Validity and role of vertebral fracture assessment in detecting prevalent vertebral fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:149-153. [PMID: 23932727 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.07.003]

The prevalence of osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most commonly known extra-articular complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since the prevalence of OP is diverse in different studies and there is no general consensus about it, in this systematic review, we aimed to investigate the global prevalence of OP among RA patients. In this review, three databases including Medline via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (Clarivate analytics) were searched by various keywords. After screening of retrieved papers, the related data of included papers were extracted and analyzed. To assess the risk of methodological bias of included studies, quality assessment checklist for prevalence studies was used. Because of heterogeneity among studies, random-effect model was used to pooled the results of primary studies. In this review, the results of 57 studies were summarized and the total included sample size was 227,812 cases of RA with 64,290 cases of OP. The summary point prevalence of OP among RA was estimated as 27.6% (95%CI 23.9-31.3%). Despite significant advances in prevention, treatment and diagnostic methods in these patients, it still seems that the prevalence of OP in these patients is high and requires better and more timely interventions.

Repeating Vertebral Fracture Assessment: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. VFs are associated with a decline in quality of life and high morbidity and mortality. The presence of a VF is a significant risk factor for developing another fracture; however, most VFs are not clinically recognized and diagnosed. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a low cost, low radiation, convenient, and reliable method to identify VFs. The finding of a previously unrecognized VF may change the assessment of fracture risk, diagnostic classification, and treatment strategies. Vertebral fracture assessment or radiographic lateral spine imaging should be repeated in patients with continued high risk for fracture (e.g., historical height loss >4 cm [>1.5 inches], self-reported but undocumented vertebral fracture, or glucocorticoid therapy equivalent to ≥5 mg of prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than or equal to 3 months).

Diagnosis of vertebral deformities on chest CT and DXA compared to routine lateral thoracic spine X-ray

X-ray, CT and DXA enable diagnosis of vertebral deformities. For this study, level of agreement of vertebral deformity diagnosis was analysed. We showed that especially on subject level, these imaging techniques could be used for opportunistic screening of vertebral deformities in COPD patients.

INTRODUCTION

X-ray and CT are frequently used for pulmonary evaluation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and also enable to diagnose vertebral deformities together with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging. The aim of this research was to study the level of agreement of these imaging modalities for diagnosis of vertebral deformities from T4 to L1.

METHODS

Eighty-seven subjects (mean age of 65; 50 males; 57 COPD patients) who had X-ray, chest CT (CCT) and DXA were included. Evaluable vertebrae were scored twice using SpineAnalyzer™ software. ICCs and kappas were calculated to examine intra-observer variability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated to compare vertebral deformities diagnosed on the different imaging modalities.

RESULTS

ICCs for height measurements were excellent (> 0.94). Kappas were good to excellent (0.64-0.77). At vertebral level, the AUROC was 0.85 for CCT vs. X-ray, 0.74 for DXA vs. X-ray and 0.77 for DXA vs. CCT. Sensitivity (51%-73%) and PPV (57%-70%) were fair to good; specificity and NPV were excellent (≥ 96%). At subject level, the AUROC values were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of height measurements of vertebrae is excellent with all three imaging modalities. On subject level, diagnostic performance of CT (PPV 79-82%; NPV 90-93%), and to a slightly lesser extend of DXA (PPV 73-77%; NPV 80-89%), indicates that these imaging techniques could be used for opportunistic screening of vertebral deformities in COPD patients.

Organic Gallium Treatment Improves Osteoporotic Fracture Healing Through Affecting the OPG/RANKL Ratio and Expression of Serum Inflammatory Cytokines in Ovariectomized Rats

This study aimed to investigate the impact of organic gallium (OG) on osteoporotic fracture healing in ovariectomized female Sprague-Dawley rats, as well as study the mechanisms of OG on osteoporotic fracture healing. Forty-five female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups: sham operation group (Sxas control group), ovariectomized group (Ovx), and Ovx treated with OG group (Ovx + OG). Rat femoral fractures were studied using a standardized fracture-healing model utilizing bone fixation with an intramedullary pin. Six weeks later, analyses of micro-CT, histomorphometric, RNA extraction, RT-qPCR, and serum were performed following sacrifice of all mice. In comparison with Ovx group, OG can significantly increase bone volume (BV), tissue volume (TV), BV/TV radio, bone strength, callus bony area, and as similar to BMP-2 expression. OG treatment elevated OPG messenger RNA (mRNA) and inhibited RANKL mRNA, and showed an effect on OPG/RANKL ratio. OG treatment can inhibit the expression of TNF-α and IL-6. In conclusion, current study results indicate that organic OG can positively affect the OPG/RANKL ratio and inhibit the expression of serum inflammatory cytokines; thus, it can improve osteoporotic fracture healing.

Comparison of screening strategies for prevalent vertebral fractures in South Korea: vertebral fracture assessment vs. spine radiography

BACKGROUND

Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) is a useful tool to detect the vertebral fracture (VF) with low cost and radiation exposure. We aimed to compare screening strategies including VFA and spine radiography (X-ray) for detecting VF in terms of clinical effectiveness, cost and radiation exposure.

METHODS

Three screening strategies: 1) X-ray following VFA, 2) VFA only, and 3) X-ray only were compared using a Markov model based on administrative data from South Korea in a population aged ≥50 years. We compared the incidence of new VFs, cost-effectiveness of reducing new VFs and radiation exposure in each strategy.

RESULTS

The incidence of new VFs was reduced in all screening strategies compared to no screening: 29.4% for women and 12.5% for men in both X-ray following the VFA and VFA only strategies and 35% for women and 17.5% for men in the X-ray only strategy. The X-ray following VFA strategy had the lowest cost, followed by the X-ray only, and VFA only strategies. The radiation doses for X-ray only were 2,647-2,989 μSv and 3,253-3,398 μSv higher than in the X-ray following VFA and VFA only strategies. The new VF prevention effect was greater in women, and more prominent in older people (women ≥ 70, men ≥ 80) than people ≥ 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The X-ray following VFA strategy is a cost-effective option for screening prevalent VF to prevent new VF in people aged ≥50 years due to its high effectiveness, lowest cost, and least radiation exposure.

The Clinical Utility of Vertebral Fracture Assessment in Predicting Fractures

Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. VFs are associated with diminished quality of life and high morbidity and mortality. The presence of a VF, especially a recent one, is an important risk factor for developing another fracture. However, most VFs are not clinically recognized. VF assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a convenient, low-cost, low-radiation, reliable method to identify VFs during bone mineral density measurement. The finding of a previously unrecognized VF may change the diagnostic classification, assessment of fracture risk, and treatment strategies. This paper focuses on the utility of VF assessment in clinical practice.

Accuracy of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment when performed by DXA technicians--a cross-sectional, multiobserver study

Six dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technicians reviewed lateral images of the spine for deformed vertebrae. The images were acquired with a DXA scanner in 235 patients referred for osteoporosis assessment. The outcome was compared to findings on spinal radiographs assessed by two radiologists. Three DXA technicians performed acceptable or better in identifying patients with fractured vertebrae.

INTRODUCTION

This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) when used by DXA technicians as a triage test to select patients with deformed vertebrae for spinal radiographs.

METHODS

Lateral single-energy scans and radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine (T4-L4) were acquired in 235 patients aged 65 years or more referred for osteoporosis assessment. Six DXA technicians evaluated lateral scans using dedicated software. The DXA technicians were trained to identify deformed vertebrae, but they did not assess the aetiology of deformity. Two radiologists evaluated the radiographs and their consensus evaluation served as the reference test for vertebral fracture. The main outcome was sensitivity and specificity of the DXA technicians' identification of patients with one or more grade II-III deformities according to Genant's classification.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with one or more grade II-III vertebral fractures was 0.35. Sensitivity ranged from 0.61 to 0.83 and specificity ranged from 0.78 to 0.95 across the DXA technicians. In patients with grade II-III deformities on VFA, the mean probability of one or more grade II-III fractures was 0.74 (range 0.66-0.86). Conversely, in patients without such deformities, the mean probability of grade II-III fractures was 0.14 (range 0.10-0.18). Accuracy was lower for grade I-III deformities for all the DXA technicians.

CONCLUSION

Three of six DXA technicians achieved acceptable or better accuracy when using VFA to triage patients with grade II-III vertebral deformities for spinal radiographs. Heterogeneity between DXA technicians appears to be due to differences in subjective thresholds. VFA triage by DXA technicians to identify patients with grade II-III fractures is feasible.

Vertebral fracture assessment: Current research status and application in patients with kyphoplasty

Imaging of the spine is of paramount importance for the recognition of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs), and standard radiography (SR) of the spine is the suggested diagnostic method but is not routinely used because of the cost and radiation exposure considerations. VF assessment (VFA) is an efficient, low radiation method for identifying VFs at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. Prediction models used to indicate the need for VFA may have little predictive power in subspecialty referral populations such as rheumatologic patients or patients who underwent kyphoplasty. Rheumatologic patients are frequently at increased risk for VFs, and VFA should be performed on an individual basis, also taking in account the guidelines for the general population. Kyphoplasty is a new minimal invasive procedure for the treatment of VFs and is being performed with increasing frequency. Following kyphoplasty, there may be a risk of new VFs in adjacent vertebrae. The assessment and follow-up of patients who underwent kyphoplasty requires repetitive X-ray imaging with the known limitations of SR. Thus, VFA may facilitate the evaluation of VFs in these patients because most of the kyphoplasty patients would fulfill the criteria. In a pilot study, we measured the BMD and performed VFA in 28 patients treated with kyphoplasty. Ratios of anterior to posterior (A/P) and middle to posterior (M/P) height were measured, and Genant’s method was used to classify vertebrae accordingly. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for A/P, M/P and the Genant’s method were determined. Only 1 patient did not meet the criteria for VFA. Of the 364 available vertebrae, 295 could be analyzed. Most missing data (concerning 69 vertebrae) occurred in the upper thoracic region. Three of the 69 non-eligible vertebrae were lumbar vertebrae with cement leakage from the kyphoplasty procedure. In our hands, VFA was highly reproducible, demonstrating very good agreement in terms of intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Agreement was very good on the vertebral level, “vertebrae with kyphoplasty” level and “2 above and 1 below the kyphoplasty vertebrae” level. The application of Genant’s method to these patients also resulted in perfect agreement. We believe that the potential value of VFA in patients treated with kyphoplasty requires further evaluation, particularly comparing VFA with SR and performing a longitudinal follow-up. More research will help to adopt care processes that determine which patients require VFA and how often VFA should be performed, while also considering the impact of this technique on the cost of healthcare organizations.

Use of DXA-based technology for detection and assessment of risk of vertebral fracture in rheumatology practice

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the recommended method for diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of future fracture risk. However, most patients who will suffer fractures do not have osteoporosis by DXA (T-score of -2.5 or less). Bone strength, which is most closely associated with resistance to fracture, is a composite of both bone density and bone quality, and the latter is not measured by DXA. Thus, other technology is needed for non-invasive and inexpensive assessment of bone strength and fracture risk. Vertebral fractures, the most common clinical fracture in the general population, are of even greater importance in rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic disorders. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and trabecular bone scores (TBS), two techniques which can aid prediction of future fracture risk, can be used with currently available DXA machines. Description of these techniques and their potential application to clinical rheumatology practice will be the focus of this paper.