Motivational interviewing to improve treatment adherence

A randomized controlled trial of an acceptance-based, insight-inducing medication adherence therapy (AIM-AT) for adults with early-stage psychosis

This study aimed to test the effectiveness of an acceptance-based medication adherence intervention for people with early-stage psychosis. An assessor-blind, three-arm randomized controlled trial design was used. One hundred and twenty-six participants who were adults with ≤3 years of psychosis were recruited from four district Integrated Community Centers for Mental Wellness in Hong Kong. They were randomly assigned to receive a 10-session acceptance-based, insight-inducing medication adherence therapy (AIM-AT) intervention, a conventional psychoeducation group program, or usual treatment (n = 42 per group). Primary outcomes were medication adherence and insight into the illness/treatment. All study outcomes were measured at recruitment and immediately, 6 months, and 12 months post-intervention. Participants in the AIM-AT experienced statistically significant improvements in the primary outcomes (levels of medication adherence and insight into illness/treatment), when compared to those in the other two groups over the 12-month follow-ups. The AIM-AT group also had significantly greater improvements in psychotic symptoms, psychosocial functioning, service satisfaction, length of rehospitalization, and total number of patients hospitalized over the follow-up period. These findings support the effectiveness of the AIM-AT to improve medication adherence, psychosocial health, and service satisfaction in people with early-stage psychosis.

Motivational Interviewing as a Tool to Increase Motivation and Adherence to a Long COVID Telerehabilitation Intervention: Secondary Data Analysis from a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Although motivational interviewing was originally developed to address abuse disorders, scientific evidence confirms that it is an increasingly used and effective approach in a wide range of therapeutic interventions. To date, however, no studies have analyzed the use of this tool in patients with persistent symptoms following coronavirus disease 2019, a condition known as Long COVID.

Purpose

To analyze the effectiveness of motivational interviewing with regard to the adherence to telerehabilitation for Long COVID using a mobile application. As a secondary objective, factors related to greater motivation before and after the motivational interviewing techniques were analyzed.

Patients and Methods

This longitudinal design substudy used a sample of 52 adult patients with Long COVID participating in the intervention group of a randomized clinical trial. This trial examined the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program for this population using a mobile application. This program included three motivational interviews to achieve maximum treatment adherence. In this study, the main variables were motivation and adherence to application use. Sociodemographic and clinical data, personal constructs, and affective state were also collected. Subsequently, a descriptive, correlational, and regression statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistics program.

Results

The median motivation prior to the first motivational interview was 8 (IQR 2), the median at the end of the last motivational interview was 8.5 (IQR 2.75), and the change in motivation levels after the three motivational interviews was 0.5 (IQR 1). Affective state and final motivation scores were predictors of greater adherence to telerehabilitation treatment.

Conclusion

A high level of motivation after participating in motivational interviewing appears to be related to higher levels of adherence to telerehabilitation in patients with Long COVID. This suggests that motivational interviewing may be an effective tool in the treatment of this disease.

[Statin intolerance-Statin tolerance]

BACKGROUND

Statins are the first-line treatment for reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, because the evidence regarding safety, tolerability, and reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is very good. For combination treatment several options are available. Nevertheless, LDL cholesterol values are often not sufficiently lowered. One reason is intolerance of the lipid-lowering medications.

OBJECTIVE

In addition to the study situation regarding statin tolerability, possible approaches to overcome intolerability are also shown.

RESULTS

In randomized trials adverse effects due to statin treatment are as rare as in the placebo groups. In clinical practice patients more frequently report complaints, particularly muscular symptoms. One important reason for intolerability is the nocebo effect. Complaints during treatment can lead to the fact that statins are not taken or are taken in insufficient doses. As a result, the LDL cholesterol level is insufficiently lowered with unfavorable effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events. Therefore, it is important to establish a tolerable treatment together with the patient on an individual basis. Information about the facts is one important aspect. In addition, a positively guided communication with the patient helps to reduce the nocebo effect.

CONCLUSION

Most adverse effects that patients attribute to statins are not caused by statins. This shows that other reasons are frequent and should be the focus of medical care. In this article international recommendations and personal experiences of a specialized lipid outpatient clinic are described.

Improvement of osteoporosis Care Organized by Nurses: ICON study - Protocol of a quasi-experimental study to assess the (cost)-effectiveness of combining a decision aid with motivational interviewing for improving medication persistence in patients with a recent fracture being treated at the fracture liaison service

Background

Given the health and economic burden of fractures related to osteoporosis, suboptimal adherence to medication and the increasing importance of shared-decision making, the Improvement of osteoporosis Care Organized by Nurses (ICON) study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of a multi-component adherence intervention (MCAI) for patients with an indication for treatment with anti–osteoporosis medication, following assessment at the Fracture Liaison Service after a recent fracture. The MCAI involves two consultations at the FLS. During the first consultation, a decision aid is will be used to involve patients in the decision of whether to start anti-osteoporosis medication. During the follow-up visit, the nurse inquires about, and stimulates, medication adherence using motivational interviewing techniques.

Methods

A quasi-experimental trial to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness and feasibility of an MCAI, consisting of a decision aid (DA) at the first visit, combined with nurse-led adherence support using motivational interviewing during the follow-up visit, in comparison with care as usual, in improving adherence to oral anti-osteoporosis medication for patients with a recent fracture two Dutch FLS. Medication persistence, defined as the proportion of patients who are persistent at one year assuming a refill gap < 30 days, is the primary outcome. Medication adherence, decision quality, subsequent fractures and mortality are the secondary outcomes. A lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis using a model-based economic evaluation and a process evaluation will also be conducted. A sample size of 248 patients is required to show an improvement in the primary outcome with 20%. Study follow-up is at 12 months, with measurements at baseline, after four months, and at 12 months.

Discussion

We expect that the ICON-study will show that the MCAI is a (cost-)effective intervention for improving persistence with anti-osteoporosis medication and that it is feasible for implementation at the FLS.

Trial registration

This trial has been registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre (Trial NL7236 (NTR7435)).

Version 1.0; 26-11-2020.

Therapeutic assessment and the art of feedback: A model for integrating evidence-based assessment and therapy techniques in neurological rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic assessment involves the integration of evidence-based approaches and humanistic principles, and there is empirical support for the use of this approach in the context of neuropsychological assessment broadly.

OBJECTIVE

We propose that therapeutic assessment (TA) and collaborative therapeutic neuropsychological assessment (CTNA) principles are appropriate and effective for application within a neurological rehabilitation population specifically.

METHODS

We review TA and CTNA principles and propose a model for their application to a neurological rehabilitation population, with an emphasis on describing the strengths of the collaborative approach, guidelines and principles for maximizing the efficacy of feedback, and transitioning the patient into psychotherapy services to further address their personal goals. A case example of a neurologically injured individual engaged in CTNA and subsequent intervention is shared to highlight the principles discussed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The proposed model and case study demonstrate the clinical utility of TA and CTNA principles with a neurological rehabilitation population.