A mild intensity of the enzyme-support multi-point attachment promotes the optimal stabilization of mesophilic multimeric enzymes: Amine oxidase from Pisum sativum

Is enzyme immobilization a mature discipline? Some critical considerations to capitalize on the benefits of immobilization

Enzyme immobilization has been developing since the 1960s and although many industrial biocatalytic processes use the technology to improve enzyme performance, still today we are far from full exploitation of the field. One clear reason is that many evaluate immobilization based on only a few experiments that are not always well-designed. In contrast to many other reviews on the subject, here we highlight the pitfalls of using incorrectly designed immobilization protocols and explain why in many cases sub-optimal results are obtained. We also describe solutions to overcome these challenges and come to the conclusion that recent developments in material science, bioprocess engineering and protein science continue to open new opportunities for the future. In this way, enzyme immobilization, far from being a mature discipline, remains as a subject of high interest and where intense research is still necessary to take full advantage of the possibilities.

Enzyme Immobilization and Co-Immobilization: Main Framework, Advances and Some Applications

Enzymes are outstanding (bio)catalysts, not solely on account of their ability to increase reaction rates by up to several orders of magnitude but also for the high degree of substrate specificity, regiospecificity and stereospecificity. The use and development of enzymes as robust biocatalysts is one of the main challenges in biotechnology. However, despite the high specificities and turnover of enzymes, there are also drawbacks. At the industrial level, these drawbacks are typically overcome by resorting to immobilized enzymes to enhance stability. Immobilization of biocatalysts allows their reuse, increases stability, facilitates process control, eases product recovery, and enhances product yield and quality. This is especially important for expensive enzymes, for those obtained in low fermentation yield and with relatively low activity. This review provides an integrated perspective on (multi)enzyme immobilization that abridges a critical evaluation of immobilization methods and carriers, biocatalyst metrics, impact of key carrier features on biocatalyst performance, trends towards miniaturization and detailed illustrative examples that are representative of biocatalytic applications promoting sustainability.

A direct and simple immobilization route for immunosensors by CNBr activation for covalent attachment of anti-leptin: obesity diagnosis point of view

Leptin is a peptide hormone produced in adipose tissue that works as an antiobesity hormone by balancing energy intake and expenditure. We aimed to develop an ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor based on a novel immobilization technique for the early detection of leptin-related diseases in this work. Although several methods for immobilizing antibodies to the biosensor recognition element are known, it is necessary to utilize novel, cost-effective, and less complicated immobilization procedures. When compared with currently utilized immobilization techniques for leptin measurement, this novel method is more efficient, easy to prepare, and sensitive, with a broad detection range. Indium tin oxide-coated polyethylene terephthalate (ITO-PET) sheets were used as the working electrode. ITO-PET sheets were modified using cyanogen bromide (CNBr) to immobilize the anti-leptin antibody through covalent interactions. Each stage of the proposed biosensors was characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) methods, and extensive characterization studies were carried out. The designed biosensor has a wide linear detection range (0.05-100 pg/mL), low limits of detection (LOD) (0.0086 pg/mL) and quantification (LOQ) (0.0287 pg/mL). It was concluded that although it is disposable, the ITO-PET working electrode retains its activity even in repeated studies. In addition, the new immobilization procedure provided by CNBr for the designed biosensor fabrication can be effectively used in other biosensing applications.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-021-03096-w.

Stabilization of enzymes via immobilization: Multipoint covalent attachment and other stabilization strategies

The use of enzymes in industrial processes requires the improvement of their features in many instances. Enzyme immobilization, a requirement to facilitate the recovery and reuse of these water-soluble catalysts, is one of the tools that researchers may utilize to improve many of their properties. This review is focused on how enzyme immobilization may improve enzyme stability. Starting from the stabilization effects that an enzyme may experience by the mere fact of being inside a solid particle, we detail other possibilities to stabilize enzymes: generation of favorable enzyme environments, prevention of enzyme subunit dissociation in multimeric enzymes, generation of more stable enzyme conformations, or enzyme rigidification via multipoint covalent attachment. In this last point, we will discuss the features of an "ideal" immobilization protocol to maximize the intensity of the enzyme-support interactions. The most interesting active groups in the support (glutaraldehyde, epoxide, glyoxyl and vinyl sulfone) will be also presented, discussing their main properties and uses. Some instances in which the number of enzyme-support bonds is not directly related to a higher stabilization will be also presented. Finally, the possibility of coupling site-directed mutagenesis or chemical modification to get a more intense multipoint covalent immobilization will be discussed.

Immobilization of the Peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita. The Effect of the Immobilization pH on the Features of an Ionically Exchanged Dimeric Peroxygenase

This paper outlines the immobilization of the recombinant dimeric unspecific peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita (rAaeUPO). The enzyme was quite stable (remaining unaltered its activity after 35 h at 47 °C and pH 7.0). Phosphate destabilized the enzyme, while glycerol stabilized it. The enzyme was not immobilized on glyoxyl-agarose supports, while it was immobilized albeit in inactive form on vinyl-sulfone-activated supports. rAaeUPO immobilization on glutaraldehyde pre-activated supports gave almost quantitative immobilization yield and retained some activity, but the biocatalyst was very unstable. Its immobilization via anion exchange on PEI supports also produced good immobilization yields, but the rAaeUPO stability dropped. However, using aminated agarose, the enzyme retained stability and activity. The stability of the immobilized enzyme strongly depended on the immobilization pH, being much less stable when rAaeUPO was adsorbed at pH 9.0 than when it was immobilized at pH 7.0 or pH 5.0 (residual activity was almost 0 for the former and 80% for the other preparations), presenting stability very similar to that of the free enzyme. This is a very clear example of how the immobilization pH greatly affects the final biocatalyst performance.

From Enzyme Stability to Enzymatic Bioelectrode Stabilization Processes

Bioelectrocatalysis using redox enzymes appears as a sustainable way for biosensing, electricity production, or biosynthesis of fine products. Despite advances in the knowledge of parameters that drive the efficiency of enzymatic electrocatalysis, the weak stability of bioelectrodes prevents large scale development of bioelectrocatalysis. In this review, starting from the understanding of the parameters that drive protein instability, we will discuss the main strategies available to improve all enzyme stability, including use of chemicals, protein engineering and immobilization. Considering in a second step the additional requirements for use of redox enzymes, we will evaluate how far these general strategies can be applied to bioelectrocatalysis.

Transcriptomic analysis of Raphidocelis subcapitata exposed to erythromycin: The role of DNA replication in hormesis and growth inhibition

The occurrence of hormesis in the algal growth inhibition test is a major challenge in the dose-response characterization, whereas the molecular mechanism remains unraveled. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the changes in the molecular pathways in a model green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata treated with erythromycin (ERY; 4, 80, 120 μg L^-1) by transcriptomic analysis. After 7 day exposure, ERY at 4 μg L^-1 caused hormetic effects (21.9 %) on cell density, whereas 52.0 % and 65.4 % were inhibited in two higher exposures. By using adj p < 0.05 and absolute log₂ fold change> 1 as a cutoff, we identified 218, 950, and 2896 differentially expressed genes in 4, 80, 120 μg L^-1 treatment groups, respectively. In two higher ERY treated groups, genes involved in phases I, II & III metabolism processes and porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism pathway were consistently suppressed. Interestingly, genes (e.g., pri2, mcm2, and mcm6) enriched in DNA replication process were up-regulated in 4 μg L^-1 group, whereas these genes were all repressed in 120 μg L^-1 group. Alteration trend in gene expression was consistent with algal growth. Taken together, our results unveiled the molecular mechanism of action in ERY- stimulated/ inhibited growth in green alga.

Improvement of lipase biochemical properties via a two-step immobilization method: Adsorption onto silicon dioxide nanoparticles and entrapment in a polyvinyl alcohol/alginate hydrogel

In this study, the factors affecting lipase adsorption onto SiO₂ nanoparticles including SiO₂ nanoparticles amounts (8, 19 and 30 mg/mL), lipase concentrations (30, 90 and 150 μg/mL), adsorption temperatures (5, 20 and 35 °C) and adsorption times (1, 12.5 and 24 h) were optimized using central composite design. The optimal conditions were determined as a SiO₂ nanoparticles amount of 8.5-14 mg/ml, a lipase concentration of 106-116 μg/mL, an adsorption temperature of 20 °C and an adsorption time of 12.5 h, which resulted in a specific activity and immobilization efficiency of 20,000 (U/g protein) and 60 %, respectively. The lipase adsorbed under optimal conditions (SiO₂-lipase) was entrapped in a PVA/Alg hydrogel, successfully. FESEM and FTIR confirmed the two-step method of lipase immobilization. The entrapped SiO₂-lipase retained 76.5 % of its initial activity after 30 days of storage at 4 °C while adsorbed and free lipase retained only 43.4 % and 13.7 %, respectively. SiO₂-lipase activity decreased to 34.43 % after 10 cycles of use, while the entrapped SiO₂-lipase retained about 64.59 % of its initial activity. Compared to free lipase, the K_m values increased and decreased for SiO₂-lipase and entrapped SiO₂-lipase, respectively. V_max value increased for both SiO₂-lipase and entrapped SiO₂-lipase.

Co-Immobilization and Co-Localization of Oxidases and Catalases: Catalase from Bordetella Pertussis Fused with the Zbasic Domain

Oxidases catalyze selective oxidations by using molecular oxygen as an oxidizing agent. This process promotes the release of hydrogen peroxide, an undesirable byproduct. The instantaneous elimination of hydrogen peroxide can be achieved by co-immobilization and co-localization of the oxidase and an auxiliary catalase inside the porous structure of solid support. In this paper, we proposed that catalase from Bordetella pertussis fused with a small domain (Zbasic) as an excellent auxiliary enzyme. The enzyme had a specific activity of 23 U/mg, and this was almost six-fold higher than the one of the commercially available catalases from bovine liver. The Zbasic domain was fused to the four amino termini of this tetrameric enzyme. Two domains were close in one hemisphere of the enzyme molecule, and the other two were close in the opposite hemisphere. In this way, each hemisphere contained 24 residues with a positive charge that was very useful for the purification of the enzyme via cationic exchange chromatography. In addition to this, each hemisphere contained 10 Lys residues that were very useful for a rapid and intense multipoint covalent attachment on highly activated glyoxyl supports. In fact, 190 mg of the enzyme was immobilized on one gram of glyoxyl-10% agarose gel. The ratio catalase/oxidase able to instantaneously remove more than 93% of the released hydrogen peroxide was around 5–6 mg of catalase per mg of oxidase. Thirty milligrams of amine oxidase and 160 mg of catalase were co-immobilized and co-localized per gram of glyoxyl-agarose 10BCL (10% beads cross-linked) support. This biocatalyst eliminated biogenic amines (putrescine) 80-fold faster than a biocatalyst of the same oxidase co-localized with the commercial catalase from bovine liver.