Anakinra: An effective treatment in the Schnitzler syndrome

Schnitzler's Syndrome-Diagnostic Experience, Approaches to Therapy, and Patient Management according to a Multicenter Russian Cohort

The objectives of the study were to present the experience of diagnosis, management, and therapy with IL-1 inhibitors in patients with Schnitzler's syndrome (SchS) according to a multicenter Russian cohort. An observational retrospective study for a 10-year period (2012-2022) involved 17 patients with SchS who were admitted to the hospital or were observed on an outpatient basis (eight women and nine men). The diagnosis of all of them corresponded to the Strasbourg diagnostic criteria. The age of patients ranged from 25 to 81 years (Me 53[46; 56]). The age at the time of the onset of the disease ranged from 20 to 72 years (Me 46[39; 54]), the duration of the disease before diagnosis ranged from 1 to 35 years (Me 6.5[3; 6]), in three patients it exceeded 10 years, in the rest it ranged from 1 to 8 years. Infectious and lymphoproliferative diseases, monogenic AIDs (CAPS, TRAPS, and HIDS) were excluded from all patients at the prehospital stage. The referral diagnosis for all of them was Still 's disease in adults. Clinical manifestations of the disease in all patients included fatigue, lethargy, fatigue, rash, and fever. In all patients, skin elements were urticular and were accompanied by itching in 6 (37.5%) patients. Bone pain was observed in 12 (70.6%) patients; arthralgias, in 16 (94.1%); arthritis, in 9 (52.9%); myalgia, in 7 (41.2%); and weight loss, in 4 (23.5%). Lymphadenopathy was detected in 6 (35.3%) patients; enlarged liver, in 6 (35.3%); pericarditis, in 4 (23.5%); angioedema, in 6 (35.3); redness and dryness in the eyes, in 3 (17.6%); sore throat, in 2 (11.8%); abdominal pain, in 1 (5.9%), distal polyneuropathy, in 2 (11.8%); paraesthesia, in 1 (5.9%); and chondritis of the auricles, in 1 (5.9%). Monoclonal gammopathy was detected in all patients with a secretion level of 2.9-15.1 g/L: IgMk (n = 10, 64.7%), less often IgMλ (n = 2), IgGk (n = 2), IgGλ (n = 1), and IgAλ (n = 1). Ben-Jones protein was not detected in any of them. All patients had an increased level of ESR and CRP. Before inclusion in the study, 16 patients received GCs (94.1%) with a temporary effect that disappeared with dose reduction or cancellation. Seven patients received cDMARDs, including methotrexate (5), hydroxychloroquine (2), and cyclophosphamide (1). All patients received NSAIDs and antihistamines, as well as biologics, including the anti-B-cell drug rituximab (1), monoclonal ABs to IgE omalizumab (2, 1 without effect and 1 with partial effect), IL-1i canakinumab (n = 10, 58.8%) subcutaneously once every 8 weeks, and anakinra (n = 4, 23.5%) subcutaneously daily. The duration of taking anakinra, which was prescribed in the test mode, ranged from 1 week to 2.5 months with a further switch to canakinumab in 3 patients. The duration of taking canakinumab at the time of analysis ranged from 7 months to 8 years. Against the background of treatment with IL-1i, 10 out of 11 (90.9%) patients received a complete response in terms of the clinical manifestations of the disease and a decrease in the level of ESR and CRP within a few days. In one patient, a partial response to the administration of anakinra was detected; however, after switching to canakinumab, the effect of treatment was finally lost. One patient received IL-6i for 8 months with an incomplete effect and a positive dynamics after switching to anakinra. Thus, anakinra was initially prescribed to four patients and changed to canakinumab in two of them; canakinumab was started as the first drug in seven patients. Treatment with anakinra was continued in two patients; with canakinumab, in nine patients. In one patient, due to the persistent absence of relapses, the interval between canakinumab injections was increased to 5 months without signs of reactivation; however, subsequently, against the background of stress and relapses of the disease, the intervals were reduced to 4 months. A healthy child was born by the same patient on the background of treatment. The tolerability of therapy was satisfactory in all patients, no SAEs were noted. SchS is a rare multifactorial/non-monogenic AID that should be differentiated from a number of rheumatic diseases and other AIDs. The onset in adulthood, the presence of recurrent urticarial rashes in combination with fever and other manifestations of a systemic inflammatory response are indications for examination for monoclonal secretion. The use of short- or long-acting IL-1i is a highly effective and safe option in the treatment of such patients.

Off-Label studies on anakinra in dermatology: a review

Purpose: Anakinra (Kineret^®) is an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) FDA approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis and in neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID). It has been used off-label for a variety of dermatologic conditions. A review of the available studies and cases of these off-label uses would be valuable to the dermatologist considering alternative treatments for these oftentimes poorly studied conditions.Materials and methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched with the term 'anakinra.' Results were manually screened to identify published data on off-label uses of anakinra in dermatologic conditions and systemic conditions with prominent dermatologic manifestations.Results: Anakinra appears to show efficacy for numerous dermatologic conditions, with the strongest evidence for hidradenitis suppurativa, Bechet's disease, Muckle-Wells syndrome, and SAPHO syndrome. Case reports and case series data are available for numerous other dermatologic conditions.Conclusion: Anakinra is a potential option for patients with certain difficult-to-treat dermatologic diseases, given its relatively benign adverse effect profile and its effectiveness in a wide array of conditions. Overall, anakinra appears to be a promising option in the treatment of numerous dermatologic inflammatory conditions refractory to first line therapies, but further and higher-quality data is needed to clarify its therapeutic role.

Off-label use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and anakinra at an Australian tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (anti-TNFα) and anakinra are monoclonal antibodies against pro-inflammatory cytokines overexpressed in many systemic inflammatory diseases. In Australia, they are registered for the treatment of several rheumatological, gastroenterological and dermatological indications. Despite increasing observational evidence for their use in off-label indications, there is a paucity of outcome research from the Australian hospital sector.

AIMS

To describe the off-label use of anti-TNFα and anakinra at a tertiary referral hospital in Queensland, Australia and consideration of a drug register to inform future clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We performed an in-depth retrospective chart audit of off-label treatment with anti-TNFα or anakinra at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital from mid-2010 to mid-2014, linking demographic, phenotypic, pathology and outcome data with these drugs.

RESULTS

Off-label use was identified in 10 patients. The most frequent indications were sarcoidosis and dermatological conditions. Three patients required sequential therapy with a second anti-TNFα (total responses = 13). Complete response occurred in 46%, partial response in 38% and primary non-response in 8%. Response was unable to be determined in 8%. We recorded 14 adverse events (infections most common).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that anti-TNFα may be beneficial for some off-label indications (e.g. sarcoidosis). However, the observational design of this study (and pre-existing research) limits the ability to infer causality and generalise results. We propose the creation of a mandatory drug register to monitor off-label use. Whilst comparative efficacy cannot be established without a matched placebo arm, a register would enable some reporting on effectiveness in rare diseases and identify infrequent but serious adverse events.

Schnitzler's syndrome: lessons from 281 cases

Schnitzler’s syndrome is an autoinflammatory disorder characterized by the association of a monoclonal IgM (or IgG) gammopathy, a chronic urticarial rash, and signs and symptoms of systemic inflammation, including fever, arthralgias and bone pain. It was first described in 1972. This review summarizes the clinical features, efficacy of therapies, and follow-up data of the 281 cases that have been reported to date. Also, the results of skin histology, bone imaging, laboratory investigations, and studies of the pathogenesis will be discussed, including the pivotal role of interleukin-1 beta in this disorder.

Imaging findings in 22 cases of Schnitzler syndrome: characteristic para-articular osteosclerosis, and the "hot knees" sign differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Schnitzler syndrome is characterized by chronic urticaria, monoclonal gammopathy, and a risk of developing lymphoproliferative disorders. Patients frequently present with bone pain, fever, arthralgia, and lymphadenopathy. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively review and evaluate potentially attributable imaging abnormalities in a series of patients with clinically diagnosed Schnitzler syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and pathological chart review identified 22 patients meeting Strasbourg criteria for Schnitzler syndrome. Imaging of these patients was retrospectively reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and a radiology fellow to determine and characterize significant "positive" findings that could potentially be attributed to their primary disease process.

RESULTS

Evidence of abnormal bone remodeling was present in 64% (14/22) of patients with 40 bone abnormalities. Lesions were predominantly or entirely sclerotic and most commonly involved the distal femora (n = 11), proximal tibiae (nine), and innominate bones (six). Patterns of involvement were variable, but typically eccentrically intramedullary, cortical, and juxta-articular. Skeletal surveys and targeted radiographs identified only 37% (10/27) of abnormal bones subsequently "positive" by additional modalities. PET and bone scans were all positive in patients with bone sclerosis (13/13 and 17/17 bone sites, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Schnitzler syndrome often presents with characteristic osteosclerosis, most commonly around the knees and in the pelvis. In patients with a suggestive clinical history, the radiologist could direct an appropriate imaging strategy or might to be the first to suggest the diagnosis. Bone scan may be the most appropriate initial screening tool in suspected cases.

Schnitzler's syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up

Schnitzler's syndrome is characterized by recurrent urticarial rash and monoclonal gammopathy, associated with clinical and biological signs of inflammation and a long-term risk of AA amyloidosis and overt lymphoproliferation. An extensive literature review was performed, and the following questions were addressed during an expert meeting: In whom should Schnitzler's syndrome be suspected? How should the diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome be established? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be treated? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be followed up?. A diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome is considered definite in any patient with two obligate criteria: a recurrent urticarial rash and a monoclonal IgM gammopathy, and two of the following minor criteria: recurrent fever, objective signs of abnormal bone remodeling, elevated CRP level or leukocytosis, and a neutrophilic infiltrate on skin biopsy. It is considered probable, if only 1 minor criterion is present. In patients with monoclonal IgG gammopathies, diagnosis is definite if three minor criteria are present and possible if two are present. First-line treatment in patients with significant alteration of quality of life or persistent elevation of markers of inflammation should be anakinra. Follow-up should include clinical evaluation, CBC and CRP every 3 months and MGUS as usually recommended.

Anakinra as an interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, complicated genetics and molecular impacts--from the point of view of mouse genomics

IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1rn) is a protein that binds to IL-1 receptors (IL-1r1) and inhibits the binding of IL-1α and IL-1β. In recent years, IL-1rn has been implicated to be associated with many human health problems. The effects of treatment of several inflammatory disorders with anakinra, which is an interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist, have also been reported. Both positive and negative effects have been described. In this review, we systematically analyzed the expression, correlation, and regulation of IL-1rn and its 13 partner genes using available gene expression profiles from a variety of tissues in a well known transcriptome database, Genenetwork. The 13 partner genes include IL-1r1, IL-1β, IL-1α, Myd88, Irak1, Irak2, Irak4, Traf6, Tlr4, IL-1rap, Ikbkap, Nfkb1, and Nfkb2. Gene expression profiles are from 10 tissues including spleen, kidney, lung, whole brain, eye, prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum, and nucleus accumbens. Our analysis indicated that the interactions among IL-1rn and its partner are complex and different from tissues to tissues, suggesting a broad spectrum of the effect of IL-1rn on biological and metabolic pathways. Transcripts and protein sequences resulted from different splicing, interaction with genomic background of individuals, and environmental factors affect function of IL-1rn. At present, our knowledge on the function of IL-1rn and its partner in various tissues or organs is very limited. The long term and extended effect of anakinra on human health needs further investigations. In the future, targeted sequences or oligos of Il-1rn might be ideal for therapeutic application with less toxic and more specific in the treatment of specific disease. Detailed study on the molecular function of IL-1rn and its interaction with other genes and environmental factors is essential for development therapeutic application using IL-1rn.