1
|
Ajdaroski M, Esquivel A. Can Wearable Sensors Provide Accurate and Reliable 3D Tibiofemoral Angle Estimates during Dynamic Actions? SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:6627. [PMID: 37514921 PMCID: PMC10383318 DOI: 10.3390/s23146627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
The ability to accurately measure tibiofemoral angles during various dynamic activities is of clinical interest. The purpose of this study was to determine if inertial measurement units (IMUs) can provide accurate and reliable angle estimates during dynamic actions. A tuned quaternion conversion (TQC) method tuned to dynamics actions was used to calculate Euler angles based on IMU data, and these calculated angles were compared to a motion capture system (our "gold" standard) and a commercially available sensor fusion algorithm. Nine healthy athletes were instrumented with APDM Opal IMUs and asked to perform nine dynamic actions; five participants were used in training the parameters of the TQC method, with the remaining four being used to test validity. Accuracy was based on the root mean square error (RMSE) and reliability was based on the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA). Improvement across all three orthogonal angles was observed as the TQC method was able to more accurately (lower RMSE) and more reliably (smaller LoA) estimate an angle than the commercially available algorithm. No significant difference was observed between the TQC method and the motion capture system in any of the three angles (p < 0.05). It may be feasible to use this method to track tibiofemoral angles with higher accuracy and reliability than the commercially available sensor fusion algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirel Ajdaroski
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA
| | - Amanda Esquivel
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Fezazi M, Achmamad A, Jbari A, Jilbab A. A convenient approach for knee kinematics assessment using wearable inertial sensors during home-based rehabilitation: Validation with an optoelectronic system. SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN 2023; 20:e01676. [PMID: 37122479 PMCID: PMC10122771 DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Rehabilitation services are among the most severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has increased the number of people not receiving the needed rehabilitation care. Home-based rehabilitation becomes alternative support to face this greater need. However, monitoring kinematics parameters during rehabilitation exercises is critical for an effective recovery. This work proposes a detailed framework to estimate knee kinematics using a wearable Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU). That allows at-home monitoring for knee rehabilitation progress. Two MIMU sensors were attached to the shank and thigh segments respectively. First, the absolute orientation of each sensor was estimated using a sensor fusion algorithm. Second, these sensor orientations were transformed to segments orientations using a functional sensor-to-segment (STS) alignment. Third, the relative orientation between segments, i.e., knee joint angle, was computed and the relevant kinematics parameters were extracted. Then, the validity of our approach was evaluated with a gold-standard optoelectronic system. Seven participants completed three to five Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) tests. The estimated knee angle was compared to the reference angle. Root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were considered as evaluation metrics. Our results showed reasonable accuracy (RMSE < 8°), strong to very-strong correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.86), a mean difference within 1.1°, and agreement limits from -16° to 14°. In addition, no significant difference was found (p-value > 0.05) in extracted kinematics parameters between both systems. The proposed approach might represent a suitable alternative for the assessment of knee rehabilitation progress in a home context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed El Fezazi
- Electronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdelouahad Achmamad
- Electronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| | - Atman Jbari
- Electronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| | - Abdelilah Jilbab
- Electronic Systems Sensors and Nano-Biotechnologies, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts (ENSAM), Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan T, Gatti AA, Fan B, Shea KG, Sherman SL, Uhlrich SD, Hicks JL, Delp SL, Shull PB, Chaudhari AS. A scoping review of portable sensing for out-of-lab anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention and rehabilitation. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:46. [PMID: 36934194 PMCID: PMC10024704 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00782-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are common. Laboratory-based biomechanical assessment can evaluate ACL injury risk and rehabilitation progress after ACLR; however, lab-based measurements are expensive and inaccessible to most people. Portable sensors such as wearables and cameras can be deployed during sporting activities, in clinics, and in patient homes. Although many portable sensing approaches have demonstrated promising results during various assessments related to ACL injury, they have not yet been widely adopted as tools for out-of-lab assessment. The purpose of this review is to summarize research on out-of-lab portable sensing applied to ACL and ACLR and offer our perspectives on new opportunities for future research and development. We identified 49 original research articles on out-of-lab ACL-related assessment; the most common sensing modalities were inertial measurement units, depth cameras, and RGB cameras. The studies combined portable sensors with direct feature extraction, physics-based modeling, or machine learning to estimate a range of biomechanical parameters (e.g., knee kinematics and kinetics) during jump-landing tasks, cutting, squats, and gait. Many of the reviewed studies depict proof-of-concept methods for potential future clinical applications including ACL injury risk screening, injury prevention training, and rehabilitation assessment. By synthesizing these results, we describe important opportunities that exist for clinical validation of existing approaches, using sophisticated modeling techniques, standardization of data collection, and creation of large benchmark datasets. If successful, these advances will enable widespread use of portable-sensing approaches to identify ACL injury risk factors, mitigate high-risk movements prior to injury, and optimize rehabilitation paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Tan
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anthony A Gatti
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Bingfei Fan
- College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kevin G Shea
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Seth L Sherman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Scott D Uhlrich
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Hicks
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Scott L Delp
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Peter B Shull
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
| | - Akshay S Chaudhari
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Raimondo G, Vanwanseele B, van der Have A, Emmerzaal J, Willems M, Killen BA, Jonkers I. Inertial Sensor-to-Segment Calibration for Accurate 3D Joint Angle Calculation for Use in OpenSim. SENSORS 2022; 22:s22093259. [PMID: 35590949 PMCID: PMC9104520 DOI: 10.3390/s22093259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Inertial capture (InCap) systems combined with musculoskeletal (MSK) models are an attractive option for monitoring 3D joint kinematics in an ecological context. However, the primary limiting factor is the sensor-to-segment calibration, which is crucial to estimate the body segment orientations. Walking, running, and stair ascent and descent trials were measured in eleven healthy subjects with the Xsens InCap system and the Vicon 3D motion capture (MoCap) system at a self-selected speed. A novel integrated method that combines previous sensor-to-segment calibration approaches was developed for use in a MSK model with three degree of freedom (DOF) hip and knee joints. The following were compared: RMSE, range of motion (ROM), peaks, and R2 between InCap kinematics estimated with different calibration methods and gold standard MoCap kinematics. The integrated method reduced the RSME for both the hip and the knee joints below 5°, and no statistically significant differences were found between MoCap and InCap kinematics. This was consistent across all the different analyzed movements. The developed method was integrated on an MSK model workflow, and it increased the sensor-to-segment calibration accuracy for an accurate estimate of 3D joint kinematics compared to MoCap, guaranteeing a clinical easy-to-use approach.
Collapse
|