Elucidating the origin of selective dehydrogenation of propane on γ-alumina under H2S treatment and co-feed

Catalytic activity of γ-Al2O3(110) in the NO + H2 reaction: a DFT study

In this work, the interaction of the surface of γ-Al2O3(110) with NO and H2 was studied using density functional theory calculations. Free γ-Al2O3(110) adsorbs NO and binds H atoms, but repels the H2 molecule. A triplet of low-coordinated OII-AlIII-OII atoms provides the catalytic activity of γ-Al2O3(110) along the path: (i) the adsorption of NO/AlIII is followed by the binding of H2 to form a hydroxylamine derivative NHOH through an intermediate NO/AlIII + 2 × H/OII complex; (ii) recombination of NHOH with the release of N2 through an intermediate NHOH/AlIII + NHOH/AlIV or adsorption of NO followed by the release of N2O through the intermediate NHOH/AlIII + NO/AlIV; the pathway ends with the regeneration of γ-Al2O3(110). The calculated adsorption heats ensure the diffusion of H atoms from the deposited Pt to the surface (110), initiating the formation of the NH2/AlIII + H/OII complex, which releases NH3 endothermically and is stable enough to inhibit stage (ii) of the above reaction pathway. An excess of O2 in the NO + H2 mixture excludes H/Pt and eliminates inhibition. The formation of oxynitrides is suppressed, but not excluded by more exothermic surface processes. The N-doped conductivity of bulk and surface oxynitrides Al32O47N and the dependence of the heat of adsorption of H atoms on the band gap width were revealed, which suggests a relationship between the band gap width and catalytic activity.

Kinetic Promotion Effect of Hydrogen and Dimethyl Disulfide Addition on Propane Dehydrogenation over the Pt-Sn-K/Al2O3 Catalyst

The kinetic effects of co-feeding of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and hydrogen on propane dehydrogenation (PDH) over the Pt-Sn-K/Al₂O₃ catalyst were investigated by the response surface method. The 3-level Box-Behnken design for 4 factors (reaction temperature, propene, hydrogen, and DMDS flow rate) was used to design the experiment. The initial propane conversion, propene selectivity, and coking amount were chosen as responses and the results were fitted by quadratic models. The fresh and coked catalysts were characterized by high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), thermogravimetry (TG), N₂ physisorption, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results showed that the DMDS flow rate is significant for propane conversion and coking amount while hydrogen flow rate is only significant for the conversion. By using the fitted model for the response surface, it is found that DMDS can significantly reduce the coking amount at the expense of propane conversion, and hydrogen weakly affects the selectivity and coking amount. The optimal conditions to achieve maximum conversion and selectivity and minimum coking amount are not consistent. The DMDS and hydrogen flow rate should be optimized to obtain the maximum economic profit out of the propane dehydrogenation (PDH) process.