Structural remodelling of the lumbar multifidus, thoracolumbar fascia and lateral abdominal wall perimuscular connective tissues: A cross-sectional and comparative ultrasound study

Ultrasound Imaging of Thoracolumbar Fascia: A Systematic Review

Over the past decade, there has been a notable increase in research focused on ultrasound imaging of thoracolumbar fascia (TLF). Nevertheless, published papers' results about the application of US imaging in TLF examination are still sparse. Background and Objevtives: Hence, this systematic review was performed aiming to firstly investigate the use and the methodology of ultrasound imaging to assess pathologic and healthy TLF. Secondarily, we aim to assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of US imaging in TLF assessment. Materials and Methods: The search was done on PubMed and Web of Science database from inception to April 2024. Furthermore, the references of included papers were thoroughly checked to find eligible publications. The MeSH keywords used were: "Thoracolumbar fascia", "Ultrasound Imaging", "Ultrasound", "Ultrasonography", and "Ultrasound examination". Results: Studies were aimed primarily at TLF diagnosis, treatment monitoring, or evaluating movement-related changes, underscoring the diverse clinical applications. The US parameters assessed included TLF thickness, echogenicity, stiffness, deformation, shear strain, and displacement, providing comprehensive insights into TLF features. Conclusions: Advanced US imaging holds promise as a reliable tool in musculoskeletal assessment, offering insights into TLF pathology/disfunction, treatment outcomes, and movement dynamics.

Augmentation of musculoskeletal soft tissue morphology within low back pain patients may suggest the presence of physiological stress shielding: An in vivo study

INTRODUCTION

The pathomechanism of low back pain (LBP) remains unknown. However, changes to mechanical properties of soft tissues affected by LBP may indicate the presence of stress shielding, which may manifest via tissue remodeling. This study investigates the potential for physiological stress shielding within the lumbar spine by examining differences within lumbar soft tissue morphology between control and LBP subjects.

METHODS

Through MRI, the total and functional cross-sectional area (tCSA, fCSA) and fatty infiltration (FI) of the lumbar multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), quadratus lumborum (QL), psoas major (PM), and thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) were measured from the L1/L2 to L5/S1 intervertebral disc levels of 69 subjects (36 LBP and 33 control subjects). Statistical analysis was conducted using Mann-Whitney U. P < 0.05 denoted significance.

RESULTS

Comparison of male LBP patients and male healthy controls yielded an increase in tCSA and fCSA within the L4/L5 PM (p < 0.01), and the L4/L5 ES (p = 0.02) and PM (p < 0.01), respectively, of LBP patients. Female LBP patients' FI compared to female controls increased within the L1/L2 MF (p = 0.03), L3/L4 MF (p = 0.04) and ES (p = 0.02), and L4/L5 QL (p = 0.01). The L3/L4 TLF also demonstrated an 8% increase in LBP subjects.

CONCLUSION

Male patients' results suggest elevated tissue loading during motion yielding hypertrophy in the L4/L5 ES and PM fCSA, and PM tCSA. Female LBP patients' MF, ES, and PM at L3/L4 demonstrating elevated FI coupled with TLF tCSA hypertrophy may suggest irregular stress distributions and lay the foundation for stress shielding within musculoskeletal soft tissues.

MR Imaging Radiomics Analysis Based on Lumbar Soft Tissue to Evaluate Lumbar Fascia Changes in Patients with Low Back Pain

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Clinicians must precisely pinpoint the etiology of low back pain as the number of people suffering from it increases to provide targeted care. The purpose of this paper was to use MR imaging radiomics based on lumbar soft tissue to analyze changes in the lumbar fascia of patients with low back pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the lumbar MRI of 197 patients with low back pain. Patients were randomly assigned to either the training (n = 138) or validation (n = 59) cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to create radiomics model and combined nomogram model and their predictive performance were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Seven radiomics features based on lumbar soft tissue MRI images were established, which performed well in distinguishing between low back pain patients with fascial changes and normal individuals demonstrated an excellent ability to identify differences, with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.96) in the training cohort and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.96) in the validation cohort, which performed better than the clinical model significantly only.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on clinical features and radiomics features of MR images had a good predictive ability to differentiate fascial alterations in patients with low back pain from normal subjects. It had the potential to be used as a decision support tool to assist clinicians in determining the etiology of patients with lower back pain and managing patients promptly, particularly in the early stage of the fasciitis when significant abnormalities on imaging were difficult to detect.

The relationship between clinical examination measures and ultrasound measures of fascia thickness surrounding trunk muscles or lumbar multifidus fatty infiltrations: An exploratory study

Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) exhibit remodelling of the lumbar soft tissues such as muscle fatty infiltrations (MFI) and fibrosis of the lumbar multifidus (LuM) muscles, thickness changes of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and perimuscular connective tissues (PMCT) surrounding the abdominal lateral wall muscles. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) parameters such as thickness and echogenicity are sensitive to this remodelling. This experimental laboratory study aimed to explore whether these RUSI parameters (LuM echogenicity and fascia thicknesses), hereafter called dependent variables (DV) were linked to independent variables (IV) such as (1) other RUSI parameters (trunk muscle thickness and activation) and (2) physical and psychological measures. RUSI measures, as well as a clinical examination comprising physical tests and psychological questionnaires, were collected from 70 participants with LBP. The following RUSI dependent variables (RUSI-DV), measures of passive tissues were performed bilaterally: (1) LuM echogenicity (MFI/fibrosis) at three vertebral levels (L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1); (2) TLF posterior layer thickness, and (3) PMCT thickness of the fasciae between subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT) and external oblique (PMCT_STT/EO ), between external and internal oblique (PMCT_EO/IO ), between IO and transversus abdominis (PMCT_IO/TrA ) and between TrA and intra-abdominal content (PMCT_TrA/IA ). RUSI measures of trunk muscle's function (thickness and activation), also called measures of active muscle tissues, were considered as independent variables (RUSI-IV), along with physical tests related to lumbar stability (n = 6), motor control deficits (n = 7), trunk muscle endurance (n = 4), physical performance (n = 4), lumbar posture (n = 2), and range of motion (ROM) tests (n = 6). Psychosocial measures included pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, psychological distress, illness perceptions and concepts related to adherence to a home-based exercise programme (physical activity level, self-efficacy, social support, outcome expectations). Six multivariate regression models (forward stepwise selection) were generated, using RUSI-DV measures as dependent variables and RUSI-IV/physical/psychosocial measures as independent variables (predictors). The six multivariate models included three to five predictors, explaining 63% of total LuM echogenicity variance, between 41% and 46% of trunk superficial fasciae variance (TLF, PMCT_STT/EO ) and between 28% and 37% of deeper abdominal wall fasciae variance (PMCT_EO/IO , PMCT_IO/TrA and PMCT_TrA/IA ). These variables were from RUSI-IV (LuM thickness at rest, activation of IO and TrA), body composition (percent fat) and clinical physical examination (lumbar and pelvis flexion ROM, aberrant movements, passive and active straight-leg raise, loaded-reach test) from the biological domain, as well as from the lifestyle (physical activity level during sports), psychological (psychological distress-cognitive subscale, fear-avoidance beliefs during physical activities, self-efficacy to exercise) and social (family support to exercise) domains. Biological, psychological, social and lifestyle factors each accounted for substantial variance in RUSI-passive parameters. These findings are in keeping with a conceptual link between tissue remodelling and factors such as local and systemic inflammation. Possible explanations are discussed, in keeping with the hypothesis-generating nature of this study (exploratory). However, to impact clinical practice, further research is needed to determine if the most plausible predictors of trunk fasciae thickness and LuM fatty infiltrations have an effect on these parameters.

Intermittent pain in patients with chronic low back pain is associated with abnormalities in muscles and fascia

We investigated the relationship between paravertebral muscles and perimuscular connective tissues of the thoracolumbar fascia region and the four types of pain in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. A total of 17 patients with chronic low back pain participated in this study. Ultrasound imaging method was used to measure the thickness and echogenicity of the paravertebral muscles and perimuscular connective tissues. The measurement site considered in this study was located lateral to the midpoint between L2-3 and L4-5 spines. In addition, age, gender, BMI, numerical rating scale and the short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 (includes questions with respect to continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain and affective descriptors) were used for assessment. Statistical analysis was performed using correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. A significant association was observed between paravertebral muscle echogenicity at L2-3 and the numerical rating scale (r = 0.499), between paravertebral muscle echogenicity at L4-5 with numerical rating scale (r = 0.538) and intermittent pain (r = 0.594), and between perimuscular connective tissue thickness at L2-3 and numerical rating scale (r = 0.762). We observed that the factor influencing perimuscular connective tissue thickness at L2-3 and L4-5 was intermittent pain (β = 0.513, β = 0.597, respectively). It was also observed that some of the imaging findings were associated with age and BMI. In conclusion, we observed that paravertebral muscle echogenicity and perimuscular connective tissue thickness in patients with chronic low back pain were associated with pain, especially intermittent pain.

Structural remodeling of the lumbar multifidus, thoracolumbar fascia and lateral abdominal wall perimuscular connective tissues: Medium-term test-retest reliability of ultrasound measures

INTRODUCTION

Growing interest is being paid to the lumbar multifidus (LM) intramuscular fatty infiltrations and fibrosis that are secondary to low back pain as well to the remodeling of perimuscular connective tissues (fasciae) such as the thoracolumbar fascia and fascia sheets separating the abdominal wall muscles. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography have traditionally been used but rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) is much more affordable and practical, which can accelerate research and clinical applications on this topic. The aim of this study was to test the medium-term (8 weeks) test-retest reliability of the corresponding RUSI measures.

METHODS

Thirty-four participants with non-acute LBP and 30 healthy controls performed a RUSI assessment before and after an 8-week time interval. LM echogenicity was quantified to assess fatty infiltrations and fibrosis while fasciae were quantified with thickness measures. Relative and absolute reliability were estimated using the generalizability theory as a framework, allowing to partition the different sources of error.

RESULTS

Overall, the reliability findings were quite acceptable, with negligible systematic effects. Excellent relative reliability was reached in half of the investigated RUSI measures, particularly when averaging measures across trials. However, neither relative, nor absolute reliability results support the use of these RUSI measurements on an individual basis (e.g. clinical applications) but they are useful on a group basis (e.g. research applications).

DISCUSSION

The different sources of error were distributed unequally across RUSI measures, pointing to different measurement strategies to mitigate the underlying errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the generalizability theory allowed identifying the sources of error of the different RUSI measures. For each category of measure, depending of the distribution of errors, it was possible to recommend specific measurement strategies to mitigate them.

Structural remodeling of the lumbar multifidus, thoracolumbar fascia and lateral abdominal wall perimuscular connective tissues: A search for its potential determinants

Recently remodeling of lumbar soft tissues has received increased research attention. However, the major determinants that influence remodeling need to be elucidated in order to understand the impact of different rehabilitation modalities on tissue remodeling. The main aim of this study was to explore the between-subject variance of different measures of lumbar soft tissues quantified with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). RUSI measures (n = 8) were collected from 30 subjects without and 34 patients with LBP: (1) lumbar multifidus (LM) echogenicity (fatty infiltration/fibrosis) at three vertebral levels (L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1) (n = 3); (2) posterior layer thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia (n = 1); and (3) thickness of the fasciae surrounding the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transversus abdominis (TrA) (n = 4). Forward stepwise multivariate regression modeling was conducted with these RUSI measures as dependent variables, using the following independent variables as potential determinants: age, sex, the presence of LBP, body size/composition characteristics (height, weight, trunk length, subcutaneous tissue thickness over the abdominal, and LM muscles), trunk muscle function (or activation) as determined with the percent thickness change of LM, EO, IO, and TrA muscles during a standardized effort (RUSI measures), and physical activity level during sport and leisure activities as estimated with a self-report questionnaire. Two or three statistically significant predictors (or determinants) were selected in the regression model of each RUSI measure (n = 8 models), accounting for 26-64% of their total variance. The subcutaneous tissue thickness on the back accounted for 15-30% variance of LM echogenicity measures and thoracolumbar fascia thickness while the subcutaneous tissue thickness over the abdominals accounted for up to 42% variance of the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissues and the EO muscle. The thickness of IO at rest accounted for 13-21% variance of all investigated abdominal fasciae except the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissue and EO. Pain status accounted for 13-18% variance of the anterior and posterior fasciae of the TrA. Age accounted for 11-14% variance of LM echogenicity at all investigated vertebral levels while sex accounted for 15-21% variance of LM echogenicity at L3/L4 and fascia separating subcutaneous adipose tissue and EO muscle. The function (or activation) of EO and LM at L3/L4 accounted for 8-11% variance of the thoracolumbar fascia and fascia separating TrA and intra-abdominal content (TrA posterior fascia), respectively. Finally, the physical activity level during sport activities accounted for 7% variance of the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissues and the EO muscle. These findings suggest that determinants other than body size characteristics may impact the remodeling of lumbar soft tissues, more importantly the subcutaneous adipose tissue deposits (thickness RUSI measures), which are associated with ectopic fat deposition in the LM and in the fasciae that are more closely positioned to the surface. While age, sex, and pain status explain some variability, modifiable factors such as physical activity level as well as trunk muscle thickness and function were involved. Overall, these results suggest that rehabilitation can potentially impact tissue remodeling, particularly in terms of intramuscular and perimuscular adipose tissues.