Elevation and orientation of external loads influence trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces despite identical moments at the L5–S1 level

Biomechanics of the Human Knee Joint in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Flexion: Study of Changes in Applied Moment, Agonist-Antagonist Participations, Joint Center, and Flexion Angle

Estimation of the knee joint strength by maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) is a common practice to assess strength, coordination, safety to return to work or engage in sports after an injury, and to evaluate the efficacy of treatment modalities and rehabilitation strategies. In this study, we utilize a previously validated coupled finite element-musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity to explore the sensitivity of output measures (posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]/muscle/contact forces and passive moments) in knee MVIC flexion exercises at seated position. To do so, at three knee flexion angles (KFA), input measures (resistance moment and contribution moments of quadriceps and gastrocnemii) were varied at four levels each using the Taguchi design of experiment. Our findings reveal significant increases in PCL forces with KFA (p < 0.01), net MVIC moment (p < 0.01), and resistance moment of quadriceps (p < 0.01). In contrast, they drop at larger activity in gastrocnemii (p < 0.01). Tibiofemoral (TF) contact forces increase with the net MVIC moment (p < 0.01). The passive knee flexion moment, while highly dependent on the location at which computed, also increases with the net MVIC moment (p < 0.01). Changes in KFA, MVIC moment, and proportions thereof carried by quadriceps and/or gastrocnemii substantially affect biomechanics of the joint. Compared with level walking and stair ascent, slightly larger contact forces/stresses and much greater PCL forces are computed. This study improves our understanding of the knee joint behavior during MVIC in effective evaluation and rehabilitation interventions. Besides, it emphasizes the importance of positioning the joint center in model studies.

Intradiscal cement leakage (ICL) increases the stress on adjacent vertebrae after kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebra compression fracture (OVCF): a finite-element study

This study aimed to explore the biomechanical effects on adjacent vertebra of thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Vertebra Compression Fracture (OVCF) after Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (PKP) with intraoperative intradiscal cement leakage (ICL) by applying a Finite-Element Analysis. We collected pre- and post-operative computer tomography (CT) images of a 71-year-old female patient with single T12 OVCF, who underwent an intraoperative cement leakage into the T12-L1 disc. Three-dimensional finite element models of thoracolumbar spine (T10-L2) were built with the support of Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System (MIMICS) and ABAQUS software. The stress on adjacent vertebrae and endplates under the uniform compressive pressure (0.3 MPa) and during different loading moments were analyzed. The three-dimensional finite element models reveal an asymmetrical distribution of von Mises stresses on the adjacent endplate unaffected by the surgical intervention. The maximum von Mises stress on adjacent vertebral bodies increased during different loading conditions, especially for lateral bending and rotation loading conditions, whereas the maximum von Mises stress on distal non-treated vertebrae decreased on anteflexion and backward extension loading conditions. Post-operative adjacent vertebra compression fractures after PKP with intraoperative intradiscal cement leakage (ICL) may be closely related to the biomechanical changes of adjacent vertebrae of thoracolumbar OVCF, and it may increase the risk of postoperative fracture.

Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion

Excessive loads on the human spine is recognized as a risk factor for back injuries/pain. Various lifting analysis tools such as musculoskeletal models, regression equations and NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) lifting equation (NLE) have been proposed to evaluate and mitigate associated risks during manual material handling activities. Present study aims to compare predicted spinal loads from 5 different lifting analysis tools as well as to critically evaluate the NIOSH recommended weight limit (RWL). Spinal loads were estimated under different symmetric/asymmetric lifting tasks in which hand-load mass at each task was set based on RWL from NLE. Estimated intradiscal pressures (IDPs) of various tools were also compared with in vivo measurements. We compared RWL by NLE versus our estimations of RWL calculated from our regression equations using biomechanical criteria (compression <3400 N with/without shear <1000, 1250 or 1500 N). Our regression equations followed by OpenSim, AnyBody, simple polynomial and 3DSSPP satisfactorily predicted L4-L5 IDPs. Lifting analysis tools estimated comparable spinal compression forces (mean Pearson's r = 0.80; standard deviation of relative difference = 26%) while in shear, differences were greater (mean Pearson's r = 0.68; standard deviation of relative difference = 56%). NLE estimations of RWL were conservative in comparison with our estimations for lean individuals (BMI < 25 kg/m²) when compression <3400 N and shear <1250 N were considered as the biomechanical criteria. For heavier individuals, however, NLE estimations of RWL generated spinal compression >3400 N (NIOSH biomechanical safety threshold) as well as shear >1000 N. Although RWLs estimated by NLE was body weight independent, body weight substantially altered RWLs estimated from our regression equations. For improved estimation of the risk of injury, more accurate failure criteria for spinal segments are essential.

Trunk response and stability in standing under sagittal-symmetric pull-push forces at different orientations, elevations and magnitudes

To reduce lifting and associated low back injuries, manual material handling operations often involve pulling-pushing of carts at different weights, orientations, and heights. The loads on spine and risk of injury however need to be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate muscle forces, spinal loads and trunk stability in pull-push tasks in sagittal-symmetric, static upright standing posture. Three hand-held load magnitudes (80, 120 and 160 N) at four elevations (0, 20, 40 and 60 cm to the L5-S1) and 24 force directions covering all pull/push orientations were considered. For this purpose, a musculoskeletal finite element model with kinematics measured earlier were used. Results demonstrated that peak spinal forces occur under inclined pull (lift) at upper elevations but inclined push at the lowermost one. Minimal spinal loads, on the other hand, occurred at and around vertical pull directions. Overall, spinal forces closely followed variations in the net external moment of pull-push forces at the L5-S1. Local lumbar muscles were most active in pulls while global extensor muscles in lifts. The trunk stability margin decreased with load elevation except at and around horizontal push; it peaked under pulls and reached minimum at vertical lifts. It also increased with antagonist activity in muscles and intra-abdominal pressure. Results provide insight into the marked effects of variation in the load orientation and elevation on muscle forces, spinal loads and trunk stability and hence offer help in rehabilitation, performance enhancement training and design of safer workplaces.

Biomechanical Analysis of an S1 Pedicle Screw Salvage Technique via a Superior Articulating Process Entry Point

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical, cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the fixation strength of a novel S1 pedicle screw insertion technique in a revision setting to a standard S1 pedicle screw and an L5 pedicle screw.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Fusions to the sacrum remain a difficult clinical challenge. Very few salvage techniques exist when a nonunion occurs.

METHODS

The biomechanical integrity of three screw fixations, L5 pedicle screws, a standard S1 pedicle screw, and an S1 pedicle screw placed via a superior articulating process entry point (SAP S1), was characterized by performing pullout tests using cadaveric specimens including L5 and sacrum.

RESULTS

SAP S1 constructs (735.5 ± 110.1 N/mm) were significantly stiffer than standard S1 (P = 0.005) and L5 (P = 0.02) constructs. There was no statistically significant difference between the L5 constructs and the standard S1 constructs for linear stiffness. There was no statistical difference between the three fixations for yield load, displacement at yield load, and energy absorbed to yield load.The ultimate pullout force for the SAP S1 was statistically higher than the standard S1 (1213.7 ± 579.6 vs. 478.6 ± 452.9 N; P = 0.004). Displacement at ultimate load was significantly greater for L5 screw fixation (3.3 ± 1.1 mm) compared to the other two constructs. Both the L5 (2277.4 ± 1873.3 N-mm) and SAP S1 (2628.2 ± 2054.4 N-mm) constructs had significantly greater energy absorbed to ultimate load than the standard S1 construct (811.7 ± 937.6 N-mm), but there was no statistical difference between the L5 and SAP S1 constructs.

CONCLUSION

S1 pedicle screw fixation via an SAP entry point provides biomechanical advantages compared to screws placed via the standard S1 or L5 entry point and may be a viable option for revision of a failed L5-S1 fusion with a compromised standard S1 entry point.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.