Kinetics of DNA strand transfer between polymerase and proofreading exonuclease active sites regulates error correction during high-fidelity replication

Strategies and procedures to generate chimeric DNA polymerases for improved applications

Chimeric DNA polymerase with notable performance has been generated for wide applications including DNA amplification and molecular diagnostics. This rational design method aims to improve specific enzymatic characteristics or introduce novel functions by fusing amino acid sequences from different proteins with a single DNA polymerase to create a chimeric DNA polymerase. Several strategies prove to be efficient, including swapping homologous domains between polymerases to combine benefits from different species, incorporating additional domains for exonuclease activity or enhanced binding ability to DNA, and integrating functional protein along with specific protein structural pattern to improve thermal stability and tolerance to inhibitors, as many cases in the past decade shown. The conventional protocol to develop a chimeric DNA polymerase with desired traits involves a Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle. This procedure initiates with the selection of a parent polymerase, followed by the identification of relevant domains and devising a strategy for fusion. After recombinant expression and purification of chimeric polymerase, its performance is evaluated. The outcomes of these evaluations are analyzed for further enhancing and optimizing the functionality of the polymerase. This review, centered on microorganisms, briefly outlines typical instances of chimeric DNA polymerases categorized, and presents a general methodology for their creation. KEY POINTS: • Chimeric DNA polymerase is generated by rational design method. • Strategies include domain exchange and addition of proteins, domains, and motifs. • Chimeric DNA polymerase exhibits improved enzymatic properties or novel functions.

A conserved polar residue plays a critical role in mismatch detection in A-family DNA polymerases

In A-family DNA polymerases (dPols), a functional 3'-5' exonuclease activity is known to proofread newly synthesized DNA. The identification of a mismatch in substrate DNA leads to transfer of the primer strand from the polymerase active site to the exonuclease active site. To shed more light regarding the mechanism responsible for the detection of mismatches, we have utilized DNA polymerase 1 from Aquifex pyrophilus (ApPol1). The enzyme synthesized DNA with high fidelity and exhibited maximal exonuclease activity with DNA substrates bearing mismatches at the -2 and - 3 positions. The crystal structure of apo-ApPol1 was utilized to generate a computational model of the functional ternary complex of this enzyme. The analysis of the model showed that N332 forms interactions with minor groove atoms of the base pairs at the -2 and - 3 positions. The majority of known A-family dPols show the presence of Asn at a position equivalent to N332. The N332L mutation led to a decrease in the exonuclease activity for representative purine-pyrimidine, and pyrimidine-pyrimidine mismatches at -2 and - 3 positions, respectively. Overall, our findings suggest that conserved polar residues located towards the minor groove may facilitate the detection of position-specific mismatches to enhance the fidelity of DNA synthesis.

Joint Efforts of Replicative Helicase and SSB Ensure Inherent Replicative Tolerance of G-Quadruplex

G-quadruplex (G4) is a four-stranded noncanonical DNA structure that has long been recognized as a potential hindrance to DNA replication. However, how replisomes effectively deal with G4s to avoid replication failure is still obscure. Here, using single-molecule and ensemble approaches, the consequence of the collision between bacteriophage T7 replisome and an intramolecular G4 located on either the leading or lagging strand is examined. It is found that the adjacent fork junctions induced by G4 formation incur the binding of T7 DNA polymerase (DNAP). In addition to G4, these inactive DNAPs present insuperable obstacles, impeding the progression of DNA synthesis. Nevertheless, T7 helicase can dismantle them and resolve lagging-strand G4s, paving the way for the advancement of the replication fork. Moreover, with the assistance of the single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) gp2.5, T7 helicase is also capable of maintaining a leading-strand G4 structure in an unfolded state, allowing for a fraction of T7 DNAPs to synthesize through without collapse. These findings broaden the functional repertoire of a replicative helicase and underscore the inherent G4 tolerance of a replisome.

Structural basis for DNA proofreading

DNA polymerase (DNAP) can correct errors in DNA during replication by proofreading, a process critical for cell viability. However, the mechanism by which an erroneously incorporated base translocates from the polymerase to the exonuclease site and the corrected DNA terminus returns has remained elusive. Here, we present an ensemble of nine high-resolution structures representing human mitochondrial DNA polymerase Gamma, Polγ, captured during consecutive proofreading steps. The structures reveal key events, including mismatched base recognition, its dissociation from the polymerase site, forward translocation of DNAP, alterations in DNA trajectory, repositioning and refolding of elements for primer separation, DNAP backtracking, and displacement of the mismatched base into the exonuclease site. Altogether, our findings suggest a conserved 'bolt-action' mechanism of proofreading based on iterative cycles of DNAP translocation without dissociation from the DNA, facilitating primer transfer between catalytic sites. Functional assays and mutagenesis corroborate this mechanism, connecting pathogenic mutations to crucial structural elements in proofreading steps.

Molecular basis for proofreading by the unique exonuclease domain of Family-D DNA polymerases

Replicative DNA polymerases duplicate entire genomes at high fidelity. This feature is shared among the three domains of life and is facilitated by their dual polymerase and exonuclease activities. Family D replicative DNA polymerases (PolD), found exclusively in Archaea, contain an unusual RNA polymerase-like catalytic core, and a unique Mre11-like proofreading active site. Here, we present cryo-EM structures of PolD trapped in a proofreading mode, revealing an unanticipated correction mechanism that extends the repertoire of protein domains known to be involved in DNA proofreading. Based on our experimental structures, mutants of PolD were designed and their contribution to mismatch bypass and exonuclease kinetics was determined. This study sheds light on the convergent evolution of structurally distinct families of DNA polymerases, and the domain acquisition and exchange mechanism that occurred during the evolution of the replisome in the three domains of life.

Design and interpretation of experiments to establish enzyme pathway and define the role of conformational changes in enzyme specificity

We describe the experimental methods and analysis to define the role of enzyme conformational changes in specificity based on published studies using DNA polymerases as an ideal model system. Rather than give details of how to perform transient-state and single-turnover kinetic experiments, we focus on the rationale of the experimental design and interpretation. We show how initial experiments to measure k_cat and k_cat/K_m can accurately quantify specificity but do not define its underlying mechanistic basis. We describe methods to fluorescently label enzymes to monitor conformational changes and to correlate fluorescence signals with rapid-chemical-quench flow assays to define the steps in the pathway. Measurements of the rate of product release and of the kinetics of the reverse reaction complete the kinetic and thermodynamic description of the full reaction pathway. This analysis showed that the substrate-induced change in enzyme structure from an open to a closed state was much faster than rate-limiting chemical bond formation. However, because the reverse of the conformational change was much slower than chemistry, specificity is governed solely by the product of the binding constant for the initial weak substrate binding and the rate constant for the conformational change (k_cat/K_m=K₁k₂) so that the specificity constant does not include k_cat. The enzyme conformational change leads to a closed complex in which the substrate is bound tightly and is committed to the forward reaction. In contrast, an incorrect substrate is bound weakly, and the rate of chemistry is slow, so the mismatch is released from the enzyme rapidly. Thus, the substrate-induced-fit is the major determinant of specificity. The methods outlined here should be applicable to other enzyme systems.