Antisynthetases syndrome associated with right heart failure

Joint and muscle inflammatory disease: A scoping review of the published evidence

OBJECTIVES

Polyarthritis is commonly reported in idiopathic inflammatory myositis patients, but few studies have focused on the overlap of myositis with rheumatoid arthritis which is a difficult diagnosis in the absence of well-defined diagnostic criteria. The primary objective of this scoping review was to map the field of research to explore the potential diagnoses in patients presenting with both myositis and polyarthritis.

METHODS

Two electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed® and Web of Science®) were systematically searched using the terms (myositis OR 'inflammatory idiopathic myopathies') AND (polyarthritis OR 'rheumatoid arthritis') without any publication date limit.

RESULTS

Among individual records, 280 reports met inclusion criteria after full-text review. There was heterogeneity in the definition of overlap myositis as well as the characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis. In many studies, key data were lacking; rheumatoid factor status was reported in 56.8% (n=151), anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies status in 18.8% (n=50), and presence or absence of bone erosions in 45.1% (n=120) of the studies. Thirteen different diagnoses were found to associate myositis with polyarthritis: antisynthetase syndrome (29.6%, n=83), overlap myositis with rheumatoid arthritis (16.1%, n=45), drug-induced myositis (20.0%, n=56), rheumatoid myositis (7.5%, n=21), inclusion body myositis (1.8%, n=5), overlap with connective tissue disease (20.0%, n=56), and others (5.0%, n=14).

CONCLUSION

The spectrum of joint and muscle inflammatory diseases encompasses many diagnoses including primitive and secondary myositis associated with RA or arthritis mimicking RA. This review highlights the need for a consensual definition of OM with RA to better individualise this entity from the numerous differential diagnoses.

Subclinical systolic and diastolic myocardial dysfunction in polyphasic polymyositis/dermatomyositis: a 2-year longitudinal study

Background

Cardiac involvement in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk; however, little is known about the progression of cardiac dysfunction and long-term data are scarce. In the present work, we intended to prospectively study echocardiographic parameters in patients with IIM for 2 years.

Methods

Twenty-eight IIM patients (41.9±1.6 years) without cardiovascular symptoms were enrolled. Patients with monophasic/polyphasic disease patterns were studied separately and compared to age-matched healthy individuals. Conventional echocardiographic and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) parameters of systolic [LV: ejection fraction (EF), mitral annulus systolic movement (MAPSE), lateral s′) and diastolic left (mitral inflow velocities, lateral anulus velocities: e′, a′, E/e′) and right ventricular function (fractional area change: FAC, tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion: TAPSE) were measured at the time of the diagnosis and 2 years later.

Results

Subclinical LV systolic dysfunction is characterized by reduced lateral s′ (10.4 vs. 6.4 cm/s, p<0.05), EF (62.6±0.6%, vs. 51.7±0.7%) and MAPSE (18.5±0.6 vs. 14.5±0.6 mm) could be observed in IIM patients with polyphasic disease course 2 years after diagnosis compared to controls. Furthermore, diastolic LV function showed a marked deterioration to grade I diastolic dysfunction at 2 years in the polyphasic group (lateral e′: 12.9 ±0.6, vs. 7.4±0.3 cm/s; lateral a′: 10.7±0.3, vs. 17.3±0.8 cm/s; p<0.05) supported by larger left atrium (32.1±0.6 vs. 37.8±0.6 mm; p<0.05]. TDI measurements confirmed subclinical RV systolic dysfunction in polyphasic patients 2 years after diagnosis (FAC: 45.6±1.8%, vs. 32.7±1.4%; TAPSE: 22.7±0.5, vs. 18.1±0.3 mm; p<0.05). Similar, but not significant tendencies could be detected in patients with monophasic disease patterns. Polyphasic patients showed significantly (p<0.05) worse results compared to monophasic patients regarding EF (51.7±0.7% vs. 58.1±0.6%), lateral s′ (6.4±0.4 cm/sec vs. 8.6±0.4 cm/s,), left atrium (37.8±0.6 mm vs. 33.3±0.8 mm), FAC (32.7±1.4% vs. 41.0±1.6%) and TAPSE (18.1±0.3 mm vs. 21.3±0.7 mm).

Conclusions

Significant subclinical cardiac dysfunction could be detected in IIM patients with polyphasic disease course 2 years after diagnosis, which identifies them as a high-risk population. TDI is a useful method to detect echocardiographic abnormalities in IIM complementing conventional echocardiography and can recognize the high cardiac risk.

Treatment consensus for management of polymyositis and dermatomyositis among rheumatologists, neurologists and dermatologists

Although rheumatologists, neurologists and dermatologists see patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), their management appears to vary depending on the physician's specialty. The aim of the present study was to establish the treatment consensus among specialists of the three fields to standardize the patient care. We formed a research team supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Clinical questions (CQ) on the management of PM and DM were raised. A published work search on CQ was performed primarily using PubMed. Using the nominal group technique, qualified studies and results in the published work were evaluated and discussed to reach consensus recommendations. They were sent out to the Japan College of Rheumatology, Japanese Society of Neurology and Japanese Dermatological Association for their approval. We reached a consensus in 23 CQ and made recommendations and a decision tree for management was proposed. They were officially approved by the three scientific societies. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary treatment consensus for the management of PM and DM was established for the first time.

Brief report: antisynthetase syndrome-associated myocarditis

BACKGROUND

The antisynthetase (AS) syndrome is characterized by autoimmune myopathy, interstitial lung disease, cutaneous involvement, arthritis, fever, and antibody specificity. We describe 2 patients with AS syndrome who also developed myocarditis, depressed biventricular function, and congestive heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both patients were diagnosed with AS syndrome based on clinical manifestations, detection of serum AS antibodies, and myositis confirmation with the use of skeletal muscle magnetic resonance imaging and skeletal muscle biopsy. In addition, myocarditis resulting in heart failure was confirmed with the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and from endomyocardial biopsy findings. After treatment for presumed AS syndrome-associated myocarditis, one patient recovered and the other patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

AS syndrome is a rare entity with morbidity and mortality typically attributed to myositis and lung involvement. This is the first report of AS syndrome-associated myocarditis leading to congestive heart failure in 2 patients. Given the potentially fatal consequences, myocarditis should be considered in patients with AS syndrome presenting with heart failure.