Influence of newly designed monorail pressure sensor catheter on coronary diagnostic parameters: An in vitro study

Methodology for Hemodynamic Assessment of a Three-Dimensional Printed Patient-Specific Vascular Test Device

Assessing hemodynamics in vasculature is important for the development of cardiovascular diagnostic parameters and evaluation of medical devices. Benchtop experiments are a safe and comprehensive preclinical method for testing new diagnostic endpoints and devices within a controlled environment. Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing have enhanced benchtop tests by allowing generation of patient-specific and pathophysiologic conditions. We used 3D printing, coupled with image processing and computer-aided design (CAD), to develop a patient-specific vascular test device from clinical data. The proximal pulmonary artery (PA) tree including the main, left, and right pulmonary arteries, with a stenosis within the left PA was selected as a representative anatomy for developing the vascular test device. Three test devices representing clinically relevant stenosis severities, 90%, 80%, and 70% area stenosis, were evaluated at different cardiac outputs (COs). A mock circulatory loop (MCL) generating pathophysiologic pulmonary pressure and flow was used to evaluate the hemodynamics within the devices. The dimensionless pressure drop–velocity ratio characteristic curves for the three stenosis severities were obtained. At a fixed CO, the dimensionless pressure drop increased nonlinearly with an increase in (a) the velocity ratio for a fixed stenosis severity and (b) the stenosis severity at a specific velocity ratio. The dimensionless pressure drop observed in vivo was similar (within 1%) to that measured in moderate area stenosis of 70% because both flows were viscous dominated. The hemodynamics of the 3D printed test device can be used for evaluating diagnostic endpoints and medical devices in a preclinical setting under realistic conditions.

The IMPACT Study (Influence of Sensor-Equipped Microcatheters on Coronary Hemodynamics and the Accuracy of Physiological Indices of Functional Stenosis Severity)

Background—

The Navvus pressure sensor–equipped microcatheter allows to measure functional stenosis severity over a work-horse guidewire and is used as a more feasible alternative to regular sensor-equipped wires. However, Navvus is larger in diameter than contemporary sensor-equipped guidewires and may, thereby, influence functional measurements. The present study evaluates the hemodynamic influence of the Navvus microcatheter.

Methods and Results—

In patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, coronary pressure and flow velocity were measured using a dual sensor–equipped guidewire before and after introduction of Navvus. Patients were randomized to microcatheter-first or guidewire-first measurement. The primary end point was the difference in hyperemic stenosis resistance index between measurements before and after introduction of Navvus. Measurements were completed in 28 patients (28 stenoses). Mean hyperemic stenosis resistance was 0.37±0.19 Hg/cm/s for wire-only assessment and 0.48±0.26 Hg/cm/s after Navvus introduction ( P <0.001). Bland–Altman analysis documented a mean bias of +0.11 Hg/cm/s (limits of agreement: −0.13 to 0.36), proportional to mean hyperemic stenosis resistance (Spearman ρ =0.61; P =0.001). Passing–Bablok analysis revealed absence of a constant difference but significant proportional difference between the methods. Mean fractional flow reserve was 0.86±0.06 for wire-only assessment and 0.82±0.07 after Navvus introduction ( P <0.001). Bland–Altman analysis documented a mean bias of −0.033 (limits of agreement: −0.09 to 0.03), proportional to mean fractional flow reserve (Spearman ρ =0.40; P =0.036). Passing–Bablok analysis revealed significant constant and proportional differences between methods. Similar results were documented for resting indices of stenosis severity.

Conclusions—

Introduction of the Navvus microcatheter leads to clinically relevant stenosis severity overestimation in intermediate stenosis.

History and Development of Coronary Flow Reserve and Fractional Flow Reserve for Clinical Applications

We discuss the historical development of clinical coronary physiology, emphasizing coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Our analysis focuses on the clinical motivations and technologic advances that prompted and enabled the application of physiology for patient diagnosis. CFR grew from the general concepts of physiologic and coronary reserve, linking the anatomic severity of a lesion to its impact on hyperemic flow. FFR developed from existing models relating pressure measurements to the potential for flow to increase after removing a stenosis. Because pressure measurements have proved easier and more robust than flow measurements, FFR has become the dominant metric.