Prevalence and nature of excluded findings at reduced scan length CT angiography for pulmonary embolism

Incidental Thyroid Nodules on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Prevalence, Follow-Up, and Risk of Malignancy

Background: The increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) has led to a higher detection rate of thyroid incidentalomas. Currently, there are no widely agreed-upon guidelines for managing these incidentalomas. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, follow-up practices, and malignancy rates of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published before April 12, 2024 (PROSPERO #42024535501). Studies reporting on the prevalence, follow-up, and risk of malignancy (ROM) of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT were included. Combined outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportion with a random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on characteristics including size of the incidentaloma, CT area, and age of the study population. Results: Thirty-eight studies involving 195,959 patients were included in the prevalence analysis, revealing a prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas on CT of 8.3% (confidence interval [CI], 7.4-9.3). The prevalence was higher in neck CT (16.5%, CI, 11.0-22.1) compared with chest CT (6.6%, CI, 5.3-7.9). Multiple incidentalomas were found in 27.0% (CI, 12.9-41.1) of patients. Of the nodules, 46.3% (CI, 32.3-60.3) were ≥1 cm, and 28.6% (CI, 19.9-37.3) were ≥1.5 cm. Thyroid ultrasounds, biopsies, and surgeries were performed in 34.9% (CI, 26.1-43.7), 28.4% (CI, 19.9-36.9), and 8.2% (CI, 2.1-14.4) of cases, respectively. Additionally, 25 studies with 6272 patients reported a ROM of 3.9% (CI, 3.0-4.9) for thyroid incidentalomas detected on CT. A higher ROM was observed in incidentalomas ≥1 cm (11.7%, CI, 3.9-19.4) and ≥1.5 cm (24.9%, CI, 0-52.7) compared with those <1 cm (0.1%, CI, 0-0.8) and <1.5 cm (0%, CI, 0-0.2). Conclusions: Most thyroid incidentalomas identified on CT are benign. Implementing a collaborative protocol between radiologists and thyroid specialists to manage high-risk thyroid incidentalomas can ensure appropriate follow-up and optimal patient care.

Prevalence of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally on noncancer-related imaging: a review

Pulmonary nodules are common incidental findings requiring surveillance. Follow-up recommendations vary depending on risk factors, size and solid or subsolid characteristics. This review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant nodules detected on noncancer-dedicated imaging and the prevalence of part-solid and ground-glass nodules. We conducted a systematic search of literature and screened texts for eligibility. Clinically significant nodules were noncalcified nodules >4-6 mm. Prevalence estimates were calculated for all studies and risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer. Twenty-four studies were included, with a total of 30 887 participants, and 21 studies were cross-sectional in design. Twenty-two studies used computed tomography (CT) imaging with cardiac-related CT being the most frequent. Prevalence of significant nodules was highest in studies with large field of view of the chest and low size thresholds for reporting nodules. The prevalence of part-solid and ground-glass nodules was only described in two cardiac-related CT studies. The overall risk of bias was low in seven studies and moderate in 17 studies. While current literature frequently reports incidental nodules on cardiovascular-related CT, there is minimal reporting of subsolid characteristics. Unclear quantification of smoking history and heterogeneity of imaging protocol also limits reliable evaluation of nodule prevalence in nonscreening cohorts.

Impact of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CT coronary angiography scan length and effective radiation dose

Objective

Imaged scan length (z-axis coverage) is a simple parameter that can reduce CT dose without compromising image quality. In CT coronary angiography (CTCA), z-axis coverage may be planned using non-contrast calcium score scan (CaCS) to identify the relevant coronary anatomy. However, standardised Agatston CaCS is acquired at 120 kV which adds a relatively high contribution to total study dose and CaCS is no longer routinely recommended in UK guidelines. We evaluate an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CTCA scan length and effective radiation dose.

Methods

An ultra-low dose tin filter (Sn-filter) planning scan (100 kVp, maximum iterative reconstruction) was performed and used to plan the z-axis coverage on 48 consecutive CTCAs (62% men, 62 ± 13 years) compared with 47 CTCA planned using a localiser alone (46% men, 59 ± 12 years) between May and June 2019. Excess scanning beyond the ideal scan length was calculated for both groups. Estimations of radiation dose were also compared between the two groups.

Results

Addition of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan to CTCA protocol was associated with reduction in overscanning with no impact on image quality. There was no significant difference in total study effective dose with the addition of the planning scan, which had an average dose-length product of 3 mGy.cm. (total study dose: Protocol A 2.1 mSv vs Protocol B 2.2 mSv, p = 0.92).

Conclusion

An ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan facilitates optimal scan length for the diagnostic CTCA, reducing overscanning and preventing incomplete cardiac imaging with no significant dose penalty or impact on image quality.

Advances in knowledge

An ultra-low dose CTCA planning is feasible and effective at optimising scan length.

Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism With Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Reduced Scan Range

PURPOSE

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CT-PA) is frequently used in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism (PE), even in highly radiosensitive patient populations. This study aims to assess CT-PA with reduced z -axis coverage (compared with a standard scan range covering the entire lung) for its sensitivity for detecting PE and its potential to reduce the radiation dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 602 consecutive CT-PA scans with definite or possible PE reported. A reduced scan range was defined based on the topogram, where the cranial slice was set at the top of the aortic arch and the caudal slice at the top of the lower hemidiaphragm. Locations of emboli in relation to the reduced scan range were recorded.

RESULTS

We included 513 CT-PA scans with definite acute PE in statistical analysis. Patients' median age was 66 (52 to 77) years, 46% were female. Median dose length product was 270.8 (111.3 to 503.9) mGy*cm. Comparing the original and reduced scan ranges, the mean scan length was significantly reduced by 48.0±8.6% (26.8±3.0 vs. 13.9±2.6 cm, P <0.001). Single emboli outside the reduced range in addition to emboli within were found in 15 scans (2.9%), while only 1 scan (0.2%) had an embolus outside the reduced range and none within it. The resulting sensitivity of CT-PA with reduced scan range was 99.81% (95% confidence interval: 98.74%-99.99%) for detecting any PE.

CONCLUSION

A reduced scan length in CT-PA, as defined above, would substantially decrease radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic accuracy for detecting PE.

The Effect of Limiting the Scan Range of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (to Reduce Radiation Exposure) on the Detection of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the standard imaging test for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but it is associated with patients' exposure to radiation. Studies have suggested that radiation exposure can be reduced without compromising PE detection by limiting the scan range (the z-axis, going from up to down); (2) Methods: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE on 17 July 2021. Studies were included if they enrolled patients who had undergone a CTPA and described the yield of PE diagnoses, number of missed filling defects and/or other diagnoses using a reduced z-axis in comparison to a full-length scan. To assess risk of bias, we modified an existing risk of bias tools for observational studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were synthesized in a narrative review. Primary outcomes were the number of missed PE diagnoses (based on at least one filling defect) and filling defects; the secondary outcome was the number of other missed findings; (3) Results: Eleven cohort studies and one case-control study were included reporting on a total of 3955 scans including 1025 scans with a diagnosis of PE. Six different reduced scan ranges were assessed; the most studied was from the top of the aortic arch to below the heart, in which no PEs were missed (seven studies). One sub-segmental PE was missed when the scan coverage was 10 cm starting from the bottom of the aortic arch and 14.7 cm starting from the top of the arch. Five studies that reported on other findings all found that other diagnoses were missed with a reduced z-axis. Most of the included studies had a high risk of bias; (4) Conclusions: CTPA scan coverage reduction from the top of aortic arch to below the heart reduced radiation exposure without affecting PE diagnoses, but studies were generally at high risk of bias.

Diagnostic Performance of a Contrast-Enhanced Ultra-Low-Dose High-Pitch CT Protocol with Reduced Scan Range for Detection of Pulmonary Embolisms

(1) Background: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a simulated ultra-low-dose (ULD), high-pitch computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocol with low tube current (mAs) and reduced scan range for detection of pulmonary embolisms (PE). (2) Methods: We retrospectively included 130 consecutive patients (64 ± 16 years, 69 female) who underwent clinically indicated high-pitch CTPA examination for suspected acute PE on a 3rd generation dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM FORCE, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). ULD datasets with a realistic simulation of 25% mAs, reduced scan range (aortic arch-basal pericardium), and Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE®, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) strength 5 were created. The effective radiation dose (ED) of both datasets (standard and ULD) was estimated using a dedicated dosimetry software solution. Subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence were evaluated independently by three reviewers using a 5-point Likert scale. Objective image quality was compared using noise measurements. For assessment of diagnostic accuracy, patients and pulmonary vessels were reviewed binarily for affection by PE, using standard CTPA protocol datasets as the reference standard. Percentual affection of pulmonary vessels by PE was computed for disease severity (modified Qanadli score). (3) Results: Mean ED in ULD protocol was 0.7 ± 0.3 mSv (16% of standard protocol: 4.3 ± 1.7 mSv, p < 0.001, r > 0.5). Comparing ULD to standard protocol, subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence were comparably good (p = 0.486, r > 0.5) and image noise was significantly lower in ULD (p < 0.001, r > 0.5). A total of 42 patients (32.2%) were affected by PE. ULD protocol had a segment-based false-negative rate of only 0.1%. Sensitivity for detection of any PE was 98.9% (95% CI, 97.2-99.7%), specificity was 100% (95% CI, 99.8-100%), and overall accuracy was 99.9% (95% CI, 98.6-100%). Diagnoses correlated strongly between ULD and standard protocol (Chi-square (1) = 42, p < 0.001) with a decrease in disease severity of only 0.48% (T = 1.667, p = 0.103). (4) Conclusions: Compared to a standard CTPA protocol, the proposed ULD protocol proved reliable in detecting and ruling out acute PE with good levels of image quality and diagnostic confidence, as well as significantly lower image noise, at 0.7 ± 0.3 mSv (84% dose reduction).

Investigating centering, scan length, and arm position impact on radiation dose across 4 countries from 4 continents during pandemic: Mitigating key radioprotection issues

Purpose

Optimization of CT scan practices can help achieve and maintain optimal radiation protection. The aim was to assess centering, scan length, and positioning of patients undergoing chest CT for suspected or known COVID-19 pneumonia and to investigate their effect on associated radiation doses.

Methods

With respective approvals from institutional review boards, we compiled CT imaging and radiation dose data from four hospitals belonging to four countries (Brazil, Iran, Italy, and USA) on 400 adult patients who underwent chest CT for suspected or known COVID-19 pneumonia between April 2020 and August 2020. We recorded patient demographics and volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose length product (DLP). From thin-section CT images of each patient, we estimated the scan length and recorded the first and last vertebral bodies at the scan start and end locations. Patient mis-centering and arm position were recorded. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

The extent and frequency of patient mis-centering did not differ across the four CT facilities (>0.09). The frequency of patients scanned with arms by their side (11–40% relative to those with arms up) had greater mis-centering and higher CTDI_vol and DLP at 2/4 facilities (p = 0.027–0.05). Despite lack of variations in effective diameters (p = 0.14), there were significantly variations in scan lengths, CTDI_vol and DLP across the four facilities (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Mis-centering, over-scanning, and arms by the side are frequent issues with use of chest CT in COVID-19 pneumonia and are associated with higher radiation doses.

Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography during Pregnancy: Radiation Dose of Commonly Used Protocols and the Effect of Scan Length Optimization

Objective

To evaluate the radiation dose for pregnant women and fetuses undergoing commonly used computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (CTPA) scan protocols and subsequently evaluate the simulated effect of an optimized scan length.

Materials and Methods

A total of 120 CTPA datasets were acquired using four distinctive scan protocols, with 30 patients per protocol. These datasets were mapped to Cristy phantoms in order to simulate pregnancy and to assess the effect of an effective radiation dose (in mSv) in the first, second, or third trimester of pregnancy, including a simulation of fetal dose in second and third trimesters. The investigated scan protocols involved a 64-slice helical scan at 120 kVp, a high-pitch dual source acquisition at 100 kVp, a dual-energy acquisition at 80/140 kVp, and an automated-kV-selection, high pitch helical scan at a reference kV of 100 kV_ref. The effective dose for women and fetuses was simulated before and after scan length adaptation. The original images were interpreted before and after scan length adaptations to evaluate potentially missed diagnoses.

Results

Large inter-scanner and inter-protocol variations were found; application of the latest technology decreased the dose for non-pregnant women by 69% (7.0–2.2 mSv). Individual scan length optimization proved safe and effective, decreasing the fetal dose by 76–83%. Nineteen (16%) cases of pulmonary embolism were diagnosed and, after scan length optimization, none were missed.

Conclusion

Careful CTPA scan protocol selection and additional optimization of scan length may result in significant radiation dose reduction for a pregnant patient and her fetus, whilst maintaining diagnostic confidence.