The role of neck muscle co-contraction and postural changes in head kinematics after safe head impacts: Investigation of head/neck injury reduction

A six degrees-of-freedom cable-driven robotic platform for head-neck movement

This paper introduces a novel cable-driven robotic platform that enables six degrees-of-freedom (DoF) natural head-neck movements. Poor postural control of the head-neck can be a debilitating symptom of neurological disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cerebral palsy. Current treatments using static neck collars are inadequate, and there is a need to develop new devices to empower movements and facilitate physical rehabilitation of the head-neck. State-of-the-art neck exoskeletons using lower DoF mechanisms with rigid linkages are limited by their hard motion constraints imposed on head-neck movements. By contrast, the cable-driven robot presented in this paper does not constrain motion and enables wide-range, 6-DoF control of the head-neck. We present the mechatronic design, validation, and control implementations of this robot, as well as a human experiment to demonstrate a potential use case of this versatile robot for rehabilitation. Participants were engaged in a target reaching task while the robot applied both assistive and resistive moments on the head during the task. Our results show that neck muscle activation increased by 19% when moving the head against resistance and decreased by 28-43% when assisted by the robot. Overall, these results provide a scientific justification for further research in enabling movement and identifying personalized rehabilitation for motor training. Beyond rehabilitation, other applications such as applying force perturbations on the head to study sensory integration and applying traction to achieve pain relief may benefit from the innovation of this robotic platform which is capable of applying controlled 6-DoF forces/moments on the head.

Symmetry of the Neck Muscles' Activity in the Electromyography Signal during Basic Motion Patterns

The activity of muscles during motion in one direction should be symmetrical when compared to the activity of the contralateral muscles during motion in the opposite direction, while symmetrical movements should result in symmetrical muscle activation. The literature lacks data on the symmetry of neck muscle activation. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the activity of the upper trapezius (UT) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles at rest and during basic motions of the neck and to determine the symmetry of the muscle activation. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was collected from UT and SCM bilaterally during rest, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and six functional movements from 18 participants. The muscle activity was related to the MVC, and the Symmetry Index was calculated. The muscle activity at rest was 23.74% and 27.88% higher on the left side than on the right side for the UT and SCM, respectively. The highest asymmetries during motion were for the SCM for the right arc movement (116%) and for the UT in the lower arc movement (55%). The lowest asymmetry was recorded for extension-flexion movement for both muscles. It was concluded that this movement can be useful for assessing the symmetry of neck muscles' activation. Further studies are required to verify the above-presented results, determine muscle activation patterns and compare healthy people to patients with neck pain.

Cervical Muscle Activation Characteristics and Head Kinematics in Males and Females Following Acoustic Warnings and Impulsive Head Forces

Sex, head and neck posture, and cervical muscle preparation are contributing factors in the severity of head and neck injuries. However, it is unknown how these factors modulate the head kinematics. In this study, twenty-four (16 male and 8 female) participants experienced 50 impulsive forces to their heads with and without an acoustic warning. Female participants demonstrated a 71 ms faster (p = 0.002) muscle activation onset compared to males after warning. The magnitude of muscle activation was not significant between sexes. Females exhibited 21% (p < 0.008) greater peak angular velocity in all force directions and 18% (p < 0.04) greater peak angular acceleration in sagittal plane compared to males. Females exhibited 15% (p = 0.03) greater peak linear acceleration compared to males only in sagittal flexion. Preparation attenuated head kinematics significantly (p < 0.03) in 11 out of 18 investigated head kinematics for both sexes. A warning eliciting a startle response 420 ms prior to the impact resulted in significant attenuation of all measured head kinematics in sagittal extension (p < 0.037). In conclusion, both sex and warning type were significant factors in head kinematics. These data provide insight into the complex relationship of muscle activation and sex, and may help identify innovative strategies to reduce head and neck injury risk in sports.