Methotrexate also improves rheumatoid arthritis through correction of microbiota dysbiosis

Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis With or Without Methotrexate: 52-Week Results From Two Phase 3 Studies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess 52-week efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with or without concomitant methotrexate (+/-MTX) treatment at baseline.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of patients in BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [bDMARD]-naïve), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; prior inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi-IR]), and the BE VITAL open-label extension (NCT04009499) study. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups: bimekizumab 160 mg every four weeks, placebo, or a reference drug (adalimumab 40 mg every two weeks; BE OPTIMAL only). From Week 16, placebo-randomized patients received bimekizumab. Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation, multiple imputation, or worst-category imputation.

RESULTS

Through Week 52, similar proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response criteria for both +MTX and -MTX (BE OPTIMAL: 54.4% +MTX, 54.7% -MTX; BE COMPLETE: 56.3% +MTX, 48.0% -MTX). Similar proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% [PASI100] response) and minimal disease activity in both +MTX and -MTX groups. Similar trends were seen in placebo/bimekizumab-treated patients. Through Week 52, the proportion of bimekizumab-treated patients with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event were similar between the +MTX and -MTX groups (BE OPTIMAL 325 of 410 [79.3%] vs 230 of 292 [78.8%], BE COMPLETE 105 of 168 [62.5%] vs 138 of 220 [62.7%]). The safety profile was comparable between subgroups and consistent with the prior safety profile of bimekizumab.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with bimekizumab demonstrated consistent, sustained efficacy to 52 weeks in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with PsA and was well tolerated, irrespective of concomitant MTX.

The potential pathogenic role of gut microbiota in rheumatic diseases: a human-centred narrative review

A growing amount of evidence suggests that gut microbiota plays an important role in human health, including a possible role in the pathogenesis of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD). We analysed the current evidence about the role of microbiota in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). In RA, we found a general consensus regarding a reduction of diversity and a specific bacterial signature, with consistent changes according to the different ethnic and geographical areas. The major pathogenetic role in RA is recognised for P. copri, L. salivarius and Collinsella, even if findings become more heterogeneous when considering established disease. In SpA, we found a relative gut abundance of Akkermansia, Coprococcus, Ruminoccocus and a relative reduction in Bacterioides and Firmicutes spp. Human and preclinical data suggest loss of mucosal barrier, increased permeability and Th1- and Th17-mediated inflammation. Additionally, HLA-B27 seems to play a role in shaping the intestinal microbiota and the consequent inflammation. In SLE, the typical gut microbiota signature was characterised by a reduction in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and by enrichment of Rhodococcus, Eggerthella, Klebsiella, Prevotella, Eubacterium and Flavonifractor, even if their real pathogenic impact remains unclear. In SSc, gastrointestinal dysbiosis is well documented with an increase of pro-inflammatory species (Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Ruminococcus, Akkermansia, γ-Proteobacteria, Erwinia, Trabsulsiella, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria) and a reduction of species as Faecalibacterium, Clostridium, Bacteroidetes and Rikenella. In conclusion, seems possible to recognise a distinct gut microbiota profile for each RMD, even if significant differences in bacterial species do exist between different studies and there is a high risk of bias due to the cross-sectional nature of such studies. Therefore longitudinal studies are needed, especially on patients with preclinical and early disease, to investigate the real role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of RMD.