A novel approach to quantify the assistive torque profiles generated by passive back-support exoskeletons

A comparative study of biomechanical assessments in laboratory and field settings for manual material handling tasks using extractor tools and exoskeletons

To enhance physical capabilities of workers who regularly perform physically demanding tasks involving heavy lifting and awkward postures, various tools and occupational exoskeletons can be used. Most of the studies aiming to explore the efficiency of these tools and exoskeletons have been performed in confined and controlled laboratory spaces, which do not represent the real-world work environment. This study aimed to compare the outcome of biomechanical assessment of using a back support exoskeleton and assistive tools (Lever and Jake) in the procedure of a high demanding manual material handling task versus the results found by performing the same task in a laboratory. Ten able-bodied participants and ten able-bodied utility workers performed the same manhole removal task in-lab and in-field, respectively, with the aid of an exoskeleton and Lever and Jake tools. Muscle activity and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scores were recorded using surface electromyography and inertial measurement units, respectively and compared between in-lab and in-field trials. The field experiments indicated significant differences (p < 0.05) in normalized muscle activity across most muscles when compared to laboratory data. These results revealed how muscle activity is affected by the controlled lab setting compared to real-world field conditions. However, REBA scores indicate similar ergonomic implications regardless of the utilization of exoskeletons or tools. These findings underscore that real-world field assessments are crucial for evaluating ergonomic risks and effects of occupational exoskeletons and tools to account for environmental factors and workers' skills in ergonomic evaluations of this nature.

Biomechanical analysis of different back-supporting exoskeletons regarding musculoskeletal loading during lifting and holding

Industrial back support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising approach to addressing low back pain (LBP) which still affect a significant proportion of the workforce. They aim to reduce lumbar loading, the main biomechanical risk factor for LBP, by providing external support to the lumbar spine. The aim of this study was to determine the supporting effect of one active (A1) and two passive (P1 and P2) BSEs during different manual material handling tasks. Kinematic data and back muscle activity were collected from 12 subjects during dynamic lifting and static holding of 10 kg. Mean and peak L5/S1 extension moments, L5/S1 compression forces and muscle activation were included in the analysis. During dynamic lifting all BSEs reduced peak (12-26 %) and mean (4-17 %) extension moments and peak (10-22 %) and mean (4-15 %) compression forces in the lumbar spine. The peak (13-28 %) and mean (4-32 %) activity of the back extensor muscles was reduced accordingly. In the static holding task, analogous mean reductions for P1 and P2 of L5/S1 extension moments (12-20 %), compression forces (13-23 %) and muscular activity (16-23 %) were found. A1 showed a greater reduction during static holding for extension moments (46 %), compression forces (41 %) and muscular activity (54 %). This pronounced difference in the performance of the BSEs between tasks was attributed to the actuators used by the different BSEs.

Wearing a back-support exoskeleton alters lower-limb joint kinetics during single-step recovery following a forward loss of balance

We assessed the effects of a passive, back-support exoskeleton (BSE) on lower-limb joint kinetics during the initiation and swing phases of recovery from a forward loss of balance. Sixteen (8M, 8F) young, healthy participants were released from static forward-leaning postures and attempted to recover their balance with a single-step while wearing a BSE (backXTM) with different levels of support torque and in a control condition. The BSE provided ∼ 15-20 Nm of external hip extension torque on the stepping leg at the end of initiation and beginning of swing phases. Participants were unable to generate sufficient hip flexion torque, power, and work to counteract this external torque, although they sustained hip flexion torque for a more prolonged period, resulting in slightly increased hip contribution to positive leg work (compared to control). However, net positive leg work, and the net contribution of hip joint (human + BSE) to total leg work decreased with BSE use. While all participants had changes in hip joint kinetics, a significant compensatory increase in ankle contribution to positive leg work was observed only among females. Our results suggest that BSE use adversely affects reactive stepping by decreasing the stepping leg kinetic energy for forward propulsion, and that the relative contributions of lower-limb joints to total mechanical work done during balance recovery are altered by BSE use. BSEs may thus need to be implemented with caution for dynamic tasks in occupational settings, as they may impair balance recovery following a forward loss of balance.

Benchmarking commercially available soft and rigid passive back exoskeletons for an industrial workplace

Low-back pain is a common occupational hazard for industrial workers. Several studies show the advantages of using rigid and soft back-support passive exoskeletons and exosuits (exos) to reduce the low-back loading and risk of injury. However, benefits of using these exos have been shown to be task-specific. Therefore, in this study, we developed a benchmarking approach to assess exos for an industrial workplace at Hankamp Gears B.V. We assessed two rigid (Laevo Flex, Paexo back) and two soft (Auxivo Liftsuit 1.0, and Darwing Hakobelude) exos for tasks resembling the workplace. We measured the assistive moment provided by each exo and their respective influence on muscle activity as well as the user's perception of comfort and exertion. Ten participants performed four lifting tasks (Static hold, Asymmetric, Squat, and Stoop), while their electromyography and subjective measures were collected. The two rigid exos provided the largest assistance during the Dynamic tasks. Reductions in erector spinae activity were seen to be task-specific, with larger reductions for the two rigid exos. Overall, Laevo Flex offered a good balance between assistive moments, reductions in muscle activity, as well as user comfort and reductions in perceived exertion. Thus, we recommend benchmarking exos for intended use in the industrial workplace. This will hopefully result in a better adoption of the back-support exoskeletons in the workplace and help reduce low-back pain.

Modelling for design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: A systematic review

Industrial exoskeletons are developed to relieve workers' physical demands in the workplace and to alleviate ergonomic issues associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders. As a safe and economical alternative to empirical/experimental methods, modelling is considered as a powerful tool for design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current literature on the design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons through modelling. A systematic study was conducted by general keyword searches of five electronic databases over the last two decades (2003-2022). Out of the 701 records initially retrieved, 33 eligible articles were included and analyzed in the final review, presenting a variety of model inputs, model development, and model outputs used in the modelling. This systematic review study revealed that existing modelling methods can evaluate the biomechanical and physiological effects of industrial exoskeletons and provide some design parameters. However, the modelling method is currently unable to cover some of the main evaluation metrics supported by experimental assessments, such as task performance, user experience/discomfort, change in metabolic costs etc. Standard guidelines for model construction and implementation, as well as validation of human-exoskeleton interactions, remain to be established.

Equations for estimating the static supportive torque provided by upper-limb exoskeletons

Upper-limb exoskeletons are gaining traction in industrial work environments. However, other than advertised general specifications (e.g., peak support angle), the support torque provided throughout the reach envelope is largely unknown to end users. As such, this paper describes a methodology for measuring the specific supportive torque provided by upper-limb exoskeletons. The support of four commercially available passive upper-limb exoskeletons was quantified using an isokinetic dynamometer for all support ranges and levels (n = 68). Tests were repeated four times to determine between-session reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated 'Good' to 'Excellent' reliability, except for one condition. Polynomial regression equations were developed for each condition to predict exoskeleton support for any upper-limb elevation angle between 10° and 180°. These equations can be used to approximate upper-limb exoskeleton support in digital human modeling assessments, or to aid selection of exoskeleton settings specific to a worker's anthropometry and work task location.

Integrating Exosuit Capabilities into Clothing to Make Back Relief Accessible to Workers Unserved by Existing Exoskeletons: Design and Preliminary Evaluation

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSWe developed a method for integrating back-assist exosuit capabilities into regular clothing to make musculoskeletal relief accessible to more workers. We demonstrated proof-of-concept that this uniform-integrated exosuit can be effective and usable. Existing occupational exosuits are standalone accessories worn on top of a user's clothing and are not suitable for all workers. Our newly developed sub-class of exosuit could be beneficial to workers who alternate between bending, lifting, and sitting tasks, or to those in customer- or patient-facing jobs where it is important for wearable technology to be discreet.

Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks

Low-back pain (LBP) continues as the leading cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, and the high LBP burden is attributed largely to physical risk factors prevalent in manual material handling tasks. Industrial back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising ergonomic intervention to help control/prevent exposures to such risk factors. While earlier research has demonstrated beneficial effects of BSEs in terms of reductions in superficial back muscle activity, limited evidence is available regarding the impacts of these devices on spine loads. We evaluated the effects of two passive BSEs (BackX™ AC and Laevo™ V2.5) on lumbosacral compression and shear forces during repetitive lifting using an optimization-based model. Eighteen participants (gender-balanced) completed four minutes of repetitive lifting in nine different conditions, involving symmetric and asymmetric postures when using the BSEs (along with no BSE as a control condition). Using both BSEs reduced estimated peak compression and anteroposterior shear forces (by ∼8-15%). Such reductions, however, were task-specific and depended on the BSE design. Laevo™ use reduced mediolateral shear forces during asymmetric lifting (by ∼35%). We also found that reductions in composite measures of trunk muscle activity may not correspond well with changes in spine forces when using a BSE. These results can help guide the proper selection and application of BSEs during repetitive lifting tasks. Future work is recommended to explore the viability of different biomechanical models to assess changes in spine mechanical loads when using BSEs and whether reasonable estimates would be obtained using such models.