Medical pathways of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis before referral to pediatric rheumatology centers

Pre-Rheumatology Referral Consultation and Investigation Pattern in Children with Joint Complaints: Focus on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is often entrusted to the pediatric rheumatologist specialist. Timely referral to a specialized center is crucial. This study aims to assess the consultation and investigation patterns of patients with joint complaints before rheumatology referral. This longitudinal cohort study included patients with joint complaints who were referred to the Pediatric Rheumatology Unit. The cohort included 301 patients (58% female), 50 of them (17%) diagnosed with JIA. Compared to patients with orthopedic conditions or functional diseases, JIA patients had seen more specialists (p < 0.01) and received a quicker diagnosis (p < 0.01). Patients with early JIA diagnosis (within 3 months from symptoms onset) were younger (8.46 vs. 11.5 years old; p = 0.04), more frequently female (78% vs. 47%, p = 0.03), and with higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values (37 vs. 9 mm/h; p = 0.02) than those diagnosed later. Patients with a late diagnosis of JIA had a significantly longer median time between the first healthcare visit and the PR referral (25 vs. 101 days; p < 0.01). The main contributor to diagnostic delay in JIA was the time required for PR referral after the first healthcare consult. Younger age, female sex, and higher ESR values were associated with earlier diagnosis of JIA.

Chronic limping in childhood, what else other than juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case series

BACKGROUND

Limping is a common clinical symptom in childhood; different clinical conditions may lead to limping and the diagnosis of the underlying cause may often be a challenge for the pediatrician.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the clinical manifestations, radiological pictures and disease course of other causes of limping in childhood, through a case series of seven cases and a brief discussion of each disease.

CONCLUSIONS

although trauma is the most common cause of acute limping, when there is no history of traumatic events and the limping has a chronic course, Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis is usually the most likely clinical diagnosis. However, other some rare conditions should be taken into account if JIA is not confirmed or if it presents with atypical clinical picture.

Access to paediatric rheumatology care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: what do we know? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This review examines time to access appropriate care for JIA patients and analyses the referral pathway before the first paediatric rheumatology (PR) visit. We also describe factors associated with a longer referral.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review, screening electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Open Grey database) up to February 2020. Articles written before 1994 (i.e. before the introduction of the unifying term JIA) were excluded.

RESULTS

From 595 nonduplicate citations found, 15 articles were finally included in the review. Most of the studies took place in Europe. The median time to first PR visit ranged from 3 to 10 months, with some disparities between referral pathway and patient characteristics. Patients with systemic-onset JIA had the shortest time to referral. Some clinical and biological factors such as swelling, fever, and elevated CRP and/or ESR were associated with a shorter time to first PR visit. Conversely, enthesitis, older age at symptom onset or pain were associated with a longer time. Whatever the country or world region, and despite disparities in healthcare system organization and healthcare practitioner availabilities, times to access PR were not wide-ranging.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review to summarize research on access to PR for JIA patients. The pathway of care for JIA patients remains complex, and reasons for delayed referral depend on several factors. Standardized clinical guidelines and fast-track pathways to facilitate prompt referral to specialized teams have to allow for worldwide disparities in healthcare provision.

Genomic risk scores for juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its subtypes

OBJECTIVES

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an autoimmune disease and a common cause of chronic disability in children. Diagnosis of JIA is based purely on clinical symptoms, which can be variable, leading to diagnosis and treatment delays. Despite JIA having substantial heritability, the construction of genomic risk scores (GRSs) to aid or expedite diagnosis has not been assessed. Here, we generate GRSs for JIA and its subtypes and evaluate their performance.

METHODS

We examined three case/control cohorts (UK, US-based and Australia) with genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes. We trained GRSs for JIA and its subtypes using lasso-penalised linear models in cross-validation on the UK cohort, and externally tested it in the other cohorts.

RESULTS

The JIA GRS alone achieved cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.670 in the UK cohort and externally-validated AUCs of 0.657 and 0.671 in the US-based and Australian cohorts, respectively. In logistic regression of case/control status, the corresponding odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation (SD) of GRS were 1.831 (1.685 to 1.991) and 2.008 (1.731 to 2.345), and were unattenuated by adjustment for sex or the top 10 genetic principal components. Extending our analysis to JIA subtypes revealed that the enthesitis-related JIA had both the longest time-to-referral and the subtype GRS with the strongest predictive capacity overall across data sets: AUCs 0.82 in UK; 0.84 in Australian; and 0.70 in US-based. The particularly common oligoarthritis JIA also had a GRS that outperformed those for JIA overall, with AUCs of 0.72, 0.74 and 0.77, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A GRS for JIA has potential to augment clinical JIA diagnosis protocols, prioritising higher-risk individuals for follow-up and treatment. Consistent with JIA heterogeneity, subtype-specific GRSs showed particularly high performance for enthesitis-related and oligoarthritis JIA.

Patient factors associated with waiting time to pediatric rheumatologist consultation for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is essential to optimize outcomes. Wait times (WTs) to consultation with a pediatric rheumatologist consultation is a Canadian quality measure, with benchmarks set at 7 days for systemic JIA (sJIA) and 4 weeks for other JIA categories. In this study we assess WTs for JIA at a single academic center and describe factors associated with longer WTs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 164 patients enrolled in a pharmacogenetic study in Alberta between 2002 and 2018. Limited chart reviews were conducted to evaluate dates of referral and first rheumatology visit to calculate WTs for receipt of pediatric rheumatology care. Cox proportional hazard models identified factors associated with WTs considering variables at the first pediatric rheumatology visit including: JIA category, age, sex, distance to the pediatric rheumatology clinic, number of active joints, pain and C-reactive protein.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 8.0 years (interquartile range, IQR 3.5, 12.0) and 46% of patients had oligoarticular JIA. Only 18 patients (11%) were from rural locations. The median WT for all patients met the national benchmark (22 days, IQR, 9, 44) with no statistically significant difference between WTs among JIA categories (p = 0.055). Importantly, the majority of sJIA cases met the 7-day benchmark (67%) with a median WT of 1.5 days. Older age was associated with longer WT (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89, 0.98, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Median benchmarks were met, however delays in older patients highlight the need for monitoring WTs.

Factors impacting referral of JIA patients to a tertiary level pediatric rheumatology center in North India: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

JIA studies demonstrate that there is a "window of opportunity" early in the disease course during which appropriate management improves outcomes. No data is available regarding patients' pathway, before first pediatric rheumatology (PR) evaluation in India, a country where health-care costs are self- paid by patients and where a significant shortage of pediatric rheumatologists (PRsts) is known. This study aimed to describe time from onset of symptoms to first PR visit of JIA patients to a tertiary center in India and factors that impact this.

METHODS

This retrospective study is from data collected at the PR center, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (SGRH) in New Delhi. JIA patients fulfilling ILAR 2004 criteria and seen at least twice from 1st October 2013 to 30th September 2018 were included. Data collected were: demographic details, history of disease, referral practitioner, clinical and laboratory features, treatments. Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi square and logistic regression were used as appropriate to study factors that determined time to first PR visit.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty patients were included: 396 were diagnosed at this PR center (group A), 124 were previously diagnosed as JIA and managed by non PRsts before first PR visit (group B). Median time from symptom onset to first PR visit was 4.1 months and median distance travelled 119.5 km. Despite ongoing treatment, group B patients had more aggressive disease and resided further away as compared to Group A patients. On univariate analysis, factors that predicted PR visit within 3 months were private patients, short distance to travel, family history of inflammatory disease, history of fever, history of acute uveitis or high ESR. On multivariate analysis all these factors were significant except high ESR and acute uveitis.

CONCLUSION

Time to first PR assessment at this center was comparable to that seen in western countries. Cost of care and long distance to the center delayed consultation; acuity of complaints and family history of rheumatologic condition hastened referral. Possible solutions to improve referral to PR centers would be to increase the number of PRsts and to improve medical insurance coverage.