Incidence of paradoxical reactions in patients treated with tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis: Data from the French registry REGATE

Paradoxical Psoriasis in Patients Receiving Therapy with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Potential Pathogenic Mechanisms and the Role of Genetic Factors

TNF inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionized the therapeutic management of various chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Despite their known benefits, these therapies are related to paradoxical adverse effects (PAEs), including paradoxical psoriasis (PP). Although the underlying mechanism remains somewhat unclear, some theories suggest that genetic factors, particularly certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), may play an important role. The present review aimed to research and analyze recent findings regarding the pathomechanisms involved in the appearance of PP and the association between various genetic factors and PP in individuals treated with TNFi. We performed a literature search and found that certain genes (IL23R, TNF, FBXL19, CTLA4, SLC12A8, TAP1) are strongly associated with the occurrence of PP in pediatric and adult patients during therapy with TNFi. The identification of the specific SNPs involved in the appearance of PP and other PAEs in patients treated with TNFi for various diseases and in different populations may later favor the recognition of those patients at a high risk of developing such adverse effects and could guide personalized therapeutic strategies in future years.

Paradoxical Reactions to Biologicals in Chronic Inflammatory Systemic Diseases

BACKGROUND

Biological agents that contain substances affecting the immune system are increasingly being used to treat chronic inflammatory systemic diseases. Aside from the expected adverse effects, they can also induce unexpected paradoxical reactions (PR). A reaction is called paradoxical when a substance that is generally therapeutically effective induces the opposite of what is intended, with the new appearance or exacerbation of inflammatory changes in the skin and other organs.

METHODS

The paradoxical reactions that have been described since 1997 are presented here on the basis of the available literature on the main types of chronic inflammatory systemic disease, which was retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases.

RESULTS

Many studies and registers to date contain no mention of paradoxical reactions. Anti- TNF-alpha treatment for patients with ankylosing spondylitis leads to paradoxical reactions in 19 per 1000 patient years, compared to 11 per 1000 patient years with conventional treatment; the corresponding frequency for paradoxical psoriasis in patients with other chronic inflammatory systemic diseases are 1.04-3.68 versus 1.45 per 1000 patient years. Paradoxical reactions tend to be more common with anti-TNF-alpha treatment than, for example, with the administration of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and other agents. It is unclear whether some drugs have been noted to cause PR more commonly than others because of varying times since their approval, differences in immunogenicity, and differences between their target structures.

CONCLUSION

Paradoxical reactions induced by biological agents are a problem confronting physicians in multiple specialties. They need to be distinguished from infectious and neoplastic diseases and from autoimmune conditions of other types. The treatment options for paradoxical reactions include local treatment, symptomatic therapy, prednisolone administration, and the discontinuation or switching of the biological agent, although some patients will react with a further paradoxical reaction to a different biological agent that is used instead.

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients taking tocilizumab: paradoxical manifestation or insufficient efficacy?

Objectives

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) is a severe corneal condition associated with uncontrolled RA. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is used to control RA, however, episodes of paradoxical ocular inflammation have been reported in TCZ-treated patients. We report a case series of PUK in TCZ-treated RA patients with ophthalmological and systemic findings and discuss the potential underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Four patients (six eyes), 47–62 years of age, were included. At the onset of PUK, the median duration of RA was 13 years [interquartile range (IQR) 3–13] and the median treatment with TCZ was 9 months (IQR 3–14). Two patients had active disease [28-joint DAS (DAS28) >3.2] and the disease was controlled in two patients (DAS28 ≤3.2).

Results

TCZ was initially replaced by another immunomodulatory treatment in all patients and later reintroduced in two patients without PUK recurrence. Corneal inflammation was controlled in all cases with local and systemic treatments, with severe visual loss in one eye.

Conclusion

PUK may occur in patients with long-standing RA after a switch to TCZ and can be interpreted, depending on the context, as insufficient efficacy or a paradoxical manifestation. These cases highlight the urgent need for reliable biomarkers of the efficacy and paradoxical reactions of biologics.

Drug-induced Bullous Pemphigoid and Lupus Erythematosus Occurring under Anti-TNF-α and IL-6 Therapy in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis

A 65-year-old Japanese woman, who was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome with various autoantibodies including anti-DNA antibody, developed bullous pemphigoid (BP) and hematological abnormalities like lupus erythematosus after adalimumab therapy. The discontinuation of adalimumab resolved those disorders but polyarthritis thereafter relapsed. The introduction of abatacept was not effective, but tocilizumab was found to be effective for polyarthritis, however, thereafter both bullous disease and severe pancytopenia developed. Discontinuation of tocilizumab was effective, but polyarthritis again developed, and baricitinib resolved it. There is an increasing number of reports of drug-induced BP and lupus erythematosus, and biologics might trigger an alteration in the pathophysiological/clinical course of rheumatic disorder.

Clinical characteristics and social productivity levels of patients with malignant rheumatoid arthritis based on a nationwide clinical database in Japan: annual survey from 2003 to 2013

OBJECTIVES

Malignant rheumatoid arthritis (MRA) is defined as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with systemic vasculitis or other severe extra-articular manifestations. Japan has a nationwide database for MRA. We analyzed the characteristics of Japanese patients with MRA based on data from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW).

METHODS

We were permitted to use data on 43,108 patients who were registered in the MHLW database from 2003 to 2013.

RESULTS

Median age was 65 (interquartile range, 57-72) years. Patients consisted of 71% females. Proportions of patients who had or had experienced interstitial pneumonia and pleuritis were increased, episcleritis was stable, and other MRA manifestations were decreased over time. The number of positive symptoms per patient also decreased over time. The median dose of glucocorticoid, percentage of patients undergoing surgery, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and apheresis decreased year by year. Steinbrocker stage and class improved over time. Median C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate also decreased. Regarding social productivity levels of patients with MRA, the proportion of patients who were working or working from home increased and the proportion of patients recuperating or hospitalized decreased.

CONCLUSION

In patients with MRA, disease activity decreased and social productivity improved from 2003 to 2013.

Complications of Treatments for Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases

Medications to treat children with rheumatic disease include disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticosteroids, and biologic response modifiers that target mediators and cells involved in autoimmunity and inflammation. Although usually well-tolerated, such medications have many possible side effects, of which primary care and emergency providers should be aware. Both disease and immunosuppression contribute to susceptibility to unusual and opportunistic infections, in addition to usual childhood infections for which these children should receive all applicable nonlive vaccines. Close coordination between the rheumatologist and other medical care providers is essential, because medication side effects, infections, and disease flares are difficult to distinguish, and may occur together.

Tocilizumab: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab (RoActemra^®), an IL-6 receptor antagonist, are approved (± methotrexate) in numerous countries throughout the world, for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Extensive clinical experience has firmly established the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab [monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs)] in adults with early-stage and longer-duration established RA. In the clinical trial and real-world settings, tocilizumab monotherapy or combination therapy provided rapid and sustained improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes and health-related quality of life. The safety profile of tocilizumab is consistent over time and, in general, is consistent with that of other immunomodulatory agents. This narrative review, written from an EU perspective, summarizes the clinical use of IV and SC tocilizumab in RA. Given its low risk of immunogenicity, the flexibility of IV and SC administration and the convenience of the once-weekly, self-administered, SC regimen, tocilizumab provides an effective treatment for severe, active and progressive RA in adults not previously treated with methotrexate and an effective biologic first- or subsequent-line treatment for moderate to severe active RA in adults who have either responded inadequately to or were intolerant of previous therapy with ≥ 1 csDMARD or TNF inhibitor.