Remission in axial spondyloarthritis: The ultimate treatment goal?

[Implementation, of multidisciplinary consultations for patients with inflammatory arthritis and treated with subcutaneous biologic DMARDs: Assessment at one year and outlook]

INTRODUCTION

Biologics (bDMARDs) have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with inflammatory arthritis, but are not without serious side effects. The patient must be able to identify them, acquire self-care abilities or skills and adhere to their treatment. Multidisciplinary consultations, including a pharmaceutical consultation could improve the care of these patients. The pharmaceutical presence make it easier to switch to a biosimilar with etended patient support thanks to the community-hospital network. The return on investment is possible thanks to the more frequent use of biosimilars and the pricing of this type of consultation by the "Forfait de Prestation Intermédiaire".

METHODOLOGY

Eligible patients are patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis, treated with subcutaneous bDMARDs. The criteria assessed were patient's knowledge of their biotherapy using the Biosecure score, their medication adherence using the CQR-5, the total of switch to biosimilars perform and the financial statement of the consultations. An assessment of the actions deployed for the community-hospital network.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-five patients (47.4%) benefited multidisciplinary consultation. The mean score of the Biosecure score was 69.6/100 (moderate knowledge) and 261 patients (88.5%) were highly adherent. 57 patients (73%) accepted the switch to biosimilar. 197 pharmacy were contacted, all of witch for patients who receive the switch. Overall patient's satisfaction was 26.9/28.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary consultations with involvement of the pharmacist should optimized patient care and the management of outpatients treated with bDMARDs. Patients have already expressed their satisfaction with this course of care and the return on investment is positive.

Evaluating remission and low disease activity from the perspective of the patient with axial spondyloarthritis: The cross-sectional ConREspAx study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the properties of a single question to determine patient perception of remission and disease activity; to compare this with existing definitions for remission and low disease activity (LDA).

METHODS

Single-center, cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with axSpA (fulfilling ASAS criteria) were consecutively included. Both the patient's perception of remission and LDA and that of the physician were evaluated with a single question. Agreement between the patients' perception and other current definitions was tested using the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). The sensitivity (S) and specificity (Sp) of current definitions of disease states were tested against the patient's perception as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The study population included 105 axSpA patients (63.8% males; 67.6% with radiographic sacroiliitis). Patients considered themselves to be in remission in 21% of cases and in LDA in 51.4%; physicians considered patients to be in remission in 45.7% of cases and in LDA in 35.2%. The poorest agreement was recorded for the patient's and the physician's perception of remission. The best agreement for patients' perception of remission was for a BASDAI < 2 and normal C-reactive protein values. This definition was also the most sensitive (S=72.7%) and specific (Sp=83.1%) when the patient's perception was taken as the gold standard.

CONCLUSION

In a real-life setting, the evaluation of remission by the patient through a single question was the hardest criterion to achieve, although it did prove to be a feasible, valid, and specific way to assess remission.

2022 French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Update the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis.

METHODS

Following standardized procedures, a systematic literature review was done by four supervised rheumatology residents based on questions defined by a task force of 16 attending rheumatologists. The findings were reviewed during three working meetings that culminated in each recommendation receiving a grade and the level of agreement among experts being determined.

RESULTS

Five general principles and 15 recommendations were developed. They take into account pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures along with treatment methods based on the dominant phenotype present (axial, articular, enthesitis/dactylitis) and the extra-articular manifestations (psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, uveitis). NSAIDs are the first-line pharmacological treatment in the various presentations. Conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are not indicated in the axial and isolated entheseal forms. If the response to conventional treatment is not adequate, targeted therapies (biologics, synthetics) should be considered; the indications depend on the clinical phenotype and presence of extra-articular manifestations.

CONCLUSION

This update incorporates recent data (published since the prior update in 2018) and the predominant clinical phenotype concept. It aims to help physicians with the everyday management of patients affected by spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis.

Remission in axial spondyloarthritis: Developing a consensus definition

OBJECTIVE

To reach a consensus on the tools available to evaluate disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and to develop a consensus definition of remission in axSpA.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was used. A scientific committee proposed statements addressing the assessment of axSpA in clinical practice and the definition of remission. The questionnaire was evaluated in 2 rounds by rheumatologists from GRESSER (GRupo de Estudio de ESpondiloartritis de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología).

RESULTS

After 2 rounds of evaluation, a panel of 81 rheumatologists reached agreement on 56 out of the 80 proposed items (72.0%). There was agreement that the definition of remission in axSpA should include: disease activity, pain, fatigue, peripheral involvement, extra-articular manifestations, laboratory tests, functional impairment, mobility, quality of life, need for treatment, radiographic progression, and patient and physician global assessments. It is recommended to set a therapeutic goal when starting a treatment. The ideal goal is remission although low disease activity may also be an acceptable alternative. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is the preferred tool to assess disease activity. The panel made a proposal for clinical remission in axSpA based on the ASDAS cut-off value for inactive disease, the absence of extra-articular (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease) and peripheral (arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis) manifestations, plus normal C-reactive protein levels and absence of radiographic progression.

CONCLUSION

This work offers consensus recommendations and a proposal of clinical remission that may be useful in the management of patients with axSpA.

Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Pros, Cons, and Future Directions

Treat to target describes a management paradigm that involves choosing a clinically relevant target, assessment with validated measures at a prespecified frequency, and a change in therapy if the target is not met. Although guidelines recommend treating to target in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), ideal methods to reach this target remain controversial. This review focuses on background for a treat-to-target strategy in axSpA. Potential targets of treatment, association of targets with outcomes, evidence of treatment impact on outcomes, and how treat to target has been incorporated into treatment guidelines are discussed. Treat-to-target trials and the research agenda for studies in axSpA are discussed.

2018 update of French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations about the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To update French Society for Rheumatology recommendations about the management in clinical practice of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). SpA is considered across the range of clinical phenotypes (axial, peripheral, and entheseal) and concomitant manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis is included among the SpA phenotypes.

METHODS

According to the standard procedure advocated by the EULAR for developing recommendations, we first reviewed the literature published since the previous version of the recommendations issued in June 2013. A task force used the results to develop practice guidelines, which were then revised and graded using AGREE II.

RESULTS

Four general principles and 15 recommendations were developed. The first four recommendations deal with treatment goals and general considerations (assessment tools and comorbidities). Recommendations 5 and 6 are on non-pharmacological treatments. Recommendation 7 is about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are the cornerstone of the treatment, and recommendations 8 to 10 are on analgesics, glucocorticoid therapy, and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Biologics are the focus of recommendations 11 through 14, which deal with newly introduced drug classes, including their indications (active disease despite conventional therapy and, for nonradiographic axial SpA, objective evidence of inflammation) and monitoring, and with patient management in the event of treatment failure or disease remission. Finally, recommendation 15 is about surgical treatments.

CONCLUSION

This update incorporates recent data into a smaller number of more simply formulated recommendations, with the goal of facilitating their use for guiding the management of patients with SpA.