Patients' awareness towards physical activity in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis

[Nonpharmacological treatment measures, rehabilitation services and membership in patient support groups in axial spondylarthritis (The ATTENTUS axSpA study)]

BACKGROUND

The treatment of axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) includes pharmacological treatment measures (PTM) and nonpharmacological treatment measures (NPTM) as well as supporting resources, such as rehabilitation services (RS) and membership in patient support groups (PSG). Nevertheless, there are significant participation restrictions in patients with axSpA in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of functional deficits, participation restrictions and utilization of PTM, NPTM, RS and PSG membership in patients with axSpA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multicentric, observational study of 770 axSpA patients in Germany (ATTENTUS-axSpA).

RESULTS

Substantial functional deficits and participation restrictions were observed in axSpA patients. Of the patients 39% did not receive treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD). In the NPTM 54% received physiotherapy less than once per week and 29% once per week. Physical activities were regularly performed by 86% of patients, mainly in the form of home exercises. Training in a gym (14%) or sports club (7%) was carried out much less frequently. Of the patients 54% received RS, one third had the last rehabilitation more than 5 years ago and 13% of the patients were members in a PSG. A significantly higher utilization of NPTM and rehabilitation was found in this group.

CONCLUSION

Treatment options and resources were often utilized to a small extent and/or in low intensity by axSpA patients, which could be a possible explanation for persisting restrictions of participation. Membership in a PSG was associated with an increased utilization of NPTM and RS.

Standardized reporting for systematic global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis: An evidence-based and consensus-driven initiative

INTRODUCTION

National and international scientific societies advocate for a regular, systematic, and standardized global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. However, there are no recommendations specifying the content of this global evaluation. This initiative aimed to propose a standardized reporting framework, using evidence-based and consensus approaches, to collect data on all domains of axSpA.

METHODS

A literature review and consensus process involved a steering committee and an expert panel of 37 rheumatologists and health professionals. The first steering committee took place in March 2022 and identified the main domains for inclusion in the standardized report. A hierarchical literature review was conducted to identify items within these domains and tools for assessment. The items and tools for assessment were discussed and consensus was reached through a vote session during an expert meeting that took place in March 2023.

RESULTS

The steering committee identified four main domains to include in the standardized reporting framework: disease assessment, comorbidities, lifestyle, and quality of life. Items and tools for assessment were adopted after the expert meeting. Additionally, recommendations regarding digital tools (websites, apps, social media) were provided.

CONCLUSION

This initiative led to a consensus, based on evidence and expertise, on a reporting framework for use during periodic systematic global evaluations of axSpa in daily practice.

Impact of daily physical therapy over 2 weeks on spinal mobility including objective electronic measurements and function in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

Background

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are often compromised by impaired function and mobility. The standardized 2-week inpatient program 'multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment' (MRCT) was designed for patients with axSpA. The Epionics SPINE (ES) is an objective tool validated to assess mobility.

Objective

To investigate the impact of MRCT on physical function and mobility including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK).

Design

Single-center interventional, observational trial.

Methods

Patients with axSpA presenting with high disease activity and impaired physical function were consecutively recruited to undergo MRCT. Assessments performed before (V1) and after (V2) the intervention included Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis functional index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the ankylosing spondylitis physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and ES measurements.

Results

At baseline, the 80 patients included had: BASDAI 5.5 ± 1.5, BASFI 5.6 ± 2.0, BASMI 4.2 ± 1.8, SPPB 13.8 ± 1.8, and ASPI 37.3 ± 18.1 s. Clinically relevant improvements between V1 versus V2 were noted for BASFI, BASMI, and all other assessments (p < 0.001), and also for ES measures of RoK (all p < 0.003) and RoM (all p < 0.04), while a positive trend was seen for flexion and extension (RoM). There was no significant effect of changes in medication (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The 2-weeks MRCT was associated with definite improvements of function and mobility. Importantly, the effect of this extensive physical activity was confirmed by using the ES as an objective tool to assess spinal mobility. The ES demonstrated for the first time that the RoK of spinal mobility can significantly improve related to an exercise intervention.

Trial registration

Ethical Committee: Ruhr-Universität (reference-number: 19-6735-BR).

Clinically relevant differences in spinal mobility related to daytime performance in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) suffer from clinical symptoms like morning stiffness and back pain. Mobility of patients with axSpA is often impaired. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of patients with axSpA regarding mobility measures including performance-based tests and objective electronic assessments with the Epionics SPINE device (ES) at different times of the day compared with healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

Observational trial, consecutive inpatients with axSpA (n=100) and 20 HCs were examined in the morning (V1: before 10:00 am) and in the afternoon (V2: after 02:00 pm) by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and ES measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and range of kinematics (RoK).

RESULTS

The assessments of patients with axSpA performed in the morning clearly differed from those in the afternoon, especially regarding performance-based tests. Significant improvements were seen for BASMI (4.0±3.8 to 3.8±1.9; p<0.001), ASPI (36.2±18.3 to 28.8±11.9 s; p<0.001), SPPB (10.1±1.5 to 10.7±1.4 points; p<0.001) and for ES measures of speed (RoK; p<0.018) but not for RoM, except for lateral flexion (13.3±7.4 to 14.7±8.2°; p=0.002). This time of assessment-related variability was not observed in HC.

CONCLUSION

The spinal mobility of patients with axSpA was worse in the morning but significantly improved in the afternoon. This was captured best by performance-based measures and was not seen in HC. The diurnal variation of mobility has implications for clinical studies, suggesting that the time of assessments needs to be standardised.