Comparison of paediatric and adult classification criteria in juvenile idiopathic arthritis during the transition from paediatric to adult care

A lifelong journey: Long-term perspectives on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) represents a diverse group of chronic inflammatory conditions that begin in childhood or adolescence and continue into adulthood, with varying severity and outcomes. This review discusses the complexities of transitioning JIA patients emphasizing that inadequate transition from pediatric to adult care leads to loss of follow-up, treatment discontinuation, and increased disease activity. Furthermore, challenges in disease classification hinder continuity of care across lifespan. It is also pointed out that predicting long-term outcomes in JIA remains complex due to heterogeneity and evolving phenotypes. Factors such as disease category, joint involvement, and treatment influence disease activity, functional disability, and quality of life. Despite advancements in treatment strategies, a substantial proportion of patients experience long-term disability and joint damage. Finally, it is underscored that optimising long-term outcomes in adults with JIA requires a multifaceted approach encompassing structured transition processes, personalised treatment strategies, and comprehensive management of comorbidities. Further research is needed to refine predictive models, enhance disease monitoring tools, and understand the complex interplay between disease activity, treatment response, and long-term outcomes.

The TRUST Study-TRansition US Together: Evaluating the Impact of a Parent- and Adolescent-Centered Transition Toolkit on Transition Readiness in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Adolescents with chronic rheumatic disease must increasingly take on more responsibility for disease management from parents as they transition from pediatric to adult care. Yet, there are limited resources to inform and support parents about transition. Here, we evaluate the impact of a Transition Toolkit, geared towards parents and adolescents, on transition readiness, and explore the potential impact of parent-adolescent communication.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of youths aged 14-18 years old and their parents was performed. Participant demographics, disease characteristics, transition readiness scores (Transition-Q, max 100), and parent-adolescent communication scores (PACS, max 100) were collected at enrollment (when the Transition Toolkit was shared with adolescents and their parents. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses determined the influence of the Toolkit on transition readiness and explored the role of parent-adolescent communication quality. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were included; 19 completed one post-intervention Transition-Q and 16 completed two. Transition-Q scores increased over time and the rate of increase doubled after the Toolkit was shared (β = 7.8, p < 0.05, and β = 15.5, p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Transition readiness improved at each follow-up, the greatest increase was seen after the Toolkit was shared. Parent-adolescent communication quality did not appear to impact changes in transition readiness.

MRI Findings in Axial Psoriatic Spondylarthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a significant medical condition with a high prevalence, a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, and a high degree of overlap with other spondylarthritis disorders, particularly ankylosing spondylitis. Hence, knowledge of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations and a multidisciplinary strategy are required for the better management of these patients. We searched publications from the last 10 years and focused on the most relevant ones which discussed the classification criteria, the MRI characteristics of axial psoriatic arthritis, the importance of MRI for follow up, and the reliability of skin and synovial biopsy. Axial spondylarthritis can be diagnosed and followed up on using the well-established MRI technique and, additionally, a biopsy. The analysis and concordance between them can provide new directions for future studies.

Risk stratification using anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) in polyarticular subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in adulthood

OBJECTIVES

Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) is a subset of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), divided into two subtypes according to the presence of rheumatoid factor: pJIA without rheumatoid factor (pJIA RF-) and pJIA with positive rheumatoid factor (pJIA RF+), this latter is characterised with more structural damage. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) are often associated with RF. The respective performance of ACPA versus RF in structural outcome in pJIA, and in particular in adulthood pJIA remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether ACPA could be of value to assess structural damage in pJIA persisting in adulthood.

METHODS

Patients with pJIA and available data for ACPA, RF and X-ray were included retrospectively. Structural damage was assessed by two independent blinded investigators using Sharp Van Der Heijde scores.

RESULTS

56 pJIA adult patients were included: 62% (35/56) had pJIA RF+ and 38% (21/56) pJIA RF-. ACPA positivity in pJIA was significantly associated with presence of RF (96% vs 26%, P<0.001). RF positivity was significantly associated with higher Sharp van Der Heijde erosion and total scores (respectively P<0.01 and P<0.05). There were higher Sharp Van Der Heijde erosion, joint space narrowing and total scores in the pJIA ACPA+ subgroup than in the pJIA ACPA- subgroup, although there was no statistical significance. However, when adjusted on disease duration, pJIA ACPA+ patients had significantly higher erosion and total scores than pJIA ACPA- patients (P<0.05), and pJIA ACPA+ patients required more bDMARDs than pJIA ACPA- patients (P<0.05). Moreover, pJIA patients with high Sharp van Der Heijde joint space narrowing and total scores had significantly higher ACPA levels (P<0.01). A correlation was identified between ACPA levels and Sharp van Der Heijde total score (r=0.54, P<0.05). In the pJIA RF+ subgroup the presence of ACPA was associated with additional structural damage compared to no ACPA: sharp Van Der Heijde erosion, joint space narrowing and total scores were higher in the pJIA RF+ ACPA+ subgroup than in the pJIA RF+ ACPA- subgroup although these results did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that pJIA RF+ ACPA+ adult patients may have a more severe articular phenotype than pJIA RF+ ACPA- patients. ACPA could bring an additional value to RF for pJIA patients regarding structural damage. Altogether our results show that RF and ACPA are associated with structural damage measured by Sharp Van Der Heijde score in pJIA persisting in adulthood.

How does age determine the development of human immune-mediated arthritis?

Does age substantially affect the emergence of human immune-mediated arthritis? Children do not usually develop immune-mediated articular inflammation during their first year of life. In patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, this apparent ‘immune privilege’ disintegrates, and chronic inflammation is associated with variable autoantibody signatures and patterns of disease that resemble adult arthritis phenotypes. Numerous mechanisms might be involved in this shift, including genetic and epigenetic predisposing factors, maturation of the immune system with a progressive modulation of putative tolerogenic controls, parallel development of microbial dysbiosis, accumulation of a pro-inflammatory burden driven by environmental exposures (the exposome) and comorbidity-related drivers. By exploring these mechanisms, we expand the discussion of three (not mutually exclusive) hypotheses on how these factors can contribute to the differences and similarities between the loss of immune tolerance in children and the development of established immune-mediated arthritis in adults. These three hypotheses relate to a critical window in genetics and epigenetics, immune maturation, and the accumulation of burden. The varied manifestation of the underlying mechanisms among individuals is only beginning to be clarified, but the establishment of a framework can facilitate the development of an integrated understanding of the pathogenesis of arthritis across all ages.

In this Review, the authors discuss age-related arthropathy and the similarities and differences between childhood loss of immune tolerance and adult development of immune-mediated arthritis, and develop three hypotheses describing age-related mechanisms that contribute to the onset of arthritis.

The arthritis-free ‘immune privilege’ of early childhood is overridden by multiple mechanisms, progressively and age-dependently, generating recognizable patterns of chronic inflammatory arthritis.

The emergence of arthritis involves interconnected mechanisms related to immune priming, to a situational susceptibility and to the accumulation of an inflammatory burden.

The accumulation of epigenetic drift may contribute to differences across ages.

The exposome is expected to contribute to arthritis emergence in adults as well as in children.