Pregnancy rates and outcomes in early axial spondyloarthritis: An analysis of the DESIR cohort

Impact of Spondyloarthritis on Pregnancy Outcome: A Descriptive Analysis from a Specialized Center in Qatar

Introduction

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) most commonly presents at childbearing age; thus, pregnancy is of concern. However, data on pregnancy outcomes in these patients are limited.

Purpose

This study aimed to retrospectively describe pregnancy outcomes in patients with SpA from the Middle East.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed the electronic health records of all pregnant women attending a specialized pregnancy and rheumatic disease clinic between 2016 and 2022. All pregnant patients diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and peripheral SpA were included. Data on adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were collected.

Results

Fifty-seven eligible pregnancies were identified from hospital records: 10 pregnancies ended in early miscarriage. Forty-seven pregnancies resulted in live singleton births, 25 in patients with peripheral SpA and 22 with axSpA. Human leukocyte antigen B27 was positive in 7 (15%) patients and only in women with axSpA. Twenty-nine (64%) patients received treatment throughout pregnancy. Consistent biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use was high, in eight (32%) patients with peripheral SpA and in nine (41%) with axSpA. A conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) was used as treatment in 11 (50%) patients with peripheral SpA and two (8%) with axSpA. Twenty-two (53%) neonates were delivered by cesarean section, 19 (40%) by normal vaginal delivery and three (6%) by assisted delivery. Additionally, 44 (94%) deliveries were at term, and 42 (91%) neonates had a normal birth weight. Exploration of a subgroup showed no difference in reported outcomes between patients treated with bDMARD and those treated with csDMARD.

Conclusion

This descriptive study reports a high rate of favorable pregnancy outcomes in patients with SpA. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in pregnancy outcomes between women with axSpA and those with peripheral SpA. This study was one of the first reports from the Middle East. Further studies with larger sample size are warranted.

Pregnancy & neonatal outcomes in spondyloarthritis

Limited research has been conducted on the impact of spondylitis (SpA) on fertility, but some studies suggest a higher risk of subfertility in women with SpA compared to the general population. Factors associated with impaired fertility in SpA include pain, fatigue, stiffness, functional disorders, depression, anxiety, negative body image, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) preconceptionally, while TNF alpha inhibitors may play a role in improving fertility in certain cases. There has been a recent increase in clinical research focused on pregnancy outcomes in SpA. However, clear trends in terms of risk of pregnancy and fetal complications have been slow to emerge and many questions remain for women with SpA planning a pregnancy. This article discusses the current evidence for risk of specific pregnancy and fetal complications in women with axial and psoriatic SpA.

Comanagement with rheumatology and prescription biologics filled during pregnancy in women with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective analysis of US administrative claims data

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate comanagement with rheumatology and biological prescriptions filled during pregnancy among women with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to examine factors associated with receiving comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of US claims data.

SETTING

Commercially insured enrollees using data from the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database.

PARTICIPANTS

We identified 4131 pregnant women aged ≤55 years from the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database with an International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision/10th Revision codes for RA, axSpA or PsA, with continuous enrolment at ≥3 months before the date of the last menstrual period (LMP) (index date) and throughout pregnancy.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

Filled biologics (prescriptions and infusions) claims were categorised by 90 days before the LMP and trimester, as were primary care, obstetrician and rheumatological claims.

RESULTS

The prevalence of axSpA, RA and PsA was 0.7%, 0.2% and 0.04% among reproductive age women. The average maternal age was 32.7 years (SD 5.7). During pregnancy, 9.1% of those with axSpA (n=2,410) and 56.4% of those with RA/PsA (n=1,721) had a rheumatological claim. Biologics claims were less common among those with axSpA (90 days before LMP: 1.6%, during pregnancy: 1.1%) than those with RA/PsA (90 days before LMP: 11.9%, during pregnancy: 6.9%). Medications during pregnancy included corticosteroids (axSpA: 0.3%, RA/PsA: 2.2%), non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 1.7%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 1.3%) and opioids (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 0.6%). Established rheumatological care and biologics claims during the 90 days before LMP showed good prediction accuracy for receiving comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy (axSpA: area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) 0.73, RA/PsA: AUC 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy occurs infrequently, especially for women with axSpA. Biologics claims during pregnancy may not align with published guidelines. Future research is warranted to improve comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy.

Computed tomography-based assessment of radiographic progression in spine and sacroiliac joints after pregnancy in women with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Background

Mechanical stress are one of the pathogenesis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). During pregnancy, the mechanical overload on the spine and pelvis increases due to gravid uterus. We aimed to investigate whether pregnancy affects radiographic progression in patients with radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) based on computed tomography (CT) evaluations.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included women with r-axSpA aged 19-49 years who underwent at least two CT evaluations of the whole spine and/or sacroiliac joints (SIJs) at intervals of 2-4 years. To compare radiographic progression after delivery, we classified the patients into two groups: delivery group and controls. The delivery group was restricted to women who had the first CT ∼2 years before delivery and the second CT ∼2 years after delivery. The CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) (0-522) and SIJ scores (0-40) were used to evaluate spinal syndesmophytes and erosion, joint space narrowing, and sclerosis of the SIJs.

Results

A total of 21 women in the delivery group and 38 women in the control group were included. The median (Q1-Q3) CTSS at baseline in the delivery group and controls was 19 (16-23) and 20 (13.25-27.75), and the median progression was 1 (0-3) and 0 (0-1) during the median 2.9-year follow-up, respectively. The median (Q1-Q3) SIJ score at baseline in the delivery group and controls was 13 (8-22) and 11 (6-22), and the median progression was 1.5 (0-3) and 1 (0-2), respectively. Using cut-off 0.5, 52.9, and 61.9% of r-axSpA patients and 39.3 and 44.4% of controls showed progression of whole spine and SIJs, respectively. However, no difference in proportion of spinal and SIJ progression and absolute score changes per time point was observed between two groups. Moreover, the SIJ score changes were comparable according to the delivery method.

Conclusion

Pregnancy and delivery do not affect the radiographic progression of the spine and SIJs in women with r-axSpA assessed by CT.

[Insights into pregnancy and breastfeeding in inflammatory rheumatic diseases through observational data]

Information on pregnancy and breastfeeding in women with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases is relevant for a successful pregnancy and also for maternal and child health. In general, pregnant and breastfeeding women are excluded from randomized clinical trials and therefore evidence for clinical care and counselling has to be generated from observational studies. In the past decades, various data collections have been established for this purpose in addition to the existing spontaneous reporting systems initiated by drug authorities, with the aim of monitoring the teratogenic risk of a drug. Health insurance claims data, electronic health records and Scandinavian registers are also increasingly being used for research on pregnancy-associated events; however, all these data sources lack the inclusion of the maternal disease, especially with respect to its inflammatory component. Established cohort studies, biologics and disease registries record disease activity but are not designed for pregnancy-specific questions. Pregnancy registries and studies in rheumatology close this gap. In order to be able to make a better assessment of the possibilities and limitations of existing data sources on pregnancy and lactation, they are presented in detail in the following review including their respective advantages and disadvantages and examples from rheumatology are given. In addition, existing collaborations as well as studies for investigating the influence of paternal rheumatic disease are highlighted.

Fertility and pregnancy outcomes in women with spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and its treatments on fertility and pregnancy outcomes, as well as the impact of pregnancy on disease activity.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analyses were performed, including studies in women with SpA (axial (axSpA) and peripheral SpA, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA)). The heterogeneity between studies was quantified (I2), and in case of substantial heterogeneity, the results were reported in a narrative review.

RESULTS

Within 4397 eligible studies, 21 articles were included, assessing overall 3566 patients and 3718 pregnancies compared to 42264 controls. Fertility suffers from a lack of data in the literature. We found an increased risk of preterm birth (pooled OR 1,64 [1,15-2,33], I2 =24% in axSpA and 1,62 [1,23-2,15], I2 =0,0% in PsA), small for gestational age (pooled OR 2,05, [1,09-3,89], I2 =5,8% in axSpA), preeclampsia (pooled OR 1,59, [1,11-2,27], I2 =0% in axSpA) and caesarean section (pooled OR 1,70 [1,44-2,00], I2 =19,9% in axSpA and 1,71 [1,14-2,55], I2 =74,3% in PsA), without any other unfavourable pregnancy outcome. Further analysis showed a significant higher risk for elective caesarean (pooled OR 2,64, [1,92-3,62], I2 =0,0% in axSpA and 1,47, [1,15-1,88], I2 =0,0% in PsA), without increased risk for emergency caesarean in PsA. During pregnancy, there appears to be a tendency for unchanged or worsened disease activity in axSpA and unchanged or improved disease activity in PsA. Both conditions tend to flare in postpartum period.

CONCLUSION

SpA seems to be associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age, preeclampsia, and caesarean section.