1
|
Yanuck SB, Fox SK, Harting BR, Motyka TM. Effect of manual manipulation on mechanical gait parameters. J Osteopath Med 2024; 0:jom-2023-0203. [PMID: 38807459 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT A variety of manual manipulation techniques are utilized in clinical practice to alleviate pain and improve musculoskeletal function. Many manual practitioners analyze gait patterns and asymmetries in their assessment of the patient, and an increasing number of gait motion capture studies are taking place with recent improvements in motion capture technology. This study is the first systematic review of whether these manual modalities have been shown to produce an objectively measurable change in gait mechanics. OBJECTIVES This study was designed to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the impact of manual medicine modalities on biomechanical parameters of gait. METHODS A master search term composed of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) search terms from an initial scan of relevant articles was utilized to search six databases. We screened the titles and abstracts of the resulting papers for relevance and then assessed their quality with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Clinical trials that featured both a manual manipulation intervention and multiple mechanical gait parameters were included. Case reports and other studies that only measured gait speed or other subjective measures of mobility were excluded. RESULTS We included 20 studies in our final analysis. They utilize manipulation techniques primarily from osteopathic, chiropractic, massage, and physiotherapy backgrounds. The conditions studied primarily included problems with the back, knee, and ankle, as well as healthy patients and Parkinson's patients. Control groups were highly variable, if not absent. Most studies measured their gait parameters utilizing either multicamera motion capture systems or force platforms. CONCLUSIONS Twelve of 20 papers included in the final analysis demonstrated a significant effect of manipulation on gait variables, many of which included either step length, walking speed, or sagittal range of motion (ROM) in joints of the lower extremity. However, the results and study design are too heterogeneous to draw robust conclusions from these studies as a whole. While there are initial indications that certain modalities may yield a change in certain gait parameters, the quality of evidence is low and there is insufficient evidence to conclude that manual therapies induce changes in biomechanical gait parameters. Studies are heterogeneous with respect to the populations studied and the interventions performed. Comparators were variable or absent across the studies, as were the outcome variables measured. More could be learned in the future with consistent methodology around blinding and sham treatment, and if the gait parameters measured were standardized and of a more robust clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solomon B Yanuck
- Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| | - Sarah K Fox
- Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| | - Bethany R Harting
- Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| | - Thomas M Motyka
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stępnik J, Czaprowski D, Kędra A. Effect of manual osteopathic techniques on the autonomic nervous system, respiratory system function and head-cervical-shoulder complex-a systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1358529. [PMID: 38660420 PMCID: PMC11040076 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1358529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Osteopathic manual techniques are now widely used in medicine worldwide. At present, there are no clear conclusions regarding the possibility of affecting the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), respiratory system and head-cervical-shoulder complex by manual osteopathic techniques. Objectives The aim of the study was to review the current literature regarding the possible impact of osteopathic manual techniques on the state of the autonomic nervous system, spirometric parameters of the respiratory system and the state of the head-collar-shoulder complex. Methods Publications have been searched in the following databases: PubMed, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search strategy included keywords related to manual osteopathic treatment, autonomic nervous system, spirometry, respiratory function and head, neck and shoulder pain. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. The PRISMA guidelines were used for the systematic review. Studies from 2010 to 2023 were selected. Results Using the proposed descriptions and manual searches from the literature of other works, 40 studies were found, out of which 22 were rejected because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The analysis included: 15 randomized controlled trials, 3 pilot studies. Conclusion Studies clearly show the effect of OMT on both spirometric parameters and the condition of the head-collar-shoulder complex. Most often this translates into improved ANS performance, but there are exceptions. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023476963.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Stępnik
- Still Academy of Osteopathy, Warsaw, Poland
- SomaticMed Wołomin, Wołomin, Poland
| | - Dariusz Czaprowski
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Public Health, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
- Center of Body Posture, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kędra
- Faculty of Physical Education and Health, Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Biała Podlaska, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cottone KA, Schumacher MR, Young JL, Rhon DI. The majority of clinical trials assessing mobilization and manipulation for neck pain lack a pragmatic approach: a systematic review of 174 trials. J Man Manip Ther 2024:1-17. [PMID: 38525785 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2327127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disorders of the cervical spine are some of the costliest musculoskeletal conditions to manage globally. Joint mobilization and manipulation have been shown to be an effective treatment for neck pain. However, the generalizability and clinical translation depends on the nature of the trial designs that inform its use. The extent to which randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing manual therapy treatments for cervical spine disorders fall on the efficacy (explanatory) -effectiveness (pragmatic) spectrum often informs how the findings are translated into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to determine where RCTs of manual therapy for neck disorders fall on the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum. METHODS A search of three electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were completed for trials published from inception to May 2023. RCTs in which joint mobilization or manipulation were used to treat cervical spine disorders were assessed on the effectiveness-efficacy spectrum using the Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum (RITES) tool and risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS A total of 174 trials met eligibility. RITES domain two trial setting (71.3% vs 16.1%), domain three flexibility of intervention(s) (62.1% vs 23%), and domain four clinical relevance of experimental and comparison intervention(s) (51.7% vs 29.3%) all favored efficacy over effectiveness. Domain one participant characteristic(s) had a slightly greater emphasis on effectiveness compared to efficacy (36.8% vs 44.8%). Most studies (96%) had at least some risk of bias. CONCLUSION Over half of the RCTs assessing the treatment effect of joint mobilization and manipulation for neck pain favor efficacy (explanatory) over effectiveness (pragmatic) designs. Future RCTs on this topic should consider a greater emphasis on pragmatic trial design components in order to better reflect real-world translation to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle A Cottone
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Health Science, Bradley University, Peoria, IL, USA
| | - Matthew R Schumacher
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of Mary, Bismarck, ND, USA
| | - Jodi L Young
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valenza-Peña G, Martín-Núñez J, Heredia-Ciuró A, Navas-Otero A, López-López L, Valenza MC, Cabrera-Martos I. Effectiveness of Self-Care Education for Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:3161. [PMID: 38132051 PMCID: PMC10743108 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Self-care programs for chronic neck pain are relevant to everyday life and can lead to long- term improvement. More studies on their effectiveness, key components and appropriate duration are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of self-care programs for patients with chronic neck pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. After searching in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and ScienceDirect, eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Self-care education interventions typically consisted of education (i.e., pain neuro-science education or general educational concepts) accompanied by exercise or manual therapy. The most frequent components were addressing physical and psychological symptoms and engaging in self-care strategies. The least frequent ones were monitoring and recording symptoms and discussing with providers of medical care. The duration of the interventions ranged from three sessions to six months. Finally, individual and supervised modalities were the most frequent. After pooling the data, a meta-analysis was carried out according to four variables (i.e., pain, disability, kinesiophobia and catastrophization) and showed significant results (p < 0.05) in favor of self-care interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that self-education interventions improve pain, psychological pain-related variables and disability in patients with chronic neck pain. The most frequently used components were addressing physical and psychological symptoms and engaging in self-care strategies. Future trials should focus on including other components, such as discussing symptoms with providers of medical care or self-monitoring symptoms. Additional areas of focus include more homogeneous doses and comparator treatments, as well as studies with better evidence to reach more solid conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Laura López-López
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De la Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain; (G.V.-P.); (J.M.-N.); (A.H.-C.); (M.C.V.); (I.C.-M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Groisman S, da Silva LDS, Sanches TRR, Rocha CSDS, Malysz T, Jotz GP. Assessment of Long-term Effects of Adding Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment to Neck Exercises for Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial. J Chiropr Med 2023; 22:265-274. [PMID: 38205221 PMCID: PMC10774622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of adding osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to neck exercises compared to exercises alone for individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP). Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted by assigning 90 individuals with NCNP into the following 2 groups: (1) exercises group (EG, n = 45) or (2) OMT plus exercises group (OMT/EG, n = 45). All participants received 4 weeks of treatment. The clinical outcomes were recorded at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the treatment. The primary outcomes were pain and function-Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The secondary outcomes included range of motion for cervical spine rotation, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Results In comparison to baseline data, both groups had a reduction of NPRS (P < .05) and NDI (P < .05) after the treatment. However, no statistically significant differences in pain intensity or disability were found when OMT/EG was compared to EG alone at 3 months (P = 0.1 and P = 0.2, respectively) and at 6 months (P = 0.4 and P = 0.9, respectively for pain and disability) and no difference was found between OMT/EG and the EG in the secondary outcomes during the same follow-up period (P > .05). Conclusion Outcomes of pain and functionality for patients in both groups were improved at 6 months. Our findings show that the combination of OMT and neck exercises for 4 weeks did not improve functionality and reduction of pain in patients with NCNP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Groisman
- Doctoral Program in Health Sciences; Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
- FEEVALE University, Novo Hamburgo/RS, Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Osteopathy (IBO), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
| | | | | | - Clarice Sperotto dos Santos Rocha
- Brazilian Institute of Osteopathy (IBO), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
- School of Physical Education, Physiotheraphy and Dance; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
| | - Tais Malysz
- Doctoral Program in Neuroscience; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
- Department of Morphological Sciences; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
| | - Geraldo Pereira Jotz
- Doctoral Program in Health Sciences; Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
- Department of Morphological Sciences; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilhelm M, Cleland J, Carroll A, Marinch M, Imhoff M, Severini N, Donaldson M. The combined effects of manual therapy and exercise on pain and related disability for individuals with nonspecific neck pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther 2023; 31:393-407. [PMID: 37092822 PMCID: PMC10642331 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2202895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neck pain is among the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal disorders. Manual therapy and exercise are two standard treatment approaches to manage neck pain. In addition, clinical practice guidelines recommend a multi-modal approach, including both manual therapy and exercise for the treatment of neck pain; however, the specific effects of these combined interventions have not recently been reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of manual therapy combined with exercise on pain, disability, and quality of life in individuals with nonspecific neck pain. DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. METHODS Electronic database searches were completed in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, Ovid, and SportDiscus, with publication dates of January 2000 to December 2022. The risk of bias in the included articles was completed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2). Raw data were pooled using standardized mean differences and mean differences for pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes, and forest plots were computed in the meta-analysis. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included in the final review. With moderate certainty of evidence, three studies demonstrated no significant difference between manual therapy plus exercise and manual therapy alone in pain (SMD of -0.25 (95% CI: -0.52, 0.02)) or disability (-0.37 (95% CI: -0.92, 0.18)). With a low certainty of evidence, 16 studies demonstrated that manual therapy plus exercise is significantly better than exercise alone for reducing pain (-0.95 (95%CI: -1.38, -0.51)). Similarly, with low certainty of evidence, 13 studies demonstrated that manual therapy plus exercise is significantly better than exercise alone for reducing disability (-0.59 (95% CI: -0.90, -0.28)). Four studies demonstrated that manual therapy plus exercise is significantly better than a control intervention for reducing pain (moderate certainty) (-2.15 (95%CI: -3.58, -0.73)) and disability (low certainty) (-2.39 (95% CI: -3.80, -0.98)). With a high certainty of evidence, four studies demonstrated no significant difference between manual therapy plus exercise and exercise alone in quality of life (SMD of -0.02 (95% CI: -0.21, 0.18)). CONCLUSION Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, a multi-modal treatment approach including exercise and manual therapy appears to provide similar effects as manual therapy alone, but is more effective than exercise alone or other interventions (control, placebo, 'conventional physical therapy', etc.) for the treatment of nonspecific neck pain and related disability. Some caution needs to be taken when interpreting these results given the general low to moderate certainty of the quality of the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Wilhelm
- Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua Cleland
- Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mark Marinch
- Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baroni F, Schleip R, Arcuri L, Consorti G, D’Alessandro G, Zegarra-Parodi R, Vitali AM, Tramontano M, Lunghi C. Functional Neuromyofascial Activity: Interprofessional Assessment to Inform Person-Centered Participative Care-An Osteopathic Perspective. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2886. [PMID: 37958030 PMCID: PMC10667998 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11212886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Health professionals and bodyworkers may be pivotal in promoting prevention programs, providing tailored advice and guidance to patients' adherence to self-care strategies, such as physical activity. Contemporary evidence encourages manual therapists to involve patients in decision-making and treatment procedures integrating passive and active approaches in treatment planning. This manuscript provides a definition and applications of neuromyofascial movement patterns, discusses the significance of functional assessment, and gives an example of clinical applications in the osteopathic field to highlight how this assessment can promote interdisciplinarity. Methods: The reporting framework used in the current manuscript followed guidelines for writing a commentary. Results: The manuscript highlights the crucial role that the neuromyofascial system plays in human movement and overall well-being and the importance of a functional neuromyofascial activity assessment in the context of person-centered participative care. Conclusions: Understanding individual neuromyofascial patterns could help healthcare practitioners, movement specialists, and bodyworkers in tailoring treatment plans, meeting patients' unique needs, and promoting a more effective personalized approach to care. The current perspective could spark debates within the professional community and provide a research roadmap for developing an evidence-informed interprofessional framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Baroni
- BMS Formation, 75116 Paris, France; (F.B.); (C.L.)
- Osteopatia Lunghi-Baroni Private Practice, 00146 Rome, Italy
| | - Robert Schleip
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Conservative and Rehabilitative Orthopedics, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany;
| | - Lorenzo Arcuri
- Clinical-Based Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, 65121 Pescara, Italy
| | - Giacomo Consorti
- Education Department of Osteopathy, Istituto Superiore di Osteopatia, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Giandomenico D’Alessandro
- Clinical-Based Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, 65121 Pescara, Italy
- Centre pour l’Etude, la Recherche et la Diffusion Ostéopathiques “C.E.R.D.O.”, 00199 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Tramontano
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Christian Lunghi
- BMS Formation, 75116 Paris, France; (F.B.); (C.L.)
- Osteopatia Lunghi-Baroni Private Practice, 00146 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dal Farra F, Buffone F, Risio RG, Tarantino A, Vismara L, Bergna A. Reply to the letter sent by Ceballos-Laitaa et al. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2023; 53:101790. [PMID: 37516598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Dal Farra
- Department of Research, Institute Osteopathy Milan, Istituto Osteopatia Milano (SOMA), 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - F Buffone
- Department of Research, Institute Osteopathy Milan, Istituto Osteopatia Milano (SOMA), 20126, Milan, Italy; Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, 20125, Milan, Italy; Principles and Practice of Clinical Research (PPCR), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health-ECPE, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - R G Risio
- Department of Research, Institute Osteopathy Milan, Istituto Osteopatia Milano (SOMA), 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - A Tarantino
- Department of Research, Institute Osteopathy Milan, Istituto Osteopatia Milano (SOMA), 20126, Milan, Italy; Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, 20125, Milan, Italy
| | - L Vismara
- Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation - IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Strada Luigi Cadorna 90, 28824, Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy
| | - A Bergna
- Department of Research, Institute Osteopathy Milan, Istituto Osteopatia Milano (SOMA), 20126, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ceballos-Laita L, Jiménez-Del-Barrio S, Carrasco-Uribarren A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in patients with non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2023; 53:101789. [PMID: 37482466 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Ceballos-Laita
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad S/N, 42002, Soria, Spain.
| | - Sandra Jiménez-Del-Barrio
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad S/N, 42002, Soria, Spain
| | - Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, International University of Catalunya, Calle Josep Trueta, 08195, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen L, Zhang Q, Huang Z, Da W, Liu S, Xue C, Ding C, Chen D, Fan T, Shi Q, Li X. Efficacy of Combining Traditional Chinese Manual Therapy (Tuina) and Specific Therapeutic Neck Exercise in Young Adults with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3119-3131. [PMID: 37724170 PMCID: PMC10505386 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s424812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP) is an increasingly common musculoskeletal disease and an important issue in the global healthcare system. Some studies have shown that the combination of manual therapy and exercise is effective in treating NSCNP but still with several limitations. Traditional Chinese manual therapy (tuina) is a Chinese manual therapy that consists of soft tissue manipulation and spinal manipulation. This study aims to design a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of a tuina combined with specific therapeutic neck exercise modified protocol for NSCNP patients. Patients and Methods This is a study protocol for a randomized, participant-, assessor- and analyst-blinded controlled trial. Eighty-eight eligible NSCNP patients will be randomly allocated into tuina combined with specific therapeutic neck exercise group (TSTE group) and tuina combined with sham therapeutic neck exercise group (TS group) in a ratio of 1:1. All participants will receive 8 treatment sessions applied in 4 weeks and then be followed up for another 12 weeks. Clinical data will be collected at baseline, during treatment phase (at the 2- and 4-week) and at the 8-, 12-, 16-week follow-ups. The primary outcome is the changes in neck pain intensity (visual analogue scale). The secondary outcomes include neck disability (Neck Disability Index), cervical range of motion (ROM), neck muscle endurance, cervical muscle cross-sectional area, cervical curvature and analgesic consumption. Adverse events will be collected and recorded throughout the study. Conclusion We will discuss whether our tuina combined with specific therapeutic neck exercise modified protocol is more effective at improving pericervical muscle endurance, ROM, cervical muscle cross-sectional area and cervical curvature than tuina alone, thereby decreases neck pain and disability in individuals with NSCNP more effectively. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR2300067903. Registered on 31 January 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuhui District Tianping Street Community Health Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zheng Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weiwei Da
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chunchun Xue
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chao Ding
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Deta Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianyou Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi Shi
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaofeng Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tran A, Ngo T, Roberts T, Ko E, Holmgren JG, Edwards C, Coleman M, Gao J. Quantitative ultrasound to assess efficacy of treatment for neck somatic dysfunctions: a feasibility study. J Osteopath Med 2023; 123:443-450. [PMID: 37285456 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2022-0216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Neck pain is a common complaint in healthcare clinics. Although the pathogenesis of neck pain is often multifactorial, trapezius muscle dysfunction has been commonly linked to neck pain. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment modality in treating trapezius muscle dysfunction and neck pain. However, there is a current lack of objective, quantitative measures to assess the effectiveness of OMT. Through previous research, ultrasound technology has been shown to be promising in its ability to quantify tissue changes both pre- and post-OMT. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study are to evaluate the feasibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessing upper trapezius muscles with pain and hypertonicity, as well as the changes in these muscles post-OMT for cervical somatic dysfunctions. METHODS After obtaining approval from the Rocky Vista University Institutional Review Board and written informed consent from participants, SWE and osteopathic assessments were performed on 22 adult participants with and without cervical spine somatic dysfunction. Participants with positive osteopathic assessments of tissue texture, asymmetry, restricted motion, and/or tenderness (TART) were treated utilizing OMT. Shear wave velocity (SWV, m/s) and shear wave velocity rate [SWVR = (SWV contraction - SWV relaxation)/ SWV relaxation] of the upper trapezius muscles with and without pain and hypertonicity, and before and after OMT, were examined utilizing a two-tailed t-test. RESULTS SWV in muscle contraction and SWVR were significantly lower in muscles with pain compared to muscles without pain (p≤0.01). SWV in muscle contraction was also significantly lower in hypertonic muscles compared to normotonic muscles (p<0.01). Following OMT, SWV in muscle contraction and SWVR in muscles with pain and hypertonic increased significantly (p≤0.01). Overall TART score of all muscles with somatic dysfunction (SD) after OMT significantly decreased (p<0.01). SWV in muscle contraction and SWVR in hypertonic muscles were also significantly increased (p≤0.03), with an improvement index of 0.11 and 0.20. CONCLUSIONS This study's results demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing SWE to evaluate somatic dysfunctions of the upper trapezius musculature and the efficacy of OMT for neck somatic dysfunctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Tran
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| | - Thien Ngo
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| | - Tanner Roberts
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| | - Eric Ko
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| | | | - Chris Edwards
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| | - Michele Coleman
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| | - Jing Gao
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ivins, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mueller J, Weinig J, Niederer D, Tenberg S, Mueller S. Resistance, Motor Control, and Mindfulness-Based Exercises Are Effective for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Dose-Response Meta-Regression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023; 53:420–459. [PMID: 37339388 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the effects and dose-response relationship of the most effective exercises for improving pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to September 30, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that involved people with chronic neck pain adopting a longitudinal exercise intervention and assessed one pain and/or disability outcome. DATA SYNTHESIS: Restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses were modeled separately for resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises; standardized mean differences (Hedge's g, standardized mean difference [SMD]) were effect estimators. Meta-regressions (dependent variable: effect sizes of the interventions; independent variables: training dose and control group effects) were conducted to explore the dose-response relationship for therapy success of any exercise type. RESULTS: We included 68 trials. Compared to true control, effects on pain and disability were significantly larger for resistance exercise (pain: SMD, -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.26, -0.28; |2 = 96%; disability: SMD, -1.76; 95% CI: -3.16, -0.37; |2 = 98%), motor control exercise (pain: SMD, -2.29; 95% CI: -3.82, -0.75; |2 = 98%; disability: SMD, -2.42; 95% CI: -3.38, -1.47; |2 = 94%), and Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise (pain: SMD, 1.91; 95% CI:-3.28, -0.55; |2 = 96%; disability: SMD, -0.62; 95% CI: -0.85, -0.38; |2 = 0%). Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise was more effective than other exercises (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI: -1.553, -0.13; |2 = 86%) for reducing pain. For disability, motor control exercise was superior to other exercises (SMD, -0.70; 95% CI: -1.23, -0.17; |2 = 98%). There was no dose-response relationship for resistance exercise (R2 = 0.32). Higher frequencies (estimate = -0.10) and longer durations (estimate = -0.11) of motor control exercise had larger effects on pain (R2 = 0.72). Longer sessions (estimate = -0.13) of motor control exercise had larger effects on disability (R2 = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises were effective for reducing neck pain (very low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Higher frequencies and longer duration of sessions had a significant effect on pain for motor control exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-41. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11820.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lin D, He Z, Weng R, Zhu Y, Lin Z, Deng Y, Yang Y, Tan J, Wang M, Li Y, Huang G, Yu G, Cai D, Huang X, Huang W. Comparison of biomechanical parameters of two Chinese cervical spine rotation manipulations based on motion capture and finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1195583. [PMID: 37576989 PMCID: PMC10415076 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1195583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to obtain the stress-strain of the cervical spine structure during the simulated manipulation of the oblique pulling manipulation and the cervical rotation-traction manipulation in order to compare the mechanical mechanism of the two manipulations. Methods: A motion capture system was used to record the key kinematic parameters of operating the two manipulations. At the same time, a three-dimensional finite element model of the C0-T1 full healthy cervical spine was established, and the key kinematic parameters were loaded onto the finite element model in steps to analyze and simulate the detailed process of the operation of the two manipulations. Results: A detailed finite element model of the whole cervical spine including spinal nerve roots was established, and the validity of this 3D finite element model was verified. During the stepwise simulation of the two cervical spine rotation manipulations to the right, the disc (including the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus) and facet joints stresses and displacements were greater in the oblique pulling manipulation group than in the cervical rotation-traction manipulation group, while the spinal cord and nerve root stresses were greater in the cervical rotation-traction manipulation group than in the oblique pulling manipulation group. The spinal cord and nerve root stresses in the cervical rotation-traction manipulation group were mainly concentrated in the C4/5 and C5/6 segments. Conclusion: The oblique pulling manipulation may be more appropriate for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, while cervical rotation-traction manipulation is more appropriate for the treatment of cervical spondylosis of cervical type. Clinicians should select cervical rotation manipulations for different types of cervical spondylosis according to the patient's symptoms and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongxin Lin
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zaopeng He
- Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- The Third School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Foshan, China
| | - Rui Weng
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuhua Zhu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiwei Lin
- Orthopedic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
- Department of Human Anatomy and Histoembryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China
| | - Yuping Deng
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinchuan Tan
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mian Wang
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanbin Li
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guanghao Yu
- Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Daozhang Cai
- Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- The Third School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Orthopedic Hospital of Guangdong Province, Academy of Orthopedics, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuecheng Huang
- Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Futian), Shenzhen, China
| | - Wenhua Huang
- Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Leech JB, Owen WE, Young JL, Rhon DI. Incomplete reporting of manual therapy interventions and a lack of clinician and setting diversity in clinical trials for neck pain limits replication and real-world translation. A scoping review. J Man Manip Ther 2023; 31:153-161. [PMID: 36047903 PMCID: PMC10288932 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2113295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neck pain is a leading cause of disability, and manual therapy (MT) is a common intervention used across disciplines and settings to treat it. While there is consistent support for MT in managing neck pain, questions remain about the feasibility of incorporating MT from research into clinical practice. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the adequacy of MT intervention descriptions and the variability in clinician and setting for MT delivery in trials for neck pain. METHODS Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL, PEDRo, and the Cochrane Central Registry for Controlled Trials were searched for clinical trials published from January 2010 to November 2021. A 11-item tool modified from the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template was used to assess appropriateness of intervention reporting. Clinicians, subclassifications of neck pain, and clinical settings were also extracted. RESULTS 113 trials were included. A low percentage of studies provided the recommended level of detail in the description of how MT was delivered (4.4%), while 39.0% included no description at all. Just over half of trials included clinician's qualifications (58.4%), dose of MT (59.3%), and occurrence of adverse events (55.8%). The proportion of trials with clinicians delivering MT were physical therapists (77.9%), chiropractors (10.6%), and osteopaths (2.7%). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION These results reveal incomplete reporting of essential treatment parameters, and a lack of clinician diversity. To foster reproducibility, researchers should report detailed descriptions of MT interventions. Future research should incorporate a variety of MT practitioners to improve generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B. Leech
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Rehabilitative Sciences, the University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, TX, USA
| | - William E. Owen
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
| | - Jodi L. Young
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
| | - Daniel I. Rhon
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cholewicki J, Popovich JM, Reeves NP, DeStefano LA, Rowan JJ, Francisco TJ, Prokop LL, Zatkin MA, Lee AS, Sikorskii A, Pathak PK, Choi J, Radcliffe CJ, Ramadan A. The effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. PM R 2022; 14:1417-1429. [PMID: 34719122 PMCID: PMC9054945 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neck pain (NP) affects up to 70% of individuals at some point in their lives. Systematic reviews indicate that manual treatments can be moderately effective in the management of chronic, nonspecific NP. However, there is a paucity of studies specifically evaluating the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of OMT in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic NP. DESIGN Single-blinded, cross-over, randomized-controlled trial. SETTING University-based, osteopathic manipulative medicine outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-seven participants, 21 to 65 years of age, with chronic, nonspecific NP. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to two trial arms: immediate OMT intervention or waiting period first. The intervention consisted of three to four OMT sessions over 4 to 6 weeks, after which the participants switched groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were pain intensity (average and current) on the numerical rating scale and Neck Disability Index. Secondary outcomes included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) health domains and Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Outcomes obtained prior to the cross-over allocation were evaluated using general linear models and after adjusting for baseline values. RESULTS A total of 38 and 37 participants were available for the analysis in the OMT and waiting period groups, respectively. The results showed significantly better primary outcomes in the immediate OMT group for reductions in average pain (-1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.72, -0.32; p = .005), current pain (-1.02, 95% CI -1.75, -0.30; p = .006), disability (-5.30%, 95% CI -9.2%, -1.3%; p = .010) and improved secondary outcomes (PROMIS) related to sleep (-3.25, 95% CI -6.95, -1.54; p = .003), fatigue (-3.26, 95% CI -6.04, -0.48; p = .022), and depression (-2.59, 95% CI -4.73, -0.45; p = .018). The effect sizes were in the clinically meaningful range between 0.5 and 1 standard deviation. No study-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS OMT is relatively safe and effective in reducing pain and disability along with improving sleep, fatigue, and depression in patients with chronic NP immediately following treatment delivered over approximately 4 to 6 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek Cholewicki
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research (CNCR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - John M. Popovich
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research (CNCR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - N. Peter Reeves
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Sumaq Life, LLC, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Lisa A. DeStefano
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research (CNCR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Jacob J. Rowan
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research (CNCR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Timothy J. Francisco
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Lawrence L. Prokop
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Mathew A. Zatkin
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research (CNCR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Angela S. Lee
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Center for Neuromusculoskeletal Clinical Research (CNCR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Alla Sikorskii
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Pramod K. Pathak
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Statistics and Probability, College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Jongeun Choi
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Present affiliation: School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Clark J. Radcliffe
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Ahmed Ramadan
- Center for Orthopedic Research (MSUCOR), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Present affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Demir O, Atıcı E, Torlak MS. Therapeutic and stabilization exercises after manual therapy in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain. INT J OSTEOPATH MED 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
17
|
Dal Farra F, Buffone F, Risio RG, Tarantino AG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in patients with non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2022; 49:101655. [PMID: 35986986 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate whether osteopathic manipulative interventions can reduce pain levels and enhance the functional status in patients with non-specific neck pain (NS-NP). METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA statement. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in five databases, assessed through a standardized form, and evaluated using the "13 items Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool". Effect sizes (ES) were calculated post-treatment, and the quality of evidence was assessed through GRADE criteria. RESULTS Five articles were included in the review, and none of these was completely judged at low RoB. Four of these were included in the meta-analysis. Osteopathic interventions compared to no intervention/sham treatment showed statistically significant results for pain levels (ES = -1.57 [-2.50, -0.65]; P = 0.0008) and functional status (ES = -1.71 [-3.12, -0.31]; P = 0.02). The quality of evidence was "very low" for all the assessed outcomes. Other results were presented in a qualitative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS Osteopathic interventions could be effective for pain levels and functional status improvements in adults with NS-NP. However, these findings are affected by a very low quality of evidence. Therefore, further high-quality RCTs are necessary to improve the quality of evidence and generalize the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvio Dal Farra
- Department of Research, SOMA - Istituto Osteopatia Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Francesca Buffone
- Department of Research, SOMA - Istituto Osteopatia Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, Milan, Italy; PPCR, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health - ECPE, Boston, USA.
| | | | - Andrea Gianmaria Tarantino
- Department of Research, SOMA - Istituto Osteopatia Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luca Vismara
- Department of Research, SOMA - Istituto Osteopatia Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, Milan, Italy; Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy; Department of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Andrea Bergna
- Department of Research, SOMA - Istituto Osteopatia Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|