Comparison of static postural sway characteristics between pregnant and non-pregnant women

Sensory integration and segmental control of posture during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25% of pregnant people fall, yet the underlying mechanisms of this increased fall-risk remain unclear. Prior studies examining pregnancy and balance have utilized center of pressure analyses and reported mixed results. The purpose of this study was to examine sensory and segmental contributions to postural control throughout pregnancy using accelerometer-based measures of sway.

METHODS

Thirty pregnant people (first trimester: n = 10, second trimester: n = 10, third trimester: n = 10) and 10 healthy, nonpregnant control people stood quietly for one minute in four conditions: eyes open on a firm surface, eyes closed on a firm surface, eyes open on a foam pad, and eyes closed on foam. Postural sway was quantified using the root mean square accelerations in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions from an inertial sensor at the lumbar region. Sensory sway ratios, segmental coherence and co-phase, were calculated to assess sensory contributions and segmental control, respectively.

FINDINGS

Pregnant people did not display greater sway compared to healthy, nonpregnant controls. There were no group differences in vestibular, visual, or somatosensory sway ratios, and no significant differences in balance control strategies between pregnant and nonpregnant participants across sensory conditions.

INTERPRETATION

The small effects observed here contrast prior studies and suggest larger, definitive studies are needed to assess the effect of pregnancy on postural control. This study serves as a preliminary exploration of pregnant sensory and segmental postural control and highlights the need for future to hone the role of balance in fall risk during pregnancy.

Clinical and exercise professional opinion of return-to-running readiness after childbirth: an international Delphi study and consensus statement

Female athletes have identified a lack of guidance as a barrier to successfully returning to running postpartum, and existing guidelines are vague. Our aim was to define the current practice of determining postpartum run-readiness through a consensus survey of international clinicians and exercise professionals in postpartum exercise to assist clinicians and inform sport policy changes.A three-round Delphi approach was used to gain international consensus from clinicians and exercise professionals on run-readiness postpartum. Professionals who work with postpartum runners participated in an online survey to answer open-ended questions about the following postpartum return-to-running topics: definitions (runner and postpartum), key biopsychosocial milestones that runners need to meet, recommended screening, timeline to initiate running, support items, education topics and factors that contribute to advising against running. Consensus was defined as ≥75% participant agreement.One hundred and eighteen professionals participated in round I, 107 participated in round II (response rate 90.6%) and 95 participated in round III (response rate 80.5%). Responses indicated that, following a minimum 3-week period of rest and recovery, an individualised timeline and gradual return to running progression can be considered. Screening for medical and psychological concerns, current physical capacity, and prior training history is recommended prior to a return to running.This study proposes recommendations for the initial guidance on return-to-running postpartum, framed in the context of current research and consensus from professionals. Future research is needed to strengthen and validate specific recommendations and develop guidelines for best practice when returning-to-running after childbirth.