Periacetabular reconstruction following limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas

Curative-intent surgery for solitary bone metastasis from extremity and trunk wall sarcoma: What are the outcomes and complications?

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 40-50 % of sarcoma patients will develop lung metastasis, but only 10 % will develop bone metastasis. The survival benefit of surgery for solitary bone metastasis remains unclear.

METHODS

From 1987 to 2019, 47 patients who underwent curative-intent treatment for localized bone or soft tissue sarcoma in the extremities or trunk wall developed solitary bone metastases as the first distant recurrence. Of them, 51 % (24/47) received curative-intent metastasectomy. We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics of the metastasectomy versus non-metastasectomy patients and evaluated the prognostic impact of solitary bone metastasectomy. The primary outcome measure was disease-specific survival (DSS) after developing solitary bone metastasis.

RESULTS

The post-metastasis DSS was worse with larger primary tumour size (HR 1.09; 95 % CI 1.02-1.16; p = 0.01) and bone metastasis in the pelvis or spine versus other bones (HR 3.79, 95 % CI 1.46-9.87; p = 0.01), and better with curative-intent surgery for the solitary bone metastasis (HR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.06-0.34; p < 0.001). The median DSS was 43 (95 % CI, 24-69) months for the metastasectomy group vs. 13 (95 % CI, 7-19) months for the non-metastasectomy group (p < 0.001). The metastasectomy group had fewer patients with metastasis in the spine or pelvis and longer metastasis-free interval. In the multivariate analysis, curative-intent surgery for solitary bone metastasis was associated with better survival (HR 0.21; 95 % CI 0.08-0.53; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative-intent surgery for solitary bone metastasis from sarcoma is associated with a better prognosis and is a reasonable treatment strategy whenever feasible.

Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications

BACKGROUND

Malignancies involving the pelvic ring present numerous challenges, especially in the periacetabular area. Extensive resection of the pelvic region without reconstruction can lead to severe functional impairment. Numerous reconstructive options exist, but all have drawbacks. Extracorporeally irradiated autografts are one option for reconstruction after periacetabular resections; they offer the potential advantages of eliminating the risk of allogeneic reactions associated with allografts and preserving local anatomy. However, little is known about the durability and risks of this approach in pelvic reconstruction.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the survival rates of the autograft used, and if there is graft loss, what is the extent of this loss? (2) What are the functional outcomes after the implementation of this method? (3) What is the rate and nature of complications associated with this approach?

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series from one subspecialty tumor unit that evaluated patients treated between January 2005 to January 2022. During that time, three surgeons treated 48 patients with Type II resections (defined as resection of periacetabular area). Patients treated with isolated Type II resections were eligible, as were those treated either with Type I+II resections, Type II+III resections, Type I+II+III resections, and Type I+II+III+IV resections. Of those, 21% (10 of 48) were treated primarily with a cone prosthesis, 13% (6 of 48) were treated without femoral reconstruction, 10% (5 of 48) were treated with resection without reconstruction, and 6% (3 of 48) had a THA on the sacrum, leaving 50% (24 of 48) of patients who were treated with femoral and acetabular reconstruction using extracorporeally irradiated autograft and total hip replacement; those patients were potentially eligible for this study. During that time span, we used this approach in all Type II pelvic resection procedures, when a part of the hemipelvis could be preserved without resection (other than Type I+II+III+IV) and where we predicted that there would be sufficient bone stock after tumor removal. Of those, 21% (5 of 24) were lost to follow-up before 2 years, and 13% (3 of 24) died within 2 years with the reconstruction intact and without any reoperation or graft loss, leaving 67% (16 of 24) for analysis here. Demographic characteristics, type of tumor, tumor origin site, type of applied resection, and extent of applied surgical procedure were noted. Of 16 patients, 12 were male, with a mean age of 38 ± 21 years. Tumor types included chondrosarcoma in eight patients, malignant mesenchymal tumor in four patients, osteosarcoma in two patients, and Ewing sarcoma in two patients. Among these, 10 patients had tumors originating from the pelvis, whereas six patients had tumors originating from the proximal femur. We used a Kaplan-Meier estimator to calculate survivorship free from total or partial graft removal at 72 months. To measure functional results, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system was utilized at most recent follow-up so as to be able to evaluate the impact of complications (if any) on the ultimate result. The MSTS score ranges from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 30 points, where a higher score reflects lower pain and higher functional and emotional capacity. Related complications, time of complications, secondary interventions, and mortality rates were also ascertained from chart review.

RESULTS

Graft survival rate at 72 months after initial reconstruction, free from partial or total graft removal, was 50% (95% CI 26% to 75%). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed estimated mean time of graft removal as 43 months (95% CI 28 to 58). The graft was protected in eight patients on their final follow-up radiographs. The median (range) MSTS score was 18 (6 to 25) of 30 points at most-recent follow-up (these scores include patients who have had their grafts removed). In all, 15 of 16 patients had 17 complications; 16 were major complications (defined as those substantial enough to result in further surgery or a life- or limb-threatening event). A total of 14 of those 15 patients underwent one or more secondary procedures (a total of 21 unplanned additional procedures were performed in those patients). Deep infection was the most common complication, occurring in eight patients. Prosthesis dislocation occurred in four patients. Three patients developed aseptic acetabular component loosening, two had graft fractures, and one patient developed heterotopic ossification.

CONCLUSION

Composite reconstruction with extracorporeal irradiated autografts plus total hip replacement is a feasible reconstruction technique after Type II pelvic resections, although complications and reoperations were common. Although no reconstruction technique has been proven superior to other alternatives, the high risk of complications and reoperations associated with this technique should be considered when selecting from among possible alternative reconstruction methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Short-to-Mid-Term Outcomes of Ipsilateral Femoral Head Autograft Combined with Uncemented Total Hip Replacement for Partial Periacetabular Defects Following Tumor Resection

OBJECTIVE

Periacetabular tumors, especially in young to middle-aged patients with invasive benign tumors or low-grade malignant tumors involving type II or II + III, present significant challenges due to their rarity and the complexity of the anatomical and biomechanical structures involved. The primary difficulty lies in balancing the need to avoid unfavorable oncological outcomes while maintaining postoperative hip joint function during surgical resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of a surgical method involving partial weight-bearing acetabular preservation combined with the use of an uncontaminated femoral head autograft to reconstruct the segmental bone defect after intra-articular resection of the tumorous joint, providing a solution that ensures both oncological safety and functional preservation of the hip joint in these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with a follow-up period of at least 36 months. From January 2010 to October 2020, we reviewed 20 cases of patients under 60 year of age with periacetabular invasive benign tumors or primary low-grade malignant tumors. All patients underwent reconstruction of the tumorous joint using autologous femoral head grafts. Data collected included patient age, gender, tumor type, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), patient survival rates, postoperative tumor recurrence, and surgical complications. To analyze the data, we utilized various statistical methods, including descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographics and clinical characteristics, and paired sample t-tests to compare preoperative and postoperative scores.

RESULTS

The study included 20 patients, and a total median follow-up was 83 months. Their pathologic diagnoses comprised 13 giant cell tumors (GCTs), 5 chondrosarcomas, one chondroblastoma, and 1 leiomyosarcoma. Postoperatively, the median differences in vertical and horizontal center of rotation (COR) were 3.8 and 4.0 mm. Median limb length discrepancy (LLD) postoperatively was 5.7 mm (range, 2.3-17.8 mm). Two patients (10%) experienced delayed wound healing, resolved with antibiotics and early surgical debridement. One patient experienced dislocation 3 months postoperatively, which was promptly addressed under general anesthesia without further dislocation.

CONCLUSION

Through multiplanar osteotomy with limited margins, femoral head autograft, and uncemented total hip replacement for pelvic segmental bone defects in selected patients in type II or II + III appears to be an encouraging limb-sparing surgery worthy of consideration for carefully selected patients.

Limb Salvage and Pelvic Reconstruction With Endoprosthesis After Pelvic Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review

Periacetabular defects following tumor resection present formidable challenges in reconstruction and continue to pose clinical difficulties. Historically, treatment approaches leaned towards hindquarter amputation; however, due to associated morbidities and functional limitations, limb-sparing procedures gained prominence in the 1980s. Nevertheless, the intricacies of pelvic anatomy and the imperative of achieving wide surgical margins while preserving essential structures make pelvic tumor resection and subsequent reconstruction inherently complex. Various reconstruction modalities have been explored, including non-vascularized fibular grafts and prosthetic implants. Among these options, the LUMiC® endoprosthesis stands out as a promising solution for pelvic reconstruction post-tumor resection. Characterized by a modular design featuring a hydroxyapatite-coated stem and acetabular cup, this device has shown favorable implant survival rates in studies, despite encountering complications primarily associated with soft tissue failure, dislocation, and infection. Notably, the incidence of complications varies across studies. The Henderson classification system delineates these complications, encompassing soft tissue issues, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, infections, and tumor recurrence. Despite the encouraging functional outcomes associated with the LUMiC® endoprosthesis, it is not immune to limitations. Concerns persist regarding complications such as dislocation and infection, underscoring the imperative for further research to evaluate the long-term durability and reliability of this reconstructive approach. Moreover, advancements in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and the advent of navigation-assisted procedures hold promise for enhancing outcomes and mitigating complication rates in pelvic reconstruction surgeries.

Reconstruction after Pelvic Bone Massive Resection: Evolution and Actuality of 3D-Printing Technology

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Pelvic reconstructions after massive bone resections are among the most challenging practices in orthopedic surgery. Whether the bone gap results after a trauma, a tumor resection, or it is due to a prosthetic revision, it is mandatory to reconstruct pelvic bone continuity and rebuild the functional thread that connects spine and hip joint. Several different approaches have been described in literature through the decades to achieve those goals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To this date, 3D-printed implants represent one of the most promising surgical technologies in orthopedic oncology and complex reconstructive surgery. We present our experience with 3D-printed custom-made pelvic prostheses to fulfi ll bone gaps resulting from massive bone loss due to tumor resections. We retrospectively evaluated 17 cases treated with pelvic bone reconstruction using 3D-printed prostheses. Cases were evaluated in terms of both oncological and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, local complications were found in 6 cases (36%): in 4 (23.5%) of them the cause was a local recurrence of the disease, whereas only 2 (12.5%) had non-oncologic issues. The mean MSTS score in our population increased from 8.2 before surgery to 22.3 at the latest clinical control after surgery.

DISCUSSION

3D-printing technology, used to produce cutting jigs and prosthetic implants, can lead to good clinical and functional outcomes. These encouraging results are comparable with the ones obtained with other more frequently used reconstructive approaches and support custom-made implants as a promising reconstructive approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confi rm 3D-printing and custom-made implants as promising technologies that could shape the next future of orthopedic oncology and reconstructive surgery.

KEY WORDS

custom made prosthesis, pelvic reconstruction, orthopedic oncology, cutting jigs, 3D-printing.

Hip Transposition Can Provide Early Walking Function After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction after periacetabular bone tumor resection involves important tradeoffs; large bone grafts or endoprostheses are reported to offer fair walking function in general but can be technically demanding and carry a high risk of severe complications. Conversely, hip transposition avoids implant-related risks, but stability and functional return may be less consistent. Fewer studies are available on hip transposition, which is also appealing in more resource-constrained environments, and little is known about the time course from surgery to functional return after hip transposition.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the time course of recovery of walking function after hip transposition, especially in the first 6 months? (2) What factors are associated with a greater likelihood of early functional recovery? (3) Is early (2-month) functional recovery associated with a greater likelihood of walking ability and higher Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores?

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2019, six tertiary care centers in Japan treated 48 patients with internal hemipelvectomy for malignant tumors. During that time, the preferred reconstructive approach was hip transposition, and 92% (44 of 48) of our patients were treated with this procedure. Among them, 86% (38 of 44) had follow-up of at least 6 months, had no local recurrence during that time, and were included in our retrospective study. We chose 6 months as the minimum follow-up duration because the endpoints in this study pertained to early recovery rather than reconstructive durability. Hip transposition involved moving the proximal end of the femur (femoral head, resection end of the trochanteric area, and spacers such as prostheses) upward to the underside of the resected ilium or the lateral side of the sacrum if sacroiliac joint resection was performed. The end of the proximal femur was stabilized to the remaining ilium or sacrum using polyethylene tape, polyethylene terephthalate mesh, an iliotibial tract graft, or an external fixator, according to the surgeon's preference. The median age at surgery was 46 years (range 9 to 76 years), there were 23 women and 15 men, and the median follow-up duration was 17 months (range 6 to 110 months). The postoperative time course of functional recovery was assessed with a record review, the timing of functional milestones was identified (wheelchair, walker, bilateral crutches, single crutch or cane, and walking without an aid), and the MSTS score at the final follow-up was assessed. Additionally, demographic and surgical factors were reviewed, and their association with short-term functional recovery and the final functional outcome was analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients started using a walker at median postoperative day (POD) 20 (IQR 14 to 36) and with bilateral crutches at median POD 35 (IQR 20 to 57). At POD 60, which was the approximate median date of discharge, 76% (29 of 38) of patients were able to walk using bilateral crutches (the early recovery group) and 24% (nine of 38) of patients were not able to do so (the delayed recovery group). No baseline factors were different between the two groups. The early recovery group had a higher median MSTS score than the delayed recovery group: 57% (range 17% to 90%) versus 45% (13% to 57%) (p = 0.047). Moreover, more patients acquired better function (a single crutch or cane or more) in the early recovery group, with a median of 5 months (95% CI 4 to 11) than did those in the delayed recovery group (median not reached) (p = 0.0006). The HR was 15.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 93). Forty-two percent (16 of 38) underwent additional surgery for wound management.

CONCLUSION

It took patients a fair amount of time to recover walking function after hip transposition, and patients who could not walk on bilateral crutches at POD 60 seemed less likely to regain walking function and were likely to have lower MSTS scores thereafter. Wound-related complications were frequent. This method may be a realistic alternative for younger patients who have the strength for a long rehabilitation period or those who want to minimize prosthesis-related complications. Future studies with more patients are necessary to understand the risk factors associated with delayed recovery.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Stress-shielding resistant design of custom pelvic prostheses using lattice-based topology optimization

Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the pelvic bone using 3D-printed, custom-made implants has delivered early load-bearing ability and good functional outcomes in the short term to individuals with pelvic sarcoma. However, excessive stress-shielding and subsequent resorption of peri‑prosthetic bone can imperil the long-term stability of such implants. To evaluate the stress-shielding performance of pelvic prostheses, we developed a sequential modeling scheme using subject-specific finite element models of the pelvic bone-implant complex and personalized neuromusculoskeletal models for pre- and post-surgery walking. A new topology optimization approach is introduced for the stress-shielding resistant (SSR) design of custom pelvic prostheses, which uses 3D-printable porous lattice structures. The SSR optimization was applied to a typical pelvic prosthesis to reconstruct a type II+III bone resection. The stress-shielding performance of the optimized implant based on the SSR approach was compared against the conventional optimization. The volume of the peri‑prosthetic bone predicted to undergo resorption post-surgery decreased from 44 to 18%. This improvement in stress-shielding resistance was achieved without compromising the structural integrity of the prosthesis. The SSR design approach has the potential to improve the long-term stability of custom-made pelvic prostheses.

[Three-dimensional-printed hemi-pelvic prosthesis for revision of aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed hemi-pelvic prosthesis for revision of aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis.

Methods

Between February 2017 and January 2020, 11 patients with aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis were revised using 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses. There were 7 males and 4 females with an average age of 44 years (range, 25-60 years). In the first operation, all patients underwent total tumor resection, modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis reconstruction, and autologous femoral head transplantation. According to the Enneking pelvic partition system, 8 cases were resected in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ and 3 cases in zones Ⅰ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ. The interval from the initial operation to this revision ranged from 14.3-66.2 months, with an average of 35.8 months. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. At 6 months after the first operation, before revision, and at last follow-up, the American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the recovery of lower limb function. The pain-free walking distance of patients without brace assistance was recorded at last follow-up. X-ray films were taken at 1 month after the first operation, before revision, and at 1 month after revision, the acetabulum position was assessed by the differences in weight arm and cup height between bilateral hip joints. At last follow-up, the digital X-ray tomography was taken to evaluate the prosthesis-bone integration and the occurrence of aseptic loosening.

Results

The operation time was 182.6-238.0 minutes (mean, 197.4 minutes). The amount of intraoperative bleeding was 400-860 mL (mean, 550.0 mL). All incisions healed by first intention with no infection, hip dislocation, nerve damage, or vascular-related adverse events. The MSTS score and Harris score at last follow-up were significantly higher than those at 6 months after the first operation and before revision ( P<0.05), while the score before revision was significantly lower than that at 6 months after the first operation ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the patients were able to walk more than 1 000 meters painlessly without brace assistance. Imaging review showed that the difference of cup height at 1 month after revision was significantly lower than that at 1 month after the first operation and before revision, and at 1 month after the first operation than before revision operation, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the difference of weight arm among three time points ( P>0.05). All prostheses were well integrated, and no aseptic loosening of the prosthesis or screw fracture occurred.

Conclusion

Revision with 3D-printed hemi-pelvic prostheses benefited in reconstructing stable pelvic ring and natural bodyweight transmission for patients encountering the aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis. Early postoperative rehabilitation training can maximize the recovery of patient limb function, reduce pain during walking, and reduce the incidence of complications.

Complications and Functional Outcome Differences in Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Surgery for Malignant Bone Tumors of the Pelvis: A Multicenter, Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an evolving treatment option for malignant pelvic tumors in patients with poor surgical indications. However, the difference in complications and functional outcomes between CIRT and surgery is poorly understood. This study compares the complications and functional outcomes of CIRT and surgery to facilitate treatment selection.

METHODS

A total of 28 patients who underwent CIRT for pelvic bone tumors while theoretically meeting the surgical resection criteria were included. Sixty-nine patients who underwent surgery for pelvic bone tumors were included as controls. Major complication rates and functional outcomes (ambulatory, pain, urination, constipation) were evaluated and compared at several time points (pretreatment, discharge, and final follow-up) between the groups.

RESULTS

Early (within 90 days) major complications were not observed in the CIRT group but occurred in 30% of the surgery group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In contrast, late (after 90 days) major complications occurred more often in the CIRT group than in the surgery group (18% and 4%, respectively; P = 0.042). From pretreatment until discharge, all functional outcomes in the surgery group deteriorated (P < 0.001 for all) but did not change in the CIRT group (P = 0.77-1.00). At the final follow-up, all functional outcomes showed no significant intergroup difference (P = 0.28-0.92) due to the recovery trend in the surgery group and the deterioration trend in the CIRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with surgery, CIRT may have favorable safety and stable functional outcomes in the short-term but more late complications. Mid-term functional outcomes were similar between the groups.

[Effectiveness analysis of resection and reconstruction of primary bone tumor in pelvic zone ]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of complete resection of bone tumor in pelvic zone Ⅱ and reconstruction with allogeneic pelvis, modular prosthesis, and three-dimensional (3D) printing prosthesis.

Methods

The clinical data of 13 patients with primary bone tumor in pelvic zone Ⅱ who underwent tumor resection and acetabular reconstruction between March 2011 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 4 males and 9 females with an average age of 39.0 years ranging from 16 to 59 years. There were 4 cases of giant cell tumor, 5 cases of chondrosarcoma, 2 cases of osteosarcoma, and 2 cases of Ewing sarcoma. The Enneking classification of pelvic tumors showed that 4 cases involved zone Ⅱ, 4 cases involved zone Ⅰ and zone Ⅱ, and 5 cases involved zone Ⅱ and zone Ⅲ. The disease duration ranged from 1 to 24 months, with an average of 9.5 months. The patients were followed up to observe the recurrence and metastasis of the tumor, and the imaging examination was performed to observe the status of implant in place, fracture, bone resorption, bone nonunion, and so on. The improvement of hip pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score before operation and at 1 week after operation, and the recovery of hip function was evaluated according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system after operation.

Results

The operation time was 4-7 hours, with an average of 4.6 hours; the intraoperative blood loss ranged from 800 to 1 600 mL, with an average of 1 200.0 mL. There was no reoperation or death after operation. All patients were followed up 9-60 months (mean, 33.5 months). No tumor metastasis was found in 4 patients receiving chemotherapy during follow-up. Postoperative wound infection occurred in 1 case, and prosthesis dislocation occurred in 1 case at 1 month after prosthesis replacement. One case of giant cell tumor recurred at 12 months after operation, and the puncture biopsy showed malignant transformation of giant cell tumor, and hemipelvic amputation was performed. The postoperative hip pain significantly relieved, and the VAS score was 6.1±0.9 at 1 week after operation, which was significantly different from the preoperative score (8.2±1.3) ( t=9.699, P<0.001). At 12 months after operation, the MSTS score was 23.0±2.1, including 22.8±2.1 for patients with allogenic pelvis reconstruction and 23.3±2.3 for patients with prosthsis reconstruction. There was no significant difference in the MSTS score between the two reconstruction methods ( t=0.450, P=0.516). At last follow-up, 5 patients could walk with cane assistance and 7 patients could walk without cane assistance.

Conclusion

The resection and reconstruction of primary bone tumor in pelvic zone Ⅱ can obtain satisfactory hip function, and the interface of allogeneic pelvis and 3D printing prosthesis have better bone ingrowth, which is more in line with the requirements of biomechanics and biological reconstruction. However, pelvis reconstruction is difficult, the patient's condition should be evaluated comprehensively before operation, and the long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.

LUMiC® endoprosthesis for pelvic reconstruction: A Canadian experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The LUMiC® prosthesis was introduced to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with periacetabular reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection. Few have evaluated the outcomes associated with its use.

METHODS

A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. All patients with a LUMiC® endoprosthesis were included. Their charts were reviewed for surgical and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were followed for 28 months (3-60). A total of 12 patients (75%) had a LUMiC® after a resection of a primary sarcoma. Mean surgical time was 555 min. Four patients (25%) had a two-stages procedure. MSTS score was 60.3 preoperatively and 54.3 postoperatively. Patients got a dual mobility bearing and the silver coated implant was used in 7 patients (43.7%). Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a fabric. Silver-coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p = 0.61) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p = 0.6). Five patients had peroperative complications (31.3%). Eight patients (50%) had an infection including all four with two-stages surgery. Dislocation occurred in five patients (31.3%) whereas no cases of aseptic loosening were reported. A total of 10 patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation.

CONCLUSION

LUMiC® endoprosthesis provides low rates of aseptic loosening on medium-term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and silver-coated implants.

Internal Hemipelvectomy for primary bone sarcomas using intraoperative patient specific instruments- the next step in limb salvage concept

BACKGROUND

During pelvic Sarcoma resections, Surgeons often struggle to obtain negative margins while minimizing collateral damage and maintaining limb function. These complications are usually due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis. Here we present an accurate 3D surgical approach, including pre-operative printing of models and intraoperative patient-specific instruments (PSIs) for optimizing pelvic sarcoma resections.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study (N = 11) presents surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients (average age 14.6 +/- 7.6 years, 4 males) who underwent pelvic sarcoma resections using a 3D surgical approach between 2016 and 2021. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months (mean = 38.9 +/- 30.1 months).

RESULTS

Our results show promising surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes. Using a 3D approach, 90.9% had negative margins, and 63.6% did not require reconstruction surgery. The average estimated blood loss was 895.45 ± 540.12 cc, and the average surgery time was 3:38 ± 0.05 hours. Our results revealed no long-term complications. Three patients suffered from short-term complications of superficial wound infections. At 24 month follow up 72.7% of patients displayed no evidence of disease. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at 12 months was 22.81.

CONCLUSION

3D technology enables improved accuracy in tumor resections, allowing for less invasive procedures and tailored reconstruction surgeries, potentially leading to better outcomes in function and morbidity. We believe that this approach will enhance treatments and ease prognosis for patients diagnosed with pelvic sarcoma and will become the standard of care in the future.

3D-printed hemipelvic prosthesis combined with a dual mobility bearing in patients with primary malignant neoplasm involving the acetabulum: clinical outcomes and finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage reconstruction for pelvic tumors, especially periacetabular tumors, is challenging. We combined the use of dual mobility bearing and 3D-printed hemipelvic prosthesis to improve function and reduce the probability of complications after hemi-pelvic resection in patients with primary acetabular malignancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.

METHODS

Between October 2011 and May 2021, 11 patients with malignancies involving the acetabulum received hemipelvic replacement with a 3D-printed prosthesis and dual mobility bearing. Follow-up of postoperative survival, complications, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS-93) lower limb functional scores were carried out. A finite element model of the postoperative pelvis was developed and input into the finite element analysis software. The Von Mises equivalent stress formula was used to analyze the stress distribution of each part of the pelvis under one gait cycle and the stress distribution at different angles of the hip joint.

RESULTS

By the last follow-up, 9 of the 11 patients (81.8%) were still alive, and 2 patients had local tumor recurrence. The complications including 1 deep infection and 1 dislocation of the artificial joint. Excluding 1 amputation patient, the average score of the remaining 8 patients at the last follow-up was 21.4/30 (71.3%) on the MSTS-93. In the reconstructed pelvis, stress distributions were concentrated on the junction between hemipelvic prosthesis and screw and iliac bone on the resected side, and between femoral prosthesis stem and femoral bulb, while the stress of polyethylene lining was small. Before impact, the polyethylene lining will rotate at a small angle, about 3°. The inner stress of polyethylene liner is greater than the outer stress in all conditions. The polyethylene liner has no tendency to slide out.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction using 3D-printed hemipelvic prosthesis combined with dual mobility bearing was an effective treatment for pelvic tumors. Our patients achieved good early postoperative efficacy and functional recovery. The dual mobility bearing is beneficial to prevent dislocation, and the mechanical distribution and wear of the prosthesis are acceptable.

Surgical Site Infection after Bone Tumor Surgery: Risk Factors and New Preventive Techniques

The management of malignant bone tumors requires multidisciplinary interventions including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical tumor resection and reconstruction. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious complication in the treatment of malignant bone tumors. Compared to other orthopedic surgeries, the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumors is associated with higher rates of SSIs. In patients with SSIs, additional surgeries, long-term administrations of antibiotics, extended hospital stays, and the postponement of scheduled adjuvant treatments are required. Therefore, SSI may adversely affect functional and oncological outcomes. To improve surgical outcomes in patients with malignant bone tumors, preoperative risk assessments for SSIs, new preventive techniques against SSIs, and the optimal use of prophylactic antibiotics are often required. Previous reports have demonstrated that age, tumor site (pelvis and tibia), extended operative time, implant use, body mass index, leukocytopenia, and reconstruction procedures are associated with an increased risk for SSIs. Furthermore, prophylactic techniques, such as silver and iodine coatings on implants, have been developed and proven to be efficacious and safe in clinical studies. In this review, predictive factors of SSIs and new prophylactic techniques are discussed.

Computer-Aided Design and 3D Printing of Hemipelvic Endoprosthesis for Personalized Limb-Salvage Reconstruction after Periacetabular Tumor Resection

3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthesis is an emerging solution for personalized limb-salvage reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection. Further clinical studies are still required to report its surgical characteristics, outcomes, benefits and drawbacks. Sixteen consecutive patients underwent periacetabular tumor wide resection and pelvic reconstruction with a 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthesis from 2018 to 2021. The surgical characteristics and outcomes are described. The mean follow-up duration was 17.75 months (range, 6 to 46 months). Five patients underwent surgery for type I + II resection and reconstruction, seven for type II + III resection and reconstruction, three for type II resection and reconstruction, and one for type I + II + IV resection and reconstruction. The incidence of postoperative complication was 12.5% (2/16) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 12.5% (2/16) for pneumonia, and 12.5% (2/16) for would deep or superficial infection. During follow-up, two patients (12.5%) suffered hip dislocation and underwent revision surgery. CT demonstrated an obvious prosthetic porous structure–bone fusion after follow-up of at least 6 months. At the final follow-up, 12 lived with no evidence of disease while four lived with disease; no patients experienced pain; and 15 had independent ambulation, with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 85.8% (range, 26.7% to 100%). 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthesis facilitates wide resection of periacetabular tumor and limb-salvage reconstruction, thus resulting in good oncological and functional outcomes. The custom-made nature is able to well mimic the skeletal anatomy and microstructure and promote osseointegration. Perioperative complications and rehabilitation exercise still need to be stressed for this engineering technology-assisted major orthopedic surgery.