The two paralogous copies of the YoeB-YefM toxin-antitoxin module in Staphylococcus aureus differ in DNA binding and recognition patterns

Emergence of persister cells in Staphylococcus aureus: calculated or fortuitous move?

A stable but reversible phenotype switch from normal to persister state is advantageous to the intracellular pathogens to cause recurrent infections and to evade the host immune system. Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile opportunistic pathogen known to cause chronic infections with significant mortality. One of the notable features is the ability to switch to a per-sisters cell, which is found in planktonic and biofilm states. This phenotypic switch is always an open question to explore the hidden fundamental science that coheres with a calculated or fortuitous move. Toxin-antitoxin modules, nutrient stress, and an erroneous translation-enabled state of dormancy entail this persistent behaviour in S. aureus. It is paramount to get a clear picture of why the cell chooses to enter a persistent condition, as it would decide the course of treatment. Analyzing the exit from a persistent state to an active state and the subsequent repercussion of this transition is essential to determine its role in chronic infections. This review attempts to provide a constructed argument discussing the most widely accepted mechanisms and identifying the various attributes of persistence.

The crystal structure of insecticidal protein Txp40 from Xenorhabdus nematophila reveals a two-domain unique binary toxin with homology to the toxin-antitoxin (TA) system

Txp40 is a ubiquitous, conserved, and novel toxin from Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria, toxic to a wide range of insect pests. However, the three-dimensional structure and toxicity mechanism for Txp40 or any of its sequence homologs are not yet known. Here, we are reporting the crystal structure of the insecticidal protein Txp40 from Xenorhabdus nematophila at 2.08 Å resolution. The Txp40 was structurally distinct from currently known insecticidal proteins. Txp40 consists of two structurally different domains, an N-terminal domain (NTD) and a C-terminal domain (CTD), primarily joined by a 33-residue long linker peptide. Txp40 displayed proteolytic propensity. Txp40 gets proteolyzed, removing the linker peptide, which is essential for proper crystal packing. NTD adopts a novel fold composed of nine amphipathic helices and has no shared sequence or structural homology to any known proteins. CTD has structural homology with RNases of type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) complex belonging to the RelE/ParE toxin domain superfamily. NTD and CTD were individually toxic to Galleria mellonella larvae. However, maximal toxicity was observed when both domains were present. Our results suggested that the Txp40 acts as a two-domain binary toxin, which is unique and different from any known binary toxins and insecticidal proteins. Txp40 is also unique because it belongs to the prokaryotic RelE/ParE toxin family with a toxic effect on eukaryotic organisms, in contrast to other members of the same family. Broad insect specificity and unique binary toxin complex formation make Txp40 a viable candidate to overcome the development of resistance in insect pests.

Deciphering the conformational stability of MazE7 antitoxin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis from molecular dynamics simulation study

MazEF Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are associated with the persistent phenotype of the pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), aiding their survival. Though extensively studied, the mode of action between the antitoxin-toxin and DNA of this family remains largely unclear. Here, the important interactions between MazF7 toxin and MazE7 antitoxin, and how MazE7 binds its promoter/operator region have been studied. To elucidate this, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has been performed on MazE7, MazF7, MazEF7, MazEF7-DNA, and MazE7-DNA complexes to investigate how MazF7 and DNA affect the conformational change and dynamics of MazE7 antitoxin. This study demonstrated that the MazE7 dimer is disordered and one monomer (Chain C) attains stability after binding to the MazF7 toxin. Both the monomers (Chain C and Chain D) however are stabilized when MazE7 binds to DNA. MazE7 is also observed to sterically inhibit tRNA from binding to MazF7, thus suppressing its toxic activity. Comparative structural analysis performed on all the available antitoxins/antitoxin-toxin-DNA structures revealed MazEF7-DNA mechanism was similar to another TA system, AtaRT_E.coli. Simulation performed on the crystal structures of AtaR, AtaT, AtaRT, AtaRT-DNA, and AtaR-DNA showed that the disordered AtaR antitoxin attains stability by AtaT and DNA binding similar to MazE7. Based on these analyses it can thus be hypothesized that the disordered antitoxins enable tighter toxin and DNA binding thus preventing accidental toxin activation. Overall, this study provides crucial structural and dynamic insights into the MazEF7 toxin-antitoxin system and should provide a basis for targeting this TA system in combating Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Structural insights into the PrpTA toxin-antitoxin system in Pseudoalteromonas rubra

Bacteria could survive stresses by a poorly understood mechanism that contributes to the emergence of bacterial persisters exhibiting multidrug tolerance (MDT). Recently, Pseudoalteromonas rubra prpAT module was found to encode a toxin PrpT and corresponding cognate antidote PrpA. In this study, we first reported multiple individual and complex structures of PrpA and PrpT, which uncovered the high-resolution three-dimensional structure of the PrpT:PrpA2:PrpT heterotetramer with the aid of size exclusion chromatography-multi-angle light scattering experiments (SEC-MALS). PrpT:PrpA2:PrpT is composed of a PrpA homodimer and two PrpT monomers which are relatively isolated from each other and from ParE family. The superposition of antitoxin monomer structures from these structures highlighted the flexible C-terminal domain (CTD). A striking conformational change in the CTDs of PrpA homodimer depolymerized from homotetramer was provoked upon PrpT binding, which accounts for the unique PrpT-PrpARHH mutual interactions and further neutralizes the toxin PrpT. PrpA2-54-form I and II crystal structures both contain a doughnut-shaped hexadecamer formed by eight homodimers organized in a cogwheel-like form via inter-dimer interface dominated by salt bridges and hydrogen bonds. Moreover, PrpA tends to exist in solution as a homodimer other than a homotetramer (SEC-MALS) in the absence of flexible CTD. Multiple multi-dimers, tetramer and hexamer included, of PrpA2-54 mediated by the symmetric homodimer interface and the complicated inter-dimer interface could be observed in the solution. SEC-MALS assays highlighted that phosphate buffer (PB) and the increase in the concentration appear to be favorable for the PrpA2-54 oligomerization in the solution. Taken together with previous research, a model of PrpA2-54 homotetramer in complex with prpAT promoter and the improved mechanism underlying how PrpTA controls the plasmid replication were proposed here.

Structural Analysis of Ino2p/Ino4p Mutual Interactions and Their Binding Interface with Promoter DNA

Gene expression is mediated by a series of regulatory proteins, i.e., transcription factors. Under different growth conditions, the transcriptional regulation of structural genes is associated with the recognition of specific regulatory elements (REs) in promoter DNA. The manner by which transcription factors recognize distinctive REs is a key question in structural biology. Previous research has demonstrated that Ino2p/Ino4p heterodimer is associated with the transcriptional regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. Mechanistically, Ino2p/Ino4p could specifically recognize the inositol/choline-responsive element (ICRE), followed by the transcription activation of the phospholipid biosynthetic gene. While the promoter DNA sequence for Ino2p has already been characterized, the structural basis for the mutual interaction between Ino2p/Ino4p and their binding interface with promoter DNA remain relatively unexplored. Here, we have determined the crystalline structure of the Ino2p^DBD/Ino4p^DBD/DNA ternary complex, which highlights some residues (Ino2p^{His12/Glu16/Arg20/Arg44} and Ino4p^{His12/Glu16/Arg19/Arg20}) associated with the sequence-specific recognition of promoter DNA. Our biochemical analysis showed that mutating these residues could completely abolish protein–DNA interaction. Despite the requirement of Ino2p and Ino4p for interprotein–DNA interaction, both proteins can still interact—even in the absence of DNA. Combined with the structural analysis, our in vitro binding analysis demonstrated that residues (Arg35, Asn65, and Gln69 of Ino2p^DBD and Leu59 of Ino4p^DBD) are critical for interprotein interactions. Together, these results have led to the conclusion that these residues are critical to establishing interprotein–DNA and protein–DNA mutual interactions.