-23/IL-17 axis in rheumatic diseases and the clinical benefit which has been realized so far. Finally, we will discuss the complex interrelationship between IL-23 and IL-17 and the possible uncoupling in certain disease settings.