Stabilometric analysis of the effect of postural insoles on static balance in patients with hemiparesis: A randomized, controlled, clinical trial

Effect of insole on postural control and gait of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review aims to examine the evidence of adding postural insole to traditional physical therapy to improve weight distribution, gait, mobility, balance, and postural control in stroke survivors. Five databases were searched to retrieve all related randomized controlled trials examining the effect of insole on stroke patients. Two independent authors checked the potential articles against eligibility criteria according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted for available outcomes and the statistical heterogeneity was examined using the I2 test. Of 762 articles, only 15 with 448 patients were included after they met the inclusion criteria with most of them including participants exceeding 6 months of stroke incidence. When insole was used as compelled body weight shifting method, pooled statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in gait velocity [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 1.02; P  = 0.0003], cadence (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.16, 1.18; P  = 0.01] and stride length (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65; P  < 0.0001), while no significant effect on step length (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI: -0.37, 1.33; P  = 0.27). Pooled statistical analysis of balance outcomes revealed significant improvement in weight-bearing symmetry balance (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.25, 1.39; P  = 0.005) and long-term improvement in Berg Balance Scale (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.19, 2.20; P  = 0.02), while no difference was observed in balance confidence (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI: -0.15, 1.04; P  = 0.14) and sensorimotor functions (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI -0.39, 1.11; P  = 0.35). Insoles significantly improved spatiotemporal gait parameters, gait symmetry, and static balance compared with traditional physical therapy alone.

Physicians' experiences with indications and prescriptions of foot orthoses-A cross-sectional study in northern Germany

Background

Foot orthoses (FOs) are prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) and orthopedic surgeons for various complaints. As there are very limited medical guidelines and checklists, the prescription of FOs is often inconsistent. Therefore, our study to evaluate the general prescription behavior and indication experiences with FOs from the perspective of GPs and orthopedists.

Methods

A survey was carried out using a questionnaire from October to December 2021. GPs and orthopedic surgeons in northern Germany were included. The focus of the survey was to examine which foot problems would lead GPs and orthopedic surgeons to prescribe FOs and to evaluate what factors these physicians included in their diagnostic analysis. Apart from descriptive analyses, a stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to explore potential associations of the primary outcome variable 'specific effect on the prescription of FOs', which was introduced to shed light upon the estimated added value of the prescription of FOs.

Results

Out of the 790 questionnaires distributed, 184 questionnaires were returned by GPs (n = 95) and orthopedic surgeons (n = 74) (response rate 23 %). FOs were most frequently prescribed for talipes valgus (96 %) and heel spur (54 %). Diagnostic analysis was mainly carried out clinically. Custom-made FOs (82 %) were prescribed more frequently than prefabricated FOs (6 %). Regular interaction within the prescription process was most commonly with orthopedic technicians (61 %). The estimation of the specific effect on FO prescription was assessed by a mean of 66 % of the participants, 82 % recommended self-exercises as an additional therapy.

Conclusions

FOs are a specific and well-established aid prescribed by many GPs and orthopedic surgeons for a variety of foot complaints. Despite being one of the most frequently prescribed orthopedic devices, the utilization of FOs is predominantly explorative due to a growing but nevertheless still deficient body of well-researched evidence. There is a clear need for a uniform approach to the indication and prescription of FOs among physicians.

Assessing the Subjective Effectiveness of Sensorimotor Insoles (SMIs) in Reducing Pain: A Descriptive Multicenter Pilot Study

This pilot study aimed to investigate the use of sensorimotor insoles in pain reduction, different orthopedic indications, and the wearing duration effects on the development of pain. Three hundred and forty patients were asked about their pain perception using a visual analog scale (VAS) in a pre-post analysis. Three main intervention durations were defined: VAS_post: up to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and more than 6 months. The results show significant differences for the within-subject factor "time of measurement", as well as for the between-subject factor indication (p < 0.001) and worn duration (p < 0.001). No interaction was found between indication and time of measurements (model A) or between worn duration and time of measurements (model B). The results of this pilot study must be cautiously and critically interpreted, but may support the hypothesis that sensorimotor insoles could be a helpful tool for subjective pain reduction. The missing control group and the lack of confounding variables such as methodological weaknesses, natural healing processes, and complementary therapies must be taken into account. Based on these experiences and findings, a RCT and systematic review will follow.

Influence of footwear on postural sway: A systematic review and meta-analysis on barefoot and shod bipedal static posturography in patients and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Bipedal static posturography is widely used to assess postural control. However, standardized methods and evidence on the influence of footwear on balance in comparison to barefoot stance is sparse.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Is bipedal static posturography applied in a standardized way with respect to demographics and the experimental set-up (systematic review)? Does habitual footwear influence postural control in comparison to barefoot condition during bipedal static posturography in adult patients and healthy subjects (meta-analysis)?

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive follow-up literature search was conducted from March 2009 until January 2020 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Original, research articles reporting on bipedal, unsupported, static posturography in adults (≥18 years) were included according to inclusion criteria (age, sex, height, weight, duration, repetitions, visual/foot condition, sampling frequency). Studies comparing habitual footwear with barefoot condition during bipedal static posturography were included for the meta-analysis. Center of pressure parameters (sway velocity, range, root mean square, paths lengths) with subjects having eyes closed (EC) or open (EO) were analyzed using random effects models.

RESULTS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, 207 and eight out of 5189 studies with 12'341 and 156 subjects, respectively, were eligible. Most studies (89%) reported barefoot, 5% shod, and 6% barefoot and shod measurements. Less than half of studies (44%) included patients of which the minority (13%) suffered from neurological disease. Sway velocity in the anterior-posterior direction was higher in habitual shoes compared to barefoot with EC (SMD: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.68-1.48; p < 0.01; I² = 0%), with EO (SMD: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.11-1.26; p = 0.02; I² = 1%), and in the medio-lateral direction with EC (SMD: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.76-1.85, p < 0.01; I² = 37%).

SIGNIFICANCE

Methodical heterogeneity of bipedal static posturography hampers studies' comparability. Thus, we provide a standardized approach to increase knowledge whether habitual footwear decrease postural control in comparison to barefoot stance.

Stabilometric Analysis of Parkinson's Disease Patients

Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered a movement disease; it is a progressive and degenerative neurological disorder, causing disabling motor dysfunctions. Investigate the body instability of PD patients through the stabilometry test is the aim of this study. A sample of 40 participants with PD were staged between the stages of the disease using Hoehn and Yahr Modified Scale 1.5 to 3.0 in static posture with eyes open and closed to assess stabilometry in the distance from the center of pressure (CoP), as well as anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral axis (ML). There were found no differences in the body oscillation variables on the AP and ML axis. There was a difference in CoP displacement and oscillation speed between stage 1.5 to 3.0. It was concluded that participants with PD in stage 3.0 had greater distances from the CoP and greater speed of body sway, and that these instabilities become more evident with the progression of the disease.

Effects of orthopedic insoles on postural balance in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic insoles (OIs) with medial arch support and heel cushion are widely used to manage lower extremity injuries, but their effects on postural balance in patients with chronic stroke have not been adequately explored.

METHODS

Design: Double-blinded, sham-controlled, randomized crossover trial.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 32 ambulatory patients (20 men and 12 women, aged between 30 and 76 years) with more than 6 months since stroke onset.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received one assessment session wearing OIs and one session wearing sham insole (SI) in a random order with a 1-day interval.

OUTCOMES

Our primary outcome was the Berg Balance Scale score. Secondary outcomes included the Functional Reach Test, Timed Up and Go test, and computerized posturography. All were performed in both sessions. Subgroup analyses regarding demographic and functional variables were conducted to identify potential responders.

RESULTS

Significant between-insole differences favoring OIs were seen in all clinical tests (P < 0.05), but were seen only in the static medial-lateral sway in computerized posturography assessment (P = 0.04). An approximate 2-point difference in the BBS score favoring OIs was observed in all subgroups, not reaching the minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

The use of OIs generated small but significant positive effects on improving postural balance among patients with chronic stroke. Additional biomechanical and clinical studies are required to evaluate their potential for routine clinical use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03194282.

Analyses of Baropodometry Protocols Through Bibliometric Research

The posture of the foot is an important and complex aspect of the human body that implies a constant and coherent adaptation, and keeps the body segments in alignment. Baropodometry is a quantitative exam that evaluates the distribution of pressures at different points in the plantar region and the foot contact area. The objective of the study was to know evaluation protocols that used Barapodometry and to verify which variables were observed after the examination. It was analyzed 43 publications, between 2014 and November 2017, indexed in the Web of Science database and / or IEEE. It was verified that the year with the most publications was 2016 and the language with the highest incidence was English. Italy was the country with the highest number of articles published. In relation to the profile of the participants the most studied were those affected by Parkinson's Disease; the most used positioning protocol was bipodal barefoot support with separated feet with open eyes and then closed and arms along the body, the analyzes performed after the examination were on the stabilization area and anteroposterior and lateral velocity of balance. It was concluded that the examination can be effective in the diagnosis of disorders of static and dynamic equilibrium in the different disorders.