Exercise on balance and function for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

The effect of balance exercises on central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of balance exercises on functional status, pain, balance, and central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients diagnosed with bilateral Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 2 primary knee OA and associated central sensitization were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups. Both groups were provided with verbal and written information on knee OA. In addition, the intervention group received a supervised balance exercise program for 6 weeks, 3 days a week on alternating days. The outcome measures were the changes in the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Berg Balance Scale, and Y Balance Test. Evaluations were performed at baseline, immediately after treatment (6th week) and at 12th week. The study included 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. At the end of the treatment period (6th week), the improvement in CSI score, WOMAC pain, WOMAC physical function, WOMAC total score, Y Balance Test scores, and VAS pain during activity was significantly greater in the intervention group than that in the control group (p < 0.001). Regarding the changes from baseline to the 12th week, the intervention group experienced greater improvement in most of the outcome measures. Yet, the change in WOMAC pain score, Berg Balance Scale score, and VAS pain at rest was similar between the study groups (p = 0.05, p = 0.257, and p = 0.385, respectively). A two-model multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the changes in VAS pain (during activity) after the treatment and at follow-up [(p = 0.004, adjusted R2: 0.346) and (p = 0.002, adjusted R2: 0.391), respectively], as well as changes in WOMAC pain from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.020, ΔR2 = 0.245) significantly affected central sensitization. However, changes in Y Balance Test and WOMAC total scores did not appear to have a significant impact on the improvement in central sensitization (p > 0.05). Balance exercises may provide improvement in central sensitization, functional status, and dynamic balance among patients with knee OA. The improvement in central sensitization depends mostly on the pain relief effect of balance exercises.

Fall experiences from the perspectives of people with osteoarthritis: in their own words

PURPOSE

To explore real-life experiences of people with osteoarthritis (OA) to increase understanding of how they perceive contributing factors to falls, circumstances at time of falls, and consequences of falls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four focus groups of 3-7 people with OA from the Chicago, IL, USA, and neighboring areas were conducted remotely via web-based videoconferencing. Inclusion criteria included history of falls in previous 12 months and hip and/or knee OA. Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach to identify themes.

RESULTS

Focus group participants (n = 17) described experiences associated with fall-related events that resulted in the identification of four themes: (1) perception of falls and fall risks can be influenced by OA symptoms, (2) ability to remember circumstances of falls are influenced by consequences, (3) behaviors and attitudes that address OA symptoms and avoidance of falls are similar and (4) OA symptoms and falls have common psychological impacts on lives.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights how people with OA define falls, perceive contributing factors to falls, and describe general and OA-related factors that contributed to their fall experiences. The shared experiences contributed to the creation of themes that represented various aspects of the circumstances and impact of falls. Consideration for the identified themes may enhance recording and reporting of falls, contribute to development of improved fall risk assessment tools, and prioritize research into the biopsychosocial effects of falls in people with OA.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONInformation about circumstances of a fall such as location, activity, and symptoms of osteoarthritis may be beneficial in creating tailored fall prevention training and education.Falls are a common problem for people with lower limb osteoarthritis that can lead to negative changes in activity and quality of life.The psychological impact of osteoarthritis symptoms may be contributing to fear of falling and decrease participation in daily activities.Awareness of the perceptions people with osteoarthritis have about their symptoms may provide educational and training opportunities to address the benefits of different therapeutic treatments.Awareness of perceptions people with osteoarthritis have about their risk of falling may provide educational and training opportunities to address the benefits of different therapeutic treatments.

Effectiveness of balance training on pain and functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a musculoskeletal disorder that causes pain and increasing loss of function, resulting in reduced proprioceptive accuracy and balance. Therefore, the goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of balance training on pain and functional outcomes in knee OA. Methods: "PubMed", "Scopus", "Web of Science", "Cochrane", and "Physiotherapy Evidence Database" were searched for studies conducted between January 2000 and December 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of balance training in knee OA, as well as its effects on pain and functional outcome measures, were included. Conference abstracts, case reports, observational studies, and clinical commentaries were not included. Meta-analysis was conducted for the common outcomes, i.e., Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The Timed Up and Go (TUG), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The PEDro scale was used to determine the quality of the included studies. Results: This review includes 22 RCTs of which 17 articles were included for meta-analysis. The included articles had 1456 participants. The meta-analysis showed improvement in the VAS scores in the experimental group compared to the control group [ I 2= 92%; mean difference= -0.79; 95% CI= -1.59 to 0.01; p<0.05] and for the WOMAC scores the heterogeneity ( I 2) was 81% with a mean difference of -0.02 [95% CI= -0.44 to 0.40; p<0.0001]. The TUG score was analyzed, the I 2 was 95% with a mean difference of -1.71 [95% CI= -3.09 to -0.33; p<0.0001] for the intervention against the control group. Conclusions: Balance training significantly reduced knee pain and improved functional outcomes measured with TUG. However, there was no difference observed in WOMAC. Although due to the heterogeneity of the included articles the treatment impact may be overestimated. Registration: The current systematic review was registered in PROSPERO on 7th October 2021 (registration number CRD42021276674).

The effectiveness of exercise with behavior change techniques in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of exercise with behavior change techniques (BCTs) on core outcome sets in people with knee osteoarthritis.

LITERATURE SURVEY

We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in eight databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDro, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov) up to November 4, 2021.

METHODOLOGY

Eligible participants were people with knee osteoarthritis. The intervention was exercise with BCTs. Primary outcomes included physical function, quality of life (QOL) 6 to 12 months after intervention, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were knee pain, exercise adherence, mobility, and self-efficacy 3 months or more after intervention. The bias risk was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. The random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.

SYNTHESIS

We found 16 individual BCTs, and 37.7% of trials used a single BCT. For meta-analysis, we included 21 RCTs (n = 1623). Most outcomes had a very low certainty of evidence, and the risk of bias was the consistent reason for downgrading evidence levels. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.00 (-0.24, 0.24) in physical function, 0.33 (-0.51, 1.17) in exercise adherence, and 0.04 (-0.39, 0.47) in self-efficacy. The risk ratio (95% CI) of adverse events was 3.6 (0.79, 16.45). QOL was not pooled due to insufficient data (very low certainty of evidence). In contrast, the SMD (95% CI) for knee pain reduction and mobility improvement was -0.33 (-0.53, -0.13) and 0.21 (-0.05, 0.47) with moderate and low certainty of evidence, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of BCTs with exercises on core outcome sets. Further research should explore the effectiveness of BCTs with valid design.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020212904).

Factors associated with falls in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study

Falls represent an important adverse effect associated with knee osteoarthritis and result in a significant financial burden on the healthcare system. Therefore, identification of fall predictors is essential to minimize fall incidence. However, few studies have investigated falls and fall predictors, particularly focused on the fear of falls and proprioception. In this study, we investigated significant fall predictors in patients with knee osteoarthritis in Malang, Indonesia. Our findings may serve as useful guidelines to develop geriatric fall prevention programs. This cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was performed between April and July 2021 and included 372 participants. We recorded the following data: sociodemographic and medical history questionnaire responses, visual analog scale scores, Hopkins falls grading scale scores, Fall Efficacy Scale-International scores, proprioception test findings, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), range of motion (ROM), chair stand test and the timed up and go test performance. Data were analyzed using the chi-square and t tests, and multivariate logistic regression to determine significant fall predictors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a lower risk of falls in patients with better proprioception and ROM than in the other groups (odds ratio 0.55 vs 0.96). The risk of falls was higher in patients with higher KOOS symptoms, fear of falls, diagnosis of low back pain and diabetes mellitus, and increased body mass index than in the other groups (odds ratio 1.41, 2.65, 1.27, 3.45, and 1.10, respectively. Our study shows that knee proprioception and ROM serve as protective factors against falls, whereas KOOS symptoms, fear of falls, low back pain, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index were associated with a high risk of falls, with diabetes mellitus and fear of falls being the most significant risk factors. These findings may be useful to policy makers to develop a fall prevention program that can be implemented in community health care centers across Indonesia to deliver individualized, person-centered care and improve fall prevention strategies through a systematic process comprising evaluation, intervention, and monitoring to minimize fall risk.

Interactive multiobjective optimization for finding the most preferred exercise therapy modality in knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

There are no explicit guidelines or tools available to support clinicians in selecting exercise therapy modalities according to the characteristics of individual patients despite the apparent need.

OBJECTIVE

This study develops a methodology based on a novel multiobjective optimization model and examines its feasibility as a decision support tool to support healthcare professionals in comparing different modalities and identifying the most preferred one based on a patient's needs.

METHODS

Thirty-one exercise therapy modalities were considered from 21 randomized controlled trials. A novel interactive multiobjective optimization model was designed to characterize the efficacy of an exercise therapy modality based on five objectives: minimizing cost, maximizing pain reduction, maximizing disability improvement, minimizing the number of supervised sessions, and minimizing the length of the treatment period. An interactive model incorporates clinicians' preferences in finding the most preferred exercise therapy modality for each need. Multiobjective optimization methods are mathematical algorithms designed to identify the optimal balance between multiple conflicting objectives among available solutions/alternatives. They explicitly evaluate the conflicting objectives and support decision-makers in identifying the best balance. An experienced research-oriented physiotherapist was involved as a decision-maker in the interactive solution process testing the proposed decision support tool.

RESULTS

The proposed methodology design and interactive process of the tool, including preference information, graphs, and exercise suggestions following the preferences, can help clinicians to find the most preferred exercise therapy modality based on a patient's needs and health status; paving the way to individualize recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

We examined the feasibility of our decision support tool using an interactive multiobjective optimization method designed to help clinicians balance between conflicting objectives to find the most preferred exercise therapy modality for patients with knee osteoarthritis. The proposed methodology is generic enough to be applied in any field of medical and healthcare settings, where several alternative treatment options exist.KEY MESSAGESWe demonstrate the potential of applying Interactive multiobjective optimization methods in a decision support tool to help clinicians compare different exercise therapy modalities and identify the most preferred one based on a patient's needs.The usability of the proposed decision support tool is tested and demonstrated in prescribing exercise therapy modalities to treat knee osteoarthritis patients.

Effects of a Fall Prevention Program Based on Goal Attainment Theory for Homebound Older Adults With Osteoarthritis of the Lower Extremities

This study implemented and evaluated a community-based fall prevention program based on goal attainment theory that targeted older adults with osteoarthritis. The program included education, exercise, and one-on-one counseling during which the participant and the provider set individual fall prevention goals. This study used a nonequivalent control group pre-/posttest design. Participants were older adults in senior centers with lower extremity osteoarthritis. A fall prevention program in the experimental group included group (70 minutes, once/week; education and exercise) and individual counseling (10 minutes, twice/week; emotional support and goal setting). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS/WIN 22.0 with the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, independent t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. The experimental group experienced significantly fewer falls, less stiffness, less difficulty performing activity; more muscular strength, walking ability, and balance; as well as less fear of falling and higher falls efficacy in comparison with the control group. However, pain did not improve in either of the two groups. Fall prevention programs need to include the active involvement of carers in ensuring environmental changes to reduce fall risks. In addition, health professionals who care for community patients with osteoarthritis could strengthen interactions and exchanges to prevent falls and actively modify home hazards.

Effects of Circuit Training on Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The most prevalent joint disease is osteoarthritis (OA), which affects an estimated 240 million individuals worldwide. Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the top 10 causes of disability worldwide. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the effect of circuit training (CT) on patients with KOA. We searched through PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Google Scholar up to 12 February 2022. We used random-effects statistical analysis for continuous variables and reported the results as a standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 percent confidence intervals (CI). Seven trials involving 346 patients were included. A significant improvement in the intervention group was observed for the parameter, pain level (SMD -0.96, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.14; p = 0.02; seven trials, 346 participants; high quality evidence), while no significant improvement was found in physical function (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.44-0.50; p = 0.89; five trials, 294 participants; high-quality evidence), quality of life (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -1.18-0.68; p = 0.60; three trials, 205 participants; high-quality evidence), the activity of daily living (SMD 0.81, 95% CI -0.85-2.48; p = 0.34; three trials, 223 participants; high-quality evidence), and knee stiffness (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.96-0.66; p = 0.33; two trials, 71 participants; high-quality evidence). The findings in this meta-analysis suggest that CT could effectively complement the conventional treatment of KOA, particularly in alleviating pain. However, comprehensive data on the guidelines for the CT approach would be needed to adequately examine the effects of CT on quality of life and biochemical markers in patients with KOA.

A recommended exercise program appropriate for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative disease. Recommended first-line management includes exercise. However, there is still no standard recommendation for the appropriate exercise program for patients with KOA.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the effects of a land-based exercise program with high vs. uncertain compliance with recommendations among people with KOA in pain, function, and stiffness.

Methods: From January 2000 to January 2022, PubMed, EBSCO, Sport-discuss, Medline, and Web of Science were searched. A comprehensive review of meta-analyses of land-based exercise programs with exercise prescriptions was done in symptomatic individuals with KOA. The Cochrane Collaboration’s standards were followed for study selection, eligibility criteria, data extraction, and statistics, and the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5 software was used to extract the baseline mean and follow-up values, as well as the accompanying standard deviation, to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD). In meta-analyses, SMD was calculated for pain outcomes, self-reported physical function, and stiffness. The effects of the outcomes on the subgroups of studies were compared. A fixed- or random-effects model was used in group research studies with comparable outcomes.

Results: There were 15 studies with a total of 1,436 participants. Compliance with the ACSM recommendations was categorized as “high” in five cases and “uncertain” in nine others. The SMD for pain was −0.31 (95% CI −0.47, −0.14) in the subgroup with a high ACSM compliance ratio and −0.55 (95% CI −0.69, −0.41) in the subgroup with uncertain ACSM compliance. For physical function, in the high-compliance group, the SMD was −0.21 (95% CI −0.38, −0.05), while in the uncertain-compliance group, it was −0.61 (95 % CI −0.82, −0.40). The SMD was −0.40 (95 % CI −0.61, −0.19) for stiffness and high compliance with ACSM. The SMD was −0.29 (95% CI −0.66, 0.07) for study interventions with uncertain compliance.

Conclusion: The results showed that the land-based training program significantly improved pain, physical function, and stiffness in KOA patients compared to controls. Exercise interventions with high adherence to ACSM recommendations differed significantly only in stiffness measures compared with the uncertain-compliance group.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier PROSPERO (ID CRD42022311660)

Effects of exercise on knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease and a major cause of functional limitation and pain in adults. The aim of this literature review is to review the existing evidence regarding the impact of exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis concerning physical and functional outcomes. The secondary aim is to provide both healthcare professionals and patients with updated and high-quality recommendations for the management of this condition.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed at Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, limiting the studies to English, French and Portuguese language, from 2010 to May 2020. Eligible studies were randomized control trials or clinical control trials that compared an intervention consisting of an exercise programme in adult participants with knee osteoarthritis against no intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 4499 studies were retrieved and 19 articles met the inclusion criteria. Beneficial effects of exercise were found on pain and strength. Regarding function, functional performance and quality of life, evidence is controversial. Both strengthening and aerobic exercise showed positive effects and both aquatic and land-based programmes presented improvement of pain, physical function and quality of life. Relatively to stretching, plyometric and proprioception training, no concrete conclusions can be taken.

CONCLUSION

Exercise programmes appear to be safe and effective in knee osteoarthritis patients, mainly regarding pain and strength improvement. Pilates, aerobic and strengthening exercise programmes performed for 8-12 weeks, 3-5 sessions per week; each session lasting 1 h appear to be effective. Both aquatic and land-based programmes show comparable and positive effects.

Relative Efficacy of Different Exercises for Pain, Function, Performance and Quality of Life in Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Guidelines recommend exercise as a core treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). However, it is unclear which type of exercise is most effective, leading to inconsistency between different recommendations.

Objectives

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to investigate the relative efficacy of different exercises (aerobic, mind–body, strengthening, flexibility/skill, or mixed) for improving pain, function, performance and quality of life (QoL) for knee and hip OA at, or nearest to, 8 weeks.

Methods

We searched nine electronic databases up until December 2017 for randomised controlled trials that compared exercise with usual care or with another exercise type. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to estimate the relative effect size (ES) and corresponding 95% credibility interval (CrI) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42016033865).

Findings

We identified and analysed 103 trials (9134 participants). Aerobic exercise was most beneficial for pain (ES 1.11; 95% CrI 0.69, 1.54) and performance (1.05; 0.63, 1.48). Mind–body exercise, which had pain benefit equivalent to that of aerobic exercise (1.11; 0.63, 1.59), was the best for function (0.81; 0.27, 1.36). Strengthening and flexibility/skill exercises improved multiple outcomes at a moderate level. Mixed exercise was the least effective for all outcomes and had significantly less pain relief than aerobic and mind–body exercises. The trend was significant for pain (p = 0.01), but not for function (p = 0.07), performance (p = 0.06) or QoL (p = 0.65).

Conclusion

The effect of exercise varies according to the type of exercise and target outcome. Aerobic or mind–body exercise may be the best for pain and function improvements. Strengthening and flexibility/skill exercises may be used for multiple outcomes. Mixed exercise is the least effective and the reason for this merits further investigation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-019-01082-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: rehabilitation and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Inactivity and obesity are risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) progression. The purpose of this review was to highlight intervention parameters of exercise and lifestyle diet interventions on clinical outcomes in OA that were published over 15 months, starting January 1, 2018.

DESIGN

Systematic literature searches were performed in Medline (Pubmed, OVID), Scopus, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Embase from January 1, 2018 to April 1, 2019. Key words included osteoarthritis, exercise, physical activity, diet and nutrition. Randomized controlled designs and data synthesis papers (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical guidelines) written in English, that included humans with OA of any joint were included. Trials were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) critical appraisal tool and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were evaluated using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). Intervention details (RCTs) and key finding from papers were summarized.

RESULTS

Of 540 titles and abstracts retrieved, 147 full articles were reviewed and 53 met the inclusion criteria, comprised of 39 RCTs and 14 synthesis papers. By addressing inactivity, exercise effectively improves clinical outcomes and, based on low-moderate quality evidence, without further damage to cartilage or synovial tissue. By comparison, much less work focused on minimizing obesity. Diet must be combined with exercise to improve pain, but alone, can improve physical function.

CONCLUSIONS

Future work is necessary to identify the ideal exercise frequency and intensity and lifestyle diet intervention parameters. Improved adherence to reporting guidelines in future work will greatly enhance the OA rehabilitation field.

The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been widely applied for pain control in musculoskeletal disorders. Whether ESWT can improve pain relief and joint function for knee osteoarthritis remains controversial. Therefore, we designed a meta-analysis based on relevant studies to comprehensively analyze and determine the efficacy and safety of ESWT for knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We identified relevant studies by an electronic search consisting of five English language databases: MEDLINE (1966 to July 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2019 Issue 2), EMBASE (1980 to July 2019), and PubMed (1946 to July 2019). The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was independently evaluated by two reviewers according to the criteria in the Cochrane Collaboration for Systematic Reviews. The quality of cohort and case-control studies was assessed by the Newcastlee-Ottawa scale (NOS). We performed statistical analysis by the Stata software, version 15.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and three cohort studies involving 589 patients were included. The present meta-analysis indicated that ESWT was associated a significant reduction of pain score at 4 weeks (WMD = -0.436; 95% CI = -0.604 to -0.269), 8 weeks (WMD = -0.234; 95% CI = -0.447 to -0.022) and 12 weeks (WMD = -0.239; 95% CI = -0.436 to -0.043). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at 4 weeks (WMD = -3.107; 95% CI = -5.073 to -1.142), 8 weeks (WMD = -3.617; 95% CI = -5.760 to -1.475) and 12 weeks (WMD = -2.271; 95% CI = -3.875 to -0.667).

CONCLUSION

The ESWT was efficacious and safe for reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, without increasing the risk of adverse effects.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: rehabilitation and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Conduct a systematic review of systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the past year evaluating rehabilitation for people with osteoarthritis, and provide narrative synthesis of findings focused on core recommended treatments for osteoarthritis (exercise, education, biomechanical interventions, weight loss).

DESIGN

A comprehensive search strategy was used to search PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases (16^th May 2017 to 22^nd March 2018). Search terms included 'osteoarthritis', 'rehabilitation', 'systematic review', and 'randomised controlled trial'. Inclusion criteria were: (1) RCT, or systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs); (2) human participants with osteoarthritis (any joint); (3) evaluation of rehabilitation intervention; and (4) at least one patient-reported measure. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool (systematic reviews) and PEDro rating scale (RCTs). Narrative synthesis mapped findings to core recommendations from existing osteoarthritis clinical guidelines.

RESULTS

From 1994 records, 13 systematic reviews and 36 RCTs were included. 73% of these evaluated knee osteoarthritis (36 studies). The remaining studies evaluated hand osteoarthritis (6 studies), hip, hip/knee and general osteoarthritis (each 2 studies), and neck osteoarthritis (1 study). Exercise was the most common intervention evaluated (31%). Updated recommendations for exercise prescription and preliminary guidance for psychological interventions are provided.

CONCLUSION

Level 1 and 2 osteoarthritis rehabilitation literature continues to be dominated by knee osteoarthritis studies. Consistent with current clinical guidelines, exercise should be a core treatment for osteoarthritis, but future studies should ensure that exercise programs follow published dose guidelines. There is a clear need for research on rehabilitation for hip, hand, foot/ankle, shoulder and spine osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2017: rehabilitation and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to describe studies examining rehabilitation for people with osteoarthritis (OA) and to summarize findings from selected key systematic reviews (SRs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DESIGN

A systematic search was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases from April 1^st 2016 to May 15^th 2017 using the terms 'osteoarthritis', 'randomized controlled trial', and 'systematic review'. Inclusion criteria were: clinically or radiologically diagnosed patients with OA, rehabilitation treatment, RCT or SRs. A selection of the included studies is discussed based on study quality and perceived importance to the field; including those that are innovative, inform the direction of the field or generate controversy. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro-scale for RCTs and the Amstar guideline for SRs.

RESULTS

From 1211 articles, 80 articles met the eligibility criteria including 21 SRs and 61 RCTs. The median of the methodological quality of the SRs and RCTs was 7 (2-9) and 6 (3-10), respectively. The studies were grouped into several themes, covering the most important rehabilitation fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Striking is the small number of studies investigating another joint (18%) than the knee (82%). Exercise is the most common treatment evaluated and should be accompanied with education to effectuate a behavioural change in physical activity of people with OA. No new insights in the field of braces (or orthoses) and in the field of acupuncture were found.