Efficacy and safety of febuxostat in 73 gouty patients with stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease: A retrospective study of 10 centers

Febuxostat dose requirement according to renal function in patients who achieve target serum urate levels: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the febuxostat dose requirement according to renal function in patients who achieve target serum urate (SU) levels.

METHODS

Of 3153 gout patients who underwent febuxostat treatment, 873 patients with an initial SU level>6mg/dL were included and categorized by the estimated glomerular filtration rate: normal, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3, and stages 4-5. Ninety-five patients with insufficient follow-up were further excluded. The dose of febuxostat in patients who achieved the SU target (< 6mg/dL) was defined as the average daily dosage at the time of SU target achievement.

RESULTS

The cohort of 778 gout patients had a median age of 52.0 years (IQR, 41.0-63.0) and comprised 711 (91.4%) men. The mean SU at febuxostat initiation was higher in the CKD 4-5 (9.6 [± 3.1] mg/dL) than in the other groups (CKD 3, 8.7 [± 1.7]; normal, 8.4 [± 1.7]; P<0.001). Patients achieved target SU at a median of 4.0 (1.9-9.6) months and in those who achieved target SU, the dose of febuxostat at the time of SU target achievement was significantly lower in the CKD 4-5 group (50.0 [± 16.5] mg) than in the other groups (vs. CKD stage 3, 60.0 [± 19.5] mg; P<0.01, vs. normal, 60.0 [± 19.8] mg; P<0.01). Furthermore, CKD stage 4-5 had a negative correlation with the febuxostat dose requirement (Beta: -2.334, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among patients who achieved SU target, those with severely decreased renal function (CKD 4-5) required a lower febuxostat dose to achieve the target SU level compared to patients with normal or mild renal impairment.

Effectiveness and safety of different doses of febuxostat compared with allopurinol in the treatment of hyperuricemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of hyperuricemia has increased steadily with the continuous improvement of living standards. Some studies have reported the clinical effectiveness and safety of different doses of febuxostat in comparison with allopurinol in hyperuricemia treatment, but the sample sizes of the studies have been small, and the results have been inconsistent. We designed this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different doses of febuxostat compared with allopurinol in the treatment of hyperuricemia.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of febuxostat and allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia. The effectiveness and safety of different doses of febuxostat and allopurinol in treating hyperuricemia were assessed using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the percentage of patients achieving serum uric acid levels of 6.0 mg/dL or less was higher among patients taking febuxostat (80 mg/d) than among patients taking allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.79, 95% CI (1.55, 2.08), P < 0.00001]. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients achieving serum uric acid levels of 6.0 mg/dL or less between febuxostat (40 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.93, 1.31), P = 0.25]. There was also no statistically significant difference in the incidence of gout between the febuxostat (40 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.64, 1.49), P = 0.91] or between the febuxostat (80 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (0.81, 1.58), P = 0.48].No significant difference in the incidence of major adverse reactions as observed between the febuxostat (40 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.16; 95% CI (0.43, 3.16), P = 0.77] or between the febuxostat (80 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.06; 95% CI (0.79, 1.42), P = 0.70]. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between the febuxostat (40 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.30; 95% CI (0.57, 2.95), P = 0.53] or between the febuxostat (80 mg/d) and allopurinol (200-300 mg/d) [RR = 1.79; 95% CI (0.74, 4.32), P = 0.20].

CONCLUSIONS

Febuxostat (80 mg/d) was associated with a higher percentage of patients achieving serum uric acid levels of 6.0 mg/dL or less than allopurinol (200-300 mg/d), however, febuxostat (80 mg/d) did not exhibit better efficacy in reducing the incidence of gout. More attention should be devoted to the adverse reactions caused by an increase in febuxostat doses.

Cardiovascular Safety Evaluation of Febuxostat and Allopurinol: Findings from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Febuxostat and allopurinol are the most commonly used uric acid-lowering medications, and their safety is of great concern, especially the cardiovascular adverse reactions associated with febuxostat. We propose to study the cardiovascular toxicity of febuxostat and allopurinol using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

A total of 64 quarters of FAERS data were downloaded from 2004 to 2019. Febuxostat- and allopurinol-related cardiovascular adverse events were extracted after data cleaning. Signal detection was conducted by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR).

RESULTS

There were 2939 and 25,219 reports of febuxostat- and allopurinol-related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs), respectively. The most frequent CVAEs with febuxostat and allopurinol were edema peripheral (14.38%) and peripheral swelling (8.76%), respectively. In elderly gout patients, febuxostat is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy. Febuxostat in combination with acetic acid derivatives nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDS) also increases the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with allopurinol, febuxostat may increase cardiovascular toxicity in patients with gout.

Febuxostat Therapy for Patients with Gout and Stage 2-4 CKD: a Retrospective Study

Introduction

The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and renal safety of febuxostat in gout and stage 2–4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and factors that correlated with target serum urate (SU).

Methods

A single-center retrospective study including male patients with gout and CKD was conducted. SU, the rate of SU < 360 µmol/L (RAT), and renal safety were analyzed in subjects who received febuxostat over 44 weeks. Factors that correlated with target SU were also explored.

Results

Between January 2017 and March 2021, 102 patients (stage 2 CKD: n = 27; stage 3 CKD: n = 70; stage 4 CKD: n = 5) were enrolled. The SU level reduced significantly over 44 weeks (600.76 ± 95.42 versus 405.52 ± 111.93 µmol/L; P < 0.05), and RAT increased to 39.20%. The overall estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level improved over 44 weeks (52.05 ± 11.68 versus 55.46 ± 14.49 mL/min/1.73 cm², P < 0.05). An obvious improvement of eGFR was observed in stage 3 CKD, in patients with ≤ 1 risk factor (hypertension, diabetic mellitus, hyperlipidemia, or usage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), and in patients with terminal SU < 360 µmol/L (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that baseline SU level and body weight were correlated with RAT. Further analysis revealed that patients with SU < 600 μmol/L and body weight ≤ 70 kg reached higher RAT (56.7%).

Conclusions

Febuxostat demonstrated efficacy and renal safety in patients with gout and CKD in clinical practice. Achieving the target SU could obviously improve renal function. Baseline SU level and body weight could affect the achievement of target SU.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00480-7.

Urate-lowering efficacy and renal safety of febuxostat in patients with hyperuricemia and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease not yet on dialysis: A meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of febuxostat in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. We evaluated the urate-lowering efficacy and renal safety of febuxostat in patients with stage 4-5 CKD not yet on dialysis, through a meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases for observational studies of patients with advanced CKD starting febuxostat. Articles describing changes in serum urate levels and/or renal function assessed by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were included.

RESULTS

Among 148 retrieved studies, five relevant observational studies with 327 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Febuxostat was administered daily at 10-120 mg for 3-12 months. Serum urate reduced in response to febuxostat (weighted mean difference, -1.85 mg/dL; 95% CI, -2.04--1.67 mg/dL; I²; 0%). Three studies involving 145 patients included eGFR assessments. Renal function, assessed through the eGFR, did not change after febuxostat use (weighted mean difference, 0.11 mL/min/1.73m²; 95% CI, -0.25-0.47 mL/min/1.73m²; I²; 45%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, febuxostat has acceptable urate-lowering efficacy and renal safety in patients with hyperuricemia and stage 4-5 CKD who are not yet on dialysis.

Efficacy and safety of urate-lowering therapy in people with kidney impairment: a GCAN-initiated literature review

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, defined as achieving target serum urate <6.0 mg/dl, and safety of urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) for people with gout and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5.

METHODS

PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched from 1 January 1959 to 31 January 2018 for studies that enrolled people with gout, who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (CrCl) of <60 ml/min and exposure to allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, benzbromarone, lesinurad or pegloticase. All study designs other than case reports were included, except for people on dialysis, for whom we did include case reports.

RESULTS

There were 36 reports with an analysis of efficacy and/or safety based upon renal function: allopurinol (n = 12), febuxostat (n = 10), probenecid (n = 3), benzbromarone (n = 5), lesinurad (n = 5) and pegloticase (n = 1). There were 108 reports that involved people with gout and renal impairment but did not contain any analysis on efficacy and/or safety based upon renal function: allopurinol (n = 84), febuxostat (n = 14), benzbromarone (n = 1), lesinurad (n = 3) and pegloticase (n = 6). Most studies excluded people with more severe degrees of renal impairment (eGFR or CrCl of <30 ml/min). For allopurinol, in particular, there was significant variability in the dose of drug used and the efficacy in terms of urate lowering, across all levels of renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and/or safety of currently used ULTs according to different levels of renal function. Future studies should include patients with CKD and should report study outcomes stratified by renal function.

2020 recommendations from the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of gout: Urate-lowering therapy

OBJECTIVE

To develop French Society of Rheumatology-endorsed recommendations for the management of urate-lowering therapy (ULT).

METHODS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed by 9 rheumatologists (academic or community-based), 3 general practitioners, 1 cardiologist, 1 nephrologist and 1 patient, using a systematic literature search, one physical meeting to draft recommendations and two Delphi rounds to finalize them.

RESULTS

A set of 3 overarching principles and 5 recommendations was elaborated. The overarching principles emphasize the importance of patient education, especially the need for explaining the objective of lowering serum urate (SU) level to obtain crystal dissolution, clinical symptoms disappearance and avoidance of complications. ULT is indicated as soon as the diagnosis of gout is established. SU level must be decreased below 300μmol/l (50mg/l) in all gout patients or at least below 360μmol/l (60ml/l) when the 300μmol/l target cannot be reached, and must be maintained at these targets and monitored life-long. The choice of the ULT primarily relies on renal function: in patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is above 60ml/min/1.73m², first-line ULT is allopurinol; in those with eGFR between 30 and 60ml/min/1.73m², allopurinol use must be cautious and febuxostat can be considered as an alternative; and in those whose eGFR is below 30ml/min/1.73m², allopurinol must be avoided and febuxostat should be preferred. Prophylaxis of ULT-induced gout flares involves progressive increase of ULT dosage and low-dose colchicine for at least 6 months. Cardiovascular risk factors and diseases, the metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease must be screened and managed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations aim to provide simple and clear guidance for the management of ULT in France.

The role of febuxostat in gout

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Concerns about the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat lead to reconsideration of the place of febuxostat in the management of gout.

RECENT FINDINGS

The CARES trial is a randomized controlled trial mandated by the FDA to compare the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in the management of gout. About 6190 patients with gout and major cardiovascular disease, randomly assigned to allopurinol or febuxostat, were prospectively followed up for a median of 32 months. No difference was noted in the occurrence of the primary end-point event, a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina with urgent revascularization, but cardiovascular death was significantly more common in the febuxostat group (4.3%) as compared with the allopurinol group (3.2%) (P = 0.03).

SUMMARY

Present guidelines on the management of gout should be revised in view of recent findings. Allopurinol could be recommended as the sole first-line urate-lowering drug (ULD) in patients with no contraindication. In patients contraindicated to allopurinol, uricosurics could be preferred to febuxostat as first-line ULDs in patients with cardiovascular disease/risk factors and no history of uric acid stones.

Gout: state of the art after a decade of developments

This review article summarizes the relevant English literature on gout from 2010 through April 2017. It emphasizes that the current epidemiology of gout indicates a rising prevalence worldwide, not only in Western countries but also in Southeast Asia, in close relationship with the obesity and metabolic syndrome epidemics. New pathogenic mechanisms of chronic hyperuricaemia focus on the gut (microbiota, ABCG2 expression) after the kidney. Cardiovascular and renal comorbidities are the key points to consider in terms of management. New imaging tools are available, including US with key features and dual-energy CT rendering it able to reveal deposits of urate crystals. These deposits are now included in new diagnostic and classification criteria. Overall, half of the patients with gout are readily treated with allopurinol, the recommended xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI), with prophylaxis for flares with low-dose daily colchicine. The main management issues are related to patient adherence, because gout patients have the lowest rate of medication possession ratio at 1 year, but they also include clinical inertia by physicians, meaning XOI dosage is not titrated according to regular serum uric acid level measurements for targeting serum uric acid levels for uncomplicated (6.0 mg/dl) and complicated gout, or the British Society for Rheumatology recommended target (5.0 mg/dl). Difficult-to-treat gout encompasses polyarticular flares, and mostly patients with comorbidities, renal or heart failure, leading to contraindications or side effects of standard-of-care drugs (colchicine, NSAIDs, oral steroids) for flares; and tophaceous and/or destructive arthropathies, leading to switching between XOIs (febuxostat) or to combining XOI and uricosurics.

[Comorbidity in gout and hyperuricemia: prevalence, causes, prospects of urate lowering therapy]

Nowadays, there is increased interest in the connection of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia with comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and other. Studies conducted over the past few decades suggest that not only gout, but also asymptomatic hyperuricemia can significantly worsen the prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases, as the deposition of urate crystals can be both an immediate cause and a factor in the progression of renal failure. In that way, the timely appointment of urate - lowering therapy and achieving the target serum uric acid level can not only affect joint damage, but also can significantly slow the progression of life - threatening comorbid conditions.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Chuanhutongfeng Mixture for the Treatment of Chronic Gouty Arthritis by Regulating miRNAs

Background

We investigated whether Chuanhutongfeng mixture has actions on chronic gouty arthritis (CGA) by regulating miRNAs.

Methods

A total of 255 patients with CGA and 30 controls were enrolled. miRNA expression profiles and cluster analysis were preformed; RT-qPCR was used to detect miRNAs associated with CGA. Patients were allocated into Chuanhutongfeng mixture, allopurinol (positive control), and control (etoricoxib) groups. Expression of plasma miRNAs was measured before and after treatments; expression of chemokine 2 (CCL2) and interleukin 8 (CXCL8) was determined by ELISA.

Results

48 miRNAs were differentially expressed and compared to controls. 36 miRNAs expression levels were > 1.5 times and 12 miRNAs < 1.5 times compared to the controls. miR-339-5p, miR-486-5p, and miR-361-5p levels in patients with CGA were lower than in controls (P < 0.05). This trial showed that the Chuanhutongfeng mixture and allopurinol groups had upregulated the expressions of miR-486-5, miR-339-5p, and miR-361-5p and decreased levels of CCL2 and CXCL8 proteins. After 8 weeks of treatment, Chuanhutongfeng mixture decreased serum uric acid levels more than allopurinol (P < 0.05) and reduced levels of CCL2 and CXCL8 protein significantly more than in the allopurinol and control groups.

Conclusions

The therapeutic actions of Chuanhutongfeng mixture inhibit the expression of proteins CCL2 and CXCL8 in plasma and upregulated the expressions of three miRNAs (miR-486-5p, miR-339-5p, and miR-361-5p).

Managing Gout in the Patient with Renal Impairment

Hyperuricaemia is an independent risk factor for renal function decline. Evidence is emerging that urate-lowering therapy might be beneficial in subjects with renal impairment. We  review the association between renal impairment and gout, some of the related pathogenic processes and the possible impact of gout treatment on the progression of renal impairment. Nevertheless, the management of gout is more complex in the presence of chronic kidney disease. The main aim of gout therapy is to fully dissolve the urate crystals, thus curing the disease. Avoidance of attacks-prophylaxis-and their prompt treatment if they occur, along with accurate information to patients, completes the treatment strategy. This article provides a practical guide to managing gout in older patients and in those with renal impairment. We highlight the shortcomings in our current treatment options and strategies.

Gout: An old disease in new perspective - A review

Gout is a picturesque presentation of uric acid disturbance. It is the most well understood and described type of arthritis. Its epidemiology is studied. New insights into the pathophysiology of hyperuricemia and gouty arthritis; acute and chronic allow for an even better understanding of the disease. The role of genetic predisposition is becoming more evident. The clinical picture of gout is divided into asymptomatic hyperuricemia, acute gouty arthritis, intercritical period, and chronic tophaceous gout. Diagnosis is based on laboratory and radiological features. The gold standard of diagnosis is identification of characteristic MSU crystals in the synovial fluid using polarized light microscopy. Imaging modalities include conventional radiography, ultrasonography, conventional CT, Dual-Energy CT, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, nuclear scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography. There is remarkable progress in the application of ultrasonography and Dual-Energy CT which is bound to influence the diagnosis, staging, follow-up, and clinical research in the field. Management of gout includes management of flares, chronic gout and prevention of flares, as well as management of comorbidities. Newer drugs in the pharmacological armamentarium are proving successful and supplement older ones. Other important points in its management include patient education, diet and life style changes, as well as cessation of hyperuricemic drugs.

Current and future therapies for gout

INTRODUCTION

Gout is a common disease responsible for recurrent flares triggered by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals secondary to longstanding hyperuricaemia. The management of gout implies both the treatment of flares and the treatment of hyperuricaemia itself. Recent improvement in the understanding of the disease led to the development of new drugs. Areas covered: This review covers data related to 'old' treatments of flares and hyperuricaemia, evidence on the recently approved drugs and emerging therapies in development. Expert opinion: Recent data provide a good grasp of the optimal use of colchicine, corticosteroids and NSAIDs for the treatment of flares. Interleukin-1 blocking therapies have an increasing role in the management of difficult-to-treat gout. Sub-optimal use of allopurinol is common and its potency to reduce serum uric acid (SUA) levels is underestimated. Febuxostat effectively reduces SUA levels. New uricosurics, notably lesinurad and arhalofenate, in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors, offer promising perspectives to help a greater number of patients achieve sufficient SUA reduction.