Treadmill-belt width, but not feedback from the lower visual field, influences the noise characteristics of step width time series

Military training alters the fractal behavior of step width

Non-linear analyses have been successfully applied to gait with evidence that fractal behavior of gait-related variables provide insights into function. Specifically, shifts in the fractal behavior of step width from pink toward white noise reflects a loss of complexity and diminished adaptive capacity and functionality. We previously reported an apparent difference in the fractal behavior of step width during treadmill walking between Service members with transtibial amputations and able-bodied civilian. We now combine recently collected data and data from two previous studies to further explore the relationship between lower limb injury, military service, and step width fractal behavior. Service member, regardless of the presence or type of injury, demonstrate step width fractal behavior walked in a way that the fractal behavior of their gait was significantly closer to white noise (-0.5 dB/Hz²) than uninjured civilians (-0.82 dB/Hz²). This data suggests that military training/service leads to a change in step width fractal behavior. Further studies are needed to explore what may cause this difference and any implications this may have on stability or performance.

Incremental Visual Occlusion During Split-Belt Treadmill Walking Has No Gradient Effect on Adaptation or Retention

Split-belt treadmills have become an increasingly popular means of quantifying ambulation adaptability. Multiple sensory feedback mechanisms, including vision, contribute to task execution and adaptation success. No studies have yet explored visual feedback effects on locomotor adaptability across a spectrum of available visual information. In this study, we sought to better understand the effects of visual information on locomotor adaptation and retention by directly comparing incremental levels of visual occlusion. Sixty healthy young adults completed a split-belt adaptation protocol, including a baseline, asymmetric walking condition (adapt), a symmetric walking condition (de-adapt), and another asymmetric walking condition (re-adapt). We randomly assigned participants into conditions with varied visual occlusion (i.e., complete and lower visual field occlusion, or normal vision). We captured kinematic data, and outcome measures included magnitude of asymmetry, spatial and temporal contributions to step length asymmetry, variability of the final adapted pattern, and magnitude of adaptation. We used repeated measures and four-way MANOVAs to examine the influence of visual occlusion and walking condition. Participants with complete, compared to lower visual field visual occlusion displayed less consistency in their walking pattern, evident via increased step length standard deviation (p = .007, d = 0.89), and compared to normal vision groups (p = .003 d = 0.81). We found no other group differences, indicating that varying levels of visual occlusion did not significantly affect locomotor adaptation or retention. This study offers insight into the role vision plays in locomotor adaptation and retention with clinical utility for improving variability in step control.