Impact of key manifestations of psoriatic arthritis on patient quality of life, functional status, and work productivity: Findings from a real-world study in the United States and Europe

The impact of psoriatic arthritis on quality of life: a systematic review

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can affect individuals of all ages. Patients may experience a range of physical and psychological issues.

Objective

To examine the impact of PsA on an individual's quality of life (QoL) and physical function.

Design

A systematic review of the literature.

Data sources and methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across seven electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) to retrieve articles related to QoL and lifestyle in adults with PsA. The inclusion criteria were studies published between 2010 and 2021 that used outcomes validated in patients with PsA. The methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Our primary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measuring QoL and the impact of disease on physical function. The secondary outcomes were assessments of fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep, work productivity and employment.

Results

The study included 37 comprehensive studies that examined the impact of PsA on QoL and physical function. The findings revealed that the impact of PsA extends to various aspects of life, including activities of daily living, physical, and emotional aspects, such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety and depression. Notably, people with PsA experience reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), particularly in emotional, social and mental health aspects. The severity of pain and/or fatigue is directly linked to decreased HRQoL. Importantly, those who fail to achieve minimal disease activity face challenges in work productivity and employment status.

Conclusion

To conclude, our review underscores the significant impact of PsA on patients' HRQoL beyond joint disease. The emotional, social, and mental aspects of PsA require compassionate and holistic management.

Trial registration

The PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews - CRD42021257395.

Patient-Reported and Economic Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the National Health and Wellness Survey

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, autoimmune form of arthritis that is associated with a substantial humanistic and economic burden. Potential differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and economic outcomes among groups of varying PsA severity and different races/ethnicities have not been well studied.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed sociodemographic data, PROs, and economic outcomes for participants with PsA from the National Health and Wellness Survey (2018-2020). Multivariable analyses were used to assess the association of self-reported PsA severity and race/ethnicity with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and medical costs.

RESULTS

This study included 1544 participants with PsA (1073 non-Hispanic white, 114 non-Hispanic Black, 223 Hispanic, and 134 Other). Self-reported moderate/severe PsA was associated with significantly worse HRQoL and WPAI, greater HCRU, and higher costs than self-reported mild PsA. Black participants reported more absenteeism (31.11% vs. 16.69%; P = 0.007) and activity impairment (54.27% vs. 47.96%; P = 0.047) than white participants, and fewer healthcare provider (5.93 vs. 7.42; P = 0.039) and rheumatologist visits (0.29 vs. 0.53; P = 0.028) over the past 6 months. No differences in outcomes were observed between Hispanic and white participants. Race/ethnicity moderated the association of perceived PsA severity and PROs and HCRU, such that white participants with self-reported moderate/severe PsA had a higher likelihood of depression (P < 0.001), lower HRQoL (P < 0.001), and more emergency room visits (P = 0.001) than those with self-reported mild PsA. Race/ethnicity did not moderate the relationship of PROs, HCRU, and economic outcomes among Black or Hispanic participants.

CONCLUSION

Participants with self-reported moderate/severe PsA reported a greater burden than those with self-reported mild PsA. Black participants had a greater humanistic burden than white participants but reported lower HCRU. Moderation results were driven by white participants, suggesting important differences in PROs, HCRU, and perception of PsA severity across race/ethnicity groups. Small sample sizes in Hispanic and non-Hispanic racial/ethnic groups limited ability to discern differences related to disease severity in these groups. Further research is needed to better understand the differential burden of PsA among individuals with varying perceptions of PsA severity across different racial/ethnic groups.

Guselkumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis in Russia: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DISCOVER-1 and -2 Randomized Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data on the use of advanced therapies to treat psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Russia. Guselkumab, an interleukin (IL)-23p19-subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in patients with PsA in the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and -2, and COSMOS trials. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with PsA in Russia.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of DISCOVER-1 and -2 included 1002 biologic-naïve patients with active PsA from Russia (n = 317) and the rest of the world (RoW; n = 685). Patients received guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), or at week 0 and 4 then Q8W, or placebo then guselkumab Q4W at week 24 (Russian: n = 119, 88, and 110, respectively; RoW: n = 216, 246, and 223, respectively). Outcomes through week 52 were pooled (DISCOVER-1 and -2); outcomes from week 52 to 100 represent DISCOVER-2 only.

RESULTS

In patients from Russia, ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria response rates were higher with guselkumab vs. placebo at week 24, increased through week 52, and were consistent across all guselkumab-treated groups at week 100. Similar trends were generally observed for ACR50, ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90), achievement of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) low disease activity/remission and minimal disease activity, enthesitis and dactylitis resolution, ≥ 0.35 improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, improvement in patient-reported pain, and measures in patients with axial PsA (including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS], and patient-reported spinal pain). Efficacy responses were similar between patients from Russia and the RoW across all endpoints and timepoints. The safety profile of guselkumab in patients from Russia was consistent with previous findings.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrated that the safety and efficacy profiles of guselkumab across all PsA domains and patient-reported outcomes in patients from Russia were similar to those in patients from the RoW.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03162796 and NCT03158285.

Clinical enthesitis in patient with psoriatic arthritis, a systematic literature review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Enthesitis is considered a hallmark of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective was to assess clinical enthesitis in PsA including its prevalence in different contexts, scores used and consequences of enthesitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review with meta-analysis was conducted in PubMed 2010-2023, focusing on manuscripts involving adult PsA patients and reporting information related to enthesitis. Data collected included the prevalence of clinical enthesitis (i.e., number of patients with at least one enthesitis); scores used: Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), MASES, SPARCC; and impact of enthesitis on disease activity, patient-reported outcomes and use of analgesics. Univariate random-effects meta-analysis was applied for pooling percentages and means.

RESULTS

Overall, 212 studies, i.e., 84,262 PsA patients were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of enthesitis in the overall population was 41.6% [95% confidence interval, 37.4-45.8]; with 67.2% [62.0-72.6] in trials and 27.8% [24.5-31.2] in observational studies. The number of enthesitis varied according to the score used, with the lowest observed for the LEI, which was the most widely-used score (63.7%). Patients with enthesitis had higher disease activity and disease burden in comparison with those without enthesitis.

CONCLUSION

Enthesitis is a frequent manifestation in PsA, concerning close to half the patients, and is more prevalent in trials than in observational studies, reflecting recruitment patterns. The clinical assessment of enthesitis remains challenging, with heterogeneity in the scores used influencing the results: the most used score was the LEI, which also led to the lowest number of enthesitis. Links with patients' quality of life should be further explored.

Subclinical dactylitis is linked with active phenotype of psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Dactylitis has been identified as an important feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with poorer prognosis. Moreover, ultrasound can reveal subclinical dactylitis, however its significance is unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the impact of subclinical dactylitis on PsA severity.

METHODS

The study was performed based on the PKUPsA cohort. Patients with complete ultrasound assessment on synovitis, tenosynovitis, and soft tissue of both hands and feet were recruited. They were further classified into subgroups based on the presence of clinical or ultrasound evidence of dactylitis. Their clinical characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 223 PsA patients enrolled, there were 90 (40.4%) patients with clinical manifestations of dactylitis (clinical dactylitis group), 26 (11.7%) with evidence of dactylitis on ultrasound however not on physical examination (subclinical dactylitis group), and 107 (47.9%) patients with neither clinical nor ultrasound evidence of dactylitis (no-dactylitis group). Compared with no-dactylitis group, patients in clinical dactylitis group had more swollen joint count (4 vs. 2, P<0.01), tender joint count (4 vs. 3, P<0.05), and greater median disease activity index in PsA (DAPSA) (25.0 vs. 18.3, P<0.05). Moreover, 116 PsA patients in clinical dactylitis or subclinical dactylitis groups also had more tender joint count (4 vs. 2, P<0.01), swollen joint count (4 vs 3, P<0.001), median C-reactive protein levels (18.1 vs. 11.8, P<0.05) and median DAPSA scores (25.5 vs. 16.1, P<0.01). Even excluding the digits with dactylitis from counting, the swollen joint count of 116 patients with dactylitis remained significantly greater than that of no-dactylitis group (3 vs. 2, P<0.01). 26 patients in subclinical dactylitis group also showed significantly higher DAPSA scores (27.2 vs. 16.1, P<0.05), more swollen joint count (4.5 vs. 2, P<0.01) and tender joint count (5 vs. 3, P<0.05) than no-dactylitis group.

CONCLUSION

Subclinical dactylitis also represents a more active phenotype of PsA, which calls for more attention and probably more aggressive therapy.

Effect of bimekizumab on patient-reported disease impact in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 1-year results from two phase 3 studies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate 1-year bimekizumab efficacy in PsA from the patient perspective using the 12-item PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) questionnaire.

METHODS

BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic DMARD [bDMARD]-naïve), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; inadequate response/intolerance to TNF inhibitors [TNFi-IR]) and BE VITAL (NCT04009499; open-label extension) assessed bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks in patients with PsA. Post hoc analyses of patient-reported disease impact, assessed by the PsAID-12 questionnaire, are reported to 1 year (collected to Week 40 in BE COMPLETE).

RESULTS

Overall, 1,112 total patients were included (698 bimekizumab, 414 placebo). Rapid improvements observed with bimekizumab treatment at Week 4 continued to Week 16 and were sustained to 1 year. At 1 year, mean (SE) change from baseline in PsAID-12 total score was comparable between bimekizumab-randomized patients and patients who switched to bimekizumab at Week 16 (bDMARD-naïve bimekizumab -2.3 [0.1], placebo/bimekizumab -2.2 [0.1]; TNFi-IR bimekizumab -2.5 [0.1], placebo/bimekizumab -2.2 [0.2]). Proportions of bimekizumab-randomized patients achieving clinically meaningful within-patient improvement (≥3-point decrease from baseline) at Week 16 were sustained to 1 year (bDMARD-naïve 49.0%; TNFi-IR 48.5%) and were similar for placebo/bimekizumab patients (bDMARD-naïve 44.4%; TNFi-IR 40.6%). Across studies and arms, 35.3% to 47.8% of patients had minimal or no symptom impact at 1 year. Improvements were observed to 1 year across all single-item domains, including pain, fatigue and skin problems.

CONCLUSION

Bimekizumab treatment resulted in rapid and sustained clinically meaningful improvements in disease impact up to 1 year in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with PsA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

BE OPTIMAL: NCT03895203; BE COMPLETE: NCT03896581; BE VITAL: NCT04009499 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Health state utility values in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic condition that requires lifelong treatment and results in a serious disease burden. Health state utility values (HSUVs) are a valuable tool for quantifying this burden and conducting cost-utility analysis.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain estimates of HSUVs in patients with AS, explored potential sources of heterogeneity, and compared pooled patient HSUVs with population norms.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane database and Scopus until July, 2023 to obtain eligible studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I checklist.

RESULTS

Forty-two publications involving 11,354 participants were included in this systematic review. The most commonly used instrument is the EQ-5D (38 studies). The estimated HSUVs for patients with AS from all available studies was pooled as 0.62 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.65). The pooled mean utility estimates from the random effects meta-analysis for SF-6D, EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and HUI3 were 0.65 (95% CI 0.62,0.68), 0.63 (95% CI 0.59,0.66), 0.60 (95% CI 0.42,0.79), and 0.48 (95% CI 0.43,0.53), respectively. For the EQ-5D-3L we conducted stratified meta-analyses and meta-regression based on key subgroups. The pooled estimates of EQ-5D-3L were lower for patients published before 2010, with high disease activity, long duration of disease, and in developed countries.

CONCLUSION

Pooled estimates of HSUVs for people with AS were substantially lower than population norms. These estimates provide robust evidence that can inform the economic evaluation of new therapies for individuals with AS.

Metabolic syndrome and psoriatic arthritis: the role of weight loss as a disease-modifying therapy

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory joint and entheseal disease associated with significant personal and public health burden. PsA has a prevalence of up to 1%, affecting ~20% of people suffering with psoriasis. PsA is frequently accompanied by metabolic syndrome (MetS), and both conditions are characterised by a chronic pro-inflammatory state, with several key cytokines in PsA (interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23) also elevated in those with MetS. This narrative review aims to provide an update on MetS in PsA, focusing on its prevalence, pathogenesis, prognosis, treatment interactions and future therapeutic options. MetS is particularly prevalent in PsA compared to other inflammatory arthritides. Cohort studies indicate a higher risk of PsA in individuals with obesity, while Mendelian randomization studies link childhood obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidaemia to PsA. Weight loss interventions have been shown to reduce disease activity in PsA. Additionally, MetS negatively impacts the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) drugs in treating PsA. Drugs given for PsA may also affect the conditions constituting MetS. Leflunomide has been shown to reduce body weight but also increase blood pressure. TNFi drugs lead to weight gain but reduce cardiovascular risk. Janus kinase inhibitors increase lipid levels and cardiovascular risk among high-risk groups. Anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-12/IL-23 drugs may cause a short-term increase in cardiovascular risk, although the long-term effects have yet to be established. Weight loss represents an unexplored avenue for disease modification in PsA, alongside a plethora of general health benefits. Dietary and exercise modifications are the cornerstone of weight management but vary substantially across individuals. Novel therapies to treat weight loss, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, may prove useful alongside disease-modifying therapies for those with PsA and MetS and should be investigated as potential therapeutic adjuncts.

Association between enthesitis/dactylitis resolution and patient-reported outcomes in guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between enthesitis resolution (ER) and dactylitis resolution (DR) and meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among biologic-naïve patients with PsA receiving guselkumab in the DISCOVER-2 study.

METHODS

Enthesitis and dactylitis, characteristic lesions of PsA, were evaluated by independent assessors using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (range, 0-6) and Dactylitis Severity Score (range, 0-60). Proportions of patients with ER or DR (score = 0) among those with score > 0 at baseline were determined at weeks 24, 52, and 100. PROs included: fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-Fatigue]), pain (0-100 visual analog scale), physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]), and health-related quality of life (36-item Short-Form Health Survey physical/mental component summary [SF-36 PCS/MCS]). Meaningful responses were defined as: improvements of ≥ 4 for FACIT-Fatigue, ≥ 0.35 for HAQ-DI, and ≥ 5 for SF-36 PCS/MCS and absolute scores of ≤ 15 for minimal pain and ≤ 0.5 for normalized HAQ-DI. Associations between ER/DR status and PRO response status were tested using a Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Guselkumab-treated patients with ER were more likely than those without ER to achieve minimal pain (p < 0.001), normalized HAQ-DI (p < 0.001), and PCS response (p < 0.05) at weeks 24, 52, and 100. Patients with DR were more likely than those without DR to achieve FACIT-Fatigue response at week 24 and week 52 (both p ≤ 0.01) and minimal pain at week 24 and normalized HAQ-DI at week 52 (both p ≤ 0.03).

CONCLUSION

In biologic-naïve patients with active PsA treated with guselkumab, achieving ER or DR was associated with durable improvements in selected PROs, including those of high importance to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ) NCT03158285; Registered: May 16, 2017. Key Points • At week 100, 65% and 76% of guselkumab-treated patients achieved enthesitis and dactylitis resolution (ER/DR). • Achieving ER was associated with achieving DR and vice versa through the end of study. • Achieving ER or DR was associated with durable and meaningful improvements in selected patient-reported outcomes.

Work Productivity and General Health Through 2 Years of Guselkumab Treatment in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on work productivity and nonwork daily activity impairment and general health status through 2 years in patients who were biologic-naïve with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the phase 3 DISCOVER-2 clinical trial.

METHODS

Adult patients with PsA were randomized to subcutaneous injections of guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); at weeks 0, 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo (through week 24 with crossover to guselkumab Q4W). Work productivity and nonwork daily activity impairment were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for PsA (WPAI-PsA) and patient-reported general health status using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). Least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in WPAI-PsA domains and EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS were assessed through week 100. Changes in employment status were utilized to estimate potential indirect savings from improved work productivity.

RESULTS

Of 739 randomized patients, 738 had available baseline data for the analyses (Q4W 245; Q8W 248; placebo 245). At week 24, greater improvements in work productivity, nonwork daily activity, and EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS were observed in the Q4W and Q8W groups versus the placebo group. At week 100, LS mean reductions in work productivity impairment (- 23.8% to - 28.0%) and nonwork daily activity impairment (- 26.6% to - 29.2%) and improvements in EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS (0.14 to 0.15/21.2 to 25.0) were maintained in patients receiving guselkumab. Among patients employed at baseline, 12.1-16.4% were not employed at week 100, and 20.0-25.3% shifted from not employed at baseline to employed at week 100. Potential yearly indirect cost savings (USD) from improved work productivity at week 100 ranged from $16,529 to $19,409.

CONCLUSION

Patients with active PsA treated with guselkumab demonstrated reduced impairment in work productivity and nonwork daily activity, together with improvement in general health status and substantial potential cost savings, over a 2-year period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03158285.

Guselkumab provides durable improvement across psoriatic arthritis disease domains: post hoc analysis of a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate long-term guselkumab effectiveness across Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-recognised domains/related conditions of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Post hoc analyses used data from DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285) biologic/Janus-kinase inhibitor-naïve participants with active PsA (≥5 swollen/≥5 tender joints, C-reactive protein ≥0.6 mg/dL), randomised (1:1:1) to guselkumab every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) or placebo with crossover to guselkumab. Outcomes aligned with key GRAPPA-recognised domains of overall disease activity, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis/dactylitis and skin psoriasis (nail psoriasis was not evaluated). PsA-related conditions (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)/uveitis) were assessed via adverse events through W112. Least squares mean changes from baseline through W100 in continuous outcomes employed repeated measures mixed-effects models adjusting for baseline scores. Binary measure response rates were determined with non-responder imputation for missing data.

RESULTS

442/493 (90%) of guselkumab-randomised patients completed treatment through W100. Following early reductions in disease activity with guselkumab, durable improvements were observed across key PsA domains (swollen/tender joints, psoriasis, spinal pain, enthesitis/dactylitis) through W100. Response rates of therapeutically relevant targets generally increased through W100 with guselkumab Q4W/Q8W: Disease Activity Index for PsA low disease activity (LDA) 62%/59%, enthesitis resolution 61%/70%, dactylitis resolution 72%/83%, 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 59%/53%, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score LDA 51%/49% and minimal disease activity 38%/40%. Through W112, no cases of IBD developed among guselkumab-randomised patients and one case of uveitis was reported.

CONCLUSION

In biologic-naïve patients with active PsA, guselkumab provided early and durable improvements in key GRAPPA-recognised domains through 2 years, with substantial proportions achieving important treatment targets.

Validity and score interpretation of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease: an analysis of pooled data from two phase 3 trials of bimekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate psychometric performance of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) total and individual item scores in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to estimate score change thresholds and scores corresponding to different levels of symptom/impact severity.

METHODS

Data up to week 16 from 1252 patients with active PsA enrolled in two randomised controlled trials of bimekizumab (BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581)) were used to assess construct validity (correlations with other patient-reported outcomes), known-groups validity (based on Minimal Disease Activity index, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score), reliability (Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)) and responsiveness (sensitivity to change). Clinically meaningful within-patient improvement thresholds were estimated by anchor-based and distribution-based analyses, and symptom/impact severity thresholds were estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) PsAID-12 total score at baseline was 4.19 (1.94). PsAID-12 scores demonstrated good convergent validity and good known-groups validity. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.70) were also good. Responsiveness was acceptable (correlations ≥0.30 for most scores). Improvement thresholds were estimated at 1.5-2 points for the PsAID-12 total score and 2 or 3 points for item scores. Thresholds for different levels of symptom/impact severity could be derived for most PsAID-12 items.

CONCLUSIONS

The PsAID-12 demonstrated robust psychometric properties in a large sample of patients with active PsA, supporting its use as a fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome in this population. Furthermore, thresholds for score interpretation were derived.

An international multi-centre analysis of current prescribing practices and shared decision-making in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Shared decision-making (SDM) is advocated to improve patient outcomes in Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We analysed current prescribing practices and the extent of SDM in PsA across Europe.

METHODS

The ASSIST study was a cross-sectional observational study of PsA patients aged ≥18 years attending face-to-face appointments between July 2021-March 2022. Patient demographics, current treatment and treatment decisions were recorded. SDM was measured by the clinician's effort to collaborate (CollaboRATE questionnaire) and patient communication confidence (PEPPI-5 tool).

RESULTS

503 patients were included from 24 centres across the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Physician- and patient-reported measures of disease activity were highest in the UK. Conventional synthetic DMARDs constituted a higher percentage of current PsA treatment in UK than continental Europe (66.4% vs 44.9%), which differed from biologic DMARDs (36.4% vs 64.4%). Implementing treatment escalation was most common in the UK. CollaboRATE and PEPPI-5 scores were high across centres. Of 31 patients with low CollaboRATE scores (<4.5), no patients with low PsAID-12 scores (<5) had treatment escalation. However, of 465 patients with CollaboRATE scores ≥4.5, 59 patients with low PsAID-12 scores received treatment escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher rates of treatment escalation seen in the UK may be explained by higher disease activity and a younger cohort. High levels of collaboration in face-to-face PsA consultations suggests effective implementation of the SDM approach. Our data indicate that, in patients with mild disease activity, only those with higher perceived collaboration underwent treatment escalation. Prospective studies should examine the impact of SDM on PsA patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05171270.

Association between obesity and likelihood of remission or low disease activity status in psoriatic arthritis applying index-based and patient-based definitions of remission: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate whether obese patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were less likely to be in remission/low disease activity (LDA).

METHODS

We used data from the ReFlaP, an international multi-centre cohort study (NCT03119805), which recruited consecutive adults with definite PsA (disease duration ≥ 2 years) from 14 countries. Demographics, clinical data, comorbidities, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Remission/LDA was defined as Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA)/minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤4/≤14, or by patients' opinion. Obesity was defined as physician-reported and/or body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. We evaluated the association between obesity and the presence of remission/LDA, with adjustment in multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

Among 431 patients (49.3% women), 136 (31.6%) were obese. Obese versus non-obese patients were older, more frequently women, had higher tender joint and enthesitis counts and worse pain, physical function and health-related quality of life. Obese patients were less likely to be in VLDA; DAPSA remission and MDA, with adjusted ORs of 0.31 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.77); 0.39 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.80) and 0.61 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.99), respectively. Rates of DAPSA-LDA and patient-reported remission/LDA were similar for obese and non-obese patients.

CONCLUSION

PsA patients with comorbid obesity were 2.5-3 folds less likely to be in remission/LDA by composite scores compared with non-obese patients; however, remission/LDA rates were similar based on the patients' opinion. PsA patients with comorbid obesity may have different disease profiles and require individualised management.

Beyond expectations: disease duration and psychological burden in psoriatic arthritis

This study aims to investigate the relationship between disease duration and psychological burden in PsA and to identify the risk factors associated with psychological distress. Patients with PsA who met CASPAR classification criteria enrolled by Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR)-Network. Patients were categorized into three groups based on disease duration: early stage (< 5 years), middle stage (≥ 5, < 10 years), and late stage (≥ 10 years). All patients underwent clinical and laboratory assessment using standardized protocol and case report forms. The associations between psychological variables and clinical parameters were assessed by a multivariate analysis. Of the 1113 patients with PsA (63.9% female), 564 (%50.7) had high risk for depression and 263 (%23.6) for anxiety. The risk of psychological burden was similar across all PsA groups, and patients with a higher risk of depression and anxiety also experienced greater disease activity, poorer quality of life, and physical disability. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female gender (OR = 1.52), PsAQoL (OR = 1.13), HAQ (OR = 1.99), FiRST score (OR = 1.14), unemployment/retired (OR = 1.48) and PASI head score (OR = 1.41) were factors that influenced the risk of depression, whereas the current or past enthesitis (OR = 1.45), PsAQoL (OR = 1.19), and FiRST score (OR = 1.26) were factors that influenced the risk of anxiety. PsA patients can experience a comparable level of psychological burden throughout the course of their disease. Several socio-demographic and disease-related factors may contribute to mental disorders in PsA. In the present era of personalized treatment for PsA, evaluating psychiatric distress can guide tailored interventions that improve overall well-being and reduce disease burden.