1
|
Taleb S, Broberg JS, Lanting BA, Teeter MG. Phantom validation of a novel RSA-based impingement metric to assess component-on-component impingement risk. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2024; 238:483-487. [PMID: 38519832 PMCID: PMC11083746 DOI: 10.1177/09544119241238950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
Component-on-component impingement in total hip arthroplasty may lead to post-operative complications including dislocation. Despite numerous clinical studies focusing on reducing this risk, assessment methods remain limited to qualitative radiography, finite element analysis, and cadaver studies. There is a need for more precise measurements of impingement in the research setting. We aimed to validate a novel RSA-based impingement metric to measure component-on-component impingement in vivo. A phantom experiment of a standard metal-on-polyethylene total hip system was performed. RSA examinations were performed as typical for a traditional weight-bearing RSA exam for large joints. The phantom was placed in 10 possible impinged positions and one neutral position. Double exposure radiographs were taken to measure repeatability. The closest distance between the skirt of the head and the inner circumference of the acetabular cup liner was measured to assess impingement risk. Distances between the closest point of the hood to the edge of the cup in 10 impinged positions ranged from 0.05 to 1.03 mm, with the average being 0.67 mm. In the neutral position, the distance measured is 11.02 mm. Excellent repeatability was observed, with a standard deviation of 0.03 mm with an r value of 0.09. A validated RSA-based risk metric was established to evaluate in vivo hip impingement. A 1 mm threshold may be proposed to define impingement where distances approaching 1.00 mm are at a greater risk of impingement. This simplified metric holds promise for upcoming clinical studies on component-on-component impingement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahnaz Taleb
- Imaging Group, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jordan S Broberg
- Imaging Group, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Brent A Lanting
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital, London Health Sciences Center, London, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Imaging Group, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van de Kleut ML, Yuan X, Teeter MG, Athwal GS. Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. metal augments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:591-600. [PMID: 34968693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is rapidly being adopted as the standard procedure for a growing number of shoulder pathologies. Lateralization of the glenoid component is known to reduce the incidence of scapular notching and possibly improve postoperative range of motion. A number of methods are used for glenoid component lateralization, including bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) and porous metal-augmented baseplates. Presently, there exists little comparative literature on bone vs. metal lateralization. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare BIO-RSA to metal-augmented glenoid baseplates by assessing clinical outcomes and baseplate migration using model-based radiostereometric analysis. METHODS A power analysis indicated 40 patients would be required for this radiostereometric study. Therefore, 41 shoulders were prospectively randomized to receive either glenoid bone grafting (BIO-RSA) or a porous metal-augmented wedge-shaped titanium baseplate for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. At the time of primary surgery, all patients also underwent implantation of 8 tantalum marker beads in the glenoid and coracoid. Following surgery, participants were imaged using a calibrated, stereo radiographic technique. Radiographs were acquired at 6 weeks (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Migration of the prosthesis was compared between bone and metal lateralization groups at each time point using a mixed effects model with Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Outcome measures were acquired preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS No significant differences were observed along any translation or rotation axis at any time point for either glenoid fixation group (P ≥ .175). Mean total glenoid component translation (± standard deviation) 2 years postoperatively was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 0.5 ± 0.3 mm for BIO-RSA and metal-augmented baseplates, respectively (P = .784). No significant differences were observed between groups in active range of motion; pain; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score; Simple Shoulder Test score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; Constant Shoulder score; or Subjective Shoulder Value (P ≥ .117), with the exception of increased active external rotation in the BIO-RSA cohort (P = .036). CONCLUSION This randomized clinical trial assessed reverse shoulder arthroplasty glenoid component migration using model-based radiostereometric analysis. At 2-year follow-up, our results indicate both BIO-RSA and porous metal wedge augmented baseplates provide stable initial fixation, which is maintained at 2 years' follow-up, with no substantial differences in clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine L Van de Kleut
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Xunhua Yuan
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van de Kleut ML, Yuan X, Athwal GS, Teeter MG. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:580-590. [PMID: 34968694 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature comparing humeral implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is sparse. With minimal supporting literature, there has been a trend away from standard-length cemented humeral implants to press-fit stems and, recently, to shorter-stem implants. It is known that early implant migration, within the first 2 years postoperatively, is predictive of later implant loosening and possible revision surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and implant migration between cemented standard-length humeral stems and press-fit short stems using model-based radiostereometric analysis. METHODS After a power analysis, 41 shoulders were prospectively randomized to receive either a cemented standard-length or press-fit short humeral stem for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between July 2017 and June 2019. Following surgery, participants were imaged with stereo radiographs acquired at 6 weeks (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Migration of the humeral stem at each time point was compared with baseline, with differences in migration between cohorts assessed using a mixed-effects model with the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Patient-reported outcome measures (Subjective Shoulder Value; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score; Simple Shoulder Test score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and Constant score) were also compared. RESULTS At 6 months (P = .025), 1 year (P = .004), and 2 years (P = .001) postoperatively, press-fit short stems migrated significantly more than cemented stems along the superior-inferior translation axis; in addition, they showed greater total translation at 2 years (P = .003). Mean total translation (± standard deviation) at 2 years was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 1.0 ± 1.1 mm for the cemented and press-fit cohorts, respectively. Mean migration between the 1- and 2-year time points was minimal for both stem fixation groups along all axes (<0.1 mm and 0.6°). There was no difference in active range of motion, pain, or validated outcome measures between the cohorts at 2 years (P ≥ .170). CONCLUSION This randomized clinical trial shows that press-fit short humeral stems subside substantially more than standard-length cemented stems but ultimately achieve stability from 1 year through 2 years. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes between cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine L Van de Kleut
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Xunhua Yuan
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fraser AN, Bøe B, Fjalestad T, Madsen JE, Röhrl SM. Stable glenoid component of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at 2 years as measured with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 2021; 92:644-650. [PMID: 34196600 PMCID: PMC8635662 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1943932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is used for treating cuff arthropathy, displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF), and in revision shoulder surgery, despite sparse evidence on long-term results. We assessed stability of the glenoid component in reverse TSA, using model-based RSA.Patients and methods - 20 patients (mean age 76 years, 17 female), operated on with reverse TSA at Oslo University Hospital, in 2015-2017 were included. Indications for surgeries were PHFs, malunion, cuff arthropathy, and chronic shoulder dislocation. RSA markers were placed in the scapular neck, the coracoid, and the acromion. RSA radiographs were conducted postoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. RSA analysis was performed using RSAcore with Reversed Engineering (RE) modality, with clinical precision < 0.25 mm for all translations (x, y, z) and < 0.7° for rotations (x, z). Scapular "notching" was assessed in conventional radiographs.Results - 1 patient was excluded due to revision surgery. More than half of the patients displayed measurable migration at 2 years: 6 patients with linear translations below 1 mm and 8 patients who showed rotational migration. Except for one outlier, the measured rotations were below 2°. The migration pattern suggested implant stability at 2 years. 10 patients showed radiolographic signs of "notching", and the mean Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at 2 years was 29 points (15-36 points).Interpretation - Stability analysis of the glenoid component of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty using reversed engineering (RE) model-based RSA indicated component stability at 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Nilsskog Fraser
- Institute of Clinical Medicine; University of Oslo,Diakonhjemmet Hospital,Norway,Correspondence: Alexander Nilsskog FRASER,
| | - Berte Bøe
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital
| | - Tore Fjalestad
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital
| | - Jan Erik Madsen
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital,Institute of Clinical Medicine; University of Oslo
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van de Kleut ML, Nair C, Milner JS, Holdsworth DW, Athwal GS, Teeter MG. In vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty contact mechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:421-429. [PMID: 32580021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several in vitro studies have investigated the biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); however, few in vivo studies exist. The purpose of this study was to examine in vivo RTSA contact mechanics in clinically relevant arm positions. Our hypothesis was that contact would preferentially occur in the inferior region of the polyethylene liner. METHODS Forty patients receiving a primary RTSA were recruited for a prospective cohort study. All patients received the same implant design with a nonretentive liner. Stereo radiographs were taken at maximal active range of motion. Model-based radiostereometric analysis was used to identify implant position. Contact area between the polyethylene and glenosphere was measured as the geometric intersection of the 2 components and compared with respect to polyethylene liner size, arm position, and relative position within the liner. RESULTS There were no differences in the proportion of contact area in any arm position between polyethylene liner sizes, ranging from 30% ± 17% to 38% ± 23% for 36-mm liners and 32% ± 21% to 41% ± 25% for 42-mm liners. Contact was equally distributed between the superior and inferior halves of the liner at each arm position (P = .06-.79); however, greater contact area was observed in the outer radius of the liner when the arm was flexed (P = .002). CONCLUSION This study highlights that contact mechanics are similar between 36- and 42-mm liners. Contact area is generally equally distributed throughout the liner across the range of motion and not preferentially in the inferior region as hypothesized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine L Van de Kleut
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Jaques S Milner
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - David W Holdsworth
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van de Kleut ML, Yuan X, Athwal GS, Teeter MG. Validation of In Vivo Linear and Volumetric Wear Measurement for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Model-Based Radiostereometric Analysis. J Orthop Res 2019; 37:1620-1627. [PMID: 30977541 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Presently, polyethylene wear measurement of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is restricted to in vitro, in silico, and retrieval analysis, with no method for the quantification of in vivo wear of well-functioning implants. The purpose of this study was to validate the use of model-based radiostereometric analysis (MBRSA) as a measurement tool for in vivo rTSA wear using a phantom setup. Six additively manufactured polyethylene inserts were fabricated, one unworn control and five to represent known wear patterns, and individually fit within the rTSA components. Each insert was imaged using standard radiostereometric techniques and analyzed using MBRSA. From the position and orientation estimation provided by MBRSA, a micro-computed tomography model of the control insert was virtually placed within the metaphyseal tray. The apparent intersection of the glenosphere into the insert was recorded as wear. This method enables wear measurements with a linear precision of 0.21 mm and a bias of 0.36 ± 0.13 mm, and a volumetric precision of 49.3 mm3 , with a bias of 48.9 ± 24.3 mm3 . This technique allows for the in vivo measurement of polyethylene wear without the requirement of marker beads or baseline radiographs, expanding the potential for in vivo wear measurements to larger populations and retrospective analysis. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1620-1627, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine L Van de Kleut
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xunhua Yuan
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van de Kleut ML, Yuan X, Athwal GS, Teeter MG. Additively manufactured implant components for imaging validation studies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2018; 232:690-698. [PMID: 29962327 DOI: 10.1177/0954411918784086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiographic imaging is the current standard for evaluating postoperative joint replacements. Prior to application, such imaging methods need to be validated to determine the lower limits of performance under ideal conditions, using either a phantom or cadaver setup. Conventionally manufactured orthopedic implants for use in such studies are not always accessible and may be cost-prohibitive to purchase. We propose the use of additively manufactured implants as a cheaper, more accessible alternative for use in radiographic imaging validation studies. Bias and repeatability were compared between conventionally manufactured and additively manufactured reverse total shoulder implant sets under a standard model-based radiostereometric analysis phantom study environment. Measurements were compared using the humeral stem or glenosphere model relative to reference bone beads, and the humeral stem relative to the glenosphere model to measure implant relative displacement. Compared to the conventionally manufactured implants, the additively manufactured implants had less bias along the internal-external rotation axis (p < 0.001), but greater bias along the abduction-adduction and flexion-extension rotation axes (p = 0.005, 0.011). Additively manufactured implants had greater repeatability along the internal-external rotation axis (p < 0.001), but worse repeatability along the medial-lateral translation axis (p = 0.001) and the abduction-adduction rotation axis (p < 0.001). Differences were on the orders of 0.01 mm and 0.5°. For the purpose of validating two-dimensional-three-dimensional radiographic imaging techniques of orthopedic implants, additively manufactured implants can be used in place of conventionally manufactured implants, assuming they are fabricated to the manufacturer's specifications. Observed differences were within the errors of the measurement technique and not clinically meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine L Van de Kleut
- 1 Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,2 Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,3 Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Xunhua Yuan
- 1 Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- 3 Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.,4 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, ON, Canada.,5 Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- 1 Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,3 Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.,4 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, ON, Canada.,5 Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,6 Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|