1
|
Nedomova M, Haberecht-Müller S, Möller S, Venz S, Prochazkova M, Prochazka J, Sedlak F, Chawengsaksophak K, Hammer E, Kasparek P, Adamek M, Sedlacek R, Konvalinka J, Krüger E, Grantz Saskova K. DDI2 protease controls embryonic development and inflammation via TCF11/NRF1. iScience 2024; 27:110893. [PMID: 39328932 PMCID: PMC11424978 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
DDI2 is an aspartic protease that cleaves polyubiquitinated substrates. Upon proteotoxic stress, DDI2 activates the transcription factor TCF11/NRF1 (NFE2L1), crucial for maintaining proteostasis in mammalian cells, enabling the expression of rescue factors, including proteasome subunits. Here, we describe the consequences of DDI2 ablation in vivo and in cells. DDI2 knock-out (KO) in mice caused embryonic lethality at E12.5 with severe developmental failure. Molecular characterization of embryos showed insufficient proteasome expression with proteotoxic stress, accumulation of high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates and induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and cell death pathways. In DDI2 surrogate KO cells, proteotoxic stress activated the integrated stress response (ISR) and induced a type I interferon (IFN) signature and IFN-induced proliferative signaling, possibly ensuring survival. These results indicate an important role for DDI2 in the cell-tissue proteostasis network and in maintaining a balanced immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Nedomova
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic
- First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Katerinska 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Stefanie Haberecht-Müller
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Klinikum DZ 7, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sophie Möller
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Klinikum DZ 7, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Simone Venz
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Klinikum DZ 7, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Michaela Prochazkova
- Department of Functional Genomics, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jan Prochazka
- Department of Functional Genomics, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Frantisek Sedlak
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic
- First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Katerinska 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Kallayanee Chawengsaksophak
- Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Centre for Phenogenomics and Laboratory of Transgenic Models of Diseases, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Elke Hammer
- Department of Functional Genomics, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Petr Kasparek
- Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Centre for Phenogenomics and Laboratory of Transgenic Models of Diseases, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Adamek
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Radislav Sedlacek
- Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Centre for Phenogenomics and Laboratory of Transgenic Models of Diseases, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Konvalinka
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Elke Krüger
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Klinikum DZ 7, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Klara Grantz Saskova
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, 25242 Vestec, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ibtisam I, Kisselev AF. Early recovery of proteasome activity in cells pulse-treated with proteasome inhibitors is independent of DDI2. eLife 2024; 12:RP91678. [PMID: 38619391 PMCID: PMC11018354 DOI: 10.7554/elife.91678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Rapid recovery of proteasome activity may contribute to intrinsic and acquired resistance to FDA-approved proteasome inhibitors. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of proteasome genes in cells treated with sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitors is upregulated by the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1), which is activated by a DDI2 protease. Here, we demonstrate that the recovery of proteasome activity is DDI2-independent and occurs before transcription of proteasomal genes is upregulated but requires protein translation. Thus, mammalian cells possess an additional DDI2 and transcription-independent pathway for the rapid recovery of proteasome activity after proteasome inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibtisam Ibtisam
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn UniversityAuburnUnited States
| | - Alexei F Kisselev
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn UniversityAuburnUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li H, Ji Z, Paulo JA, Gygi SP, Rapoport TA. Bidirectional substrate shuttling between the 26S proteasome and the Cdc48 ATPase promotes protein degradation. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.20.572403. [PMID: 38187576 PMCID: PMC10769200 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.20.572403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Most eukaryotic proteins are degraded by the 26S proteasome after modification with a polyubiquitin chain. Substrates lacking unstructured segments cannot be degraded directly and require prior unfolding by the Cdc48 ATPase (p97 or VCP in mammals) in complex with its ubiquitin-binding partner Ufd1-Npl4 (UN). Here, we use purified yeast components to reconstitute Cdc48-dependent degradation of well-folded model substrates by the proteasome. We show that a minimal system consists of the 26S proteasome, the Cdc48-UN ATPase complex, the proteasome cofactor Rad23, and the Cdc48 cofactors Ubx5 and Shp1. Rad23 and Ubx5 stimulate polyubiquitin binding to the 26S proteasome and the Cdc48-UN complex, respectively, allowing these machines to compete for substrates before and after their unfolding. Shp1 stimulates protein unfolding by the Cdc48-UN complex, rather than substrate recruitment. In vivo experiments confirm that many proteins undergo bidirectional substrate shuttling between the 26S proteasome and Cdc48 ATPase before being degraded.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibtisam I, Kisselev AF. Early recovery of proteasome activity in cells pulse-treated with proteasome inhibitors is independent of DDI2. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.03.550647. [PMID: 37577495 PMCID: PMC10418215 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.550647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Rapid recovery of proteasome activity may contribute to intrinsic and acquired resistance to FDA-approved proteasome inhibitors. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of proteasome genes in cells treated with sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitors is upregulated by the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1), which is activated by a DDI2 protease. Here, we demonstrate that the recovery of proteasome activity is DDI2-independent and occurs before transcription of proteasomal genes is upregulated but requires protein translation. Thus, mammalian cells possess an additional DDI2 and transcription-independent pathway for the rapid recovery of proteasome activity after proteasome inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibtisam Ibtisam
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, 720 S. Donahue Dr. Auburn AL 36849 USA
| | - Alexei F. Kisselev
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, 720 S. Donahue Dr. Auburn AL 36849 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Whitlock JH, Soelter TM, Howton TC, Wilk EJ, Oza VH, Lasseigne BN. Cell-type-specific gene expression and regulation in the cerebral cortex and kidney of atypical Setbp1 S858R Schinzel Giedion Syndrome mice. J Cell Mol Med 2023; 27:3565-3577. [PMID: 37872881 PMCID: PMC10660642 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.18001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Schinzel Giedion Syndrome (SGS) is an ultra-rare autosomal dominant Mendelian disease presenting with abnormalities spanning multiple organ systems. The most notable phenotypes involve severe developmental delay, progressive brain atrophy, and drug-resistant seizures. SGS is caused by spontaneous variants in SETBP1, which encodes for the epigenetic hub SETBP1 transcription factor (TF). SETBP1 variants causing classical SGS cluster at the degron, disrupting SETBP1 protein degradation and resulting in toxic accumulation, while those located outside cause milder atypical SGS. Due to the multisystem phenotype, we evaluated gene expression and regulatory programs altered in atypical SGS by snRNA-seq of the cerebral cortex and kidney of Setbp1S858R heterozygous mice (corresponds to the human likely pathogenic SETBP1S867R variant) compared to matched wild-type mice by constructing cell-type-specific regulatory networks. Setbp1 was differentially expressed in excitatory neurons, but known SETBP1 targets were differentially expressed and regulated in many cell types. Our findings suggest molecular drivers underlying neurodevelopmental phenotypes in classical SGS also drive atypical SGS, persist after birth, and are present in the kidney. Our results indicate SETBP1's role as an epigenetic hub leads to cell-type-specific differences in TF activity, gene targeting, and regulatory rewiring. This research provides a framework for investigating cell-type-specific variant impact on gene expression and regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan H. Whitlock
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Tabea M. Soelter
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Timothy C. Howton
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Elizabeth J. Wilk
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Vishal H. Oza
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Brittany N. Lasseigne
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chavarria C, Zaffalon L, Ribeiro ST, Op M, Quadroni M, Iatrou MS, Chapuis C, Martinon F. ER-trafficking triggers NRF1 ubiquitination to promote its proteolytic activation. iScience 2023; 26:107777. [PMID: 37720101 PMCID: PMC10502413 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The transcription factor NRF1 resides in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and is constantly transported to the cytosol for proteasomal degradation. However, when the proteasome is defective, NRF1 escapes degradation and undergoes proteolytic cleavage by the protease DDI2, generating a transcriptionally active form that restores proteostasis, including proteasome function. The mechanisms that regulate NRF1 proteolytic activation and transcriptional potential remain poorly understood. This study demonstrates that the ER is a crucial regulator of NRF1 function by orchestrating its ubiquitination through the E3 ubiquitin ligase HRD1. We show that HRD1-mediated NRF1 ubiquitination is necessary for DDI2-mediated processing in cells. Furthermore, we found that deficiency in both RAD23A and RAD23B impaired DDI2-mediated NRF1 processing, indicating that these genes are essential components of the DDI2 proteolytic machinery. Our findings highlight the intricate mechanism by which the ER activates NRF1 to coordinate the transcriptional activity of an adaptation response in cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Chavarria
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Léa Zaffalon
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Sérgio T. Ribeiro
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Mélanie Op
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Manfredo Quadroni
- Protein Analysis Facility, Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maria Sofia Iatrou
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Chloé Chapuis
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Martinon
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Lausanne, 155 Ch. des Boveresses, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Badawi S, Mohamed FE, Varghese DS, Ali BR. Genetic disruption of mammalian endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation: Human phenotypes and animal and cellular disease models. Traffic 2023. [PMID: 37188482 DOI: 10.1111/tra.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) is a stringent quality control mechanism through which misfolded, unassembled and some native proteins are targeted for degradation to maintain appropriate cellular and organelle homeostasis. Several in vitro and in vivo ERAD-related studies have provided mechanistic insights into ERAD pathway activation and its consequent events; however, a majority of these have investigated the effect of ERAD substrates and their consequent diseases affecting the degradation process. In this review, we present all reported human single-gene disorders caused by genetic variation in genes that encode ERAD components rather than their substrates. Additionally, after extensive literature survey, we present various genetically manipulated higher cellular and mammalian animal models that lack specific components involved in various stages of the ERAD pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Badawi
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Feda E Mohamed
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Divya Saro Varghese
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Bassam R Ali
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
- ASPIRE Precision Medicine Research Institute Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|