Impact of medical practices on the costs of management of rheumatoid arthritis by anti-TNFalpha biological therapy in France

Budget Impact Analysis of the Introduction of Subcutaneous Infliximab (CT-P13 SC) for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC)-the first and only SC version of infliximab-is approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This new mode of infliximab administration will allow patients to self-inject at home, significantly reducing the number of outpatient visits and costs of intravenous (IV) administration. This paper describes the economic impact of introducing CT-P13 SC to the market from the UK societal perspective.

OBJECTIVE

The budget impact analysis was conducted to assess the financial impact of the adoption of CT-P13 SC over a 5-year period.

METHODS

A prevalence-based budget impact model was developed incorporating epidemiological data, administration cost data, and market share data. The analysis compared a "world with" CT-P13 SC scenario to a "world without" CT-P13 SC. A sensitivity analysis included dose escalation up to 4.1 mg/kg to reflect the real-world care delivery setting.

RESULTS

Compared to the "world without" scenario, the introduction of CT-P13 SC resulted in cost savings of ₤69.3 million in the UK over a 5-year period. In the scenario analysis, the saving increased to ₤173.5 million over 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Use of CT-P13 SC may lead to substantial cost savings for the UK society.

[Algorithms to identify chronic inflammatory rheumatism and psoriasis in medico-administrative databases: A review of the literature]

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe and discuss the algorithms used to identify chronic inflammatory rheumatisms and psoriasis in medico-administrative databases.

METHODS

We performed a literature review on the Medline database of articles published up to 31 January 2018. Our inclusion criteria were: original articles using medico-administrative databases in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10) and concerning rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or psoriatic arthritis (PsoA) or Psoriasis (Pso). Our exclusion criteria were: letters to the editor, commentaries on published articles, studies using codes other than those of the ICD or a previous version.

RESULTS

Out of the 590 articles identified, 37 studies were included. Concerning RA (n=10), all studies used the M05 code, associated with the M06 code in six studies. The remaining four studies specifically targeted codes M06.0, M06.2, M06.3, M06.8, M06.9, and two of them also used code M12.3. For AS (n=8), 7 studies used the M45 code, while only one study used M45.9, M46.1 or M46.8. For Pso (n=17), all studies used the L40 code and/or at least two dispensations of vitamin D. Concerning PsoA (n=13), all studies used the same codes: M07.0, M07.1, M07.2, M07.3.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using codes M05 and M06 rather than M06.1 and M06.4 for RA, M45 for AS, the algorithm L40 and/or two dispensations of topical vitamin D for psoriasis, and codes M070 to M073 to identify PsoA patients in medico-administrative databases.

Adoption of Biosimilar Infliximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in the EU5: A Budget Impact Analysis Using a Delphi Panel

Introduction: Introducing biosimilar infliximab for the treatment in rheumatology (rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis) and inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) may reduce treatment costs associated with biologics. This study aimed to investigate the budget impact of adopting biosimilar infliximab in five European countries, considering that the budget impact includes the adoption of biosimilar infliximab and the availability of biologic alternatives such as vedolizumab, biosimilar etanercept, biosimilar rituximab, and other relevant factors.

Methods: An existing budget impact model was adapted to forecast the budget impact in the UK, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy. Epidemiological parameters were derived from published literature reviewed in July 2015. Current market shares of biologics were derived from Therapy Watch (2012/2013 data). Respondents in a Delphi panel, conducted in 2015 and consisting of several leading rheumatologists and gastroenterologists from different nationalities, were asked to forecast uptake of biosimilar infliximab and estimate the proportion of patients eligible for a particular type of biological treatment, including biosimilar infliximab. Scenario analyses assessed the influence of various factors, including price reductions, on the budget.

Results: Uptake of biosimilar infliximab was particularly expected for naïve patients; switching patients that already received other biologics was not expected much. Market shares after 5 years of biosimilar infliximab were ~2% in rheumatology in all five countries and in gastroenterology ranged from 4% in France to over 30% in Italy. Except for France, budgets were expected to decrease for rheumatologic diseases. For gastroenterology, budgets were expected to decrease in Spain and Italy. Budgets were expected to increase substantially in the UK and Germany, due to the introduction of vedolizumab in the studied period. In France, budget was expected to slightly increase for ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's Disease, and ulcerative collitis. Savings in budget were expected in all countries, for all diseases, when larger price discounts on biosimilar infliximab were used.

Discussion and Conclusion: This study has shown that only when price reductions are large enough (i.e., 50% or more), physicians indicated that they will prescribe biosimilars. Policy makers should ensure substantial price reductions and stimulate physicians to use biosimilar products, to obtain savings in healthcare budgets.

An estimate of the cost of administering intravenous biological agents in Spanish day hospitals

Objective

To estimate the unit costs of administering intravenous (IV) biological agents in day hospitals (DHs) in the Spanish National Health System.

Patients and methods

Data were obtained from 188 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, collected from nine DHs, receiving one of the following IV therapies: infliximab (n=48), rituximab (n=38), abatacept (n=41), or tocilizumab (n=61). The fieldwork was carried out between March 2013 and March 2014. The following three groups of costs were considered: 1) structural costs, 2) material costs, and 3) staff costs. Staff costs were considered a fixed cost and were estimated according to the DH theoretical level of activity, which includes, as well as personal care of each patient, the DH general activities (complete imputation method, CIM). In addition, an alternative calculation was performed, in which the staff costs were considered a variable cost imputed according to the time spent on direct care (partial imputation method, PIM). All costs were expressed in euros for the reference year 2014.

Results

The average total cost was €146.12 per infusion (standard deviation [SD] ±87.11; CIM) and €29.70 per infusion (SD ±11.42; PIM). The structure-related costs per infusion varied between €2.23 and €62.35 per patient and DH; the cost of consumables oscillated between €3.48 and €20.34 per patient and DH. In terms of the care process, the average difference between the shortest and the longest time taken by different hospitals to administer an IV biological therapy was 113 minutes.

Conclusion

The average total cost of infusion was less than that normally used in models of economic evaluation coming from secondary sources. This cost is even less when the staff costs are imputed according to the PIM. A high degree of variability was observed between different DHs in the cost of the consumables, in the structure-related costs, and in those of the care process.

Identification of 7 Proteins in Sera of RA Patients with Potential to Predict ETA/MTX Treatment Response

Objective: The recent growth of innovating biologics has opened fascinating avenues for the management of patients. In rheumatoid arthritis, many biologics are currently available, the choice of which being mostly determined empirically. Importantly, a given biologic may not be active in a fraction of patients and may even provoke side effects. Here, we conducted a comparative proteomics study in attempt to identify a predictive theranostic signature of non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by etanercept/methotrexate combination.

Methods: A serum sample was collected prior to treatment exposure from a cohort of 22 patients with active RA. A proteomic “label free” approach was then designed to quantitate protein biomarkers using mass spectrometry. To verify these results, a relative quantification followed by an absolute quantification of interesting protein candidates were performed on a second cohort. The criterion of judgment was the response to etanercept/methotrexate combination according to the EULAR criteria assessed at 6 months of treatment.

Results: These investigations led to the identification of a set of 12 biomarkers with capacity to predict treatment response. A targeted quantitative analysis allowed to confirm the potential of 7 proteins from the latter combination on a new cohort of 16 patients. Two highly discriminating proteins, PROS and CO7, were further evaluated by ELISA on this second cohort. By combining the concentration threshold of each protein associated to a right classification (responders vs non-responders), the sensitivity and specificity reached 88.9 % and 100 %, respectively.

Conclusion: Prior to methotrexate/etanercept treatment, abundance of several sera proteins, notably PROS and CO7, were associated to response status of RA patients 6 month after treatment initiation.

Effect of TNF antagonists on the productivity of daily work of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a significant cause of work disability and job loss. The resulting economic burden experienced by patients has received considerable research attention. This research assesses the effect of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (infliximab, etanercept) on the ability of RA patients living in Japan to work and participate in society. A total of 42 patients with active RA were enrolled and given biological therapy for 12 months (mo). Of these patients, 14 were employed full-time, 6 were employed part-time, and 22 were not employed. Twenty-six patients were given infliximab, and sixteen were given etanercept. The amount of domestic labor performed before the biologics served as a baseline and was assigned a value of 0%. After treatment with biologics, the productivity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS; −100 to +100 mm). The administration of TNF antagonists to RA patients who exhibited an insufficient response to medical treatment significantly improved the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) after both 6 mo and 12 mo (P < 0.0001). A significant correlation was found between the improvement in their DAS 28 and improvements in their work situation (Productivity VAS) (P < 0.05). Of particular interest is the significant correlation between the values of baseline mHAQ and the percent changes of Productivity VAS that was observed after 6 mo and 12 mo (P < 0.05). Our findings indicate that medical treatment of RA with TNF antagonists improves the patients' ability to perform their jobs and housekeeping. Because loss of productivity is an important contributor to the indirect costs of RA, our findings are relevant for the pharmacoeconomic assessment of treatments.

Disability outcomes and dose escalation with etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a US-based retrospective comparative effectiveness study

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that if left untreated may substantially impair physical functioning. Etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab are tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers whose FDA-approved indications in the US include moderate to severe RA. TNF-blocker dose escalation has been well documented in the literature; however, the comparative effectiveness of these agents remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and dose escalation rates of etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab in US community settings. We hypothesized that etanercept would be equivalent to infliximab and adalimumab in patient-reported disability 9-15 months after therapy initiation, and that fewer etanercept patients would experience dose escalation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS). Adult patients with no biologic use 6 months before TNF-blocker initiation (index) and with Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores at index and 9-15 months after index were analyzed (218 etanercept, 93 infliximab, and 40 adalimumab).

RESULTS

HAQ-DI change scores at 9-15 months did not differ by treatment (-0.12, -0.10, and -0.08 points for etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab, respectively; p = 0.52). Dose increases were observed in 1.4% of etanercept, 10.8% of infliximab (p < 0.001), and 12.5% of adalimumab patients (p = 0.004). HAQ-DI change was associated with pre-index HAQ-DI score (p < 0.0001) and disease duration (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer etanercept patients escalated dose than infliximab or adalimumab patients, but improvements in functional disability were similar. These differences may have been influenced by package labeling, mode of administration, or other factors. RA treatment with infliximab and adalimumab in community settings, characterized by dose escalation, did not yield greater disability improvements compared to etanercept, which remained at a relatively stable dose. Uncontrolled treatment selection in this observational design may have influenced outcomes, and prior methotrexate treatment may partly explain disability improvements smaller than typically observed in clinical trials.

Is it possible to identify early predictors of the future cost of chronic arthritis? The VErA project

This study was conducted to identify early predictors of the total cost of inflammatory arthritis (IA). One hundred and eighty patients affected by undifferentiated arthritis (UA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included in the French Very Early rheumatoid Arthritis (VErA) cohort between 1998 and 2001. Health economic data for 2003 were collected using a patient self-questionnaire. Results were analysed in terms of direct, indirect and total costs in 2003 euros (2003euro) for the population as a whole and in diagnostic subgroups. A payor perspective (the French National Health Insurance, in this case) was adopted. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify predictors of total cost from among the criteria assessed on recruitment. Results of the study showed that for the study population as a whole, the mean total cost was euro4700 per patient. The costs attributable to the RA and UA sub-groups were euro5928 and euro2424 per patient, respectively. In a univariate analysis, certain parameters were significantly correlated with a higher cost of illness. In the multivariate analysis, some of these parameters were further identified as being predictive of higher cost. Two strong significant, early predictors of total cost were identified: higher pain (P = 0.002) and the presence of rheumatoid factor (P = 0.004). In the RA sub-group, lower grip strength of the dominant hand (P = 0.039) was another predictor of the illness's subsequent economic impact. In conclusion, our data show that simple clinical and laboratory parameters can be used early in the course of IA to predict the condition's impact on healthcare budgets.

Budget impact model of rituximab after failure of one or more TNFalpha inhibitor therapies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the budget impact implied by the introduction of rituximab after failure of one or more anti-TNFalpha therapies in the perspective of the French health care system.

METHODS

A Markov model reproduced the course, over 4years, of patients treated either by infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab or RTX, after failure of one or more anti-TNFalpha therapies, in a multicentric study. A sensitivity analysis was developed to account for patients in 3rd and subsequent lines of treatment who are expected to consume more healthcare resources.

RESULTS

When RTX is not used, total annual medical cost is euro16,555 per patient, euro13,206 of which are dedicated to drug acquisition. When RTX is the only treatment in use, these costs decrease respectively to euro11,444 and euro7469. Total savings per patient and per year is euro5000. Over 4 years, total savings for the targeted population reach euro118M. In the sensitivity analysis, the difference between H2 and H2-coeff 2 (20%) reaches euro5,400,000 in total direct costs during the first year of simulation. This difference decreases along the period, to reach euro2,400,000 the fourth year of simulation, and is due to the fact that rituximab acquisition costs are independent from the treatment line.

CONCLUSION

If TNFalpha inhibitors were the only treatment available, the annual global cost of treatment would be euro16,555 per patient versus euro11,444 for patients treated exclusively with rituximab. RTX is expected to produce important savings (-31%) if used after failure of one or more TNFalpha therapies. This is mainly due to its lower drug acquisition cost. These savings could increase with the development of rituximab in earlier stages of treatment.

Impact of etanercept on the costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): Results from a French observational study

INTRODUCTION

Economical impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been widely modified thanks to TNF inhibitors. Our study aims to estimate the impact etanercept prescription, in term of health resources consumption, within a regional cohort of French RA patients.

METHODS

The study included 148 RA patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 343 days before and after etanercept initiation. Data were anonymously collected from ERASME database of French Health Insurance in Midi-Pyrénées region. A patient-by-patient microcosting approach was performed.

RESULTS

The average annual cost per patient, attributable to RA, was 2.8 times higher after treatment by etanercept than before (15,148.57euro versus 5248.95euro). We observed a rise in pharmaceutical costs, from 11.7% of direct medical costs before to 69.7% after etanercept initiation (120.12euro versus 9995.23euro). We observed a small decrease particularly for NSAIDs (142.14euro versus 102.21euro) and physiotherapy (286.40euro versus 138.77euro). Attributable act costs and indirect costs did not differ before and after etanercept initiation.

DISCUSSION

In this short-term study, initiation of etanercept in RA patients did not come along with a decrease of consumption of health resources. Long-term studies are needed to reveal a potential economical advantage as a consequence of the clinical, structural and functional efficacy of anti-TNF.