Lateral epicondylitis: Are we missing out on radial nerve involvement? A cross-sectional study

Exploring Symptom Responses to Upper Limb Neural Test Variations of the Radial Nerve in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the radial nerve mechanosensitivity evaluation in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. Despite different positions and sequences having been described, no research analyzed how each variation triggers symptoms associated with lateral epicondylalgia. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different positions and sequences in the upper limb neural tension test 2b (ULNT2b) in symptom responses in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.

METHODS

In this observational study, 66 patients underwent 4 test conditions: standard ULNT2b, ULNT2b proximal to distal, ULNT2B with resisted supination, and resisted supination isolated. Paresthesia sensations, symptom reproduction, pain intensity (measured using a visual analog scale), and distribution of painful symptoms data were collected.

RESULTS

Significant differences in paresthesia sensations were observed between groups, with significant differences between the standard ULNT2B and other ULNT variations or resisted supination maneuvers. Symptom reproduction also differed significantly across groups, with significant differences between the standard ULNT2B and other ULNT or resisted supination tests. The positive/negative test and percentage of distribution of painful symptoms scores varied significantly across 4 conditions in both lateral and frontal views. Although pain intensity scores during tests were comparable among the tests, distribution of painful symptoms differed significantly.

CONCLUSION

Variations in the ULNT2b test can affect symptom responses in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. The standard ULNT2b test appears more effective at reproducing symptoms, intensity of paresthesia, and distribution of painful symptoms compared to other ULNT variations and the resisted supination test.

IMPACT

ULNT2b sequences have been shown to elicit varying responses concerning paresthesia, replication of familiar symptoms, positive/negative test results, and distribution of painful symptoms. Clinicians should consider specific test variations during the patients' radial nerve mechanosensitivity assessment to identify aggravating factors reproducing recognizable symptoms. A control group of asymptomatic participants and the role of presence of other comorbidities, psychological factors, or the duration of symptoms were not considered in this study and might play an important role influencing the results of the tests.

Nerve entrapment complicating neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome surgery: A 10-year retrospective study

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome results from compression of the brachial plexus. The symptoms are mainly pain, upper-limb weakness and paresthesia. Management always starts with a rehabilitation program, but failure of rehabilitation may necessitate surgery. In practice, we observed that several patients developed secondary distal nerve entrapment in the months following surgery, with no preoperative compression. We aimed to assess the occurrence of distal nerve entrapment after surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in a retrospective cohort study. Seventy-four patients were included; 82% females; mean age, 39.4 ± 9.4 years. There were 36.5% with high intensity and 63.5% with low to moderate intensity work. Eighteen (24.3%) developed secondary upper-limb entrapment at 10.6 ± 5.8 months after surgery. Sixteen had a single entrapment and 2 had two different entrapments. In 10 cases (50%) the ulnar nerve was involved at the elbow, in 7 (35.0%) the radial nerve at the radial tunnel, and in 3 (15.0%) the median nerve. No differences were found between patients with and without secondary nerve entrapment in gender (p = 0.51), mean age (p = 0.44), symptom duration (p = 0.92) or work intensity (p = 0.26). Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to shed light on the underlying mechanisms.

Immediate effects of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with lateral elbow pain

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound guided-percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be effective in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the immediate effects of one session of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the radial nerve in patients with lateral elbow pain.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted. Sixty patients with chronic lateral elbow pain were allocated into real-percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 30) or sham-percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 30) where the patients received one-single session of the real or sham percutaneous stimulation on the radial nerve, respectively. Pressure pain thresholds, pain intensity, pain-free grip strength, and the self-perceived improvement were evaluated after the intervention.

RESULTS

Significant differences between groups for pain intensity (-11.55, 95% CI -21.79 to -1.30, p < .028), but not for pressure pain threshold or pain-free grip strength, were found. Patients receiving real-percutaneous stimulation had significant improvement in pain-free grip strength on the treated side. The proportion of individuals reporting moderate to large self-perceived improvement (≥4) was significantly higher (p = .026) after real-percutaneous stimulation than after sham-percutaneous stimulation.

CONCLUSION

A single session of real-percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation targeting the radial nerve in subjects with lateral elbow pain decreased pain intensity between groups and increased pain-free grip strength on the treated side but not between groups.

Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity and Ultrasound Changes in the Radial Nerve in Patients with Unilateral Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Case-Control Study

Some authors have proposed the potential role of the radial nerve in lateral epicondylalgia. The aims of this study were to investigate the presence of pressure pain hyperalgesia and nerve swelling (increased cross-sectional area) assessed with ultrasound imaging on the radial nerve in people with lateral epicondylalgia, and to investigate if an association exists between pressure pain sensitivity and cross-sectional area. A total of 37 patients with lateral epicondylalgia (43% women, age: 45.5 ± 9.5 years) and 37 age- and sex-matched pain-free controls were recruited for participation. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed bilaterally on the radial nerve at the spiral groove, the arcade of Frohse, and the anatomic snuffbox in a blinded design. Further, the cross-sectional area of the radial nerve at the spiral groove and antecubital fossa was also assessed. The results demonstrated lower PPTs on the radial nerve of the affected side in individuals with lateral epicondylalgia as compared with the unaffected side (p < 0.01) and with both sides in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Additionally, the cross-sectional area of the radial nerve on the affected side in patients was higher compared with the unaffected side (p < 0.01) and both sides in healthy controls (p < 0.001). The cross-sectional area of the radial nerve at the spiral groove was negatively associated with PPTs over the radial nerve at the spiral groove (r = -0.496, p = 0.002) and positively associated with function (r = 0.325, p = 0.045). Our findings revealed generalized pressure pain hyperalgesia and also nerve swelling of the radial nerve in people with lateral epicondylalgia, suggesting the presence of a widespread sensitization of nerve tissues in this population. The radial nerve could represent a potential peripheral drive to initial and maintain altered pain processing in lateral epicondylalgia.

Synovial plica of the elbow - detailed measurements and how to implicate its relevance in clinical practice

PURPOSE

The synovial plica of the elbow is a fold of synovial tissue, which is said to be a remnant of the embryonic septa of normal articular development and is located around the radiocapitellar joint. The objective of the present study was to provide morphometric properties of the synovial plica of the elbow and its relation to surrounding structures in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to establish the morphometric characteristics of the synovial plica of the elbow. The results of 216 consecutive patients, who for different reasons during the five year period of time underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of an elbow, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Plica was found in a total of 161 of 216 elbows (74.5%). The mean width of the plica was set to be 3.00 mm (SD: 1.39). The mean length of the plica was established at 2.91 mm (SD: 1.13). An analysis of sexual dimorphism was also included. Potential correlations were analyzed for each of the categories and age.

CONCLUSIONS

The synovial plica of the elbow is a clinically relevant anatomical structure. Analyzing the morphometric parameters of the synovial plica is necessary to properly evaluate synovial plica syndrome, which can commonly be confused with other sources of lateral elbow pain such as tennis elbow, oppression of the radial and/or posterior interosseous nerve, or snapping of the triceps tendon. The authors suggest that the thickness of the plica may not be the golden diagnostic feature as there are no statistically significant differences in this parameter between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. A precise and accurate diagnosis of synovial fold syndrome and/or differentiation from other sources of lateral elbow pain must be performed, as the surgical treatment, even if performed properly, will be unsuccessful because of a misdiagnosed source of pain.

Radial nerve compression: anatomical perspective and clinical consequences

The radial nerve is the biggest branch of the posterior cord of the brachial plexus and one of its five terminal branches. Entrapment of the radial nerve at the elbow is the third most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb after carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes. Because the incidence is relatively low and many agents can compress it along its whole course, entrapment of the radial nerve or its branches can pose a considerable clinical challenge. Several of these agents are related to normal or variant anatomy. The most common of the compressive neuropathies related to the radial nerve is the posterior interosseus nerve syndrome. Appropriate treatment requires familiarity with the anatomical traits influencing the presenting symptoms and the related prognoses. The aim of this study is to describe the compressive neuropathies of the radial nerve, emphasizing the anatomical perspective and highlighting the traps awaiting physicians evaluating these entrapments.

The Effect of Elbow and Forearm Position on the Resisted Wrist Extension Test and Incidence of Sensory Disturbance of the Superficial Radial Nerve in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of elbow and forearm position on the resisted wrist extension test (RWET) in patients with lateral epicondylitis. We also looked at the incidence of associated sensory disturbance of the superficial radial nerve (SRN) and the effect of treatment of lateral epicondylitis on sensory disturbance.

Methods: Sixty-three consecutive patients (68 limbs) with lateral epicondylitis and an equal number of age and gender matched volunteers were investigated. Patients with lateral epicondylitis were subdivided into two groups based on history of corticosteroid injection. We performed the RWET in four limb positions namely elbow extended and forearm pronated (EP), elbow flexed and forearm pronated (FP), elbow extended and forearm supinated (ES), elbow flexed and forearm supinated (FS). Sensory disturbance in the SRN was assessed using a Wartenberg pin wheel.

Results: The positivity rate of the RWET was significantly higher in the EP position (100%) compared to the FP (66%), ES (62%) and the FS (24%) positions in limbs with lateral epicondylitis. The RWET was positive only in one subject in the EP position in the control group (1.5%). Sensory disturbance in the SRN territory was present in 63.2% of limbs and only two subjects (2.9%) in the control group. The incidence of sensory disturbance was significantly higher (74.5% vs. 48.3%, p < 0.05) in patients who did not have a corticosteroid injection.

Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of the RWET is better when it is performed with the elbow in extension with the forearm pronated (EP); 63.2% of limbs with lateral epicondylitis were noted to have an associated sensory disturbance of the SRN and a corticosteroid injection seems to decrease the incidence of sensory disturbances.

Level of Evidence: Level II (Diagnostic)